NOTES
(version 1a)

KENT. CHENTH, written in red, across the top of the page, spread above both columns, with the exception of folio 11ab (PM).

D1	DOVER. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 23) adds 'is the King's Borough' (PM).
D2	20 SHIPS. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 24) adds 'for the keeping of the sea' (PM).
D7	"ORA". Literally an ounce, in Scandinavia a monetary unit and coin still in use; in Domesday valued at 16 (assayed) or 20 (unassayed) pence, see Harvey, 'Royal Revenue and Domesday Terminology' (PM).
D8	WADARD <OF COGGES>. One of Odo of Bayeux's knights, named and depicted on the Bayeux Tapestry where he is shown during the foraging near Hastings, see Stenton, Bayeux Tapestry, plate 47 (PM).
		The name Wadard occurs on over forty holdings in Domesday Book, all probably held by one individual. All but a couple of properties in Kent were held as a tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux, the exceptions being held from St Augustine's Abbey which accommodated other of Odo's tenants. This singular distribution proves Wadard's identity, confirmed by the descent of his holdings to form the core of the barony of Cogges: Sanders, English baronies, pp. 36-37; Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 444 (JP).
	[!3! GEOFFREY !3!] SON OF MODBERT. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 24-25) identifies him as Geoffrey son of Modbert (PM).
D10	A MILL. From the description it would appear that this was a tidal mill (PM).
D11	FOUR LATHES. See {Introduction: the Lathes}.
D17	DEATH-DUTY. The relevatio, relevium, the 'relief or 'heriot', was paid by the heir on taking up his inheritance. The scale of rates was laid down in the law codes, especially 2 Canute 71 and the 'Laws of King William' 20 [Robertson, Laws of the Kings of England, pp. 210-11, 262-63]. The villanus paid an ox, cow or horse, the censarius a year's tribute (PM).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF CANTERBURY *]. Young Alnoth, or Alnoth of Kent, was a major landholder in 1066, with several very large holdings in Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire and Oxfordshire. Apart from the scale of his individual manors he is nearly always distinguished by the title cilt (Young) and by the fact that every one of his holdings devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux apart from the huge manor of Bramley (SUS 8,1) used to endow Battle Abbey, and a small property in Buckinghamshire (BUK 17,25) where an Alnoth the Kentishman was lord of the pre-Conquest holder, Edstan. It was probably the modest scale of this holding and its acquisition by a tenant-in-chief other than Odo which caused Peter Clarke to omit this Alnoth from his list: English Nobility, pp. 237-38. However, this is almost certainly Alnoth of Kent. Apart from the description, 'Kentishman', his man Edstan did occur elsewhere on the fief of the Bishop of Bayeux (ESS 18,43), and the name is rare enough to make it likely that this is the same individual, despite the distance between the properties (JP).
	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
	SIRED OF CHILHAM. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. The name Northmann is not common in the south-east, where all references have been identified as the magnate who had significant legal privileges in eastern Kent (D17). All the holdings of Northmann in Kent, Surrey and Sussex were held directly from the Crown, and several were of a status appropriate to a magnate of regional importance. Although they devolved upon a number of tenants-in-chief, the substantial manors of Nettlestead, Mereworth, Blean, Annington and Camberwell are more likely to have been held by one man rather a number of different wealthy individuals with an uncommon name. There can be less confidence with the smaller properties; but if Peter Clarke is correct in his identification, Northmann was one of the many Anglo-Saxon magnates permitted to survive on a fragment of their previous estates, holding a small part of the manor of Frankwell he had previously held in its entirety, serving moreover as one of a number of men-at-arms in the entourage of the Norman who had supplanted him: Clarke, Domesday nobility, p. 325 (JP).
D18	"SCHILDRICHEHAM". An unlocated place which appears later in 5,146 as Cildresham. The first element is the personal name Cildric, rare in Old English (PM).
D22	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
D23	PENENDEN. That is, Penenden Heath, the site of the Shire court and the scene of Lanfranc's claim against Odo of Bayeux in 1072 concerning the losses from the Canterbury estate sustained, it now appears, as a result of encroachments made by the Godwin family in the years before 1066; see Bates, 'Penenden Heath Revisited'. Domesday refers to the claim at 2,5;43. 4,16. See also 2,30 yokes note (PM).
D25	YOUNG BRICTSI. See 5,18 Brictsi note (JP).
	OSWARD OF NORTON. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
M	LAND OF THE CANONS OF ST MARTIN'S OF DOVER. Entered here as an appendix to the account of Dover, but interrupted by the account of the City of Canterbury on folio 2a. The account of the lands of the Canons of St Martin's of Dover thus breaches the custom of beginning each county with the land of the king, and their name is omitted from the list of landholders on folio 2b. The information in these sections differs from the formula employed elsewhere in Domesday in omitting ploughlands and retaining, apparently, only the Edwardian assessment. Harvey, 'Domesday Book and Anglo-Norman Governance', argues that these features are indicative of a pre-1085 date for the St Martin's entries and suggests that Ranulf Flambard, who had been master of the house, had conducted a survey of the estate which, on the failure of the 1085 reassessment, he recommended as a model for the Domesday Inquest (PM).
M1	21 SULUNGS. Listed below in M2-24. The total here is 17 sulungs, 4 ½ yokes, 3 virgates and 235 acres. The 3 sulungs in 'Limen' Lathe are entered below in P2-4 (PM).
	PREBENDS IN COMMON. Domesday records that Bishop Odo of Bayeux had distributed the prebends individually, although in the following entries the former occupant is given (PM).
M3	1 MONASTERY. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 26) calls it a church: unam ecclesiam (PM).
	SIRED [* THE CANON *]. The Sired holding on the fief of the Canons of St Martin's of Dover is evidently the canon named as such in P1 (JP).
M5	25 ACRES. See M18 Deal note (PM).
M6	SIRED [* THE CANON *]. See M3 Sired note (JP).
	SIRED [* THE CANON *]'S FATHER. See M3 Sired note (JP).
M7	VALUE 60s AND 9s 2d. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 27) gives £3 10s 2d (PM).
M9	VALUE 30s. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 27) gives 60s (PM).
M10	WALTER [!3! OF CAMBREMER !3!]. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 27) identifies him as Walter of Cambremer (Cambrermer) (PM). [Cambremer is the name of a commune in the French département of Calvados, (arrondissement Lisieux).]
M11	ROBERT. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 27-28) has 'In the Hundred of Bewsbury and 'Cornilo' Robert Trublet has 1 sulung in prebend which two men, Suthgar and Goldstan, held before 1066' (PM).
M13	85 ACRES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 28) gives '80 acres' (PM).
	VALUE £3; BEFORE 1066, £4. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 28) gives 'Value then £12; now 60s' (PM).
M14	ARCHDEACON ANSKETIL. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 28) has 'In 'Cornilo' Hundred the Archbishop of Canterbury has 1 sulung in prebend of St Martin's. Value £6 10s' (PM).
M15	½ SULUNG AND 12 ACRES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 28) gives '½ sulung and 12 ½ acres' and reduces the holding in Deal to ' ½ sulung less 11 ½ acres' (PM).
M17	3 VIRGATES. Perhaps in error. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) renders as '3 yokes' (PM).
	THE VALUE IS AND ALWAYS WAS 60s. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) has 'Value £4' (PM).
M18	IN DEAL. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) places part of the holding in Guston, perhaps the 25 acres referred to in M5 (PM).
M20	VALUE 25s; BEFORE 1066, 35s. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) has 'The value was 30s; now 25s' (PM).
M21	1 ½ YOKES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) gives '1 yoke' (PM).
	VALUE BEFORE 1066, 25s. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 29) gives it as 20s (PM).
	SPIRTES [* THE PRIEST *]. Favourite of Harold Harefoot (1037-40) and Harthacnut (c. 1040-42) who was banished by Edward the Confessor in 1065 and whose lands were forfeited: Hearne, Hemingi Chartularium, i. p. 254 (PM).
		Most of his holdings devolved upon Nigel the doctor. Spirtes is the only person with this name in Domesday Book. See Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 342-43 (JP).
M22	SIRED [* THE CANON *]. See M3 Sired note (JP).
M23	EDWIN [!3! BROTHER OF BALDWIN !3!].The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 29-30) identifies him as Baldwin's brother (PM).
M24	GODRIC [!3! LATIMER !3!]. GODRIC. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 30) identifies him as Godric Latimer [latunarius], whose predecessor was Oswynus silvagius the priest (PM).
C1	51 BURGESSES WHO PAID TRIBUTE. £3 7s 5d, according to the Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 7) (PM).
	ANOTHER 212. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 9) calls them free men (liberi homines ) and adds 'The cobblers and drapers pay 30s, the porter 5s' (PM).
	8 ACRES OF MEADOW. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 7) adds 'on which the king's horses graze, coming and going' (PM).
	1000 ACRES OF UNPRODUCTIVE WOODLAND. '1000 acres of underwood where the men of the district (patria) and the burgesses of the city paid 20s to the king's sheriff': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 7) (PM).
C2	TWO HOUSES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 10) adds 'The monks of Holy Trinity destroyed one, and have forbidden the other to be repaired. They paid 16d in tribute to the king' (PM).
C3	TRIBUTE. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 10) adds that it was worth 53s (PM).
	THESE HOUSES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 10) adds 'Now Ranulf of Colombières and Vitalis of Canterbury hold all these from the Bishop of Bayeux's Holding, but they only acknowledge 26' (PM).
	5 ACRES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 10 )adds 'with a church' (PM).
C4	[* EARL *] HAROLD'S CONCUBINE. See P20 Harold note (JP).
C5	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
C6	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
	SIRED OF CHILHAM. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
	IF ANYONE DIGS. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 9) gives 'If anyone makes a ditch, or puts up a pigsty or narrows the king's highway' (PM).
C8	BISHOP OF BAYEUX. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 7-8) adds 'and Hugh de Montfort and the Count of Eu and Richard son of Gilbert'. These were presumably the king's barons whom Domesday refers to as having tried the case (PM).
P1	SIRED [* THE CANON *]. See M3 Sired note (JP).
P6	NORWOOD. Not entered under any hundred. The place was later in the Hundred of Newchurch: Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 470. See also P18 (PM).
P11	MEDERCLIVE. Not entered under any hundred, although geographically within Bewsbury Hundred in Eastry Lathe (PM).
P16	400 ½ ACRES, WHICH MAKE 2 ½ SULUNGS. The statement, taken literally, would make the Kentish sulung contain a little over 160 acres. Vinogradoff, 'Sulung and Hide', pp. 282-86, argued that the Domesday clerk had meant 400 and ½ (a hundred) acres, which would give a sulung of roughly 180 acres. Comparison of the entries for Northbourne in Domesday and the Excerpta gives a much more precise figure of 200 acres. See 7,19 sulungs note (PM).
P19	THE MANUSCRIPT does not have the gallows-like section sign, added by Farley (PM).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
P20	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
	[* EARL *] HAROLD. The name Harold is one of the most common in Domesday Book, occurring over 700 times; but it probably represents fewer than 20 individuals, of whom Earl Harold Godwinson is overwhelmingly the most significant, Harold son of Earl Ralph of Hereford being the only other individual of any consequence. Harold is identified as the earl each of the few times he is named in Kent; but in a large number of cases in other counties the scribe has not given Harold his title. In Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk, for instance, he is described as earl only once in each county (ESS B3k. NFK 3,2. SUF 68,1) though he undoubtedly held a large number of estates in all three, possibly all but two of those recorded in the three counties. However, there are surprisingly few cases where there is real cause for uncertainty about identifying the earl: the royal estates, the larger manors, the lordship over men, his territorial predominance in some areas, association with members of his family, and relationships between estates, serve to distinguish him in the majority of cases; but see BUK 17,22 Harold note. Ann Williams, 'Land and power', Anglo-Norman Studies, vol. 3 (1981), pp. 171-87, 230-34, discusses Harold's estates and those of his men; and Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 164-91, lists them. Clarke tends to omit the dependencies where Harold is not explicitly named, or holdings named only in satellite texts (CON 4,2. 2,5;41;43). He has also omitted the following: BUK 3a,5. 26,11. 30,1. CHS 8,41. ESS 1,23. HEF 1,56. 17,2. HRT 1,15. 5,5. HUN 13,1-3. NFK 8,33. 9,178; 233. 20,8;19;24;31. 21,16;22;33-34. 22,2-8. 26,3. NTT 3,1-3. OXF 58,30. SUF 1,119. 36,3;5-7;15. 38,21. 39,17. 67,12;17. 76,6;20;23. SUR 26,1. WIL 18,2. 41,1; and the entries for GLS 30,1 and 50,3 have been confused (JP).
	HAWKHURST. A dene ['pig pasture'] of Wye Lathe. The place was later in Barnfield Hundred which, it is argued, may have been in existence by 1086; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 335; and {Introduction: Administrative Divisions}(PM).
1,1	DARTFORD. Later in its own hundred: Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 31 (PM).
	PIG PASTURES. The Latin is denę. A dena is an area of woodland pasture located in the Weald but still dependent on its parent manor in the upland of north Kent. Identification of these Wealden settlements, which appear anonymously in Domesday, is often possible from later records. Witney, Jutish Forest, contains full reference to these identifications (PM).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. Osward, probably the sheriff of Kent (1,1), is named as having full jurisdiction in western Kent (D25); he was the predecessor of the Bishop of Bayeux in Kent and Essex and probably also of the only two other holdings of an Osward in Kent, the two substantial manors of Crayford and Sellindge, the former held from the archbishop of Canterbury according to the Domesday Monachorum, and the latter acquired by Hugh de Montfort. Crayford was adjacent to the royal manor of Dartford where Osward the sheriff was active, and Sellindge was in western Kent. Moreover, two wealthy landowners with an uncommon name in one county is unlikely, three very improbable (JP).
		It has been observed that in the absence of documentation - almost always the case with Anglo-Saxon landowners - the search for connections which may indicate a identification 'starts with a scattering of dots across the map of England': Lewis, 'Joining the dots', in Family Roots, edited by K. Keats-Rohan, pp. 69-87 at p. 80. In the case of Osward, the dots are highly indicative: two concentrations, one in Kent, Sussex and Surrey, the other in western England. Otherwise the map is blank apart from a solitary dot in Nottinghamshire. In the south-east, this pattern offers indications of identification where the usual clues - tenurial associations - fail, due the manner in which the Conqueror carved up Kent and Sussex in particular, and they point to a limited number of individuals, possibly only one. The wealthy manor at Walkingstead (SUR 15,2), and the substantial ones at Addington (SUR 34,1), Pangdean and Ratton (SUS 10,35. 12,32), point in the same direction. Additionally, two tenant-in-chief acquired a holding from an Osward in Claverham, and each had one other holding in the neighbourhood from an Osward. Finally, there are three holdings along the south coast of Sussex held by an Osward at both dates (SUS 12,24;27) or in 1086 (SUS 9,14): more than one survivor with an uncommon name in a limited area is improbable. These three holdings are interspersed with those already discussed, forming a line across southern Sussex and Kent between Muntham (SUS 13,15) in the west and Sellindge in the east. It seems more likely than not that the bulk of these holdings, possibly all of them, had belonged to the same individual, allowed to survive on a fraction of his former holdings by his supplanters, as was often the case elsewhere. See also Clarke, English Nobility, whose list omits the holding recorded in the Domesday Monachorum and also SUS 9,4 and 12,24;27;32 (JP).
	HELTO THE STEWARD. See 5,2 Helto note (JP).
	OSWARD THE SHERIFF. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
1,2	ANSGOT [* OF ROCHESTER *]. Tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux, principally in Kent but also in Bedfordshire and Surrey, and possibly also in Buckinghamshire (4,35) where he is named Ansgot of Rots. As the only Ansgot in that county, his tenure from the Bishop makes the identification a probable one. No Ansgots other than tenants of the Bishop are recorded either in Kent or Bedfordshire, and only one unidentified Ansgot in Surrey, so the tenurial argument for identification is compelling. See also Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 157 (JP).
	THE CASTLE. The original motte and bailey castle at Rochester, sited on Boley Hill outside the south-west angle of the city walls (PM).
1,3	HUGH OF PORT HOLDS. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 3) adds 'from the Bishop of Bayeux. ... Edward held it' (PM).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
	THE ABBOT OF ST AUGUSTINE'S HOLDS. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 3) adds 'From these sulungs (the Abbot of) St Augustine has his part which was proved in the hundred of Milton and in the county (court) of Kent in the time of William I' (PM).
	CHURCHES AND TITHES. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 4) gives '8 prebends and a church' (PM).
1,4	LATER £60. Farley has ix in error for lx (PM).
2,1	[* IN THE BOROUGH LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	THE CLERICS OF THE TOWN. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82) adds '32 messuages and a mill which the clerics of St Gregory hold near their church'. The church was the priory of Augustinian canons founded in 1084 by Archbishop Lanfranc (PM).
2,2	SANDWICH. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89) adds 'Sandwich is Holy Trinity's manor for the monks' clothing. It is in its own lathe and hundred'. There is no evidence that Sandwich was a lathe and the reference would seem to be an error. See {Introduction: Administrative Divisions}. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 20) adds 'In this Borough St Augustine's has 1 acre. In this acre St Augustine's also has a church'. Compare 5,189 (PM).
2,3	[* IN THE HALF-LATHE OF SUTTON *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	VALUE £15 10s. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 88) adds 'It is assessed at £15. Richard has 10s in his castle (infra castellum )'. The castle is that at Tonbridge, the centre of Richard of Tonbridge's territory. See 2,4 territory note (PM).
2,4	OTFORD. Concerning Otford and Sundridge (2,5) Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87) adds 'these manors were in 'Codsheath' Hundred'. The hundred is not otherwise mentioned in Domesday (PM).
	3 THANES. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87) identifies them and the value of their holdings: 'What Haimo holds is assessed at 60s and 10s. What Robert Latimer [interpres] and Geoffrey of Rots hold at £8 10s' (PM).
	WHAT RICHARD OF TONBRIDGE HOLDS IN HIS TERRITORY. Richard of Tonbridge, son of Count Gilbert of Brionne, held what was later to become the Lowy of Tonbridge. This was not a compact block of land and had no clear boundary. Its primary purpose was the maintenance of Tonbridge castle in the aftermath of the Conquest, an offensive role shared with other compact lordships such as the Sussex Rapes, and in Kent the divisio or territory of Hugh de Montfort (see 5,130 territory note). Richard held the manors of Yalding, East Barming, Hadlow and Tudeley but the greater part of his holdings consisted of the denes of upland manors located in the Weald around the castle and manor of Tonbridge. Domesday surveys 24 of them in the accounts of the manors to which they were formerly dependent, usually prefacing the entry with the formula 'What Richard of Tonbridge holds in his territory'. See Mortimer, 'Honour of Clare'; Ward, 'Lowy of Tonbridge' (PM).
2,5	SUNDRIDGE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87) adds 'which Godwin held unjustly before 1066. The archbishop, that is Lanfranc, gained it justly by the king's grant in a plea against the Bishop of Bayeux'. See D23 Penenden note.
		According to the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87), this manor was in 'Codsheath' Hundred; see 2,4 Otford note (PM).
	13s 6d. The manuscript has xiii solid' 7 dim' ['13 ½ s'] with id est vi d' ['that is, 6d'] interlined (PM).
2,7	CRAYFORD. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 86) adds 'Osward held it from the archbishop before 1066' (PM).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
2,10	WROTHAM. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87) gives the taxable value of the men-at-arms' holdings:
		William the Bursar. 'It is assessed at £3'.
		Geoffrey of Rots. 'It is assessed at £3'.
		Farman. 'It is assessed at 100s' (PM).
	GEOFFREY HOLDS 1 SULUNG. Perhaps at Yaldham: Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 30 (PM).
	1 ½ YOKES. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 87) gives 'l ½ sulungs' (PM).
2,11	MAIDSTONE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95) adds 'Wulfric and Cola hold Burgericestune. ½ sulung there. It pays 100d to the altar of Holy Trinity. This ½ sulung is from the 10 sulungs in Maidstone' (PM).
	3 MEN-AT-ARMS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 86) adds 'Ralph holds 1 sulung which is assessed at 50s. William, brother of Bishop Gundulf, holds 2 sulungs. They are assessed at £10. Ansketil of Rots holds 1 sulung which is assessed at 60s'. The sulung belonging to Ansketil was perhaps at Cossington; see Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 21 (PM).
	2 MEN OF THIS MANOR. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 86) adds '2 men have 1 sulung which pays 16s to the altar of Holy Trinity. Value of this sulung, however, 20s' (PM).
2,12	TOTAL VALUE OF THIS MANOR. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85) gives 'What the archbishop has in lordship is assessed at £18; what Ansketil of Rots and Robert Brutin hold, 40s; however, it pays the archbishop £25 18s' (PM).
2,13	[* IN THE BOROUGH LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	TOTAL VALUE OF THIS MANOR. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84) gives 'It is assessed at £42 5s less 3 farthings [minutes]'. Farthing appears only once in Domesday; see CHS S3,2 (PM).
2,14	IT PAYS £50 14s 2d. 'It is assessed at £51 5s': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84 (PM).
	VITALIS [!2! OF CANTERBURY !2!]. Vitalis of Canterbury, according to the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84). Named and depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry where he is shown being questioned by Duke William as to the location of Harold's army; see Stenton, Bayeux Tapestry, plate 56 (PM).
	3 SULUNGS, 1 YOKE AND 12 ACRES. '1 sulung and 1 yoke and 1 ½ sulungs in Thanet. He also has 12 acres and ½ sulung in Makinbrook and Stourmouth from the archbishop': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84 (PM).
2,15	HOLD 1 ½ SULUNGS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 83) adds 'From these sulungs Godfrey the steward holds ½ sulung which belongs to the monks' clothing. That is Swarling. Nigel has 1 sulung and 1 yoke which is assessed at 40s'. It also adds that Godfrey held Swarling 'at farm': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
2,16	THERE ARE ONLY 25. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 12) and the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 81) add '25 burgesses who pay 10s in tribute' (PM).
	NEW LODGING. The manuscript has Inoua for In noua, corrected by an interlined n (PM).
	OF THIS MANOR 5 OF THE ARCHBISHOP'S MEN. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, pp. 81-82) adds 'Godfrey the steward holds 1 sulung from the archbishop in Thanington. It is assessed at 100s. Vitalis has 1 yoke from the archbishop. It is assessed at 20s. Robert of Hardres holds 1 yoke. It is assessed at 30s. Aethelward holds 3 yokes in Nackington which before 1066 paid and still pays 12s to the altar of Holy Trinity. It is assessed at 40s. Albold holds 1 yoke at Wic. It is from the land of the monks of Holy Trinity which is assessed at 30s' (PM).
	HAIMO THE SHERIFF HOLDS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82) adds 'Haimo likewise holds ½ sulung which Alric Big held from the archbishop before 1066. It is assessed at 100s'. It was perhaps at Milton, near Canterbury: Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 2 (PM).
2,17	BARHAM HUNDRED. Later Kinghamford Hundred: Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 552 (PM).
2,18	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	5 SULUNGS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84) gives '5 ½ sulungs' (PM).
	TOTAL VALUE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84) adds 'Before 1066 it was assessed at £10 and the archbishop has 100s and 15 and 3d in tribute; now, however, the value is £20 but it pays £25 at a revenue and the archbishop has his tribute as before' (PM).
2,19	IT ANSWERS FOR 8 SULUNGS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85) adds 'Before 1066 it answered for 8 sulungs, now for 7 because the archbishop has the other for his plough' (PM).
	TOTAL VALUE BEFORE 1066. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85) gives 'Value before 1066, £20; the archbishop has £4 7s in tribute. Now the value is £30 but it pays £40 at a revenue and the archbishop has tribute as before' (PM).
2,21	VALUE OF THE WHOLE 40s. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 83) gives 'Value £6' (PM).
	5 OF THE ARCHBISHOP'S MEN. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 83) identifies them: 'Vitalis has 1 sulung. Value 45s'. This was probably at Walmestone in Wingham; see Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 14. 'Wibert and Arnold have 3 sulungs. Value £12'. Perhaps Ratling in Nonington; see Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 23. 'Heringod has 1 sulung less 10 acres. Value 40s'. Probably Knell and Goss Hall in Ash; see Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 25. 'Godfrey the arblaster has 1 ½ sulungs. Value 100s'. Probably Overland in Ash; see Colvin, 'Archbishop of Canterbury's Tenants', p. 26 (PM).
2,22	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	IT ANSWERED FOR 6 SULUNGS. The manuscript has p' vi. solins se def'd'. Judging by the position of the full stop and a greyish patch it once read vii., but the second minim has been scratched out. Farley renders as p' vii. solins se def'd', although the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 91) supports a reading of the manuscript as corrected and suggests that the alteration was made by the Domesday copyist (PM).
	NOW FOR 3. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 91) adds 'When the archbishop acquired it, for 5 ½ . Hugh de Montfort has the moiety of them. Value £18' (PM).
2,23	NOW FOR 15 SULUNGS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 83) gives '20' (PM).
2,24	1 ½ SULUNGS. Probably in error for 1 sulung, as suggested by the value clause. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', 14) and the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82) give '1 sulung'. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82) adds that this land was part of the 7 sulungs of Westgate, in which case the Domesday entry would appear to duplicate information given earlier in 2,16 under the holdings of the archbishop's men (PM).
	RALPH [!2! THE CHAMBERLAIN !2!]. He is Ralph the chamberlain: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82 (PM).
2,25	85 BURGESSES. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84) has 'In Romney Marsh 25 burgesses who belong to Aldington' (PM).
	STOWTING. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 83) gives 'William of Arques has 1 manor, Stowting, which Alfhere held from the archbishop. Then it answered for 1 ½ sulungs; now for 1. Value £10' (PM).
2,26	3 OF THE ARCHBISHOP'S MEN. 'Robert son of Watson has 2 sulungs as a Holding; Robert of Hardres, ½ sulung, and Osbern Paisforiere, ½ yoke': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84 (PM).
2,27	NEWENDEN. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 92) refers to the archbishop's manor of Niuuendene in Silverden Hundred in 'Limen' Lathe which would seem to be this holding. On the basis of additional information given in the Domesday Monachorum entry David Douglas' footnote raised the possibility that the entry referred to the holding of Hugh de Montfort in Newington (5,204. 9,37-38), although in the context this would seem less likely. The full Domesday Monachorum entry is here reproduced: 'Newenden. In 'Limen' Lathe. In Silverden Hundred. The archbishop has 1 manor from the monks' land in lordship, Newenden. Before 1066 Leofric held it from the former archbishop. It answers for 1 sulung with Saltwood. Now it is assessed at £8 1s in gifts' (PM).
2,28	[* IN THE HALF-LATHE OF SUTTON *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	ANSGOT [!2! OF ROCHESTER !2!]. Ansgot of Rochester [rubitoniensis]: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
		See also 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
	FARNINGHAM. 'It is for the monks' clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
2,29	RICHARD OF TONBRIDGE HOLDS. 'Richard has as much as is assessed at £3': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 88 (PM).
2,30	[* IN "HELMESTREI" HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	3 YOKES. 'These 3 yokes did not pay tax with this manor. They are from the pleading which the archbishop made against the Bishop of Bayeux with the king's agreement': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94. See D23 Penenden note (PM).
2,31	BRASTED. 'This manor is in the Hundred of Westerham': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 86; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 70 (PM).
	ABBOT ALNOTH HELD THIS MANOR. 'Young Wulfnoth held Brasted from the archbishop before 1066': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 86 (PM).
2,32	[* IN AYLESFORD LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	[* IN EYHORNE HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
2,33	BOUGHTON [MALHERBE]. 'Ratel held Boughton [Malherbe] from the Archbishop of Canterbury before 1066': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 91 (PM).
2,34	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	RICHARD [!2! THE CONSTABLE !2!]. Richard the constable: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93 (PM).
	LEAVELAND [COURT]. 'The Deacon of Canterbury had and held this land': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93 (PM).
2,35	RICHARD [!2! THE CONSTABLE !2!]. Richard the constable: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
	GRAVENEY. 'It is from the monks' clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
2,37	IN TEYNHAM HUNDRED. Not otherwise mentioned in Domesday. Teynham itself is not surveyed, although the following detail appears in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85) as a preface to the entry for Sheppey: 'Teynham is the archbishop's manor. Before 1066 it answered for 5 ½ sulungs; now the same. It is assessed at £50' (PM).
	GODFREY ^[THE STEWARD]^. Godfrey of Malling: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85 (PM).
	SHEPPEY. 'Osward held it from the archbishop before 1066': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 85 (PM).
		See also 1,1 Osward note (JP).
2,38	[* IN EASTRY LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
2,39	FINGLESHAM. Later in 'Cornilo' Hundred, although the place lies close to the boundary with Eastry Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 570. 'Leofnoth held it from the archbishop before 1066. Value 20s': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89 (PM).
	STATENBOROUGH. 'Godwin held it from Archbishop Edsi before 1066. Value 30s': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89. Edsi had been archbishop from 1035 to 1050 (PM).
2,40	WILLIAM [!2! FOLLET !2!]. William Follet: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89 (PM).
2,41	[* IN 'LIMEN' LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	SALTWOOD. 'Earl Godwin held it. It answered for 7 sulungs; now there are 5; however, it is not taxed except for 3': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93 (PM).
		Peter Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 164-169, does not include the three manors in Kent said to have been held by Earl Godwin in the Domesday Monachorum (2,5;41;43). The Domesday entries do not name the 1066 holders. Godwin is such a common name that identifying the earl where his title in not supplied is difficult. However, the earl is frequently named: between them, the counties of Sussex, Surrey, Kent and Hampshire can muster fewer than half-a-dozen manors valued at £5 or more held by an unidentified Godwin; none of these are in Kent. In Sussex, Godwin is likely to be the earl at Tilton (SUS 10,20-21) since his son held in the same vill (SUS 9,43), and at Sheffield, held in freehold from the Crown (SUS 10,111). Peter Clarke adds Mayfield (SUS 11,118) (JP).
	225 BURGESSES. 'From whom Hugh de Montfort has nothing except 3 forfeitures': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93. The 'three forfeitures' are probably robbery, breach of the peace and highway robbery (PM).
	IN THE BOROUGH OF HYTHE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93) describes Saltwood as lying in 'Limen' Lathe, in the Hundred of Hythe. Domesday nowhere refers to Hythe as a hundred which, if it existed in 1086, makes no further appearance in the records; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 459. It is possible that the copyist of the Domesday Monachorum wrote Hede in error for Hen, that is, Heane Hundred, in which Saltwood lay (PM).
2,42	BERWICK. 'Godric the deacon held it': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 92 (PM).
2,43	LANGPORT. 'Which the archbishop proved against the Bishop of Bayeux. Earl Godwin held it': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 92. See D23 Penenden note. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 92) adds '1 yoke belongs elsewhere' (PM).
3,1	[* IN THE HALF-LATHE OF SUTTON *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	ORPINGTON. 'A free man held it before 1066': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
	2 ½ SULUNGS. 'From these sulungs Deormann has ½ sulung at Keston': Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
		This Deormann is probably the Deormann of London, who is subsequently recorded as a knight of the archbishop: see Douglas, Domesday Monachorum, pp. 62-63, 104; and Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, pp. 177. See also ESS B3a Deormann note (JP).
3,2	ONE OF THE ARCHBISHOP'S MEN HOLDS ½ SULUNG. 'In 'Stokenbury' which Edric held from King Edward': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94. The place, now lost, is perhaps commemorated by Stocking Lane in the adjoining parish of East Farleigh; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 166. The field-names Stockenbury Meadows, Stockenbury Wood Field, Little Stockenbury Field and Stockbury Wood are recorded in 1578 on the site of Borough's Oak Farm (TQ671497) in East Peckham. I am grateful to Mrs. Margaret Laurence for this reference. See also 5,61 (PM).
		See also 5,129 Edric note for the identification as Edric as Edric of Elham (JP).
3,4	MEOPHAM. 'It is from the monks' food': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
	WHAT IS VALUED AT 18s 6d. '18s 8d': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
3,5	WHAT GODFREY [!2! THE STEWARD !2!] [HOLDS]. 'Hunton is the monks' manor for their clothing. It answers for ½ sulung which Godfrey the steward holds and pays a revenue. This ½ sulung is from the 6 sulungs of Farleigh': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
	WHAT ABEL [!2! THE MONK !2!] NOW HOLDS. 'Loose is the monks' manor for their clothing. It answers for 1 sulung. Abel the monk holds it and pays a revenue to the monks. This sulung lies in the 6 sulungs of Farleigh': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 95 (PM).
3,6	CLIFFE. 'It is from the monks' clothing. Before 1066 it answered for 2 ½ sulungs': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
3,7	MONKTON. 'For their food': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89 (PM).
3,8	WILLIAM [!2! OF ADISHAM !2!]. 'William of Adisham holds 1 sulung at Ruckinge. Value £7': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
3,9	NORTHGATE. Domesday Nordeurde (Northwood). So also the Domesday Monachorum (Nordwda: (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 88). The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 12) gives Norgate, that is, Northgate (PM).
	100 BURGESSES LESS 3. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 12) gives '100 burgesses less 19' (PM).
	WHO PAY £8 4s. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 88) has £8 0s 6d. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 12) gives £9 0s 6d (PM).
3,10	SEASALTER. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90) adds 'Land for 2 ploughs. This manor is in no hundred'. It was later in Whitstable Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 100 (PM).
	BLIZE. Blittaere, according to the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90). This is perhaps a garbled Anglo-Norman attempt at the rare Old English personal name Blithhere: von Feilitzen, 'Unrecorded Old and Middle English Personal Names', p. 75; von Feilitzen, ‘Personal Names of the Winton Domesday', p. 151 note 3), or Old German Blithgaer (Förstemann, Personennamen, p. 313) (PM).
3,11	[SOUTH] PRESTON. 'For their clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 93 (PM).
3,12	CHARTHAM. 'For their clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
3,13	GODMERSHAM. 'For their clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
3,14	[GREAT] CHART. 'For their clothing': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
3,15	LITTLE CHART. 'For their food. Before 1066 it answered for 3 sulungs; now for 2 ½ : Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
	2 ½ HIDES. Probably in error for 2 ½ sulungs as in Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90) (PM).
	WILLIAM [!2! SON OF ERMENFRID !2!] HOLDS. 'William son of Ermenfrid has ½ sulung in Pett from the archbishop as a holding. It pays 25d to the altar of Holy Trinity for all customs': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
3,17	GIDDINGE. The Domesday entry would appear to locate this place in Eastry Hundred, although, like Denton, it was later in Kinghamford Hundred. Denton is similarly entered under Eastry Hundred in Domesday; see 5,220 Denton note (PM).
	VALUE £36 10s 4¼d. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 88) gives £37 10s 3d.
3,18	ADISHAM. Later in Downhamford Hundred in The Borough Lathe. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, pp. 89-90) records: 'This manor is itself a hundred and is in Eastry Lathe'. The Domesday identification is retained here (PM).
		'Adisham is the monks' of Holy Trinity's manor for their food': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89 (PM).
	2 MEN-AT-ARMS. 'Robert son of Watson has 2 sulungs. That is Eythorne. Value £7. Roger holds 1 sulung at Barham. Value £4': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90 (PM).
	IT PAYS £46 16s 4d. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 90) gives £16 16s 4d (PM).
3,19	[* IN 'LIMEN' LATHE *]. The lathe rubric is omitted in the manuscript but added at 3,20 (PM).
3,21	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	ONE MANOR. 'Robert of Romney holds one manor, Brook, at a revenue for the monks' food': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 92 (PM).
3,22	[* IN 'LIMEN' LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	ALMS-LAND. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 84) associates this sulung with Lyminge but then adds, 'In Romney Marsh lies 1 sulung of Aelmesland from the alms of the monks of Holy Trinity. It is not from the above-mentioned sulungs. From that sulung William Follet has 1 yoke, that is Sturtune. From that same sulung Robert has 3 yokes, that is Orgarswick, Castweazel and Eadruneland'. From this entry it is clear that the Asmelant of Domesday and the Aelmesland of the Domesday Monachorum is not a place-name, but a sulung of alms-land belonging to Holy Trinity, the four yokes of which lay in Sturtune, Orgarswick, Castweazel and Eadruneland. A reference to alms-land (Old English almeslond) appears also in a charter of King Athelstan to Milton Abbey: Sawyer, Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 391. In transcribing a minuscule Almeslant, the Domesday clerk clearly misread a long s for an l. The identification of Asmelant in Domesday Gazetteer as Gammons in Orgarswick is based on a misreading of Wallenberg, Kentish Place Names, pp. 267-69 (PM).
4,1	[*IN THE HALF-LATHE OF SUTTON *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	[* IN AXTON HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 96) assigns 4,1-4 to Axton Hundred (PM).
	IN TONBRIDGE. That is, in the territory of Richard of Tonbridge (PM).
4,2	NOW FOR 4 SULUNGS. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 96) gives it as 3 sulungs (PM).
4,6	[* IN AYLESFORD LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	[* IN LARKFIELD HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 97) assigns 4,6-9 to Larkfield Hundred (PM).
	VALUE NOW £12. 'It is assessed at £13': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 96 (PM).
4,10	VALUE NOW £10 10s. 'It is assessed at £10': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 97 (PM).
4,11	VALUE NOW £7 15s. 'It is assessed at £6 10s': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 97 (PM).
4,15	THEY PAY £11 13s 4d. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 97) gives £11 13s 3d (PM).
4,16	VALUE NOW £8 0s 20d. 'It is assessed at £8': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 98 (PM).
	ARCHBISHOP LANFRANC PROVED [HIS CLAIM]. A reference to the land plea at Penenden Heath in 1072; see D23 Penenden note (PM).
5,2	HELTO [* THE STEWARD *]. Helto the steward is named as holding illegally part of the royal manor of Dartford in Kent. All other occurrences of this name in Domesday Book are in Buckinghamshire and Kent, as a tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux so there can be little doubt that all refer to the same individual. See also Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 247 (JP).
	OF THE WOODLAND. The manuscript has De silva. Farley renders it as De Silva (PM).
	VALUE OF THE WHOLE MANOR £20. After this and before the 1086 value, the manuscript leaves a gap probably for an intermediate value when acquired (PM).
5,3	VALUE OF THE WHOLE MANOR £3. After this and before the 1086 value, the manuscript leaves a gap probably for an intermediate value when acquired (PM).
5,4	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,5	ANSGOT OF ROCHESTER. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,6	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. Adam of Ryes near Bayeux, brother of Eudo the steward; see Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 29 (PM).
		See also 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,7	'SONNINGS'. A lost place, surviving as a field name in the modern parish of Horton Kirby (TQ580683); see Bamping, 'Domesday Name' (PM).
5,8	YOUNG BRICTSI. See 5,18 Brictsi note (JP).
5,13	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
	½ MILL AT 5s. The manuscript has '½ mill at 5 sulungs', obviously in error (PM).
	"ESTAN" <OF FARNINGHAM>. Apart from the Bishop of Hereford, the name Estan occurs on fifteen holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing seven or eight individuals. Despite the distance separating these two properties (also LIN 4,7), they were probably held by the same individual since they not only devolved upon one tenant-in-chief but both were subinfeudated to the same tenant, Wadard <of Cogges> (JP).
5,14	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
	[* EARL *] HAROLD. See P20 Harold note (JP).
5,17	ANSKETIL ^[OF ROTS]^. Ansketil of Rots: Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
5,18	[* YOUNG *] BRICTSI. Young Bricsti held full jurisdiction in western Kent (D25) and is named as the predecessor as Bishop Odo of Bayeux on three occasions. Greenwich (5,29) and Hatcham (SUR 5,10), acquired by Bishop Odo in western Kent from a Brictsi, were granted to the Bishop of Lisieux; these and the nearby Plumstead (5,21), probably belonged to the same individual who is unlikely to have been a second Brictsi. Elsewhere in Surrey, Young Bricsti is named as the predecessor of Richard of Tonbridge at Stoke d'Abernon and was probably the Brictsi who held two substantial manors to which Walter son of Other succeeded, the closest a little over five miles away from Stoke. Young Brictsi is not named in Sussex; but the Brictsi who held two valuable manors in south Sussex (SUS 11,67 and 13,49) may well be the same individual, and possibly he at Itford (SUS 10,11) also. The only other Brictsis holding manors valued at £10 or more were the predecessors of Arnulf of Hesdin in Wiltshire (WIL 25,1), of William of Falaise in Somerset (SOM 27,1), and of Aiulf the chamberlain in Dorset (DOR 49,12), all or each of whom might have been Young Brictsi; but there are no tenurial or other associations to support an identification. See Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 265-66, who attributes the Sussex holdings to Young Brictsi but not those further afield; Williams, 'Lost Worlds: Kentish Society in the Eleventh Century' (JP).
	ORDING [* OF HORTON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	THESE 4 MANORS ARE NOW ... . The Phillimore printed edition has 'Now there are 4 manors'; the failure to translate H[aec] ('these') misled PM whose note reads: 'The manuscript has tenuit de Heraldo. H. The meaning of the H is not apparent'.
	[* EARL *] HAROLD. See P20 Harold note (JP).
5,20	ANSGOT [!2! OF ROCHESTER !2!]. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103) associates this land with others held by Ansgot of Rochester (PM). See also 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
	'HOWBURY'. A lost place surviving as Howbury Lane in Crayford; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 30 (PM).
5,21	YOUNG BRICTSI. See 5,18 Brictsi note (JP).
5,24	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	[ST MARY] CRAY. The manuscript has 'South Cray'. The place was known as St Mary Cray from at least the mid-thirteenth century, after the dedication of the parish church; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 20 (PM).
5,25	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,26	SEAL. Later in 'Codsheath' Hundred: Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 63 (PM).
	YOUNG BRICTSI. See 5,18 Brictsi note (JP).
5,27	[NORTH] CRAY. Thus Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 19 (PM).
5,28	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,29	EARL HAROLD. See P20 Harold note (JP).
	[* YOUNG *] BRICTSI. See 5,18 Brictsi note (JP).
5,31	[!2! RALPH !2!] SON OF TUROLD OF ROCHESTER. Ralph son of Turold according to the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102) (PM).
5,34	[FOOTS] CRAY. Thus Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 18 (PM).
5,35	ANSKETIL [!2! OF ROTS !2!]. Ansketil of Rots: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
5,37	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,38	SANDLINGS. 'Alfgeat held Sandlings from the archbishop before 1066': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 94 (PM).
5,39	ANSGOT OF ROCHESTER. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,40	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. A major tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux, brother of Eudo the steward, and one of the wealthiest post-Conquest landowners despite holding nothing directly from the Crown. Apart from two holdings in Kent, all his estates were held from the Bishop which makes it possible to identify him with some confidence, particularly in view of the infrequency of the name elsewhere than on the fief of the Bishop of Bayeux. See Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 123 (JP).
5,41	ANSKETIL [!2! OF ROTS !2!]. Ansketil of Rots: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,42	ESBIORN [* BIG *]. Esbiorn Big held several substantial manors in Kent before the Conquest, most of which devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux and in most of which he was named. The Esbiorn who held Ditton was probably the same man since this another substantial holding acquired by the Bishop and was just three miles from the Big manor at Birling. It is likely that he was also the Esbiorn at Atherstone in Warwickshire, (WAR 4,2) despite the distance involved, since this, too, devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux who had subinfeudated it to Corbin of Agneaux, a tenant of his at West Peckham, just a few miles from Birling. It is also conceivable that Esbiorn held the large manor at Compton (SUR 18,1. SUS 11,36), near Chichester, acquired by Earl Roger of Shrewsbury, though there are no tenurial associations to support this (JP).
5,44	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,48	NASHENDEN. Entered by Domesday in Larkfield Hundred, although the place was later in Rochester Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 126. It lies close to the hundred boundary (PM).
5,53	ROCHESTER. The manuscript has Rouecest', 'corrected' by Farley to Roucest' (PM).
5,55	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
5,56	ANSKETIL [!2! OF ROTS !2!]. Ansketil of Rots: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,57	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,59	CORBIN [* OF AGNEAUX *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
5,61	'STOKENBURY'. See 3,2 sulung note.
5,62	IN THE LATHE OF AYLESFORD. The rubric would appear to be redundant, as that at 5,40 still applies. See 5,90 lathe note (PM).
5,63	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,67	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	LEEDS. 'Earl Leofwin held Leeds from King Edward. It answered for 3 sulungs; now it answers for 2 sulungs. Aethelwold held it from the Bishop of Bayeux but now King William has it in his hand': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 2) (PM).
	FROM THE BISHOP. Farley error: ten' ep'o for ten' de ep'o (PM).
	BISHOP OF BAYEUX'S PARK. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 2) locates it at Wicham (Wickhambreux) (PM).
	4 PIG PASTURES. 'Count Robert of Eu holds 4 pig pastures from this manor in Sussex': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 2) (PM).
5,68	ANSGOT OF ROCHESTER. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,69	ANSGOT ^[OF ROCHESTER]^. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,70	HOLDS ALLINGTON. Farley, in error, has ten' de ALNOITONE for ten' ALNOITONE (PM).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,71	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	SUTTON [VALENCE]. The identification here follows Hasted, History of Kent, ii. p. 409 (PM).
5,72	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,73	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,74	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,75	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,76	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,77	ADAM ^[SON OF HUBERT]^. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,84	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
5,85	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
5,86	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,87	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,88	[* IN CHATHAM HUNDRED *]. The rubric is not entered in the manuscript until 5,89 (PM).
5,90	IN THE LATHE OF AYLESFORD. The rubric would appear to be redundant, as that at 5,40 still applies. See 5,62 lathe note (PM).
5,91	ANSGOT OF ROCHESTER. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,92	ANSGOT ^[OF ROCHESTER]^. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,93	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,94	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	PIMP'S [COURT]. Later in Maidstone Hundred but entered here under Twyford Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 138. The place is close to the hundred boundary (PM).
5,95	ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,96	HAIMO [!2! THE SHERIFF !2!]. Haimo the sheriff: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103 (PM).
	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
5,99	AETHELWOLD [!2! THE CHAMBERLAIN !2!]. Aethelwold the chamberlain: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
5,100	AETHELWOLD [!2! THE CHAMBERLAIN !2!]. Aethelwold the chamberlain: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,102	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
	HELTO [* THE STEWARD *]. See 5,2 Helto note (JP).
5,103	[* IN WROTHAM HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
5,104	[* IN 'SHAMWELL' HUNDRED *]. The heading is not entered in the manuscript until the end of 5,107 (PM).
	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,105	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,106	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,107	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,108	HUNEF <OF OAKLEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	EARL HAROLD. See P20 Harold note (JP).
5,109	ANSGOT OF ROCHESTER. See 1,2 Ansgot note (JP).
5,111	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,114	HELTO [* THE STEWARD *]. See 5,2 Helto note (JP).
5,115	3 SULUNGS. The manuscript repeats solins at the start of the second line, corrected by Farley with the gap indicated by a line of dots (PM).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,116	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,117	STUPPINGTON. Interlined. Later in Faversham Hundred but entered here under Milton Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 289. The place lies close to the hundred boundary (PM).
	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,118	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,121	STELLING. Later partly in 'Loningborough' Hundred and partly in Stowting Hundred in Wye Lathe, but entered here under Bridge Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 437. The place is close to the hundred boundary (PM).
5,122	BEKESBOURNE. The place was also known as Lyvyngisbourn, after a descendant of the T.R.E. holder, as late as the sixteenth century. The modern form commemorates a twelfth-century holder; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 540-41; Reaney, 'Survey of Kent Place-Names', p. 64 (PM).
5,124	ALFRED BICGA. Old English Bicga, used here as a byname. The personal name appears in SUR 5,22; see von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 202; compare Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 290 (PM). The Phillimore printed edition has Alfred Big, perhaps influenced by Tengvik.
	HELD THIS MANOR FROM KING EDWARD. The manuscript originally read Hoc M' tenuit Alured' biga tenuit de rege E. but the second and redundant tenuit has been scratched out and is not reproduced by Farley (PM).
	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. The Anglo-Saxon magnate named as having jurisdictional privileges in Canterbury and eastern Kent is clearly the man who had held the highly valuable manor of Chilham (5,144), as well as two other significant properties and a number of lesser ones in Kent, all of which devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux. See Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 337-38; Williams, 'Lost Worlds: Kentish Society in the Eleventh Century' (JP).
	GEOFFREY SON OF MALLETERRE. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 16) identifies him as Godefridus filius rogeri mala terra ('Godfrey son of Roger Malleterre'). Although the form Godefridus represents Old German God(e)frid (Forssner, Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England, pp. 118-19) there was confusion between it and Geoffrey (Domesday Goisfridus, Gosfridus, Gaufridus etc.) according to Forssner. If Godfrey is the same man as the Geoffrey here, Roger's name may simply have dropped out at some stage in the Domesday process; see Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 349, who gives Goisfridus as the form in the Excerpta in error.
5,125	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,126	HAIMO THE SHERIFF. 'Haimo the steward holds Nackington from the Bishop of Bayeux. The burgesses of the city claim this ½ sulung': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 14) (PM).
	NACKINGTON. Later in Bridge and Petham Hundred but entered here under Canterbury Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 544. The place is close to the hundred boundary. The identification retained here and followed by VCH Kent iii. p. 233, Domesday Gazetteer and Domesday Monachorum, p. 103 note, and applied also to the 3 yokes which appear in Domesday Monachorum, p. 103, as dependent on Westgate (see 2,16 manor note). Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 496-97, argued that this place was Hackington, as suggested by Hasted, History of Kent, iii. p. 594 (PM).
5,127	HAIMO ^[THE SHERIFF]^ ALSO HOLDS ½ SULUNG. The location of this holding is not clear, although the lands which the burgesses of Canterbury claimed from the Bishop of Bayeux would seem to have been between Westgate and Nackington: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82; Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 14). See also 2,16 manor note (PM).
5,128	VALUE OF THE WHOLE OF FOLKESTONE. Farley adds a gallows-like section sign which is not present in the manuscript (PM).
5,129	EDRIC [* OF ELHAM *]. Edric of Elham was a wealthy Anglo-Saxon magnate whose estates, all substantial, were concentrated in Kent and devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux. Named in two entries (5,185;210), he is evidently the Edric who held Elham itself, the most valuable of his manors; and there is little reason to doubt that he is the Edric who preceded the Bishop in other holdings as there appear to have been no other Edrics holding land in the county. Of the two holdings acquired by other tenants-in-chief, Garrington (7,6) had previously been held by the Bishop of Bayeux, and Newington (9,37) had once been part of 5,204 held by him. It is possible, even probable, that he is the Edric who had held the valuable manor of Dorking from Queen Edith (SUR 1,13) in which the Bishop of Bayeux had an interest; but the details of ownership are not entirely clear. See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 304-305, who mistakenly names him Edric of Elmham and omits 7,6 and 9,35 (JP).
5,130	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	HUGH DE MONTFORT'S TERRITORY. Some of Hugh de Montfort's holdings in Kent are described as lying either within (infra), or without (extra) his territory (divisio); see 5,130;169;182. 9,1;22;35;37-39;42. VCH Kent iii. pp. 188-90, suggests that this was an arrangement, analogous to the Lowy of Tonbridge, which served to maintain the castle at Saltwood. Hugh's divisio was likewise not a compact block of lands, but its detail, as recorded in Domesday, suggests a significant reorganization in the pattern of assessment in Kent in the years immediately after the Conquest. Domesday also uses the same term to describe the holdings of the Bishop of Bayeux, Ralph of Courbépine and the Count of Eu on three occasions; see 5,171;175. 9,16 (PM).
5,131	ANSFRID [* MALE THE CLERIC *]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric [Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101, where the form is Mas. An Ansfrid masculus the cleric is a subtenant of St Augustine's, Canterbury (see 7,24 Ansfrid note). Latin masculus which is a diminutive of Latin mas gives Old French masle ('male', 'masculine')]; see Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 351, under Masculus; Reaney, Dictionary of British Surnames, under Male (PM).
5,133	1 YOKE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101) assigns this holding to Ralph of Courbépine (PM).
5,134	AETHELWOLD [!2! THE CHAMBERLAIN !2!]. Aethelwold the chamberlain: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
	EASOLE. Entered here and at 5,217 in Eastry Hundred but later in Wingham Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 534. The place lies close to the hundred boundary (PM).
	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,135	1 SULUNG IN SHELVING. Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102, gives '1 yoke' (PM)
5,136	[* IN BEWSBURY HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript but added at 5,137 (PM).
	A MAN-AT-ARMS OF HIS. The Latin is equivocal and might refer either to Osbern or to Odo of Bayeux, although in the context the latter is perhaps more likely (PM).
5,138	[* IN THE BOROUGH LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	1 SULUNG. Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101, gives '1 ½ sulungs' (PM).
5,141	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,142	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,143	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,144	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
5,146	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
	"CILDRESHAM". Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101, Cyldresham. See D18 "Schildricheham" note (PM).
5,147	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,148	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
	SAEWOLD <OF MACKNADE>. Apart from Abbot Saewold, whose name occurs only in Exon. (SOM 7,15 note), the name Saewold occurs on thirteen holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing six individuals. The Saewold with half a ploughland in Macnade in 1066 was remote from others bearing that name and unlikely to be linked to them (JP).
5,149	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
	BADLESMERE. 'Godric Wisce held the manor of Badlesmere from King Edward. It answers for 1 sulung. Now Ansfrid holds it from the Bishop of Bayeux. It is assessed at £4. The monks of St Augustine claim back this manor through the charter and seal of King Edward': the Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 4-5). The claim is entered below at 7,30. Godric Wisce was undoubtedly the 1066 landholder, now dead, whose son provided evidence for the Domesday Enquiry; see Galbraith, Making of Domesday Book, pp. 153-55 (PM).
5,150	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,151	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,152	OSBERN [!2! PAISFORIERE !2!]. He is Osbertus Paisforiere in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101) (PM). [There was sometimes scribal confusion between the forms Osbernus and Osbertus. The form Osb[er]t[us] occurs in Domesday in 5,171;213-214, referring to the same individual. See also 5,200 Osbern note.]
5,153	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
5,154	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,156	NORTH EASTLING. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102) credits this land to Herfrid; see also 5,183 (PM).
5,159	30 VILLAGERS. The manuscript would seem to have been amended from xxx to xxix in heavy black ink. Farley retained what appeared to have been the original entry. Whether the alteration was a contemporary one is not apparent from close examination of the manuscript (PM).
	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
5,160	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
5,162	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,163	IN [WYE] HUNDRED. The manuscript is damaged at this point. The following places were all in Wye Hundred (PM).
	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,164	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
5,165	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
5,166	[* IN FELBOROUGH HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM) [In the previous edition of Domesday Explorer the hundred appears wrongly as Wye.]
5,167	[* IN CALEHILL HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	WAUA. Probably from an Old English Wafa, which may be associated with Old English wafian ('to wave'); see von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 409. Farley misreads as Wana (PM).
5,168	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,169	POSTLING. Entered here under Calehill Hundred in Wye Lathe, probably in error. It appears correctly under Heane Hundred in 'Limen' Lathe at 9,16 (PM).
	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
5,171	OSBERT [!2! PAISFORIERE !2!]. Osbertus Paisforiere: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. See 5,152 Osbern note.
	ALDGLOSE. Now in Bircholt Hundred; see Wallenberg, Kentish Place Names, p. 425. Domesday associates it with Brabourne, also in Bircholt Hundred; see 9,42 (PM).
5,173	12 ACRES. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101) infers that these, too, were at Palstre [Court] (PM).
5,174	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
5,175	YOUNG ALNOTH [* OF KENT *]. See D17 Alnoth note (JP).
5,181	½ YOKE. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103) places this in Benenden (PM).
	A WIDOW WHO PAYS 22d. Farley has, in error, xiii for xxii, apparently following the abbreviation ci (tredecim ) interlined. The figures in the manuscript are clearly xxii (PM).
5,182	[* IN 'BLACKBOURNE' HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript. Tinton is entered in 'Blackbourne' Hundred at 9,22. The name survives in Warehorne parish in Ham Hundred, parts of which are known to have lain in 'Aloesbridge' and 'Blackbourne' Hundreds; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 474-75 (PM).
5,183	RINGLETON. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102) credits this land to Herfrid; see also 5,156 (PM).
5,184	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
5,185	HUGH [!2! OF PORT !2!]. Hugh of Port: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102 (PM).
	EDRIC OF ELHAM. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
5,186	HUGH [!2! OF PORT !2!]. Hugh of Port: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102 (PM).
	EDRIC [* OF ELHAM *]. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
5,187	HUGH [!2! OF PORT !2!]. Hugh of Port: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102 (PM).
5,189	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
	"LEUEBERGE". Unidentified; compare 5,210 Thurstan note. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, pp. 101-102) has Endleueberga, Endleuaberga. Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 561, relates the Domesday form to the name of the T.R.E. tenant Leuuinus, (Old English Leofwine), and discounts the Domesday Monachorum form as a subsequent rationalization. However, in this section Domesday Monachorum is independent of and antecedent to Domesday, and it shows the name to be Old English endleofan beorga or (aet) endleofan beorgum ('(at) eleven barrows'). Wallenberg may well be correct in supposing that Domesday in leueberge may represent a development of the Old English place-name to a hypothetical indlefenbeorga which developed to a hypothetical inleveberge, whence the metanalysis in leveberge, especially likely in a context where the Latin preposition in preceded the name (PM).
5,190	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,192	A MAN-AT-ARMS. VCH Kent iii. p. 239 note 188, suggests that this is possibly Herbert son of Ivo, who is recorded as holding land in [Temple] Ewell at 9,35 (PM).
5,194	"ASCORED". The Domesday form Ascored might represent Old English Æscræd: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 165, but as he left it under the heading Ascored, it has been thought safest to keep to the Domesday form in the present edition. The Phillimore printed edition has Ashred; the Alecto edition has Ascored. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday.
5,196	BUCCA. The Domesday form Boche represents Old English Bucca: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 210. The Phillimore printed edition has Buck, a translation of the Old English word bucca. The Alecto edition has Bucca. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday Book.
5,197	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,198	SANDWICH. 'It is in its own lathe and hundred': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 89. See 2,2 (PM).
	AETHELWOLD [* THE CHAMBERLAIN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
5,200	OSBERN SON OF LEDHARD. The manuscript calls him Osbert but refers in the same entry to 'Osbern himself'. Domesday refers to Osbern son of Ledhard at 2,38. 5,135-136;200;206-207. 7,19 and to Osbert son of Ledhard at 5,200;205;216, but they are clearly the same man as is made apparent in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102). The translation gives Osbern throughout (PM).
5,201	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
5,203	1 ½ YOKES IN THE SAME HUNDRED. VCH Kent iii. p. 240 note 195, suggests Buckland in Woodnesborough (PM).
5,204	NEWINGTON. Entered here, and at 9,37-38, in Bewsbury Hundred in Eastry Lathe. The place was later in Folkestone Hundred in 'Limen' Lathe; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 453 (PM).
	EDRIC [* OF ELHAM *]. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
5,208	MIDLEY. Later in St Martin's Hundred in 'Limen' Lathe; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 479 (PM).
5,209	IN SOMERDEN HUNDRED. Taken literally the Domesday hundred of Summerdene would include Robert Latimer's anonymous 6 acres and lands in Tickenhurst, Woodnesborough, Each, Marshborough and Esmetone in Eastry Lathe. Both Each (5,216) and Woodnesborough (5,197) are also entered by Domesday under Eastry Hundred, and all these places, with the exception of Robert Latimer's anonymous 6 acres, were later in that hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 574-88. Most authorities have therefore assumed that this entry refers to the hundred of Somerden in the Half-Lathe of Sutton. Witney, Jutish Forest, p. 120, locates the 6 acres in Cowden (TQ465404). That Robert held from Richard son of Count Gilbert might also be taken as circumstantial evidence that this holding lay in south-west Kent. The Domesday clerk, unfamiliar with this recent subinfeudation, was therefore unsure which hundred the following five places were in and did not enter the next rubric until 5,215. Alternatively, it is possible that these places did lie in Summerdene Hundred in Eastry Lathe, although the hundred was later absorbed into Eastry Hundred. The parish of Woodnesborough contains the place-names Denne Court and Summer Field; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 587, 590 (PM). In the Phillimore printed edition Summerdene was 'translated' as Summerdene.
		It would, however, be a strange coincidence if a Summerdene Hundred made a single appearance in Domesday, only to be swallowed by Eastry Hundred (in which other parts of some of its vills already lay in 1086), while a Somerden Hundred subsequently appeared in the Half-Lathe of Sutton (otherwise first evidenced in 1157); see Anderson, English Hundred Names: South-Eastern Counties, p. 109. The most obvious conclusion is that the 6 acres lay in the Weald in Somerden Hundred (Summerdene means 'summer pig-pasture') which thus had a Domesday forebear and that both a lathe and a hundred heading (Eastry Lathe, Eastry Hundred) were omitted from above the next entry (5,210). This was often the case in Domesday Kent. The fact that an Eastry hundred head occurs subsequently at 5,215 does not invalidate this conclusion, since it corresponds to a change of subtenant. In a fief as large as that of the Bishop of Bayeux, it is likely that individual subtenants made their own returns or that the material was a one stage sub-assembled by subtenant and that an Eastry hundred head was present at one of those earlier stages, before being transferred to Domesday.
5,210	[* IN EASTRY LATHE *] [* IN EASTRY HUNDRED *]. For the reason for these inserted lathe and hundred heads, see 5,209 hundred note.
	TURSTIN [* TINEL *]. Presumably Turstin Tinel whom Domesday records as the holder of "Leueberge" 5,196 (compare 5,189 "Leueberge" note). The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102) associates that holding with those at Tickenhurst, Woodnesborough and Each [5,210-212] (PM).
	EDRIC OF ELHAM. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
5,211	TURSTIN [* TINEL *]. See 5,210 Turstin note (PM).
5,212	TURSTIN [* TINEL *]. See 5,210 Turstin note (PM).
	EACH. See 5,209 hundred note (PM).
5,213	OSBERT [!2! PAISFORIERE !2!]. See 5,152 Osbern note.
5,214	OSBERT [!2! PAISFORIERE !2!]. See 5,152 Osbern note.
	ELMTON. Domesday has Esmetone, while the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101) has Emmetune. This place was identified by Hasted, History of Kent, iv. p. 195, followed by Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, pp. 582-83, and Domesday Gazetteer, as Elmton in Eythorne. VCH Kent iii. p. 241, and the editor of the Domesday Monachorum retained the eleventh-century form. Esmetone could represent a miscopied minuscule script Elmetone, that is, Old English elmen-tune ('village at the elms'); and Emmetune could be a poor translation of a miswritten form elmne-tune. Elmton is therefore a credible suggestion (PM).
	SIRED [* OF CHILHAM *]. See 5,124 Sired note (JP).
5,215	WULFWARD [* WHITE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
5,217	EASOLE. See 5,134 Easole note (PM).
5,218	OSBERN [!2! SON OF LEDHARD !2!]. He is Osbertus son of Ledhard in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 102) (PM). [See 5,152 Osbern note.]
5,220	DENTON. Entered here in Eastry Hundred, but later in Kinghamford Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 556 (PM).
5,221	[* IN BEWSBURY HUNDRED *]. The hundred rubric is not entered in the manuscript until 5,222 (PM).
5,222	40 ACRES. 'And near there [Boswell Banks] in a manor, 40 acres': Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101 (PM).
5,223	[* IN 'LIMEN' LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	[* IN 'LONINGBOROUGH' HUNDRED *]. The rubric is not entered in the manuscript until 5,224 (PM).
6,1	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	[* IN WYE HUNDRED *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
7,1	PLUMSTEAD. 'Sorag held it before 1066': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 1). The unintelligible personal name of this T.R.E. holder appears in a thirteenth-century manuscript copy of a 1087 text, so there is a possibility of scribal error. The origin may have been an Old English byname, Strang, 'the strong', (not given in Tengvik, Old English Bynames), or a variant form of the Anglo-Norman byname Sorz ('the deaf'); see von Feilitzen, ‘Personal Names of the Winton Domesday', p. 216 (PM)
	IT PAYS £14 8s 3d. 'It pays £14': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 1) (PM).
7,2	LENHAM. 'It is for the monks' food': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 2) (PM).
	1 YOKE OF THIS MANOR, VALUE 5s. 'St Augustine has ½ yoke in Bromfeld which lies in this manor. It is assessed at 5s': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 2). Despite the discrepancy in the number of yokes this would appear to be the same holding (PM).
7,4	LANGPORT. 'It lies in the Hundred of Canterbury': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 11) (PM).
	1 YOKE WHICH BELONGS. 'Value 4s': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 11 (PM).
	70 BURGESSES. '... who paid £4 10s in tribute. The villagers and smallholders who dwell outside the city pay £8 10s 8d in tribute and one sester of honey. 4 mills which pay 29s 4d': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 11) (PM).
	VALUE NOW £35 4s. 'It is assessed at £35': Excerpta, p. 11 (PM).
7,6	EDRIC [* OF ELHAM *]. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
	RALPH [!3! OF SAINT-WANDRILLE !3!]. Ralph of Saint-Wandrille: Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 16) (PM).
7,7	IT PAYS £54. 'It is assessed at £56': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 17) (PM).
7,9	IN CHISLET HUNDRED. 'In Bleangate Hundred': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 17). See {Introduction: Administrative Divisions} (PM). [This name may be an interpolation by the thirteenth-century copyist of the Excerpta, or the hundred may have been in existence in 1086, but separate returns were made for its three manors Sturry, Chislet and Reculver which Domesday regards as hundreds in their own right. If this is so, it would have been a temporary expedient as with similar manorial hundreds in Somerset; see SOM {Introduction: Hundreds}; Anderson, English Hundred Names: South-Eastern Counties, p. 149.
	12 SULUNGS. '6 are in Margate': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 17) (PM).
7,10	WITH KING WILLIAM'S ASSENT. For Odo's grant and King William's confirmation dated 1077, see Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, i. nos. 99-100 p. 26 [= Bates, Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, nos. 83-85 pp. 348-51] (PM).
	24 ACRES. '33 acres': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 17) (PM).
	SERVICE. 'At sea': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 18); the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 82) (PM).
7,11	NOW £4. 'It is assessed at £4 2s and one sester of flour': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 11) (PM).
7,12	WILDERTON. 'It is for the monks' food': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 4) (PM).
7,13	ANSKETIL [!2! OF ROTS !2!]. He is Ansketil the marshal in Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 5) and Ansketil of Rots in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101) (PM).
7,14	ADAM [* SON OF HUBERT *]. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).
	HOLDS ½ SULUNG FROM THE ABBOT. 'For a tribute': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 5) (PM).
7,15	ANSWERS FOR 6 SULUNGS. 'It answered for 7 sulungs': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 6) (PM).
7,16	ROOTING. 'Now a villager holds from the abbot. It is assessed at 40s': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 6) (PM).
7,17	1 YOKE [IN] RIPTON. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 5) and the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 100) give it as 1 sulung (PM).
	FURTHER, HE HAS 2 YOKES. 'Further, the abbot gave him 3 villagers with 2 yokes. It is assessed at £4 5s': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', pp. 5-6) (PM).
7,18	ANSFRID [!2! MALE THE CLERIC !2!]. He is Ansfrid Male the cleric: Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 101. On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
7,19	WOODLAND, 10 PIGS. The isolated T.I which follows silua .x. porc' is probably the start of T.R.E. which begins the next line; see 9,49 pasturage note (PM).
	OIDELARD [!3! THE STEWARD !3!]. Oidelard the steward: Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 22) (PM).
		The name Oidelard occurs thirteen times in Domesday Book, probably representing two individuals, one a tenant of Eustace the sheriff, the other holding land from Ralph of Mortimer in six counties. This Oidelard may be the same man: Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 312, suggests he was Ralph's steward (JP).
	VALUE £4. '100s': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 21) (PM).
	2 SULUNGS LESS ½ YOKE. '2 sulungs less 25 acres': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 21). On this evidence the Kentish yoke contained 50 acres, the sulung 200 acres; see P16 sulungs note (PM).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See D8 Wadard note (JP).
7,20	WADARD <OF COGGES> HOLDS LAND THERE. 'Wadard held all the villagers' land': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 22) (PM).
		See also D8 Wadard note (JP).
7,21	SIBERTSWOLD. 'It is for the monks' clothing': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 23) (PM).
7,23	PRESTON. 'It belongs to the monks' chamber': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19) (PM).
	VITALIS HOLDS 1 SULUNG AND ½ YOKE. 'As a Holding': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19) (PM).
7,24	ANSFRID [!3! MALE THE CLERIC !3!]. He is Ansfrid Male [masculus] the cleric: Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19). On the name, see 5,131 Ansfrid note (PM).
	IT ANSWERS FOR ½ SULUNG AND ½ YOKE. 'Before 1066 it answered for ½ sulung, 1 yoke and 20 acres': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19) (PM).
7,25	3 VIRGATES. Probably in error for 3 yokes as in the Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19), although the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 100) repeats 3 virgates (PM).
	VALUE NOW 20s. 'Value 9s ': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 19) (PM).
7,27	"LANPORT". The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 100) renders as Langeport which David Douglas suggested might be Old Langport in Lydd, although the reference to Stowting Hundred would therefore be an error. In what is apparently the same entry the Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 30) places this holding at Elmsted and Monk's Horton (PM).
7,29	BURMARSH. 'In the Hundred of 'Blackbourne': Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 30) (PM).
8,1	[* IN THE HALF-LATHE OF SUTTON *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
9,1	[* IN WYE LATHE *].The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
9,9	ATTERTON. Domesday enters Atterton with the rest of Hugh de Montfort's holding in Newchurch Hundred in 'Limen' Lathe but records the claim of the canons of St Martin's of Dover supported by the men of Eastry Lathe. The place was later in Bewsbury Hundred in Eastry Lathe: Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 563 (PM).
9,10	OF A NINTH SALT-HOUSE. Farley printed nouae salinae ('new salt-house'), but it is clearly nonę salinę ('ninth salt-house') in the manuscript and the reading is clear in both the Ordnance Survey and Alecto facsimiles. The Phillimore printed translation has 'ninth', but the note by PM reads: 'The manuscript has nove saline, corrected by Farley to novae salina'.
9,12	BLACKMANSTONE. Named after the pre-1066 holder, Blaecmann; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 461 (PM).
9,16	ESBIORN BIG. See 5,42 Esbiorn note (JP).
9,18	"BELICE". The name would appear to be identical in origin to that of Belce Wood, in Sturry parish (see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 514), although the hundred heading is an obstacle to its identification as that place (PM).
9,19	A LAND. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103) places this at "Belice" (PM).
9,24	OSWARD [* OF NORTON *]. See 1,1 Osward note (JP).
9,27	[* IN STREET HUNDRED *]. So Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 104. (PM).
9,34	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
9,35	[* IN EASTRY LATHE *]. Not entered in the manuscript until 9,36. The entry was perhaps added at the foot of column 13c (PM).
	[* IN BEWSBURY HUNDRED *]. Not entered in the manuscript until 9,36. The entry was perhaps added at the foot of column 13c (PM).
	EDRIC OF ELHAM. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
9,37	EDRIC [* OF ELHAM *]. See 5,129 Edric note (JP).
9,41	POULTON. Later in Folkestone Hundred; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 454. The place lies close to the hundred boundary (PM).
9,44	[* IN 'LIMEN' LATHE *]. Not entered in the manuscript until 9,45 (PM).
	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
9,46	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
	IT ANSWERS FOR AS MUCH. Farley omits 7 (et ) between de rege. E. and p' tanto (PM).
9,47	"AIA". This is Aie in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 104). VCH Kent, iii. p. 250, suggests Hythe. Domesday places it in 'Limen' Lathe in Street Hundred, adjacent to Hythe. But Aia, Aie probably represent a name other than Hythe, identical with that represented by those spellings recorded by Wallenberg (Place-Names of Kent, pp. 459-60) under the name Hythe which are formally unlikely for Hythe, viz.: Hee (1199), Hei (1206), Hea (1206), Heia (1224), Heiā, Heyā (1225). This other place-name was probably hypothetical Old English (aet) Haege, hypothetical Middle English Haye from Old English haeg ('hedged enclosure'). The spellings Heiā, Heyā are ambiguous; but read as Heian, Heyan, they would suggest comparison with the name Heane (a hundred meeting-place) in Saltwood parish (Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 457), derived from the cognate Old English haegen ('an enclosure'). However, the hundred affiliation is an obstacle (PM).
9,48	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
9,49	FROM PASTURAGE. After de pasnagio the manuscript. has T.R. Probably for T.R.E. which begins the next line. See 7,19 pigs note (PM).
9,50	HAROLD <OF FANSCOMBE>. The 1086 tenant who held these two modest holdings (9,50-51) had no tenurial associations with any of his namesakes, none of them close by. These anonymous holdings, said to be held by the same individual, are likely to have been his only properties (JP).
9,51	HAROLD <OF FANSCOMBE>. See 9,50 Harold note (JP).
9,53	[* IN WYE LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
9,54	"SUESTONE". Hasted, History of Kent, iii. p. 388, followed by VCH Kent, iii. p. 250 note 257, and Domesday Gazetteer, identified this as Swetton in Cheriton in Folkestone Hundred. The Domesday reference to the same hundred, that is Longbridge Hundred, would seem to militate against this suggestion, and the Domesday form is retained here. The Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103) gives Westtune, which may well represent the correct form (PM).
10,1	IN WESTERHAM HUNDRED. The manuscript has IN OSIREHA' HUND' corrected by Farley IN OSTREHA' HUND' (PM).
11,1	[* IN AYLESFORD LATHE *]. The rubric is omitted in the manuscript (PM).
	ALDRED [* ALRED OF YALDING *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
11,2	ALRED [* OF YALDING *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
12,1	A MANOR. Haimo the sheriff is recorded as holding 2 ½ sulungs at Trimworth in the Domesday Monachorum (Douglas, The Domesday Monachorum, p. 103), probably the manor referred to here; see Wallenberg, Place-Names of Kent, p. 383; Hoyt, 'Pre-Domesday Kentish Assessment List', p. 194 (PM).
12,3	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
12,4	NORTHMANN <OF MEREWORTH>. See D17 Northman note (JP).
13,1	[* SIGAR *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	2 IN ROCHESTER WHICH PAID 64d. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 4) gives 'which pay 2s to this manor' (PM).
	£10 10s BELONG IN NEWINGTON. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 3) gives '£11.10s' (PM).
	ARCHBISHOP ^[OF CANTERBURY]^ HAS £6 FROM IT. From the customs of the church, see Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, i. no. 176 p. 84 [= Bates, Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, no. 73 pp. 330-31] (PM).
	BISHOP OF BAYEUX ... VALUE 40s. The Excerpta (Ballard, 'An Eleventh-Century Inquisition', p. 4) gives '60s' (PM).
	ADAM SON OF HUBERT. See 5,40 Adam note (JP).