NOTES
(version 1a)

The manuscript is written on either side of leaves, or folios, of parchment (sheep-skin) measuring about 15 inches by 11 inches (38 centimetres by 28 centimetres). On each side, or page, are two columns, making four to each folio. The folios were numbered in the seventeenth century, and the four columns of each are here lettered a, b, c, d. Red ink was used to emphasize words and to distinguish most chapters and sections. Underlining was generally used to indicate deletion.

LINCOLNSHIRE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote the running title LINCOLESCIRE. in vermilion capitals across the top of folios 337cd and 339cd, centred above both columns, and thereafter across the top of the verso of every folio to folio 370cd. Likewise he wrote LINDESIG. in vermilion capitals across the top of folios 338ab and 340ab, centred above both columns, and thereafter above the recto of every folio to folio 371ab, and then above folio 371cd. There are no running titles on folios 336abcd (containing the sections on the City of Lincoln and the Borough of Stamford), on folio 337ab (containing the section on the Borough of Torksey and the Landholders' List), on folios 338cd and 339ab (the second half of the Terra Regis), nor above folios 375 to 377 inclusive (the Clamores) (CT).

C1	ENGLISH METHOD. A decimal system, unlike the duodecimal system common in the Anglo-Scandinavian counties. The figures given here do not tally with the addition at C19 (PM-CT).
C2	12 LAWMEN. Burgesses who propounded the law in the borough-court (PM-CT).
	ULF'S SON SWARTBRAND. Vlf filius Suertebrand would normally be translated 'Ulf son of Swartbrand' (so Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 3, and Stenton in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xxix, but see p. xxxii), as the preceding Suartin f. gri[m]boldi is definitely Swarting son of Grimbald. However, Ulf was definitely the father, as stated in C3;13. CK18;29 (PM-CT).
	WALRAVEN ^[FATHER OF AGHMUND]^. The Phillimore printed translation has Valhraven with the following note: A Scandinavianised version of the Continental Germanic personal name Wal(a)ram: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 330 (PM). As explained in the {Introduction: State of Revision} for the present edition, this name, like many of the name-forms used in the Lincolnshire and Yorkshire Phillimore printed editions, has been brought into line either with the name-forms used in other counties in that series or with what the current editors believe to have been the form in use in 1086 and which follows JRM's principles as far as possible. See von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 409-10.
C3	BURGWALD. The Old English masculine personal name Burgweald, not discussed by von Feilitzen (Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book) or Forssner (Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England) is illustrated by von Feilitzen, ‘Personal Names of the Winton Domesday', p. 152 (PM).
	RAVEN. The manuscript has rauene; Farley misprinted reuene (CT).
C4	30 MESSUAGES. Probably between the walls and the River Witham in the area of the Stonebow: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 132 (PM).
	2 ½ CHURCHES. Including perhaps St Peter at Arches: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, pp. 132-33 (PM).
	1d. Domesday uses the old English currency system, which lasted for a thousand years until 1971. The pound contained 20 shillings, each of 12 pence, abbreviated respectively as £[ibrae], s[olidi], d[enarii]. Note however that, in common with other medieval records, Domesday frequently omits to convert quantities of pence into shillings and of shillings into pounds, as in C14 ('40s') and 1,34 ('16d') (PM-CT).
	LAND TRIBUTE. A universal tax of one penny paid to the king in the boroughs except, as here and at C8, where delegated to a lesser lord (PM).
	UNDERGO ORDEAL. The Latin offert se portaturum iudicium literally means 'offers himself to be going to bear judgement/trial'. Latin ferrum is a possible substitute for iudicium in this phrase (Revised Medieval Latin Word List, under porto) and refers to the ordeal of carrying a piece of heated metal (CT).
C5	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. He may be the important English thane in King Edward's reign who was sheriff of Lincolnshire at some stage during King William's reign (Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, no. 216 pp. 686-88) until he joined the Danes in 1069 in their attack on York (the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, version D, for 1068 [1069]). All of Ralph Paynel's lands in Devon, Somerset and Yorkshire and almost all his others in Gloucestershire and Lincolnshire had been held by Merleswein in 1066. Of this thane's other estates, four in Somerset passed to Walter of Douai and one to the king and one in Yorkshire passed to Count Alan. In Cornwall all the lands held T.R.E. by a Merleswein were held in 1086 by the Count of Mortain, three in lordship, six from his men, but although there is no definite proof that this was the same Merleswein and that he was the sheriff of Lincolnshire it is likely: VCH Somerset, i. p. 418. Frequently in Domesday all the lands of an Anglo-Saxon in a given area passed to one Norman, as with Merleswein's lands in Devon, Gloucestershire and Lincolnshire.
		Identified as sheriff and official predecessor of Ralph Paynel in the Clamores for Lincolnshire (CW12. CK31), Merleswein was among the ten wealthiest Anglo-Saxon magnates after the great earls. He is usually described as sheriff of Lincolnshire, being named as a sheriff in the Lincolnshire folios; but it would make more sense if he were sheriff of Yorkshire, where the political weight of a magnate-sheriff - the only such one in Anglo-Saxon England - would have been needed. A late tradition states that Merleswein was given an official position in the north by Harold in the aftermath of Stamford Bridge: Walker, Harold, p. 142 (JP).
		Merleswein provides the classic case of an antecessor supplying title to a Norman baron. Virtually the entire fief of Ralph Paynel came to him from his officially designated predecessor, Merleswein; and the apparent exceptions can be explained. Ralph's holding at Sandburn was illegally acquired according to the Canons of York (YKS C25), while those at Broughton and Scawby (35,2;16), previously held by Grimkel, had in fact been in Merleswein's possession in 1066, granted to him by Grimkel in an attempt to evade forfeiture (CW12). Ralph's only other holding was at East Carlton (NTH 31,1), where his predecessor was a Thorkil. This may have been the exception proving the rule; but it is also possible that Merleswein was Grimkel's overlord, these not normally being recorded in the circuit (4) in which Northamptonshire lay (JP).
		The only holdings of Merleswein which did not devolve upon Ralph Paynel were those which would have intruded into the territorial blocks allocated to others: the Count of Mortain's Cornish fiefdom, Count Alan's honour of Richmond, and the royal manor of South Petherton. There is no reason to doubt that the Merleswein's who had held parts of these territories was the sheriff, Merleswein, the only man to bear that name in Domesday Book. See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 322-24, whose list omits CON 5,2,18. 5,4,5 and GLS 44,1 (JP).
C7	ULF. Perhaps Ulf Fenman, Gilbert's predecessor elsewhere: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 46 (PM). See HUN 21,1 Ulf note.
C10	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. The name Stori occurs on 47 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing no more than four, possibly only two or three individuals. The bulk of the Lincolnshire holdings devolved the same tenant-in-chief, Ivo Tallboys, tightly-clustered around the two valuable manors of Bolingbroke and Belchford; and Stori's holding in the city of Lincoln connects Tallboys with Countess Judith, the successor to the only other Lincolnshire holding of a Stori, evidently the same man. Countess Judith's holding is almost exactly midway between the remaining Lincolnshire holdings and the two clusters of moderately substantial properties held by a Stori in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. The Stori's of both Lincolnshire and Derbyshire had urban interests and full jurisdictional rights; they are therefore likely to have been lords of other men though such information is not, of course, recorded for the counties of circuit VI. What makes a linkage between the holdings in these three counties a little more probable is the modest holdings of the Stori of Bedfordshire, where he is described as a man of Earl Tosti and was himself a lord of men. Yet his Bedfordshire holdings were extremely modest for such status. Earl Waltheof and his wife Countess Judith succeeded Earl Tosti on many holdings, and perhaps in his earldom; they also succeeded Stori of Bolingbroke on two of his Lincolnshire holdings. See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 343-44, who assigns only the Lincolnshire holdings to this Stori (JP).
C11	1 SMALL MANOR. This seems to have been an estate known as 'Willingthorpe' in twelfth-century charters. It appears to have lain to the west of the city: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, pp. 328-29 (PM).
	2 CHURCHES. Perhaps St Lawrence and St Martin which had been granted to Bishop Remigius by King William: Lincoln Cathedral Registrum Antiquissimum (Foster, i. p. 3) (PM).
C12	IN THE FIELDS OF LINCOLN. These lay to the north of the Foss Dyke and River Witham, in a semi-circle to the east, west and north of the city: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, pp. 331-32 (PM).
	THE SHIP. In the manuscript nauī; Farley misprinted uauī, though he correctly printed it in the previous line (CT).
	HAVE 231 ACRES. Latin h't (=habet) is singular, although the subject is plural (CT).
C16	CHURCH OF ALL SAINTS. It lay in Eastgate. The church does not now survive. The site was at the rear of the modern number seven Eastgate: Survey of Ancient Houses in Lincoln, I, p. 3 (PM).
	PETERBOROUGH ... PRIEST. In the manuscript there is an erasure after Burg and a small space after p'b'r (CT).
C17	ST MARY'S OF LINCOLN. The bishopric was moved from Dorchester-on-Thames to Lincoln in 1072. The reference to a church of St Mary of Lincoln, here and at CS5, which held land T.R.E. is probably to a lost parish: Owen, 'Norman Cathedral at Lincoln', p. 195 (PM).
C20	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. The name Ketilbiorn occurs on more than two dozen holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing four or five individuals, of whom the most significant was the Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton>, one of the manors held T.R.E. by Ketilbiorn (4,23). Although some of his holdings were held at different dates, lay in three counties, and were held from or devolved upon three tenants-in-chief, there are sufficient links between them to indicate that they had all belonged to a single individual. The pre-Conquest holdings in Lincolnshire, which devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux and Osbern the priest, were intermingled with those acquired by the 1086 tenant of the same name, suggesting a common identity; and the Yorkshire holding of Worsborough was shared with one Gamal in 1086, as Nettleton had been in 1066, providing another link between Lincolnshire and Yorkshire and between the 1066 and 1086 Ketilbiorns. The form of the name at Worsborough, Chetelber, occurs also in three adjacent holdings, all likely to have been held by the same man. The Nottinghamshire property, held by Ketilbiorn at both dates, lay midway between those in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, providing another link between the two counties and the 1066 and 1086 Ketilbiorns (JP).
C21	3 ½ MARKS OF SILVER. That is, 46s 8d at 13s 4d for a silver mark. The gold mark was worth £6 (CT).
C22	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	HIS NEPHEW COLA. See 26,7 Cola note.
	36 HOUSES AND 2 CHURCHES. Domesday is here recording the establishment of a new suburb in Lincoln, traditionally identified as Wigford where there are two Anglo-Saxon churches. Kolsveinn's estate, however, seems to have been located to the east of the city. One of the churches was St Peter at Welles, the other perhaps St Augustine: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 134 (PM).
C23	ALFRED, TUROLD'S NEPHEW. It is possible that this Alfred is the son of Alfred of Lincoln (LIN 27), whose wife's sister was married to Turold the sheriff of Lincolnshire; see RUT 2a Alfred note; Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 143.
C24	EDSTAN. The manuscript has Edstan. Von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday, p. 236, interprets as Old English Eadstan, but the more likely possibility is a variant from Adestan, that is, from Old English Aethelstan; see von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 188; Fellows Jensen, ‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, p. 32. See 57,48 Alstan note. The ½ messuage was part of Aethelstan's total holding of land, terra here meaning the same as feudum ('Holding') (PM-CT). For the present edition this name has been changed to Edstan, the form chosen by JRM for Old English Eadstan, as it reflects the Domesday forms.
C25	AFTER THIS ENTRY there is a one-line gap in the manuscript (CT).
C26	THE CASTLE. Founded by William in 1068 on his march south from York (PM).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY there is a one-line gap in the manuscript (CT).
C27	AFTER THIS ENTRY there is a one-line gap in the manuscript (CT).
C28	THE CUSTOMARY DUES ... IN SOUTH LINCOLN[SHIRE]. South Lincoln(shire) is a reference to Kesteven and Holland. The sum is equal to that rendered by Stamford at S16, suggesting that this represents the territory of the Anglo-Scandinavian borough of Stamford; see Roffe and Mahany, 'Stamford', p. 214; and {Introduction: Districts and Ridings} (PM).
C31	AFTER THIS ENTRY there is a two-line gap in the manuscript (CT).
C32	EACH HUNDRED [OF "ORAE"] RENDERS £8. The note in the Phillimore printed edition reads: 'The reference is to a long hundred, that is one hundred hundreds, each paying an "ora" of 16d. On the Lincolnshire hundreds, see {Introduction: Hundreds} (PM)'. However, further research on the meaning of this entry and of similar ones in Domesday Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire has suggested that the 'hundreds' are not territorial hundreds, but 'hundreds of "orae" ', and the translation has been altered for the present edition to reflect this; see NTT S1 hundreds note and NTT S1 paid note.
C33	AFTER THIS ENTRY the rest of column 336c, 10 ruled lines, has been left blank, possibly for more details of the Lincoln customs to be added when and if available; compare 1,106 entry note (CT).
S1	ACROSS THE BRIDGE. A reference to the suburb south of the River Welland in Northamptonshire, later known as Stamford Baron (PM-CT). It lay in Upton Hundred, which was a soke of the Abbot of Peterborough.
S2	THE CASTLE. The reference to the loss of 5 messuages as a result of the construction of the castle, which was possibly contemporary with that of Lincoln, contrasts with the account of Lincoln (C26) where 166 messuages were destroyed. The section refers to the loss of messuages which paid customary dues. Topographically the castle lay mostly within the manor of Queen Edith which did not render customary dues to the king; see S9; and Mahany and Roffe, 'Stamford', p. 215 (PM).
S5	40 "ORAE". An "ora" was literally an ounce, in Scandinavia a monetary unit and coin still in use; in Domesday valued at 16 (assayed) or 20 (unassayed) pence; see Harvey, 'Royal Revenue and Domesday Terminology' (PM-CT).
S6	2 CHURCHES. Possibly St Clement in Scotgate and All Saints by the Water: Mahany and Roffe, 'Stamford', p. 207; Roffe, 'Rural Manors and Stamford', pp. 12-13 (PM).
S9	EXCEPT THE BAKERS'. Latin panificis could be the genitive of panifex, third declension, meaning '[the customary due] of the baker' with consuetudine (ablative after sine) understood. But it is more likely to be the ablative plural of the adjective panificus (consuetudinibus understood from the previous phrase): 'except for the dues pertaining to bakers/bread-making'. Perhaps these were fines for baking bad bread or the right of the lord to make his tenants bake their bread in his oven; see Stenton in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xxxv (CT).
S11	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
S13	ALBERT ^[OF LORRAINE]^ [HAS?]. Albert the cleric, also known as Albert of Lorraine; see RUT 7 Albert note. The tense of the omitted verb is not apparent, though elsewhere Albert is said to be holding the church at the time of Domesday; see RUT 7 Albert note (PM-CT).
	ST PETER'S. The church does not survive. Its site is represented by a grassy knoll to the west of the castle motte (PM). See RUT 7,21 St Peter note.
T1	IN THIS TOWN. Domesday uilla. The main scribe of Great Domesday seemed genuinely unclear as to how to describe this place. He called it a uilla ('vill', 'village' or 'town') twice in this entry as well as a vicus 'quarter or suburb of a town'. In T2 he again uses uilla, and suburbium (here probably 'a small town, something less than a city') and urbem ('city'). The fact that Torksey has burgesses means that it is really a burgus ('borough') (CT).
	KNOWLEDGE AND PERMISSION OF THE REEVE. See HEF C2 (CT).
T3	[* EARL *] MORCAR. Although the name Morcar occurs over 150 times in Domesday Book, it probably represents only eight individuals, which makes the task of identifying the earl where his title has been omitted easier than it is for his brother [Earl Edwin]. As no other Morcar is recorded as a lord of men, the Morcar of BUK 12,31 is likely to have been the earl even though the holding is close to those of Morcar <of Clifton>. The Morcar holdings in Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire all devolved upon Roger of Bully which makes it probable that they had been held by one individual, almost certainly the earl in view of the value (£15) of the handsome manor of Gunthorpe (NTT 9,74), one of the half-dozen most valuable manors in the county, and barely 10 miles from the earl's manor of 'Newbold' (NTT 1,58). In Yorkshire, there can scarcely be any doubt that the Morcar who had held the royal manors, or those (whose values suggest most had been royal) which devolved upon Drogo of la Beuvrière, or the Bishop of Durham. Probably, though less certainly, the large manors acquired by Count Alan of Brittany had also been held by the earl. Apart from the holdings held by Morcar <of Smeaton>, the remaining Yorkshire properties were all connected to one or more of these holdings attributed to the earl. In Lincolnshire as in Yorkshire, Earl Morcar was evidently the predecessor of Drogo of la Beuvrière (LIN 30), several of whose manors cluster around Skillington (2,37) and Sempringham (27,57) to which they had been connected in the past, making it likely that the Morcar on those holdings and others in the same fiefs was the earl: Anglo-Saxon Wills, edited by Dorothy Whitelock, no. 39, pp. 95-97;207-12. The remaining Lincolnshire holdings (56,9-10) were close to his manors of Bassingham (30,27) and Carlton (1,26), and substantial enough to please an earl. See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 215-217, whose list omits the dependencies of manors and BUK 12,31. 23,2. CHS 2,21. YKS 6W2;5-6. 6N162. (6E1) (JP).
T5	THIS ENTRY is not really part of the Torksey customs at all, being in fact a list of the major T.R.E. landholders in Lincolnshire (CT).
	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
	THORGOT LAG. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined lag above Turgot; it is visible under the gall in the manuscript, but Farley did not print it and there is no mention of it in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday. Thorgot is given the byname lag in 18,1;7;13;29. 59,6; it was erroneously spelt Lagr in the Phillimore printed edition. See Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 320.
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
	RALPH THE CONSTABLE. In the manuscript stalre is interlined above Radulfus; Farley misprinted stalrel, mistaking the rather extended 'tail' of the f in Vlf in the line above as part of the byname (CT).
	ROTHULFR SON OF SKJALDVOR. Skjaldvor is a female name: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 250 (PM).
	AZUR SON OF SVALA. Svala is a female name: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 273 (PM).
	AELRIC SON OF MERGEAT. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
	AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	AZUR SON OF BURG. A difficult personal name to explain: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 211. The manuscript has Burgi; Farley misprinted Burg (PM-CT).
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. Barthi had held all the lands of the Bishop of Lincoln in Northamptonshire (NTH 5) and one of his in Leicestershire (LEC 3,11), as well as four of his in Lincolnshire (7,38-39;43;48).
		All estates held by a Barthi in Domesday Book devolved upon the Bishop of Lincoln, plausibly identifying all Barthis as one individual. Sleaford (7,43) was his largest estate (JP).
L68	SWARTBRAND. In the manuscript the name is written on a separate line, to which the scribe gave a separate chapter number. Swartbrand (L68), Ketilbiorn (L69) and others of the king's thanes (L70) appear in one chapter in the text; see LIN 68 thanes note (PM-CT).
L69	KETILBIORN. In the manuscript the name is written on a separate line, to which the main scribe of Great Domesday gave a separate chapter number. Swartbrand (L68), Ketilbiorn (L69) and others of the king's thanes (L70) appear in one chapter in the text; see LIN 68 thanes note (CT).
L70	OF THE KING'S THANES. In the manuscript Tainorum regis is written on a separate line, to which the scribe gave a separate chapter number. Swartbrand (L68), Ketilbiorn (L69) and others of the king's thanes (L70) appear in one chapter in the text; see LIN 68 thanes note (PM-CT).
1	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday omitted the I beside this chapter when he rubricated this county; this error occurs in several other counties (CT).
1,1	FREEMEN ... VILLAGERS ... SMALLHOLDERS. It is not clear whether the Latin should be extended to the accusative as the objects of 'the king has' in the line above. Such ambiguity occurs in almost every entry which has habet with the 1086 holder's (lordship) ploughs (CT).
	[WITH 2] PLOUGHS [AND]. In the manuscript cū .ii. car' can just be deciphered under the gall, which was applied because the parchment is rubbed here; the .ii. is the clearest part. Farley printed three dots at these points (CT).
	WEIGHED AND ASSAYED. Latin cum pondere et arsione, literally 'with weight and assaying'. See ad pondus ('by weight') in 1,9. The money was weighed to avoid losses due to clipping of coins or wear, and assayed, that is tested by fire for the presence of alloy, a similar process to blanching (see DOR 1,1 blanched note). Any deficiency was then made good. Sometimes the coins were not actually melted down, but an extra number of pence were required to be paid in compensation for any loss; this was achieved by using an "ora" of 20d instead of the normal "ora" of 16d (see S5 "orae" note). Payment made in coin that had been subjected to these methods was the opposite of payment 'at face value'; see Harvey, 'Royal Revenue and Domesday Terminology' (CT).
1,3	AUSTHORPE. In the Phillimore printed edition, the place was identified as East Thorpe with the note: 'The manuscript has Oustorp, Austr, 'east'. The modern name is Ewerby Thorpe. The settlement lies to the east of Ewerby; see Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 109' (PM). The settlement Austhorpe in Ewerby Thorpe is the successor of the Domesday name.
1,4	PASTURABLE WOODLAND IN [VARIOUS] PLACES, 210 ACRES. The Phillimore printed edition has 'woodland, pasture in places' with the following note:
		'This phrase occurs about 50 times in Domesday Lincolnshire, and means that part of the woodland was available for pasturage (there were probably clearings): see 38,10 where about half of the woodland is pasturable and 56,16 where of the silua pastilis half is pastureland, the other half underwood. It seems to convey the same information as silua pastilis because of the correspondence between the two phrases in Lincolnshire, and "Roteland"; for example, RUT 2,7;13 have 'woodland, pasture in places', while for the same manors LIN 56,11;18 have 'woodland pasture'); the scribe merely omitted the per loca as apparently superfluous, the aim of the finished Domesday being to abbreviate as far as possible. The phrase per loca therefore does not appear to mean that the woodland pasture is scattered over several parts of the vill but that parts of the woodland were pasture: the word order in 13,44 siluae per loca pastilis (as also in RUT 1,5;20. 2,12-13. 5,15 makes this perfectly clear (CT)'.
		As a result of further work on all the occurrences of this phrase in Domesday and of the use of per loca with other resources, the present editors have decided that it does in fact mean pasturable woodland in various parts of the estate, rather than as one block, and the translation has been changed throughout Domesday; see DBY 1,12 woodland note.
1,5	11 FREEMEN WITH 3 CARUCATES. Latin de normally means 'of or 'from', though in Domesday it also has the meaning of 'at' in a phrase such as ii molini de xxxii den[ariis] ('2 mills at 32d'). Here, however, the precise sense of de is unclear; it is possibly elliptical for '11 Freemen with a holding consisting of/assessed at 3 carucates'. Nonetheless the easiest translation is 'with', even though this now is the same translation as that of cum as in the phrase 'Freemen with x ploughs'. Here, of the 8 carucates of Boothby Graffoe the Freemen were responsible for 3 carucates (these are fiscal carucates and may or may not have borne any relationship to the actual size of their holding). On the extents of their holdings and their plough-teams, see Lennard, 'Economic Position of the Domesday Sokemen'. In the Phillimore printed edition de was translated as 'on' in this phrase, but it has been altered to 'with' to bring it into line with the translations in other counties, such as Nottinghamshire.
1,6	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
	LAND FOR AS MANY PLOUGHS. That is, 18 ploughs, as many as the carucates (CT).
	ST. PETER'S CHURCH IN LINCOLN. St Peter at Pleas. The church does not now survive: Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 130 (PM).
1,8	8 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .ix. car', but then began to correct the number to .viii., then gave up and interlined viii but forgot to underline the ix for deletion (CT).
1,9	THIS ENTRY is written closer together and in a smaller script than others on this folio. Although, as elsewhere in Domesday Lincolnshire, lines were originally scored for the main scribe of Great Domesday to write on, he does not seem to have kept to them in this entry: the lines are not in fact visible at this point (as often on the reverse of a folio), but the 13 lines here occupy the space of some 10 lines in the opposite column (CT).
	111 BURGESSES [AND?] 80, LESS 3, PLOTS OF THE FREEMEN OF THE THANES. An awkward statement. The case of burgenses is unclear, there is no 7 to link the burgesses with the plots, and the phrase socchemannorum teignorum is very rare in Domesday (CT).
	IVO FOUND 1 PLOUGH. Or possibly 'Ivo found 1 carucate', as car' can abbreviate both caruca and carucata, as in 1,91 where it means both words in successive lines. However, there the scribe clarified the meaning by including t[er]rę ('of land') after the first car', as he did most of the time when car' meant 'carucates'. The phrase means that when Ivo (Tallboys, the sheriff) took over the running of this manor for the king, he found there 1 plough (or carucate), 72 smallholders, a church etc. (CT).
1,12	SOUTH STOKE [* STOKE [ROCHFORD] *] ... 'NORTH STOKE'. [Domesday unusually distinguishes North Stoke from South Stoke]. The latter was later Stoke Rochford. The vill appears to have occupied the area close to the present parish church; 'North Stoke' lay to the north, close to Stoke Rochford Hall (PM).
	MEADOW ... AND 20 ACRES. The Latin is P'ti .ix. q' l'g' 7 iii. lat' 7 xx. ac's. This needs emending on several counts. Firstly, it is likely that p'ti (= prati, genitive) is a scribal error for the nominative p'tū (= pratum), as the genitive case is not correct when two dimensions are given, though it would be correct if the scribe had included in before l'g' and lat' (making the meaning '9 furlongs of meadow in length and 3 in width'). The case of ac's (= acras, accusative) is unexpected. As the scribe started a new sentence for the details of the meadow, it is unlikely that the acres are accusative because they are the object of 'the king has' two lines above (the case of the intervening villagers, Freemen and mills is not known). It could be an accusative of extent, but only if the meaning were 'meadow 9 furlongs long and 3 [furlongs] and 20 acres wide' (as this accusative is dependent on the adjectives longum and latum); the q' would thus abbreviate quarentinas, accusative, though the scribe also uses the nominative is such cases (see DOR 26,40 woodland note). Such a combination of furlongs and acres in a measurement does occur several times in Domesday (see DOR 5,1 woodland note), but not apparently in Lincolnshire. However, scribal error for the nominative ac' (= acrae) is the most likely explanation. If so, the 20 acres could be describing a separate piece of meadow: the scribe would have found it difficult to combine an existing square measure with a rectangle described by two linear measurements which was probably made up of a number of small parcels of meadow (see 1,4 woodland note), and so he tacked the 20 acres on afterwards. Alternatively, the 20 acres might refer to another resource which the scribe omitted in error, perhaps 'woodland' or 'spinney' which regularly succeed the meadow details in Domesday Lincolnshire (as in the previous entry: 1,11). See DEV 1,53 pasture note.
1,13	"NONGTONE". An unidentified place. It appears as Nongetune at 5,2. Canon Foster argued that this represented Spittlegate in Grantham: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. lxi-lxii (PM).
1,14	A JURISDICTION OF GRANTHAM. Latin soca can theoretically have an abstract or a concrete sense so Soca in Grāhā used of "Nongtone" in the previous entry could either stand for Soca est in Grāhā meaning 'Jurisdiction of it is in Grantham' (that is, Grantham has the jurisdiction (soke) over it) or est soca iacens in Grāhā ['it is a jurisdiction (sokeland) lying in (that is, 'belonging to') Grantham']. The meaning of the present example has to be concrete, because of the Nunc est haec terra: 'This land is now a jurisdiction of Grantham'. In many other cases, soca in ['a jurisdiction in'] appears to be idiomatic for soca de ['a jurisdiction of']; see DBY 1,26 jurisdiction note.
1,15	THE WHOLE OF THIS LAND IS IN 'ASWARDHURN' WAPENTAKE. Possibly in error. Most of these places were later in 'Threo' Wapentake (PM).
1,16	{{2 ½ CARUCATES AND 2 BOVATES}}. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined 7 ii. bō, but then lined through the whole of the carucage for deletion, presumably when he realized that he had already given this information in 1,15, albeit as 2 carucates and 2 bovates (CT).
1,21	`DUNSTHORPE'. Lost in Grantham at approximately SK925358 (PM).
1,23	THEIR JURISDICTION [IS] IN GRANTHAM. Canon Foster argues that this refers to the 2 mills: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 18 (PM).
1,31	[IT IS] 20 FURLONGS LONG AND 12 WIDE. This seems to be the measurement of the whole manor; compare the phrases totum m[anerium] with similar measurements in 7,10 and 14,83 and plain totum in 1,26;35. 4,17. 8,1. 12,21 etc. (CT).
1,33	5 CARUCATES ... WHICH COUNT ALAN HELD. The 5 carucates are described at 12,84 where the scribe observed that they are adjudged for the king's use (PM).
1,34	2 SALT-HOUSES. Latin salinas is accusative after h[abe]t rex in the line above; the Latin for the villagers and fishery should probably be extended to the accusative case. The term salina comprehends all kinds of salt-workings from the coastal pans (as in the marshland of Lincolnshire) to the boilers of Worcestershire and Cheshire with their associated sheds and buildings: 'salt-house' is the most comprehensive term. See WOR 1,3a brine-pits note on salt extraction. The number of salt-houses per entry in Lincolnshire ranges from 1 to 26 + 15 in 12,64; Count Alan had the most on his lands. Normally their render is stated (always in money, never in kind) and this seems in a great many cases to have been based on the "ora" of 16d (for example, the 4 salt-houses in 11,6 pay 5s 4d, or 4 "orae"; the 9 in 12,61 pay 12s, or 9 "orae"; the 15 in 12,70 pay 20s, or 15 "orae"), though 12d was also a common rate (for example, in 12,19;39. 38,14 etc.). A salt-house in Bicker (2,30) was waste (CT).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY 10 ½ lines - at least two full entries - have been erased, mostly neatly; the resultant large space is thus not to mark 'the passage from Holland to Lindsey', as stated in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 18 note 3 (CT).
1,36	OF THIS LAND ODO THE CROSSBOWMAN HAS 2 ½ CARUCATES. See 48,16, though the figures differ (PM).
1,37	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, probably in a space originally left by him after Nettleham and its jurisdiction; the pen used is much thinner and the script is of a more 'upright' nature compared to the surrounding entries. See 56,23 entry note for another entry which seems to have been written at the same time as this one (CT).
1,39	MORTON, 9 BOVATES. This was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in slightly paler ink outside the marginal ruling; there is no sign as to where exactly in the list of jurisdictions he intended it to fit (CT).
	59 CARUCATES OF LAND TAXABLE. The addition is 61 carucates and 2 ⅔ bovates (PM).
1,40	GLENTWORTH. This and the following estates (1,40-63) are entered in the order in which they are named in 1,39, though no information is given for Morton which was a marginal addition (PM-CT).
1,48	HEAPHAM. In the manuscript the name appears clearly as Iopehā; Farley misprinted Lopehā. The name occurs as Iopeham in 1,39 (not Jopeham, as Farley printed) and in 12,5 (where Farley also put L for I; see 12,5 Heapham note). Compare 1,61 Yaddlethorpe note, 16,26 Yawthorpe note, 24,38 Ewerby note, 31,18 'Langoe' note, 32,25 'Langoe' note, 68,20 Lobthorpe note and 68,37 Yaddlethorpe note (CT).
1,61	YADDLETHORPE. The manuscript has Iadulftorp; Farley misprinted Ladulftorp, as he also did for the same name in 68,37. Compare 1,48 Heapham note (CT).
1,63	223 FREEMEN, 16 SMALLHOLDERS AND 15 VILLAGERS WITH 50 PLOUGHS. Although the number of the Freemen in 1,40-63 totals 223, the smallholders total 18 and the villagers 31 and between them they had 52 ½ ploughs and 14 oxen (CT).
1,64	THIS ENTRY appears to qualify or correct information given in the previous entries. Hibaldstow is earlier listed in the jurisdiction of Kirton-in-Lindsey (1,39), but here noted to be an outlier; whilst inland at Grayingham and Springthorpe, not listed earlier (1,39), is now given separately (PM).
1,65	A CHURCH. That at Caistor. The success of the bishop's claim is noted at CN6 (PM).
1,77	NEWSHAM. The manuscript has Neuhuse; it is Neosum in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 11/2 p. 250), the latter preserving the dative case from which the modern place-name form results (PM).
1,80	ALTOGETHER 28 CARUCATES OF LAND AND 1 BOVATE. The total of carucates and bovates in 1,67-80 comes to 29 ½ carucates and three and one-sixth bovates, but only the 15 bovates in 1,78 are actually said to be taxable. The totals of the Freemen and villagers are accurate, but there are in fact 31, not 28, smallholders (the 3 in 1,78 were probably omitted) and the ploughs they had amount to 31 ½ with 3 oxen, not 30 (CT).
1,90	ALTOGETHER 25 ½ CARUCATES, 1 BOVATE AND THE THIRD PART OF A BOVATE. In fact the total of 1,82-90 comes to 24 ½ carucates, 1 bovate and the third part of a bovate. The numbers of Freemen, villagers and smallholders are correctly totalled, but their ploughs add up to 35, not 34: the two half-ploughs in 1,89-90 may not have been counted (CT).
1,92	4 CARUCATES OF LAND. The rest of this line has been erased (CT).
1,93	TOYNTON. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote Todintune, with [ve]l Ti interlined above the in of Todintune. As there was no room for him to write the [ve]l Ti above the To, he may have intended the reading to be [ve]l Ti[ntune], as understood by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 24. However, Totintune is the form used at 3,26, so, despite the capital T, he may intended the Ti as a possible replacement of the do (CT).
1,94	"TORP". An unidentified place, associated here and at 4,51 with Langton. Canon Foster tentatively identified it as Langton Thorpe, that is, the 'outlying farm' of Langton. In the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 19/8 p. 260) the holding at 4,51 appears to be represented by 'Buckland' in Woodhall to the west of Langton; see Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. li (PM).
1,102	MAREHAM[-LE-FEN]. Distinguished in early sources, by the form Marum, from Mareham[-on-the-Hill] which appears as Meringhe; see Ekwall, Dictionary of English Placenames, p. 299 (PM).
1,106	IN TOTAL, 42 CARUCATES. In fact the total of 1,92-106 comes to 41 ½ carucates and 1 bovate. The Freemen and smallholders are added up correctly, but there are 65, not 66, villagers, and 53 ½ , not 55, ploughs (CT).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the rest of the column, 37 ruled lines, has been left blank, probably for further details of the king's land to be added when and if available. Similar spaces occur at the end of the first chapter in other Domesday counties: for example, Nottinghamshire, Kent, Yorkshire. The main scribe of Great Domesday seems to have begun writing up Lincolnshire before all the material for many of the fiefs was to hand, because he also left large amounts of space after chapters 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 27, 63 and smaller amounts after chapters 2, 8, 11, 17, 18, 28, 33, 34, 37, 39, 42, 46, 48, 52, 54. The number of late-added entries also suggests this (CT).
2,2	BARKWITH. Domesday does not distinguish between East and West Barkwith, though there were two discrete settlements in the twelfth century; see Stenton, 'Documents Illustrative of the History of the Danelaw', p. 66. Canon Foster identified the holding at 16,17 as West Barkwith: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 92 (PM).
2,6	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,7	`THRUNSCOE'. Lost in Cleethorpes at TA311077 (PM).
	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,11	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,12	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,13	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,14	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,15	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,18	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,19	TRUSTHORPE. The manuscript has Dreuistor corrected to Dreuistorp by the main scribe of Great Domesday (CT).
	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,20	"TATEBI". Lost in Ulceby at approximately TF420740: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxviii (PM).
	UNDER[WOOD]. The manuscript has minutę with siluę omitted in error (PM-CT).
	20 ACRES. In the manuscript xx has been corrected from xl by the main scribe of Great Domesday, though it is possible that the alteration could have been from xx to xl (CT).
	HERBERT [* SON OF AUBREY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,23	"TORP". An unidentified place associated with Langton-by-Wragby at CS22. Canon Foster suggested that this might represent Low Langton at TF155760: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 211 (PM).
2,25	½ WOOL-HOUSE. In the manuscript lanina (not a capital L as Farley prints): a word which is not found in Classical Latin, nor does it appear in the Revised Medieval Latin Word List, the Dictionary of Medieval Latin, nor several other medieval glossaries, but which has obviously got something to do with lana ('wool'), constructed on the same lines as salina 'salt-house' is from sal. Perhaps, as Stallingborough stands near several minor streams feeding into the Humber estuary, the lanina was a place where the wool was washed. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 28, translate it as 'slaughter-house', perhaps confusing lanina with laniena ('a butcher's stall', from lanio 'to tear'). Domesday Geography of Eastern England, p. 85, calls it a shearing house. There is no mention of the other half. It is just possible, however, that at some stage in the Domesday Enquiry salina was miscopied as lanina (l and long s can look very similar in the Carolingian minuscule script), as there is mention of 2 ½ salinae in another entry for Stallingborough (25,7) (CT).
2,26	WHICH BELONG TO LANEHAM. The archbishop's manor in Nottinghamshire (NTT 5,4) (PM).
2,31	GRABY. A single settlement called Graby still exists (at TF1029), but there were formerly two settlements: 'East Graby' was in Dowsby parish, 'West Graby' in Aslackby. It is likely therefore that this entry, a jurisdiction of Dowsby, refers to 'East Graby', whereas the holding of Robert of Tosny (18,17), who held Aslackby, refers to 'West Graby' (PM).
2,32	VALUE 10s. This was added partly in the 'tramlines' and partly in the central margin, in slightly darker ink and with a sharper pen (CT).
2,33	WALTER [* OF AINCOURT *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
2,34	MARGINAL M. In this entry the main scribe of Great Domesday added a marginal M[anerium] against the holding of both Baca and Wulfwin. At the same time the initial I was changed from a rustic to a 'square' capital, indicating the manorial status (PM).
	[NORTH] WITHAM. Identified by the reference to a jurisdiction of North Witham in 2,35 (PM).
2,35	'TWYFORD'. The name survives in Twyford Wood at SK950230 (PM).
2,36	"WARNODE". In Domesday the word is found in Lincolnshire of seven places in the south of Kesteven. It is used only of areas of woodland, or meadow, usually of 40 or 60 acres, with one exception, the claim for Uffington (CK2). There the wording seems to include with the 48 acres of meadow, '60 acres of land', held without tax (sine geldo), unstocked, but worked from the adjacent manor of Belmesthorpe. The wording varies. On six occasions the acres are in Warnode of a named landholder; twice the Warnode 'lies in' or 'belongs to' (iacet in or pertinet ad) a particular manor; once the landholder in silua Westbitham ... habet xl acras pro viii den' Warnode, and once he withheld Warnode de x acris prati in eadem Beltone. Here two figures are given, 8d for 40 acres, and 4d for 60 acres, both of woodland. The phrasing suggests a payment made to, or through, a manor or lord. Stenton (in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xxxviii) noted that in later times the sum was increased if payment was delayed, and describes it as 'rent'. See Du Cange, Glossarium, under Warnode, quoting a plea roll of 33 Ed I. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 29, translated 'for the purpose of defence against the geld'. Maitland, Domesday Book and Beyond, p. 123, suggested War- (presumably intending 'defence obligation'; from Old English wara, genitive ware- 'defence, watch') and Old English suffix -notu ('business', 'office'). Finn, Introduction to Domesday Book, p. 259, links Warnode with wara ('war') and the better known warland which he contrasts with inland. An example not cited by Finn is Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, iii. pp. 192-93, which mentions two hides near Cirencester (Gloucestershire) in 1152-1153, one in lordship, the other de warlande quam iiiior villani tenuerunt. An alternative possibility is an Old English hypothetical warnodh ('a warning, an admonition') from Old English war(e)nian ('to beware', 'to take heed'; 'to put on guard', 'to warn'; 'to see to something'); see Bosworth and Toller, Anglo-Saxon Dictionary; and compare Domesday monere ('warn', 'summon for military or other duty'). However, since the word is restricted to a small area which had probably once been attached to the maintenance of the Danish borough of Stamford, it may be of Scandinavian origin and could be a usage of the recorded cognates, early Danish vaerned ('assurance', 'pledge') or the Norwegian-Icelandic varnadhr ('protection', 'warning', 'caution'); see Cleasby and Vigfusson, Icelandic-English Dictionary (CT).
2,37	FREE JURISDICTION. Thus Stenton, Types of Manorial Structure, pp. 40-42, who argued that this represents the ability to withdraw jurisdiction at will. It appears in eight entries in Lincolnshire, but is not otherwise found in Domesday (PM).
2,42	LENTON. Formerly 'Lavington' (PM).
	ULF. He is Ulf son of Topi in CK10 (PM).
3,1	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *] ... HAS ... IT. See 26,1 (PM).
3,2	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
3,3	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
3,4	½ CHURCH ... JOCELYN SON OF LAMBERT. There is no mention of a church in Jocelyn's holding in Blyborough at 28,1, though without mention of the church. The other half of the church would seem to be in the holding there of Geoffrey of la Guerche at 63,1 (CT).
3,6	WALBERT <OF FULSTOW>. Note to be supplied (JP).
3,7	WALBERT <OF FULSTOW>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	A HALL WITH A PLOT AND FULL JURISDICTION. An addition by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the end of the entry, the final phrase interlined (CT).
3,8	IN BULLINGTON. This holding may perhaps be represented by Goltho, a deserted village and the site of a motte and bailey castle contemporary with Domesday: Beresford, 'Goltho Manor, Lincolnshire'. The identification of the Goltho site with this entry, as distinct from one of the other two Bullington manors at 13,26 and 14,58, is, however, problematic. See also CS32 Apley note (PM).
3,9	`HARDWICK'. Lost at approximately TF175790 (PM).
3,10	LANGTON[-BY-WRAGBY]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote Langetone, then corrected it to Langetona; Farley misprinted Langetone.
	'[LITTLE] STURTON'. Lost in Baumber at TF215755, now represented by Stourton Hall: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxvii. The lands here were shared between Eudo son of Spirewic and the Bishop of Durham (see 29,1;6-7). Hugh son of Eudo is shown holding land in Sturton in Horncastle Wapentake in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 19/10 p. 260) making it probable that the place referred to is [Little] Sturton (PM).
3,11	IN WISPINGTON. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square', with the place-name rubricated (PM).
	4 PLOUGHS. The first minim of the iiii is not meant to be cancelled (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 31 note 4), but seems to have been slightly malformed; it is thicker than the others because the scribe went over it twice and then interlined or (for quattuor, '4') to emphasize the number (CT).
3,12	IN WADDINGWORTH. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square' (PM).
3,13	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. The Clamores (CS21-22) reveal that the Harold of Tattershall Thorpe (3,15), a dependency of Kirkby[-on-Bain], was almost certainly the brother of Aelfric and Guthfrithr; and since the name Harold was sufficiently uncommon for it to be unlikely that any tenant-in-chief had two predecessors of that name, it is likely that this Harold also held Keddington and its dependencies (JP).
3,14	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,15	MARGINAL K. Here and against 16 other entries in Domesday Lincolnshire, for kalum(p)nia ('claim'), drawing attention to a claim against the land. In six cases the main scribe of Great Domesday noted, either in the text, as here, or in the margin, who was making the claim (CT).
	EUDO [* SON OF SPIREWIC *]. Eudo son of Spirewic, whose holding here appears at 29,34. This entry is apparently duplicated at 4,55 and 29,34, though the detail is not identical. The division of Tattershall Thorpe between Eudo and the bishop is noted at 29,8 (PM).
		The Clamores for the South Riding (CS21-22) reveal that the Eudo with whom the Bishop of Durham was in dispute was Eudo son of Spirewic, who is also likely the be the tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux at Tattershall Thorpe (4,55), where he held two-thirds of the vill; see 29,8 (JP).
	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,16	[* ABBEY OF *] SAINT-CALAIS. This abbey was situated in what is now the commune of Saint-Calais in the French département of Sarthe (arrondissement Le Mans), and is sometimes known in England as Saint Carilef's. It is the monasterium Sancti Karilephi in a ninth-century document, being called after St Carilephus, a sixth-century anchorite who came from the Auvergne; see Dauzat and Rostaing, Dictionnaire des Noms de Lieux en France, under St-Calais. The Bishop of Durham, William of Saint-Calais, had been Abbot of Saint-Calais.
3,17	THIS ENTRY and the next (3,18) were written at the bottom of folio 340d, but on the ruled lines (with the exception of the last part-line of 3,18). They were not later additions, merely misplaced, and a pair of transposition signs indicate their correct position in the text of the column above (CT).
	[* ABBEY OF *] SAINT-CALAIS. See 3,16 Saint-Calais note.
3,18	FOR THIS MISPLACED ENTRY, see 3,17 entry note.
	'LOUTHESK' WAPENTAKE. Entered mostly in the central margin thus beginning the wapentake rubrication which continues in the rest of this chapter (PM).
3,19	[LITTLE] GRIMSBY. This estate lay in Ludborough Hundred, as did Covenham (3,16). This is obscured by the intrusion of the misplaced entries 3,17-18 (3,17 entry note).
	JURISDICTION OF THIS MANOR. That is, of Covenham [3,16, the preceding entry in the manuscript] (PM).
3,20	SUMARLITHI. The Domesday forms of this name - Sum[m]erled, Sum[m]erlede, Sumerlet, Sum[m]erde, Sum[m]erdi (genitive) - represent Old Norse Sumarlithr, Sumarlithi: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 377-78; Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, pp. 270-71. The forms Summerled and Sumarlithi appear in the Phillimore printed edition; these have now been standardized as Sumarlithi. The Alecto edition has Sumarlithr generally. Compare 4,19 "Summerlede" note.
3,22	EUDO ^[SON OF SPIREWIC]^ CLAIMS IT. This was added in the right margin by the main scribe of Great Domesday. A marginal k (for kalum(p]nia, 'claim') in the central margin calls attention to the claim in CN30, where Eudo is the son of Spirewic. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
3,24	THIS ENTRY is written in the central margin, but with no transposition signs to indicate where it belongs in the text. The main scribe of Great Domesday used a thinner pen than he did for the rest of this folio, but the ink colour is the same (CT).
3,25	EUDO [* SON OF SPIREWIC *]. See 3,15 Eudo note.
3,27	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,28	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,29	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruling of folio 341b, in the middle of the entry for '[South] Cadeby' (3,48); there is no rubrication. A pair of transposition signs indicate its correct position within the text on folio 341a (CT).
	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,30	HAROLD [* BROTHER OF AELFRIC AND GUTHFRITHR *]. See 3,13 Harold note.
3,31	GONERBY. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated. The place is represented by Great Gonerby and 'Little Gonerby'. Canon Foster identified 67,24 as Little Gonerby [Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 199 no. 67/24], the remaining entries [with more or less certainty, according to their Index] as Great Gonerby; see Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. 16, 33, 47, 143, 182, 227 nos. 1/10. 3/31. 5/3. 31/2. 57/26. 72/21) (PM).
3,32	IN NEWTON. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square', with the place-name rubricated (PM).
	WULFGEAT AND HIS WIFE HAVE THE OTHER [HALF]. See 67,10 (PM)
3,35	ALMOD [* THE ARCHDEACON *]. The Domesday form here and in 3,37 is Almod. Searle, Onomasticon Anglo-Saxonum, under Almodus, cites Ellis, General Introduction to Domesday Book, p. 282, and cross-refers to Ælfmod where, under the heading Ælfmod and Elemod, he mentions a moneyer active under King Ethelred II. Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, pp. 136-37, identifies the Bishop of Durham's tenant here and in 3,37 as Almod the archdeacon. A man of that name occurs in a Northamptonshire charter, probably dating from 1112 x 1113: Stenton, Early Charters from Northamptonshire, p. 15 no. 3(b) (= Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, ii. p. 111 no. 1033). However, the connection with the Domesday Almod is not made there. The name Almod also occurs in a charter, possibly spurious, dating from 1095 (Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, i. p. 93 no. 363); among the signatories are William son of Almod, and Alimod son of Makod and Alimold son of Agulf. Keats-Rohan also mentions two abbots called Almodus, one of Mont-Saint-Michel, subsequently of Cérisy (Normandy), and the other of Redon (Brittany). This slender evidence appears to suggest that Almod and variants is a name in its own right and not a scribal error for Alnod, Alnoth (as in the note by PM in the Phillimore printed edition). Almod could well have originated as a simplified form of the Old English name Æthelmoth, just as Alnod derives from Æthelnoth.
		The Phillimore printed translation has Alnoth and the Alecto edition has Almod.
	BISHOP R[EMIGIUS]. Bishop of Lincoln. In the Clamores (CK13) it is noted that Remigius and the Bishop of Durham shared Arnketil's land. The phrase here 'the bishop has the jurisdiction' may therefore refer to Remigius and not to the Bishop of Durham (PM).
3,36	EVEDON. Later in 'Aswardhurn' Wapentake, and so entered in other entries, but here entered in 'Flaxwell' Wapentake as again at 64,10 (PM).
	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. See 4,2 Kolsveinn note (PM).
3,37	RAUCEBY ... AND THE OTHER RAUCEBY. North Rauceby and South Rauceby were in existence by 1086, but it has not proved possible to distinguish them in the Domesday entries (PM).
	ALMOD [* THE ARCHDEACON *]. See 3,35 Almod note.
3,40	RAVENDALE. Both East Ravendale and West Ravendale were in existence by 1086 but it has not proved possible to distinguish them in the Domesday entries (PM).
	WALBERT <OF FULSTOW>. Note to be supplied (JP).
3,41	HIS TWO BROTHERS. Or perhaps 'two brothers of his' (as in ii homines episcopi in the next line), as Godric may have had more than two brothers. See also in 12,4;31. 26,25. 31,17 (CT).
	LAND FOR 6 PLOUGHS. Added in the right margin in paler ink and with a different pen. (CT)
3,42	[TATTERSHALL] THORPE. The bishop's holding was a third of the village; see 29,8 (PM).
3,47	IN WAINFLEET. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square', with the place-name rubricated (PM).
	3 BROTHERS. Perhaps Alnoth, Fenkell and Eskil, to whose lands the Bishop of Durham succeeded; see CN30 brothers note (PM).
	2 OXEN; [***]. There is an erasure after the 2 oxen; it is not a 'blank space' as stated in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 36 note 1 (CT).
3,48	`[SOUTH] CADEBY'. Lost in Grimblethorpe: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. lii-liii). The site of the vill lay to the north-east of Grimblethorpe Hall at TF244877 (PM).
3,52	SLOOTHBY. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
3,55	IN THREEKINGHAM. In the manuscript the initial I was changed from 'square' to rustic, and the place-name rubricated. This entry duplicates that at 67,11 (PM).
3,56	PARTS OF CHURCHES, PLOUGHS AND MEN. The manuscript has ho[min]um, genitive plural in error for ho[min]es, accusative plural, because the bishop had no 'parts' of men, as he had of churches and ploughs (CT).
	THEY DIVIDE NEWTON. See 3,32 (PM).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining 15 ruled lines of this column and all of folio 341d (also ruled), perhaps for the later inclusion, if necessary, of more of the bishop's lands (see 3,56 scribe note). On other such spaces, see 1,106 entry note (CT).
	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday wrote BRUNETORP in the left margin of the manuscript, in very pale ink, below the final line of this entry. It is not reproduced by Farley. This is the place-name Bonthorpe and may have been intended as a reminder to himself to add a holding of the bishop there. An attempt may perhaps have been made to erase it, though it is still legible; if so, this may be because he discovered that he had already entered the bishop's holding in Bonthorpe at 3,51. Alternatively, the memorandum may have been written during checking when he saw the entry there. For other marginal notes, see 24,90 scribe note and 38,12 scribe note, and Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', pp. 126-28 (= Erskine and Williams, The Story of Domesday Book, pp. 191-93) (CT).
4,1	EALDORMANN. The Domesday form Aldreman, which only occurs here as a personal name, represents the hypothetical Old English Ealdormann from the Old English word for 'alderman', 'ruler', 'chief officer': von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 241.
	BY THE BISHOP OF BAYEUX'S SEAL. That is, by a sealed document or charter (CT).
4,2	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. This is the Kolsveinn who held land as a tenant-in-chief in LIN 26 and who is identical with the man in 3,36. 8,13. 24,2. 28,3. 40,2. The lands mentioned here passed to the de La Haye family (DR).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. The name Wadard occurs on some 50 holdings in Domesday Book, all probably held by one individual. All but a couple of properties in Kent were held as a tenant of the Bishop of Bayeux, the exceptions being held from St Augustine's Abbey which accommodated other of Odo's tenants. This singular distribution proves Wadard's identity, confirmed by the descent of his holdings to form the core of the barony of Cogges: Sanders, English Baronies, pp. 36-37; Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 444 (JP).
4,6	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the opposite column (folio 342b) after the entry for Kingerby (4,21) and directed by transposition signs to its correct position on folio 342a after the manor of Ingham, of which it was an outlier. It was not a later addition to the text.
	IN COATES. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
	[WHO] HAVE. In the manuscript h[abe]nt (third person plural present indicative) would seem to be a mistake for h[abe]ntes (present participle) because there is already a main verb in the sentence (habet); it is very unlikely that the meaning is 'Ilbert has 3 villagers; 2 smallholders have 1 plough'. Compare WIL 67,39 lordship note and DEV 28,16 lordship note (CT).
4,7	MARGINAL S. In the manuscript M' was corrected to S' by the main scribe of Great Domesday using a darker ink. Farley misprinted as M', probably because the bottom of the S' is obscured by a crease in the parchment below the original M' (CT).
	"ESTAN" <OF FARNINGHAM>. Apart from the Bishop of Hereford, the name Estan occurs on 15 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing seven or eight individuals. Despite the distance separating these two properties, they were probably held by the same individual since they not only devolved upon one tenant-in-chief but both were subinfeudated to the same tenant, Wadard <of Cogges> (JP).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
	20 [***]. The scribe probably omitted in error what measured 20 (acres), though he may have intended the meadow to be 30+20 acres, perhaps indicating two stretches of meadow. This latter was the interpretation of Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 38 (CT).
4,9	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
	AND 1? FREEMAN. The manuscript has 7 7i soch'. It is possible that the second 7 was meant to be a i to which Farley corrected it (CT).
4,11	FIRSBY. Now represented by East Firsby and 'West Firsby', the latter a deserted village at SK991853 (PM).
4,12	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the bottom of folio 324b, but not below the last ruling, so its omission was discovered by him after he had written the entry for Rothwell (4,25) before he turned the folio over. He directed it to its correct position in the text by a transposition sign, though he wrote the corresponding sign above the manorial name Firsby on folio 342a, rather than at the end of the entry for that manor on folio 342b, which is the normal place for jurisdictions to be described (CT).
	NEWTON[-BY-TOFT]. In the manuscript the place-name Neutone is rubricated (PM).
4,15	ILBERT, THE BISHOP'S MAN, HAS 1 PLOUGH THERE HIMSELF. Or perhaps 'Ilbert, the bishop's man, has (them, that is, the 6 bovates) there; he (has) 1 plough himself'. The main scribe of Great Domesday extended the initial letter of the interlineation ipse .i. car' ('himself 1 plough') down to the line below to indicate that it belonged after ibi and before .vi. uill'. Farley printed a capital I and a separate insertion line, as he often did, though this implies that the interlineation is a separate sentence (CT).
4,16	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	NOW 11[?]s. It is very hard to tell in the manuscript what the number of shillings is; it resembles xv but with the right-hand part of the v. scraped, though not enough to make it look like xi. However, Farley printed xi (CT).
4,17	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. Apart from the earl, Harold's brother, the name Tosti is not particularly common, occurring on twenty holdings between Sussex and Lincolnshire. Lincolnshire has the only concentration, and all these devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux, making it likely that they had been held by the individual who can be identified as Tosti, 'one of King Edward's barons', according to the Ramsey Chronicle; see HUN 29,3 Erik note (JP). See also HUN D27 Tosti note.
4,18	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. See 4,17 Tosti note.
4,19	IN "SUMMERLEDE" [* OSGODBY *]. The Domesday Sūmerlede would appear to be the personal name Sumarlithi (3,20 Sumarlithi note) which the main scribe of Great Domesday mistakenly wrote as a place-name. This entry may refer to Osgodby, entered after the misplaced entry for Coates (see 4,6 entry note) after the other jurisdictions of Audleby (4,20-21): the details of the two entries are almost the same. A similar error occurs at 28,22 with the same name, and see 24,26 "Offran" note and CN28 "Schemin" note (PM-CT). Compare SHR 6,3 "Lel" note.
4,20	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. See 4,17 Tosti note.
4,21	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. Apart from the earl, Harold's brother, the name Tosti is not particularly common, occurring on twenty holdings between Sussex and Lincolnshire. Lincolnshire has the only concentration, and all these devolved upon the Bishop of Bayeux, making it likely that they had been held by the individual who can be identified as Tosti, 'one of King Edward's barons', according to the Ramsey Chronicle; see also HUN 29,3 Erik note (JP).
4,22	OSGODBY. See 4,19 "Summerlede" note.
4,23	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ERNEIS [* OF BURON *]. Although the name Erneis occurs fairly frequently in Domesday Book, the number of individuals who held the name was probably only four, the most important of whom was Erneis of Buron, tenant-in-chief in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, in which counties all other holdings of an Erneis also belonged to him, as testified by their descent: VCH Yorkshire, ii. pp. 179-81. See also Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 191 (JP).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,24	`AUTBY'. A deserted village, now represented by Autby Farm in the parish of North Thoresby: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xlviii (PM). The Phillimore printed edition has 'Audby'.
	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ERNEIS [* OF BURON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,25	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ERNEIS [* OF BURON *]. See 4,23 Erneis note.
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,28	WADARD <OF COGGES>. Wadard is named and depicted on the Bayeux Tapestry; see KEN D8 Wadard note (PM). On his identification, see 4,2 Wadard note.
4,29	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, squeezed into a small space left at the end of the entry for Keelby (4,28). He used a thinner pen and wrote smaller to make it fit.
	"WENFLET". The place-name form is the equivalent of Wainfleet which is, however, improbably distant. Canon Foster suggested a scribal error for the lost Houflet at approximately TA238130 (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lviii), though palaeographically it is difficult to propose a likely error in transcription (PM).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,30	{{JURISDICTION}} "INLAND". The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote soca and then corrected it by interlining inland above it, extending the i down to cover the s of soca and underlining that word for deletion. Farley printed a separate insertion mark below the inland and put a capital I for the first letter.
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,31	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,32	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,33	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,34	'SOUTH COATES' [* [LITTLE] COATES *]. Domesday distinguishes two adjacent settlements as Sudcotes (here and in 4,35. 30,13) and Cotes (4,35. 12,16. 27,3-4. 32,5. 44,8. CN12). 'South Coates' was later Little Coates and Coates was [Great] Coates.
4,35	'SOUTH COTES' [* [LITTLE] COATES *]. See 4,34 Coates note.
4,37	`ITTERBY'. A hamlet in Cleethorpes, Seaview Street representing the former High Street of the vill (PM).
4,38	2 PARTS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected an original iii. partes to ii by the erasure of the last minim; a new dot after the ii has been added. Farley misprinted iii. partes. (CT).
4,39	BROKLAUSS. The manuscript has Broclos. Farley misprinted Brodos (CT).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,40	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,42	5 OXEN. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the number of oxen by joining together the two minims of his original ii. to make v. (CT).
	TURF-LAND. Domesday toruelande here and at 12,20 represents either Old English hypothetical turf-land or Old Norse hypothetical torf-land, the unrecorded predecessors of Modern English turf-land (eighteenth century, according to the Oxford English Dictionary) meaning 'land where peat is cut' (CT).
	[* YOUNG *] EDWARD. There is a repaired hole in the manuscript after the personal name; it is not a blank 'intended for a name' as suggested by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 42 note 1. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote round this hole, the ep'o baioc'. being the other side of it. Farley did not indicate this (CT).
		Young Edward is named as holding land in three counties, as the predecessor of the Count of Mortain and Walter Giffard in Buckinghamshire and of Countess Judith in Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire. There are few unidentified Edwards in those three counties and is possible, even likely, that all were this man. The substantial manor of Broughton (BUK 15,1) acquired by William of Warenne was less than 10 miles from Young Edward's principal manor of Wing (BUK 12,7) and even closer to another of his holdings, at Crafton (BUK 12,8). This, the status of the holding, and the paucity of unidentified Edwards makes it likely that Warenne's predecessor was Young Edward here and at Caversfield (BUK 15,2), even though the Edward on that holding was described as a thane of Earl Tosti: Warenne is unlikely to have had two predecessors named Edward. In Lincolnshire, the unidentified Edward at Bytham (30,31) was encircled by Judith's holdings; and the Edward who exchanged the substantial manor of Thoresby (4,42) with the Bishop of Bayeux can only have been someone of the status of Young Edward. If he were that man, then he had probably also held the nearby holding at Binbrook. Finally, in Northamptonshire, apart from the predecessor of Countess Judith, the one unidentified Edward held Empingham, just three miles from her manor of Tickencote. See also Clarke, English Nobility, p. 306, who accidentally assigns the Buckinghamshire holdings to Hertfordshire and whose list omits BUK 15,1-2 and NTH 35,9; he includes Binbrook but not Thoresby, which was not explicitly stated to be in Edward's possession in 1066 (JP).
4,45	`BURRETH'. Lost in Tupholme at TF152697: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lii (PM).
4,47	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line on folio 342d, the initial letters being written in the 'tramlines'. It thus interrupted the account of Langton (4,51) which continued on folio 343a. He used transposition signs to indicate its correct position on folio 342d after the manor of Hainton (4,46).
	IN SOUTHREY. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
4,51	LANGTON AND "TORP". In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square' and Langton is manorial. Torp is rubricated (PM).
4,53	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,55	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line on folio 343a, the initial letters being in the 'tramlines'. It thus interrupted the entry for Ailby (4,63) which continued onto folio 343b. He wrote in a smaller script and did not rubricate the place-name TORP, so this addition was made at a late stage, after the county had been rubricated. The scribe used transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the column above after the manor of Kirkby-on-Bain.
	EUDO [* SON OF SPIREWIC *]. Eudo son of Spirewic; see 29,8;28;34; the information in the last is duplicated here in a somewhat fuller version (PM).
4,57	COCKERINGTON. Now represented by North Cockerington and South Cockerington, but a formal identification has not proved possible (PM).
4,59	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,60	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,61	VALUE BEFORE 1066, 60s. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the number of shillings from an original xx, or possibly xi (CT).
4,65	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
4,66	14 FREEMEN. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .xiii., then he joined the last two minims together to make a v, giving the number xiv. Farley misprinted .xiii. (CT).
	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
4,69	ERIK <OF TEALBY>. The name Erik occurs on ten holdings in Domesday Book. There are sufficient links between them to suggest that they refer to a single individual, despite being spread between three counties and devolving upon several tenants-in-chief. The present entry and its dependencies, held T.R.E. by Swein, Erik and Tosti, is connected to another group held by Erik centred on Tealby (28,20-24) by the intermediate tenure of one Rainer the deacon (CN13;18), the Tealby group in turn being connected to another holding of Erik (14,7) by soke in Willingham. Keelby (47,3), the final holding in Lincolnshire held by Erik, is just a few miles away from the main group of his properties. Thistleton [RUT 2,8], by contrast, is some distance from the Lincolnshire holdings; and Catworth and Sawtry in Huntingdonshire (HUN 29,3. 19,1. D27) even more so. But Sawtry provides a possible link between the three counties. The claims for Huntingdonshire state that the Tosti who had held Sawtry was the brother of Erik, a claim confirmed by the Ramsey Chronicle (Early Charters of Eastern England, p. 235 no. 323). As already noted, the main group of Erik's holdings in Lincolnshire were entered under the names of Erik, Tosti and Swein. It seems probable that this Erik and Tosti were the same men as the Huntingdonshire brothers. Their extensive properties (and this Tosti may have been the Tosti holding several other Lincolnshire holdings) makes the Ramsey Chronicle's description of Tosti as unus ex baronibus regis Edwardi ('one of King Edward's barons') comprehensible. Thistleton is almost midway between the Huntingdonshire and Lincolnshire holdings and would have provided a useful staging point (JP).
	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. See 4,17 Tosti note.
4,70	CUSTOMARY DUES AND THE FERRY. The ferry is also referred to in Ralph of Mortimer's holding at 36,1. He apparently held it jointly with the bishop; see CN14 (PM).
	VALUE. In the context the clause probably refers to the three manors of Laceby, Bradley and Scartho (4,69). The reference to the ferry at Grimsby does not constitute a separate entry, though rendered as such by Farley and retained here (PM).
	ERIK <OF TEALBY>. See 4,69 Erik note.
	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. See 4,17 Tosti note.
4,71	ERIK <OF TEALBY>. See 4,69 Erik note.
	TOSTI <OF SAWTRY>. See 4,17 Tosti note.
4,72	LESS THE THIRD PART OF 1 BOVATE. Added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; he began the phrase in the right-hand margin and wrote the rest over an erasure (of something shorter, hence the compression) at the beginning of the next line (CT).
4,74	2 CARUCATES. In the manuscript there is no sign that the .ii. car' has been corrected, as suggested by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 45 note 6. There are merely some tiny ink blots surrounding the .ii. (CT).
	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
4,75	IN THORGANBY. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square', altered from a rustic form (PM).
4,76	GLADWIN <OF DODDINGTON>. The small holding at Doddington was over 30 miles from any other Gladwin and without tenurial associations with any of them. It was probably the sole property of this man (JP).
4,78	CASTHORPE. There was once a village here, now lost in Barrowby, the name commemorated by Casthorpe Lodge and Casthorpe House at SK863350: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liii (PM).
	NOW 30[s]. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably omitted sol' here because of lack of room, as in several other cases, but he also omitted it, and lib' for £, on numerous occasions when there was no shortage of space: no doubt he thought that the sol' and lib' in the previous statements would do service for the succeeding number (CT).
4,80	IN CANWICK. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square' and the place-name manorial (PM).
	2 [***]. After the ii. one or two letters were erased; the resultant space is rather small for the later inclusion of uill' (for 'villagers') or soch' (for 'Freemen'). Farley printed a much larger space, which is misleading (CT).
4,81	WADARD <OF COGGES>. See 4,2 Wadard note.
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the remaining 22 ruled lines of folio 343c were left blank by the main scribe of Great Domesday, probably for the later addition, if necessary, of more of the bishop's land; see 1,106 entry note (CT).
5,1	IN LONDONTHORPE. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square' and the place-name manorial (PM).
	CHURCH OF GRANTHAM. St Wulfram's, the parish church, then held by Bishop Osmund of Salisbury (PM).
5,2	"NONGETUNE". See 1,13 "Nongtone" note (PM).
5,3	VALUE OF THIS LAND. The value probably refers to 5,1-3. Grantham church is valued at 1,9 (PM-CT).
6,1	AFTER THIS ENTRY the remainder of folio 343d, 26 ruled lines, was left blank by the main scribe of Great Domesday, probably for the later inclusion, if necessary, of other lands of the Bishop of Coutances. See 1,106 entry (CT).
7,1	A CHURCH. The Benedictine monastery of Stow founded by Bishop Eadnoth of Dorchester-on-Thames c. 1016, and endowed by Earl Leofric and (Lady) Godiva in 1055-1057. It was re-established by William II c. 1091, but became the parish church at the restoration of Eynsham Abbey in 1109; see Hill, Medieval Lincoln, pp. 75-76; Knowles and Hadcock, Medieval Religious Houses, p. 78. See 7,55 for a reference to a monk of the house, perhaps a survivor of Leofric's endowment (PM).
7,7	{{AND 6 BOVATES}}. This phrase was lined through for deletion in the manuscript. (CT).
7,8	6 CANONS OF LINCOLN. Welton had been granted to Lincoln as a prebend by William: the Lincoln Cathedral Registrum Antiquissimum (Foster, i. p. 25); see Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 107 (PM).
7,11	KNAITH. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
7,12	STOW. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
7,13	THIS ENTRY was added in a smaller script by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the bottom margin below the last ruled line of folio 344a. This is probably part of the land referred to in CS5 held by Alsi and Wulfgrim and claimed by Bishop Remigius (PM-CT).
7,14	THE MARGINAL fđ written beside this entry and the nine others in this fief on folios 344 and 345 (7,14-15;17;20;22-24;29;48;54) may be some form of checking mark. It is impossible to tell whether the đ is the Anglo-Saxon letter for th or the ordinary letter d with an abbreviation line through it. If the latter, it may abbreviate feudum ('holding' or 'fee'). These occurrences of fđ are probably, though not necessarily, linked with the occurrence of marginal f (on which see 8,14 marginal note). See Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', pp. 129-31 (=Erskine and Williams, The Story of Domesday Book, pp. 195-97) (CT).
7,15	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
7,16	GRAYINGHAM. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated (PM).
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. He was the predecessor of Bishop Remigius in many places, identified as Healfdene [son of] Topi at 7,18. The circumstances are described in CK45 Healfdene note (PM).
7,17	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
7,18	EXACTIONS 10s. This phrase may have been added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, as it extends into the right margin of the manuscript, but if so, it was probably an early addition as the ink is the same colour as the adjacent text (CT).
7,19	EXACTIONS 10s. This phrase may have been added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, as it extends into the right margin of the manuscript, but if so, it was probably an early addition as the ink is the same colour as the adjacent text (CT).
7,20	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
	WORLABY. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated (PM).
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,22	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,23	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
7,24	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
7,25	IN [NORTH] ORMSBY. In the manuscript the initial I of In was changed from a 'square' capital to a rustic one (PM).
7,27	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,29	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
	IN SOUTHREY. In the manuscript the 'square' initial I has been changed to a rustic one; the place-name is rubricated (PM).
7,30	DUNSBY. See CK45 (PM).
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	RALPH <OF KIMCOTE>. Keats-Rohan (Domesday People, p. 345) suggests that this Ralph ['the bishop's man'] here and in 7,53 might be the same as the Bishop of Lincoln's subtenant on seven estates in Leicestershire (LEC 3,5-10;14), one of which was Kimcote.
7,31	HACONBY. In the manuscript the place-name is half rubricated (PM).
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	RALPH <OF KIMCOTE>. See 7,30 Ralph note.
7,32	`RINGSTONE'. Lost in Rippingale at approximately TF094268: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxiii (PM).
	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,33	HEALFDENE [* SON OF TOPI *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,34	ITS VALUATION IS [INCLUDED] IN GOSBERTON. At 7,36 (PM).
7,36	IN GOSBERTON. In the manuscript the place-name is Gozeberdecherca, literally 'Gosbert's church', though no church is mentioned (PM). The 'church' element also occurs in 12,76 (Gosebertechirche) and in the associated entry in the Clamores (CK69).
7,37	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, compressed into the space left after the value of 7,36 (CT).
7,38	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,39	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
	17 VILLAGERS. Repeated in error at the top of folio 344d (CT).
7,40	NOW 20s. It is possible that this superfluous 1086 value should have been 'exactions 20s': Tailla in place of m[od]o, as perhaps also in 14,93 (14,93 now note). See 7,44 entry note (CT).
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. Note to be supplied (JP).
7,41	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,42	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,43	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,44	THIS ENTRY was inserted by the main scribe of Great Domesday into the gap remaining at the end of the entry for Sleaford (7,43), though the ink colour is the same as in the surrounding entries. It is not rubricated. Canon Foster suggested that the superfluous 'now 20s' at the end of the value statement for Bitchfield (7,40: 7,40 now note) belonged with the present entry as 'no figure is given for the present value': Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 52 note 2. However, Val' in this entry does not abbreviate the past tense as he translated it, but the present tense Valet, so the 'now 20s' would be superfluous here (CT).
7,45	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,46	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,47	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,48	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
	OSMUND. Perhaps an Anglicisation of the Scandinavian personal name Asmundr: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 35 (PM).
7,49	`LAYTHORPE'. Lost in Kirkby-la-Thorpe, though the name survives [as La Thorpe] in the name of the parish. The Domesday place-name form [Leduluetorp] indicates that this was Leithulfr's torp: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 113 (PM).
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,50	OF THIS JURISDICTION. Perhaps beginning a new section (PM).
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,51	CANWICK. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM)
	BARTHI <OF SLEAFORD>. See T5 Barthi note.
7,53	RALPH <OF KIMCOTE>. See 7,30 Ralph note.
7,54	FOR THE MARGINAL fđ beside this entry in the manuscript, see 7,14 marginal note.
	IN HOUGHAM. See 56,5 (PM).
7,56	LOUTH. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote LVDES over the erasure of an original place-name which ended in I (CT).
	1 MARKET AT 29s. This statement is misplaced, in the middle of the list of population instead of with the mills. Perhaps in the original returns the details of the market and the number of burgesses were entered together (CT).
7,58	THIS ENTRY and the next one (7,59) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the space left after the end of LIN 7 (of which 12 ruled lines on folio 345a and the whole of folio 345b still remain blank; see 1,106 entry note). The pen used is thinner and there are signs that these entries may have been added on different occasions; neither is rubricated (CT).
7,59	THIS ENTRY like 7,58 was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the space left after the end of LIN 7; see 7,58 entry note.
8	LAND OF ST PETER'S OF PETERBOROUGH. The Domesday evidence on the Peterborough estate is amplified by a series of texts which belong to the generation or so after the Domesday Survey. The Black Book (Liber Niger) of Peterborough (Society of Antiquaries, manuscript 60; see Davis, Medieval Cartularies, no. 754) contains inter alia a survey of the abbey's manors (Descriptio Maneriorum) in Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire, Huntingdonshire and Bedfordshire (dating from 1125 x 1128), a list of the abbey's knights in c. 1105 (Descriptio Militum), and a survey of the abbey's estates in Lincolnshire in c. 1100 (Descriptio Terrarum). All three texts are printed in an appendix to Stapleton's edition of the Peterborough Chronicle (Stapleton, Chronicon Petroburgense, pp. 157-82). The Descriptio Terrarum is discussed by Stenton, Types of Manorial Structure, pp. 6-9. The Descriptio Militum is printed and discussed by King, 'Peterborough "Descriptio Militum'''. A commentary on the events of the Domesday settlement which makes use of these and other, now lost, sources appears in the Chronicle of Hugh Candidus, which dates from the late twelfth century (PM-CT).
8,2	`HOLME'. Lost in Sudbrooke, the name commemorated by Sudbrooke Holme at TF043762: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxxxvi (PM).
8,4	MEADOW ... PASTURABLE WOODLAND. It is impossible to tell whether these details belong only to the abbot's men (like the 7 villagers and 2 Freemen) or to the manor as a whole. See 31,9 meadow note (CT).
8,5	"ADEWELLE". An unidentified place-name represented by Careby in thirteenth-century sources (DR).
8,6	IN WITHAM[-ON-THE-HILL]. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square', and the place-name is rubricated. This entry is equivalent to Witham in the Descriptio Terrarum (Stapleton, Chronicon Petroburgense, p. 178) where it is described as a manor (PM).
	TOFT AND LOUND. Here and at 8,34 written as one word, Toftlund. At 24,32, however, the scribe inserted 7 ('and') between the two place-names (PM).
8,7	"BERGESTORP". An unidentified place-name, represented in later sources by Holywell and Aunby (DR).
		Canon Foster suggested that this might be Bowthorpe (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. l-li) but this seems unlikely in view of the fact that Bowthorpe was a manor of Crowland Abbey. Bergestorp may represent Old English be(o)rg, Scandinavian berg ('hill' or 'mound'), or alternatively the Scandinavian female personal name Bjorg: Gillian Fellows Jensen, personal comment (PM).
	SASWALO <OF BYTHAM>. The name Saswalo occurs on 22 holdings in Domesday Book, probably representing three or four individuals. The properties of Saswalo, the tenant of Henry of Ferrers, lie to the north, south and west of Bytham which may therefore have belonged to this man; but there are no apparent connections between Saswalo of Houghpark and Peterborough Abbey, nor indeed between the abbey and Henry of Ferrers (JP).
	VALUE BEFORE 1066 OF THIS JURISDICTION. The Latin soch' is the regular abbreviation in Domesday Lincolnshire for sochemannus ('Freeman'), not for soca ('jurisdiction'), though the latter would seem to be the meaning here. It is no doubt a scribal error: socha is another spelling of soca, though not one used by the main scribe of Great Domesday in Lincolnshire. In 7,36 he corrected his original soca to soch' CT).
8,8	ANSKETIL [* OF SAINT-MEDARD *]. Ansketil of Saint Médard in the list of Peterborough's knights: King, 'Peterborough "Descriptio Militum''', p. 97. He also held Wittering in Northamptonshire: NTH 6a,4 (PM).
8,9	GILBERT. Gilbert of Néville: King, 'Peterborough "Descriptio Militum"'', p. 13. The connection with Walcot is also made by Hugh Candidus (Round, Feudal England, pp. 166-67). In the list of Peterborough's knights his holding is given as 2 carucates, thus amplifying the Domesday record and making it plain that Peterborough Abbey retained three of the five carucates (PM).
8,12	`HOUGHTON'. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated. 'Houghton' is lost in Grantham, and was represented by Houghton Farm at SK927742: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lviii (PM).
		The Grid Reference in this note in the Phillimore printed edition and the four-figure form given in the index to that volume (9274) are both in error; these put 'Houghton' to the west of Lincoln, whereas Foster and Longley state that it lay in Grantham Ancient Parish. The correct reference is SK927342; see Lay Subsidy Roll (1334), p. 171. Houghton Paper Mill appears there on the first series one-inch Ordnance Survey map (sheet 70 of 124, reprinted as sheet 36 in 1970). There is a Houghton Road on modern maps, but it appears that Houghton Farm is now represented by Papermill Farm.
8,13	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. The circumstances surrounding Kolsveinn's holding are described in the Peterborough list of knights: 'Picot, Kolsveinn's son, has ½ carucate in Riseholme, which the abbot gave his father for such service that he might be in the pleas of the abbey and that he might support his affairs and men in the shire and in other places' (King, 'Peterborough "Descriptio Militum''', p. 100) (PM).
	ABBOT TUROLD. The Norman abbot who succeeded Brand (see CW16 manors note) in 1069. According to Hugh Candidus' Chronicle (Mellows, p. 84) he 'badly broke up his compact estate and gave lands to his kinsfolk and the knights who came with him' (PM).
8,14	THE MARGINAL f beside this entry and 8,18 and those beside seven entries on folio 346a (8,19-20;23;25;27-29) and the one on folio 366a next to LIN 49 chapter head (not shown by Farley) are probably some form of checking mark, though it is not clear to what they refer. With the exception of the one beside 8,25, they are written in paler ink than the text at these points and than the marginal fđs which seem to be related to them (see 7,14 marginal note). There are similar instances of f in several other Domesday counties. See Thorn, 'Marginal Notes and Signs', pp. 129-31 (=Erskine and Williams, The Story of Domesday Book, pp. 195-97) (CT).
8,15	ESKIL. A brother of Abbot Brand. The Peterborough tradition of his bequests to the abbey survives in the Black Book of Peterborough (Society of Antiquaries manuscript 60 folio 25v), and was used by Hugh Candidus for his Chronicle (Mellows, pp. 40-41) (PM).
	RICHARD. See 8,20 Ralph note (PM).
8,17	SCOTTER. Alnoth and Eskil's holdings were of 4 carucates each: Stapleton, Chronicon Petroburgense, p. 182 (PM).
8,18	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
8,19	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
8,20	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
	RALPH. Ralph of Néville: King, 'Peterborough "Descriptio Militum''', p. 52. He also held at Raventhorpe (8,23). Hugh Candidus also connects Ralph with Scotton, said in Domesday (8,15) to be held by Richard. Canon Foster argued that this represented a scribal error and pointed also to the association of Ralph of Néville with Scotton's jurisdiction in Northorpe at 8,16 and CW14: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 56 (PM).
8,21	1 FREEMAN WHO PLOUGHS WITH 1 OX. Domesday .i. boū must either be a rather unusual abbreviation for .i. boue, ablative (see 13,13 for it in full in a similar statement), or the meaning is '1 Freeman who ploughs 1 bovate' (boū abbreviating bouatam), but this is not the normal word in this phrase. In 8,27;30, for example, boū abbreviates boues and bouem respectively in the plough estimates (PM-CT).
8,23	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
	RAVENTHORPE. Any village that was here is now lost, but the site is represented by Raventhorpe Farm (PM).
8,24	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the space left after the value of 8,23 and it extends into the central margin; it is in slightly paler ink (CT).
8,25	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
8,27	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
	RISBY. Now represented by High Risby at SE920148 and Low Risby at SE930150 (PM).
	SAWCLIFFE. Any village that was here is now lost, but the name survives as Sawcliffe Farm at SE912145 (PM).
8,28	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
8,29	FOR THE MARGINAL f written beside this entry, see 8,14 marginal note.
	ALKBOROUGH; 1 CARUCATE. '1 carucate of the villagers', according to the Descriptio Terrarum (Stapleton, Chronicon Petroburgense, p. 182) (PM).
8,30	`HAIRBY'. Earlier 'Haythby'. Lost in West Halton: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lvii (PM).
8,31	MEADOW, 20 ACRES. It is impossible to tell whether acras here is the object of 'William ... has' or 'the villagers ... have'; this is a problem also in 12,1 and 18,19 (CT).
8,33	AND THE ABBOT'S VILLAGERS. It is not clear whether the villagers as well as Geoffrey hold the acres of meadow despite the singular tenet, or whether Geoffrey holds the acres and the villagers. Nor is it certain that uill' abbreviates the plural rather than the singular (CT).
8,34	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. Identified by Round (Round, Feudal England, pp. 159-61) as Hereward the 'Wake' whose successor was Asfrith, see CK4. He is described by Hugh Candidus as a 'man of the monks'. Round further speculated that he was identical with the man of the same name at 42,9 and CK48 (PM).
		Hereward is also known as 'of Bourne'. The two Lincolnshire Clamores entries put the identification of the Hereward of legend with the pre-Conquest tenant of Peterborough Abbey and predecessor of Oger the Breton beyond reasonable doubt. See Hart, The Danelaw, pp. 625-48, and Williams, The English and the Norman Conquest, pp. 49-51.
		For other Herewards named in Domesday Book, see WAR 16,26 Hereward note (JP).
8,35	STOWE. Now represented by Stowe Farm at TF107711 (PM).
	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
8,36	GODFREY. Godfrey of Cambrai, as also at 8,38. His holding at Barholm as a Peterborough tenant is recalled by Hugh Candidus in his Chronicle (Mellows, pp. 113-14). See 51,4 (PM).
8,37	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
8,38	A JURISDICTION OF WITHAM[-ON-THE-HILL], [A MANOR] OF ST PETER'S OF PETERBOROUGH. The manuscript has Soca in Werche Sancti Petri de Burg. The word Werche here is definitely either Old English weorc ('work'), corresponding to Latin opus, or geweorc ('fortification'); it may well be connected with the legal term Old English weorcland ('land for which labour is rendered'); but any of the senses of Latin opus could be involved here (PM).
		The Phillimore translation associated with this note ('A jurisdiction of St Peter's of Peterborough work') makes no sense and after the commonly occurring Soca in ... a place-name would be expected. In the context, it is more likely that Werche is the result of a series of scribal errors for Withā (Witham-on-the-Hill), the abbey's manor at 8,34: i and e, th and ch, ā and e, can easily be confused. Compare Soca in Withā in 8,37 and Soca in Burg in 8,36. The addition Sancti Petri de Burg, seemingly otiose in the context, may be because the place-name was already so badly corrupted in the scribe's source that he did not recognize it, so felt the need to emphasize that nonetheless it was a manor of Peterborough Abbey, or because there was another manor in Witham-on-the-Hill (35,11) held by Ralph Paynel. In the Alecto edition this sentence is translated '[It is] sokeland for the use of Peterborough Abbey'.
8,39	THURLBY. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote TVROLDEBI, but then interlined a V above the D (under which he then wrote a deletion line, not a dot as Farley printed). The form TVROLVEBI is also found at 8,4, and it appears as Torulfbi at 27,52 and Turoluebi at 59,8 (CT).
9,1	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. See CK27 and CK27 Baldwin note (PM). On Aelric son of Mergeat, see LEC 16,9 Aelric note; see also 65,1 Aelric note.
9,2	AELRIC SON OF MERGEAT. See 9,1 Aelric note.
10,1	2 CHURCHES. The second is probably that of All Saints, later St Giles in Old Sleaford: Roffe, 'Origins' (PM).
10,4	THREEKINGHAM. The manuscript has TRICHINGHĀ (a TR ligature); Farley misprinted TRRICHINGHĀ (CT).
10,5	"COTELAND". Lost in Anwick (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left the remaining 27 ruled lines blank, probably for the later inclusion of more manors of Ramsey Abbey if they should be discovered. See 1,106 entry note (CT).
11,9	THORALD THE SHERIFF. The post-Conquest sheriff who is known to have been active between 1072 and 1079; see Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 96; Round, Feudal England, pp. 328-29) (PM).
12,1	GUNNHVATI. His manor is described as 1 carucate in CW10 (PM).
	MEADOW ... ACRES. See 8,31 acres note for the ambiguity of the Latin here (CT).
	WATER-MEADOW. Domesday broce, genitive singular after acras, is a first declension Latinization of Old English broc. See HEF 24,2 water-meadow note for other forms. Broc came to mean 'a brook', but originally the word meant 'marsh', 'bog' etc., a sense retained by 'brook' ('water-meadow') in the Modern English dialects of Kent, Sussex and Surrey and in medieval field names in Cambridgeshire and Essex and in some place-names; see Ekwall, Dictionary of English Placenames, under broc. Gate Burton is near the River Trent (PM-CT).
12,3	VILLAGERS ... 1 PLOUGH. In the manuscript .i. car' has been corrected by erasure from .ii. car'.
	VALUE ... 40s. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .xx. sol' for the T.R.E. value, but then erased the second x and replaced it with l (CT).
12,5	HEAPHAM. The manuscript has Iopehā. Farley misprinted Lopehā; see 1,48 Heapham note (CT).
12,7	WILGRIM. Domesday Welgrim represents Old German Wilgrim: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 415. However, it may be a scribal error for Vlgrim, which represents Old Norse Ulfgrimr: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 399. The only other occurrence of this name in Domesday is in CW15 as Wilgrim and there is evidence that that is a scribal error for Vlgrim; see CW15 Wilgrim note.
	LANDRIC [* OF HORNBY *]. The name occurs 16 times in Domesday Book, probably representing three individuals. In Yorkshire and Lincolnshire the Landric who held seven manors from Count Alan of Brittany has been identified as Landric of Hornby. He may also be same man who held as a minor tenant-in-chief at Bishopthorpe and Acaster Selby since Landric witnessed a charter of Count Alan' honor of Richmond involving land at Acaster. Finally, a Landric the carpenter in mentioned at York. See Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 288 (JP).
12,9	GRIMBALD KRAKR. Domesday crac represents Krakr ('crow', 'raven'): Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 181; Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 361 (PM).
12,13	6 [VILLAGERS?]. In the manuscript there is vi with nothing to indicate an omitted word; it could be uill[ani], but one cannot be sure (CT).
12,20	TURF-LAND. See 4,42 turf-land note (CT).
12,25	`FENBY'. A deserted village at TF260993, the name surviving in Ashby-cum-Fenby
	to the north (PM).
12,27	CADEBY. This was formerly 'North Cadeby'. A former settlement here is lost at TF270960. The site of the vill lay to the east of Cadeby Hall. It was later in Ludborough Wapentake, though it appears here in the wapentake sequence with 'Haverstoe' Wapentake (PM).
12,29	ERNWIN THE PRIEST. Possibly the kinsman of Godric son of Garwine in C16 and a substantial landowner in Lincolnshire; see Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 46. The circumstances of his capture, referred to here are not known, though he retained some lands in Domesday; see 68,25 (PM).
12,31	3 BROTHERS. LIN 12,31
	HIS 3 BROTHERS. Or '3 brothers of his' as he may have had more than three (see 3,41 brothers note). They may be One, Eadric and Ecgwulf who had held Beesby (12,29) with Ingimundr (CT).
12,37	LANDRIC [* OF HORNBY *]. See 12,7 Landric note.
	THE FOURTH PART. In the manuscript iiii. partē with ta (in error for tā) interlined above the iiii to clarify that the number is an ordinal. Farley misprinted parte, but partem is accusative after h[abe]t two lines previously, as is the acras of the meadow (CT).
12,38	'HAVERSTOE' WAPENTAKE. Added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the left margin. The insertion of the wapentake heads in the remainder of the chapter appears to be post-scriptal, though occasionally the headings are inserted into gaps in the text: Roffe, 'Lincolnshire Hundred', p. 29 (PM).
12,40	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. Identified as named from his manor of Mumby in the Lindsey Survey: Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 195 (JP).
12,41	IT IS A JURISDICTION. Added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin (CT).
	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,42	CNUT <OF SPRIDLINGTON>. This name is rare south of the Humber, occurring only seven times and possibly representing four individuals. Of the three holdings in Lincolnshire, two devolved upon the same tenant-in-chief and the third was less than three miles from the others; all three therefore probably belonged to the same individual (JP).
12,45	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 347d, but the ink colour is the same as for the rest of the column, so it may have been an early insertion. The scribe used transposition signs, which he rubricated, to indicate its correct position after the other dependency of Hough-on-the-Hill (CT).
12,46	THIS ENTRY may have been added in the space probably originally left between the manors of Hough-on-the-Hill and Brant Broughton; the addition was probably early, because there is no change in ink colour (CT).
12,47	ANOTHER. The accusative alios here would suggest that uill', bord' and soch' ought to be extended to the accusative case and that they are all the object of 'Count Alan has in lordship'. However, because it would be very unusual for Freemen in particular to be 'in lordship', they are probably just the object of h't with the in d'nio belonging as usual only with the ploughs. Similarly in 12,55: h't ... in d'nio ... ull'os ... (CT).
	CADIO <OF BROUGHTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
12,48	FOUR HUNDREDS. It is possible that the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote IIII for II here; this is suggested both by the 24-carucate extent of the two places and the fact that the normal customary due for the supplies of horses seems in Lincolnshire, to have been 50s for one hundred (see 12,43;47) and 100s is the payment mentioned here, which is the same as for the two hundreds of (Long) Bennington (12,49) (CT).
12,49	14 CARUCATES. The manuscript has xiiii. corrected from xxiiii., the first x having been erased, though still partly visible. One would expect 24 carucates for 'two hundreds' (CT).
12,54	1 FREEMAN. In the manuscript .i. soch's clearly; Farley misprinted .i. soch' (CT).
12,55	BILLINGBOROUGH. The manuscript has BILINGEBVRG. Farley misprinted BILINGE. VRG; the EB are rubbed and faint (CT).
	[AND] [***] VILLAGERS. Farley left a gap for the number, which has been rubbed off the parchment. There is room for .iii. or .iiii., certainly a number longer than .ii. which is the 'somewhat doubtful' reading chosen by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 67 note 3. There is no sign of an expected 7 to link the accusative uill[an]os with h[abe]t ... in the previous line (CT).
12,57	HARROWBY - HORBLING -. In the manuscript ORBELINGE (that is, Horbling) is interlined above HERIGERBI (Harrowby) in a slightly darker ink; it is not rubricated and HERIGERBI is not underlined for deletion (CT).
12,58	VALUE ... 16s. In the manuscript there is an ink smudge over the xvi, but it has not been corrected, as stated by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 67 note 5 (CT).
12,59	BISHOP WULFWY. Bishop of Dorchester-on-Thames 1053-1067, Remigius' predecessor before the removal of the see to Lincoln. This land is probably the land known as Osferthun, 'Osferth's tun' (lost in Drayton) granted by Aethelric, Bishop of Dorchester-on-Thames (1016-1034) to Ramsey Abbey to provide beans, salt and honey for the monks. The Ramsey Chronicle (Macray, p. 145) says that it was later held by Count Alan; see Early Charters of Eastern England, p. 102 (PM). See CK65.
12,62	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin of folio 348b next to another holding in Donington (12,61); it is unrubricated. At the same time he added an M' in the central margin level with both the adjacent entry for Donington and the marginal addition, though he did not line it up with the M' beside Drayton (12,60), but wrote it more centrally, as it in fact belongs to the present entry, not to 12,61 which is not a manor but an outlier.
	DONINGTON. The manuscript has Dōnintune; Farley misprinted Dōninctune. (CT).
12,63	'WOLMERSTY' WAPENTAKE. Later Skirbeck Wapentake; see {Introduction: Wapentakes} (PM).
12,67	13? VILLAGERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday seems to have corrected viii. to xiii. and then interlined cī (for tredecim) to clarify the alteration. However, the v appears clearer and in darker ink than the x, while the cī is in paler ink, both of which might suggest that the correction was from xiii. to viii. (CT).
	2 CHURCHES. The latter is probably the church of St Botolph in Boston which Count Alan gave to St Mary's, York, in 1090. Boston is probably a Norman creation like Richmond; see Beresford and Joseph, Medieval England, p. 217; Harden 'Historical Development in Medieval Boston' (PM).
12,69	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin; it is unrubricated and there are no transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the text (CT).
		The entry is probably equivalent to 12,88; see Lincolnshire Archives Office, Longley 7/11 (DR).
12,72	`RISKENTON'. Lost in Kirton at TF300380: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxiii; Hallam, Settlement and Society, pp. 54-55, 58-59 (PM).
	LAND FOR AS MANY PLOUGHS. Added by the main scribe of Great Domesday mostly over an erasure and extending into the central margin of the manuscript; see 31,12 land note (CT).
12,74	"RICHE". Lost in Wigtoft: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxii. The name derives from Old English ric ('a narrow strip') denoting a strip of land or a stream or ditch; see English Place-Name Elements, ii. p. 83 (PM).
12,76	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
12,77	"TRIC". The name is not recorded after 1086, but appears later to be represented by Skegness: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxx (PM).
12,80	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,81	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,82	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,83	THIS ENTRY and the next (12,84) were written over the erasure of seven lines of original text; the last line of 12,84 was not written on the erased area (CT).
12,84	THIS ENTRY and the previous one (12,83) were written over the erasure of seven lines of original text; the last line of this entry was not written on the erased area (CT).
	5 CARUCATES. See 1,33 Alan note (PM).
	LANDRIC [* OF HORNBY *]. See 12,7 Landric note.
	IT IS ADJUDGED FOR THE KING'S USE. Written by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 348a, not on the erased part (12,84 entry note); it was indented some three letters for some reason, but was not a later addition (CT).
12,85	HAGWORTHINGHAM. See 12,96 Hagworthingham note (PM).
	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,86	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,89	GEOFFREY [OF] TOURNAI. Domesday Goisfrid' tornai, that is from Tournai, in the French département of Calvados, France: Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 130. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably omitted de before tornai as on other occasions in Domesday (see, for example, SHR 4,8,3 Roger note) (CT).
12,92	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *] CLAIMS IT. Written by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin in the same pale ink as the marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), in the left margin which signals the claim entered at CK29. See 3,15 marginal note. In the manuscript Sortebrant (the last two letters an NT ligature); Farley misprinted Sortebran' (CT).
12,93	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,94	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,95	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
12,96	IN {{HAGWORTHINGHAM}} MUMBY. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined MVNDEBI above HACBERDINGHĀ, which he then underlined for deletion. Holmketill's manor in Hagworthingham had already been entered at 12,85 (PM-CT).
	EUDO [* OF MUMBY *]. See 12,40 Eudo note.
	7 MANORS. Including Mumby at 12,93 (PM).
13,1	GREETHAM. The parchment of the manuscript is very rubbed here, only GRA, part of what looks like N and H and then Ā being visible. Farley printed GRA, part of an N, then put a dot and HĀ. Although there is not really room for a capital D between the N and H, there probably was one there as the place-nameoccurs as Grandhā in 13,9 (CT).
13,2	19? SMALLHOLDERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined viii above xi.; as both are in the same colour ink, it was probably done at an early stage. It is not entirely clear whether he meant the viii to be an addition or a correction, though the former is more likely, both because the xi. is not underlined for deletion and because '19' fits better than '8' the total of 168 smallholders given at the end of 13,9. Compare 24,51 meadow note and 64,3 meadow note (CT).
13,3	IN SWABY ... TOTHILL. These lands make up Swaby hundred, containing 12 carucates; see the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 15/1 p. 254). CS12 refers to a claim for 1 carucate at Claythorpe (PM).
13,4	7 CARUCATES OF LAND {{AND A HALF}} TAXABLE. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .vi. car' t'rę 7 dim', inadvertently copying the plough estimate figure. He then corrected his mistake by cancelling the 7 dim' and adding an extra minim to the .vi. (CT).
13,5	8 VILLAGERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected their number from vii. to viii. (CT).
13,6	"LANGENE". Lost in the vicinity of Irby-in-the-Marsh: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lix. It appears as Langena in the later twelfth century: Stenton, Social and Economic History of the Danelaw, p. 11. We owe this reference to Professor Cameron (PM).
13,8	IN HUTTOFT. See CS16 (PM).
13,9	376 FREEMEN. The total of Freemen in 13,1-9 comes to 493, or 492 if one excludes 13,1 which seems necessary if the numbers of villagers, smallholders and ploughs are to agree with the totals given here (CT).
13,10	IN [WEST] HALTON. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is enlarged and 'square' and the place- name is manorial (PM).
	WILLIAM SON OF NIGEL. A major tenant of Earl Hugh in Cheshire (CHS 9) whose estate became the honour of Halton (PM).
13,16	CONESBY. 'Little Conesby' is lost in Crosby and 'Great Conesby' in Flixborough. Both names are commemorated by Conesby Farm at SE894138. The identification of Canon Foster (in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 75) was with 'South Conesby' (= 'Great Conesby') in Crosby, but see also 32,30 Conesby note (PM).
13,17	6 CARUCATES. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .iiii. car' (not .iii. car', as Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 75 note 1), then wrote a v over the first two minims and erased the last one; the original punctus after the iiii can still be seen in the manuscript (CT).
	WILLIAM [* SON OF NIGEL *], EARL H[UGH]'S MAN. Although H. should abbreviate the last-mentioned name, that is Harold, it is far more likely to abbreviate Hugonis ('Hugh's'), as the regular description of a 1086 tenant is as the man of the tenant-in-chief; see also 13,38 earl note (CT).
13,18	WILLIAM [* SON OF NIGEL *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,19	`LOPINGHEHAM'. The 'homestead of Loppa's people': Cameron, Scandinavian Settlement in the Territory of the Five Boroughs, p. 17. Lost in Killingholme at approximately TA143183: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lx (PM).
	WILLIAM [* SON OF NIGEL *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,20	ERNEIS [* OF BURON *]. See 4,23 Erneis note.
13,21	FULSTOW. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
13,22	BALDRIC [* OF LINDSEY *]. The earl's tenant here and at 13,31;39. He granted the tithes from these places to the Abbey of Saint-Evroult as Baldric of Lindsey: see Tait, Domesday Survey of Cheshire, p. 54 (PM).
13,23	BALDRIC [* OF LINDSEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,24	OSBERN [* SON OF TEZZO *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,25	OSBERN [* SON OF TEZZO *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,26	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,29	AND KELSTERN. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined this (CT).
13,31	BALDRIC [* OF LINDSEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,32	THIS ENTRY was briefly omitted by the main scribe of Great Domesday, but found after he had written the next entry (13,33). It is not a later addition: only the value was written on a half-line below the last ruled line. He directed it to its correct position in the text above with transposition signs (CT).
	BALDRIC [* OF LINDSEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,33	OSBERN [* SON OF TEZZO *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	EXACTIONS 5s. Added in the central margin in smaller script and a thinner pen (CT).
13,35	190 ACRES. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote c xc. and interlined nonag[inta] ('90') above the xc., perhaps because he thought the xc. was unclear. There is a small space before the xc., not shown by Farley (CT).
13,37	75,000 EELS. A pronounced line over a number indicates 'thousand'. Although the line is not over the v, only over the lxx (there being a slight space before the v), it is unlikely that the main scribe of Great Domesday intended the eel render to be 70,000 and 5. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 77, mistranslated this as '50 score and 5' (CT).
13,38	IN ASHWELL. It lay in "Roteland" where this entry is duplicated (RUT 6,16), though with slightly differing detail (PM).
	JOCELYN [* OF TUSCHET *]. See RUT 6,16 Jocelyn note.
	EARL H[UGH]'S MAN. In the corresponding entry in "Roteland" (RUT 6,16) Jocelyn is called Earl Hugh's man. Compare 13,17 William note (CT).
13,39	FULLETBY. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote FVLNODEBI, then interlined LOBI above NOD, underlining it and the rest of the place-name (NODEBI) for deletion, to produce the correct form FULLOBI, as used in 3,53. Farley did not reproduce the underlining; it is not visible in the Ordnance Survey facsimile. Only FUL and LOBI are rubricated, meaning that the correction was made before the scribe rubricated the county. The error had presumably arisen through confusion with Fulnedebi, the form for Fulnetby (34,20) (CT).
	BALDRIC [* OF LINDSEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,40	THIS ENTRY was squeezed by the main scribe of Great Domesday into the space left after 13,39; the fact that the priest holds 'from the king' indicates that it was not a sub-holding of 13,39. The ink is the same colour as the surrounding entries, so the addition was done at an early stage (CT).
13,41	HUGH [* SON OF OSBERN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,42	HUGH [* SON OF OSBERN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,43	HUGH [* SON OF OSBERN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
13,45	OSBERN [* SON OF TEZZO *]. Osbern son of Tezzo was a leading tenant of the Earl in Cheshire (CHS 24) and gave the tithes of Newball to the Abbey of Saint-Evroult; see Tait, Domesday Survey of Cheshire, p. 52 (PM).
14,7	JURISDICTION OF ERIK <OF TEALBY>. This half-carucate is referred to at 28,21 where [North] Willingham is described as a jurisdiction of Tealby, the T.R.E. holder of which would seem to have been Erik (28,20 Erik note) (PM). See also 4,69 Erik note.
14,13	OTBY. Now represented by Otby Farm in Walesby at TF139936 (PM).
14,19	3 FREEMEN WHO PLOUGH WITH 6 OXEN. This translation extends the Latin to .iii. soch[emanni] .vi. bob[us] arant[es], where arantes agrees with the sochemanni and bobus is an ablative of the instrument ('by means of'). This use of the plain ablative is found elsewhere in Domesday; see, for example, 3,30: .i. uill[anu]s arans .i. boue ('1 villager who ploughs with 1 ox') and also 5,2. 8,10;21;30. 12,10;12. 13,27. 14,14;28;30. The alternative with the preposition cum is found at 14,44. 22,4. 24,55. Another possibility would be to extend arant' to the ablative plural arantibus to agree with bobus, thus producing an ablative absolute phrase (rare in Medieval Latin): '3 Freemen with 6 ploughing oxen' or '3 Freemen with 6 oxen ploughing'; see DBY 6,20 ploughing note; NTT 11,27 ploughing note. Similarly in 14,24, and 22,20. In 16,19 arant' abbreviates arantem and in 24,39 arantes, accusative, both agreeing with the ox, while in 24,19;29 it abbreviates arantes, nominative, with the 'villagers' as its subject (CT).
14,21	THERE ALSO. A new entry is indicated by the use of a large rustic initial I (PM). However, this jurisdiction does not appear to belong to this fief but to that of the Bishop of Lincoln (LIN 7). It seems that the main scribe of Great Domesday, or a predecessor working on the circuit volume (if there was one), was abstracting material for each fief from a document like the Inquistio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis, in which the estates were not arranged by fief but vill by vill. Thus all the parts of Owmby-by-Spital were once together and this bovate is still clinging to another part of the vill when it should have been placed elsewhere. This is a not infrequent occurrence in Domesday Lincolnshire. A similar instance may be the nine bovates of taxable land at Normanby-by-Spital and Owmby-by-Spital (28,4) held by Jocelyn son of Lambert (the fief holder of LIN 28), but over which Bishop Remigius had the jurisdiction. In both cases, this land may well have been removed illegally from Bishop Remigius' holding of Owmby-by-Spital (7,6) which was itself a jurisdiction of his manor of Stow (7,1). Bishop Remigius also held Ingham and Coates (7,14-15) in the same wapentake.
14,23	DUNSTALL. A deserted village at SK891939 (PM), although the name still denotes a settlement on modern maps at SK889937.
14,25	VALUE ... 10s. This line is written below the last ruled line of folio 350b, indented; it is in slightly paler ink than the rest of the entry and may have been added later (CT).
14,27	GAINSTHORPE. The medieval village is lost at SE956011, the site commemorated by Gainsthorpe Farm; see Crawford, 'Air Photography of Gainstrop, Lincolnshire', pp. 432-33 (PM).
	HIBALDSTOW. The place-name Hilboldestou was interlined by the main scribe of Great Domesday above GAMELSTORP, which he did not then underline for deletion. He did not rubricate either place-name (CT).
		Hibaldstow and Gainsthorpe are described together in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 1/18 p. 238) (PM).
14,28	STURTON. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
14,30	LAND FOR 7 ½ PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .iiii. car', then joined together the first two minims to form a v and interlined 7 dimid', to produce a correct .vii. car' 7 dimid' (PM).
14,31	BRICTFRITH <OF KILLINGHOLME>. The name Brictfrith occurs four times in Domesday Book. The Brictfrith who held almsland in Devon is unlikely to be related to the other three, whose modest holdings, lacking tenurial or any other links to each other, are too widely separated to be plausibly linked. They were therefore probably held by different individuals (JP).
14,35	HOLTON[-LE-MOOR]. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
14,36	THE FIRST LINE OF THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on the last ruled line of folio 350c, the two half-lines below it; it is in the same colour ink as the surrounding entries, so was probably an early addition. He used transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the column above (CT).
	WAITHE. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
14,37	HABROUGH. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM)
	[EAST] HALTON. The vill centre probably lay to the north of Halton church, which in twelfth-century charters was also known as St Peter, North Killingholme; see Stenton, Social and Economic History of the Danelaw, p. 213; Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxi (PM).
14,43	HAROLD <OF WESTLABY>. Lincolnshire is the only county in which more than one Harold is clearly identified, numbering Earl Harold, Harold the constable, and Harold brother of Aelfric among its numbers. Which, if any of these, the Harold at Westlaby might be is impossible to decide in the absence of any clear linkages (JP).
14,46	'HAVERSTOE' WAPENTAKE. Possibly in error. The following places were all later in 'Gartree' Wapentake (PM).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
	5 PLOUGHS IN LORDSHIP. In the manuscript there is a repaired hole between the second and fourth lines of this entry between iN and d'nio; the scribe probably wrote a wide capital N for in, to fill in some of the (small) space between it and the beginning of the hole, so there would not appear to be an intentional space left after in (CT).
14,47	GOULCEBY. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,48	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,49	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,50	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,51	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,52	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,53	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,54	THE TWO [ESTATES CALLED] MINTING. Minting and 'Little Minting', the latter lost in Minting at approximately TF160730 (PM).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,55	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,56	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,57	`THORLEY'. Lost in the region of Minting and Gautby. Canon Foster associates it with Minting Park: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxix (PM).
	3 BOVATES. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the number from ii to iii and interlined es (for tres) in clarification (CT).
	IN THE MARGIN beside this entry the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote an r (for require, 'enquire'). There is no sign in the manuscript of anything erased or added or any gaps in this entry, which might have been the reason for, or the result of, this r. It is possible that he wanted to check some detail, perhaps the 3 ploughs attributed to the Freemen, as the plough estimate was only for 1 plough and 3 oxen (the 'as many' referring to the 1 carucate and 3 bovates of the assessment), although there are frequently more ploughs on the land than in the plough estimate in this county. Alternatively, he could have written the r next to the wrong entry: it could have been intended for the next entry (see 14,58 villagers note).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,58	13 VILLAGERS, 1 VILLAGER. The main scribe of Great Domesday may have written one of the uill' in error for soch' (Freeman or Freemen); or he may have been merely reproducing the wording of his source (see 14,57 margin note). See also 14,71 (CT).
14,59	LAND FOR 6 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the .vi. from .v. (CT).
14,60	IN KINGTHORPE. In conjunction with 14,62 (the manor of Ludford) this entry is repeated at 14,92 where the detail of the two manors is amalgamated, though 2 oxen and the mill are omitted and see 14,92 Thorulf note (PM-CT).
14,61	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday, squeezed into the space left after the value statement of 14,60; it extends into the central margin. It is not rubricated and he used a slightly finer pen, as he did for a number of additions made after rubrication. Its connection with Kingthorpe is unclear and it may in fact be a duplicate of a fuller entry for 2 bovates in Strubby which had already been entered at 40,11, as a jurisdiction of another manor in Kingthorpe, held in 1086 by Rainer of Brimeux (CT).
14,66	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,67	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,68	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,69	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,70	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,71	18 VILLAGERS, 3 VILLAGERS. The main scribe of Great Domesday may have written one of the uill' in error for soch' (Freemen); see also 14,58 (CT).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,72	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,73	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,74	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,75	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,76	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,77	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,78	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,79	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,80	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,81	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,82	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,83	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
14,84	ELKINGTON. Now represented by 'North Elkington' and South Elkington, the former a deserted village at TF286904 (PM).
14,86	HANBY. The site is commemorated by Hanby Hall at TF475698: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lvi (PM).
14,87	IN BOURNE. This holding and those at 27,51 and 59,7 were later represented by Austerby in Bourne (DR).
	3? BOVATES. In the manuscript only a small part of the top half of the first minim of iii remains; there seems to have been an erasure immediately after Seuuen, which extends to the bottom of the first minim, but it is not clear whether the scribe intended to erase the first minim at the same time (CT).
14,88	BRACEBY. In the manuscript place-name is manorial (PM).
	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
14,89	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
14,90	HONINGTON. The main scribe of Great Domesday had originally written Huntindune, but then made a poor job of altering it to Hundindune: in trying to turn the t into a d he accidentally covered the i, making Hundndune. Farley 'corrected' this to Hundindune (CT).
14,91	HONINGTON. The main scribe of Great Domesday had originally written Hundint', then altered it to Hundintone, but left the abbreviation sign after the t (CT).
14,92	THORULF. The Domesday form Torul represents Old Danish Thorulf: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 396; see also Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 317. This man would seem, however, to be identical with Thorald (Domesday Turold) in 14,62; see 14,60 Kingthorpe note (PM-CT). Compare DEV 30 Richard note.
14,93	NOW 30s. As the main scribe of Great Domesday had already given the 1086 value, it is possible that m[od]o xxx. sol' is an error for Tailla xxx. sol' ('Exactions 30s'), as perhaps also in 7,40 (7,40 now note) (CT).
14,95	HE HAD 14 BOVATES. The name of the T.R.E. holder is omitted (PM).
	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
14,97	SPALDING. Ivo Tallboys granted the church of Spalding to the Abbey of Saint-Nicolas of Angers at Gloucester in 1085. He had re-founded the Benedictine priory in Angers in 1074: Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, i. pp. 75-76 no. 288a (PM).
	FROM SALT-HOUSES, 20s. The number is not given, but in view of the render from salt-houses in Lincolnshire being often an "ora" of 16d per salt-house (see 1,34 salt-houses note), the number rendering 20s here may be 15, the same as rendered that amount in 12,70. However, there are several cases of a salt-house rendering only 6d, so there may have been many more, though this is not so likely (CT).
14,101	[2?] VILLAGERS. There is a splash of gall here, but the number appears to be ii from the size of the space it occupies and what can be deciphered under the gall (CT).
	W[IMU]ND. Farley printed W...d'. In the manuscript Wond' can be seen fairly clearly, especially under ultra-violet light, but most of the o was rubbed away when a splash of gall was wiped up, leaving W.nd'. The personal name Wond would be difficult to explain, except as Old Norse Vondr: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 340. A man called Wimund[us], Ivo's man, held from Ivo elsewhere (see 14,5-6;64-65) and it is possible that Wond' was the result of scribal confusion at some stage in the Domesday process. This was the interpretation of the scribe of the Breviate. The Alecto edition has Wimund (CT).
16,1	STENKIL <OF RIBY>. The name Stenkil occurs seven times in Domesday Book, the three Lincolnshire holdings probably belonging to the same individual. Two were held from the same tenant-in-chief and were shared with another English tenant, Ernwin, while the third was adjacent to both of these properties. All other holdings of a Stenkil were remote and modest so unlikely to have belonged to the Stenkil of Riby (JP).
	ERNWIN [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,2	STENKIL <OF RIBY>. See 16,1 Stenkil note.
16,3	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), though without a corresponding entry in the Clamores. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
16,5	THORNTON[-LE-MOOR]. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
16,6	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), perhaps referring to the claim of William of Percy for these 11 bovates, mentioned in 22,5, where the detail of the meadow is also given. On these ks, see 3,15 marginal note (CT).
16,8	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia 'claim'), which was entered at CN15. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
	CHURCH OF WINGHALE. Presumably Winghale Priory at TF029969. The date of the foundation is not clear but there is a reference to the monks of Winghale holding this land in the Lindsey Survey of c. 1115-1118 (Foster and Longley, 7/15 p. 245) (PM).
16,9	GEOFFREY [* THE SHERIFF *]. According to Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 232, the Geoffrey here is the same as the Geoffrey who held in Domesday Shropshire, on whom see SHR 4,3,27 Geoffrey note.
16,14	KLAKKR. See 27,21 (PM).
	SIUNDI. Gillian Fellows Jensen observes that the manuscript form Sendi may also be identical with 'Sandi', Old Icelandic Sandr, 'sand' (PM).
	ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,15	THIS ENTRY and the next (16,16) were written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on folio 352b after the entry for Cadney (16,34). He used a pair of transposition signs to indicate their correct position in the text of the adjacent column (folio 352a).
	ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,16	FOR THE POSITION of this entry in the manuscript, see 16,15 entry note.
	ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,17	BARKWITH. See 2,2 Barkwith note (PM).
	ALBERT [* GRELLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,19	TORRINGTON. The Lindsey Survey distinguishes between Torrington and the other Torrington, later East Torrington and West Torrington. Domesday, however, provides no evidence of which entry represents which site. Canon Foster identified this entry as West Torrington: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 92 (PM).
16,20	SNARFORD. In the manuscript it is SVARDESFORDE; it seems likely that the main scribe of Great Domesday miscopied an N as a V as the second letter, as the place is Snardesforde in 3,2 and 35,17, Snereforde in 16,21 and Snerteforde in 16,50 (CT).
16,21	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin beside the end of the entry for Northorpe (16,22), though the reference to a jurisdiction of Snarford indicates its correct position four or five lines above next to Snarford (16,20). The entry is underlined in the same colour ink, perhaps for emphasis rather than, as was more normal, for deletion; see also 68,21 entry note. The scribes of the Abbreviatio (folio 237v) and the Breviate (folio 176v) obviously did not believe that it was intended for deletion and included it (CT).
16,23	`THONOCK'. The medieval village is lost, the name commemorated in Thonock Lane Farm, between Gainsborough and Wharton at SK828928. In the manuscript Tunec was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday over the erasure of a longer word and is blurred, with a gap between the e and the c and a link-line to join them, not shown by Farley (PM-CT).
	WHARTON. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined IN WHARTON above Tunec, though he did not underline that place-name for deletion (CT).
16,24	IVO HAS 2 BOVATES. See 14,23 (PM).
16,25	THIS ENTRY and the next one (16,26) were squeezed by the main scribe of Great Domesday into a space of a line and three-quarters left by him at the end of the previous entry (16,24). He separated them from that entry and from each other with 'gallows' signs. He did not rubricate them (CT).
	SOUTHORPE. A deserted village, now represented by Southorpe Farm at SE888952 (PM).
16,26	FOR THIS ADDED ENTRY, see 16,25 entry note (CT).
	YAWTHORPE. In the manuscript it is Ioletorp; Farley misprinted Loletorp; see 1,48 Heapham note (CT).
16,28	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'); see 3,15 marginal note. The claim is entered at CW15; see CW15 Swein note (CT).
16,29	LAUGHTON. In the manuscript Lestone was corrected to Lastone by the main scribe of Great Domesday by interlining an a above the first e, under which he then put a deletion dot (CT).
16,33	WILLIAM [* MALET *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ERNWIN [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,34	3 PARTS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original iii. pars ('the third part') to iii. partes ('3 parts'), interlining es (for tres) above the number in clarification. However, 'the third part' seems to fit better, as there are two other references to '5 bovates and the third part of 1 bovate' in Cadney and the adjacent Howsham (12,11;13). A similar correction occurs in 16,40 (CT).
	WILLIAM [* MALET *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ERNWIN [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,38	2 PARTS OF 1 MILL SITE. The remaining third part of the site is recorded in 3,49 (CT).
16,40	3 PARTS. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote .iii. pars ('the third part') and then corrected it to .iii. partes and interlined es (for tres) in clarification; he made a similar correction in 16,34. In another holding in Somercotes (40,24) there is a third part of 1 carucate (CT).
16,45	6 BOVATES OF LAND TAXABLE. In the manuscript .vi. bou' t'rę g'ld'; Farley printed .vi. bou' t'rę ad g'ld', inserting the ad which was almost certainly omitted in error as ad geldum is the normal phrase (CT).
16,47	"STRUI". The Domesday form Strui, which only occurs here in Domesday, might be an error for Sturi, perhaps representing the hypothetical Old Norse Sturi: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 376, 377. He also mentioned Old Swedish Sture or an error for Strut, representing Old Norse Strutr. In view of the uncertainty, it has been decided to keep to the Domesday form for the present edition. The Alecto edition has Strui.
	ERNWIN [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
16,48	"BRANZUIC". Unidentified. Gillian Fellows Jensen suggests that this is Branston, the element uic arising out of confusion with Caneuuic in the preceding entry: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 189 (PM).
17,1	GREETWELL. A deserted village, the site commemorated by Greetwell Hall and the church of All Saints at TF013716 (PM).
	SWEIN. Identical with Swein son of Svafi in C9 and T5 (PM).
18,1	IN INGLEBY. See 22,30 Ingleby note (PM).
	THORGOT LAG. Thorgot 'the short' (Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 320) and not lag[emannus] ('lawman') as suggested by Canon Foster (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 95). No lawman of this name is recorded at Lincoln (PM).
		He was a wealthy Anglo-Saxon magnate, listed among those with full jurisdictional rights in T5 and in Yorkshire (YKS C36), and one of the principal predecessors of Robert of Tosny and his son Berengar. See Clarke, English Nobility, p. 344, whose list omits dependencies and also NTT 21,3, perhaps because it was without value (JP).
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	VALUE ... £10. The main scribe of Great Domesday did an exuberant flourish at the end of the x with the usual punctus written after it taking account of this flourish; it is not an i, or a partly completed addition to the x which is how Farley seems to have read it (CT).
18,2	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,3	BUSLINGTHORPE. Domesday Esetorp ('Esi's torp'). The vill takes its modern name from the Norman tenant Buselin recorded in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 3/8 p. 241) (PM).
	THORGOT [* LAG *]. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,4	THORGOT [* LAG *]. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,5	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 352d, but in the same colour ink as the preceding entry, so probably an early addition. He used rubricated transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the column above (CT).
	THORGOT [* LAG *]. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,6	THORGOT [* LAG *]. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,7	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ARE THE FREEMEN'S. Domesday Soch' normally abbreviates sochemannus ('Freeman') in its various cases. Although it is possible that Soch' here is a mistake for Soca (see 8,7 jurisdiction note) and the meaning is 'are a jurisdiction' (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 96) there is nothing wrong with translating it as 'the Freemen's', as Freemen regularly held land; see 1,5 Freemen note and 13,24 dim[idia] carucata soch[emann]orum: 'a half carucate [is] the Freemen's'; see Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 76 (CT).
18,8	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
18,9	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
18,10	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,13	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,14	BANTHORPE. Lost in Braceborough. The name is commemorated in Banthorpe Wood and Banthorpe Lodge: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xlviii. The place-name form here, Barnetone, shows substitution of Old English tun for Scandinavian torp; see Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 102 (CT).
	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,16	KIRKBY [UNDERWOOD]. In the manuscript the initial I is rustic, but the place-name is manorial (PM).
18,19	MEADOW, 40 ACRES; UNDERWOOD, 24 ACRES. On the ambiguity of the Latin here, see 8,31 acres note (CT).
	GILBERT OF GHENT. See 24,97 (PM-CT).
18,20	`AVETHORPE'. Lost in Aslackby: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xlviii. The site is possibly commemorated by the moated site 'The Aveland' at TF068296 (PM).
	MEADOW, 12 ACRES; MEADOW, 130 ACRES. The second p'ti is probably a scribal error for siluę (minutę or pastilis) and ac[ra]s with it is a scribal error for the nominative ac[rę]. Compare 24,102 meadow note (CT).
18,23	`SEMPRINGHAM'. The vill lay to the north-west of St Andrew's church at TF106329 (PM).
18,29	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
18,30	THORGOT LAG. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
	BERENGAR [* OF TOSNY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
20,4	DEINCORA. A difficult personal name; see von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 223 (PM).
21	HENRY OF FERRERS. The manuscript has FERRIERES, the I being interlined. The toponym is Ferrières-Saint-Hilaire in the French département of Eure: Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 88. 'Ferrers' is in deference to the more common form of this well-known family name (CT).
21,1	SIWARD BARN. Domesday Seubar. The more correct form Siuuardbar appears in CW17 where he appears as Henry's predecessor (PM).
	SASWALO <OF HOON>. The name Saswalo was a fairly uncommon name, so this individual is probably the same as three subtenants of Henry of Ferrers in Derbyshire (DBY 6,47 (Hoon). 6,49;98) and one each in Northamptonshire and Warwickshire (NTH 25,2, WAR 19,4). He appears to be the same man as Sewal in the Tutbury Cartulary (Saltman, p. 65 no. 52), as the giver of two-thirds of Hoga and of 4 acres near Merstone (Marston-on-Dove in Derbyshire); see DBY 6,47 Hoon note. According to VCH Warwickshire, i. pp. 281-82, he was ancestor of the Shirley family; Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 417, adds that he was an ancestor of the Ireton family, though there is no mention of a Saswalo in DBY 1,13 (Kirk Ireton) or DBY 6,92 (Ireton).
21,2	SASWALO <OF HOON>. See 21,1 Saswalo note.
22,2	LACEBY. Domesday Lenesbi here is probably in error for Leuesbi, its form in 4,69 and 30,15 (PM).
22,5	THORNTON[-LE-MOOR]. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
	ROGER OF POITOU ... 11 BOVATES. See 16,6 manuscript note. (CT)
22,6	THIS ENRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 353d, interrupting the entry for Stainfield (22,16) which continues onto folio 354a. He used transposition signs to indicate that this account of Thornton[-Le-Moor] belonged with the entry for that place earlier in the column.
22,15	IT LIES IN SNELLAND. See 28,26 William note (PM).
22,17	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. The name Tonni occurs on 47 holdings, probably representing two or three individuals. In 43 of these holdings Tonni was the predecessor of either Gilbert of Ghent or William of Percy, almost certainly the same individual since Gilbert had claims on the properties in the hands of William of Percy (CS30-31). See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 350-51, who also assigns the Yorkshire holding of Appleton to this Tonni (JP).
22,19	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), entered at CS31. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
22,20	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), entered at CS32. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
	WHO PLOUGH WITH 1 OX. Or perhaps 'with 1 ploughing ox'; see 14,19 plough note (CT).
22,23	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
22,27	THIS ENTRY was briefly omitted by the main scribe of Great Domesday, though it was not a later addition because it was written on the ruled lines and was succeeded by another misplaced jurisdiction (22,36), the account of which continues onto folio 354b. He used transposition signs to link the present jurisdiction with the manor of Covenham a few lines earlier (CT).
22,28	6 ½ CARUCATES ... ARE THE FREEMEN'S. The Latin soch' here and at the end of the next entry (22,29) is far more likely to abbreviate sochemannorum as usual, than socha which is a form of soca that the main scribe of Great Domesday does not use in Lincolnshire. It is translated as '6 ½ carucates ... are soke[land]' in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 103, though Freemen regularly held land (1,5 Freemen note) and compare 18,7 Freemen's note and 25,1 Freemen note (CT).
22,29	HALF OF THIS LAND IS THE FREEMEN'S. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 103, translate this as 'A moiety of this land is soke[land]', reading soch' as abbreviating socha; see 22,28 Freemen's note.
22,30	IN INGLEBY. William of Percy's land is said to be at Saxilby in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 3/3 p. 241) as also in the Nottinghamshire folios (NTT 21,3). Both here and at 18,1 the holding may embrace land at Saxilby (PM).
22,35	EVERARD [* OF LEATHLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
22,36	THE SCRIBE presumably thought that he had already recorded the manor of Legsby and so gave the details of its jurisdiction, when he gave those for the similarly misplaced jurisdiction of Covenham entered just before it (see 22,27 entry note). In fact he did not enter the manor of Legsby until almost the end of William of Percy's fief (22,35) and he then added the transposition signs to link the present jurisdiction with its manor (CT).
	HOLTHAM. Lost in Legsby, the site commemorated by Holtham Garrs Farm at TA148168 (PM).
	EVERARD [* OF LEATHLEY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
22,37	THERE ALSO. That is, in Legsby at 22,35 (PM).
23,1	1 FERRY. Across the Humber, giving its name to the settlement. North Ferriby lies on the Yorkshire bank of the Humber (PM).
24	GILBERT OF GHENT. Son-in-law of Hugh II of Montfort-sur-Risle. He was taken prisoner in September 1069 during the fall of York to the Anglo-Danish army, according to Symeon of Durham, Historia Regum (Arnold, ii. p. 188). His family were from Alost where they served as advocati of the Abbey of St Peter of Ghent from which they took their byname; see Sherman, 'Continental Origins of the Ghent Family of Lincolnshire' (PM).
24,2	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,4	`[MIDDLE] CARLTON'. Lost in North Carlton: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liii (PM).
24,5	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,6	MEADOW, 6 ACRES. In the manuscript ac's (= acras), accusative, after h[abe]nt earlier in the line. Farley misprinted ac' (= acrae, nominative), as also in 31,8 and 57,35 and compare 68,9 acres note (CT).
24,7	ALSO. In the manuscript ITĒ is written at the end of 24,6 connecting the two entries as jurisdictions of Scampton (CT).
24,8	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,9	ULF ^[FENMAN]^. Probably Ulf Fenman, Gilbert's predecessor at Scampton, 24,1 (PM).
	4 PLOTS WITH FULL JURISDICTION. The reference is amplified and explained at CW11 (PM).
24,10	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,11	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,12	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	EXACTIONS 40s. This may have been added by the main scribe of Great Domesday as it extends into the central margin of the manuscript, though probably an early addition as there is no difference in ink colour (CT).
24,13	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,14	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,15	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,16	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,17	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,18	`OSGODBY'. Lost in Bardney at approximately TF132727: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxii (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,19	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,20	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,21	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 354c; he used transposition signs to direct it to its correction position in the text on folio 354d.
	"SUDTONE". See 29,2 "Sudtone" note (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,22	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,23	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,24	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,25	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,26	IN "OFFRAN". Possibly in error for Keisby. "Offran" is unintelligible as a place-name, but the T.R.E. holder at Keisby (57,41. 68,22) was called Offram (representing Old English Osfram: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 339). Scribal confusion at some stage in the Domesday process is probably the cause. The Phillimore printed edition misprints Osfran in the notes and Index of Places. Compare 4,19 "Summerlede" note and CN28 "Schemin" note (PM-CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,27	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,28	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,29	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,30	BANTHORPE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote Barnetorp with a pen-stroke after the p; Farley read it as an i. It is not a i, however, as it is joined to the p at the top and there is a second stroke to the left of it on the right curve of the p, which makes the addition look rather like an n. But Barnetorpn would be an unusual form for this place-name, which is written Barnetone in 18,14, and Barnetorp in 59,6, each time linked with Braceborough, as here. It is more likely to have been an accidental pen-stroke (CT).
		Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xlviii, call Banthorpe an extinct hamlet. The name is, however, represented by Banthorpe Lodge, a settlement site, and by Banthorpe Wood on the modern 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey map.
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,31	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,32	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,33	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,34	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,36	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,37	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,38	EWERBY. The manuscript has leresbi for Ieresbi. Farley misprinted Leresbi; see 1,48 Heapham note and compare 31,18 'Langoe' note and 68,20 Lobthorpe note(CT).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,39	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,40	7 VILLAGERS. There is a repaired hole in the manuscript at the beginning of the third line of this entry; it is not 'a blank space' as stated by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 109 note 1 (CT).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,41	HALE. Now represented by Great Hale and Little Hale (PM).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,43	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,44	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,45	IN PARTNEY. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square' (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,46	HE FOUND THERE. Presumably when he received the land c. 1070/1071. The reference to an intermediate date between 1066 and 1086, though specified in the Commissioners' brief (as reported at the beginning of the Inquisitio Eliensis), only occurs once more in the Lincolnshire folios, at 32,34. In Domesday Shropshire invenit occurs regularly in this sense of an intermediate date; for example in the value statement in SHR 4,3,11: 'when he acquired it, he found it waste' (PM-CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,47	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,48	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,49	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,50	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,51	MEADOW, 440? ACRES. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably intended the interlined .cccc. to be added to his original xl. ac' p'ti, as there is no underlining for deletion. Compare 13,2 smallholders note and 64,3 meadow note CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,52	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,53	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,54	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,55	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,56	4 BOVATES OF LAND. The manuscript has .iiii.; Farley misprinted .ii., perhaps copied from the previous entry (CT).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,57	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,58	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,59	WILLOUGHBY. The T.R.E. holder was perhaps Alnoth the priest, see CS19 (PM). The marginal B[erewica] beside this entry is probably an error, caused by the preceding entries (24,55-58) being berewicks (outliers) of the manor of Willoughby (24,54). The land was held 'with full jurisdiction' and it was provided with a value, both unusual for an outlier. It is probably a manor in its own right and, if so, it is therefore uncertain whether the entry for jurisdiction of Willoughby added in the foot margin of folio 355b (see 24,60 entry note) was jurisdiction of the present holding or of the manor of Willoughby at 24,54.
24,60	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 355b, interrupting an entry for Sloothby (24,62) which continued onto folio 355c. He used transposition signs to link it to other dependencies of Willoughby in the column above, but see 24,59 Willoughby note (CT).
	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,61	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
	GUY OF CRAON. See 25,19 Guy note (PM).
24,62	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,63	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,64	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,65	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,66	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,67	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,68	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,69	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,70	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,71	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,74	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,75	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,76	TONNI <OF LUSBY>. See 22,17 Tonni note.
24,77	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,78	`HOLME'. Canon Foster identifies this as Holme Spinney in Beckingham: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lviii. 'The Holmes' appears on the Ordnance Survey first edition one-inch map (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	A JURISDICTION. The main scribe of Great Domesday added soca in the right margin using a finer pen and a slightly paler ink, at the same time as he made two other additions in this margin; see 24,84 [value] note and 24,86 land note. This addition was probably connected with the r (for require, 'enquire') written by him in the central margin level with the first line of this entry
24,80	IN BURLEY. In "Roteland" where it is also entered, though with slightly different information; see RUT 5,15 (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. See RUT 5,15 Ulf note.
	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. See RUT 5,15 Geoffrey note.
24,81	GUY OF CRAON. See 57,55 (PM).
24,82	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,83	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,84	[VALUE] 60s. The main scribe of Great Domesday added lx. s' in the right margin using a finer pen and a slightly paler ink, at the same time as two other additions in this margin; see 24,78 jurisdiction note and 24,86 land note (CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,85	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,86	1 CARUCATE. The repaired hole mentioned in 24,40 villagers note comes between the .i. and car' here; the gap thus caused is not 'a space ... left blank' as stated in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 113, note 3 (CT).
	LAND FOR 5 PLOUGHS. T'ra v. c' was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the right margin; he used a finer pen and a slightly paler ink than that used for the adjacent text. At the same time he made two other additions in this margin; see 24,78 jurisdiction note and 24,84 [value] note. For other plough estimates added by him, see 68,47 land note and 12,72 land note and compare 31,12 land note (CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,87	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,88	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,89	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,90	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday wrote hvvelle (the place-name Howell) upside down in the top margin of folio 356a above 24,90. It is not reproduced by Farley. It was probably jotted down by him as a reminder to add an entry for Howell, perhaps done when he recorded details of Gilbert of Ghent's holding in Howell on the preceding folio (24,39 on folio 355a). In fact he did add another holding in Howell (see 26,29 entry note), a jurisdiction of Kirkby, a place that also features on folio 356a (24,101). For other marginal memoranda, see 3,56 scribe note and 38,12 scribe note (CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,91	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,92	STOW. Now represented by Stow Farm at TF098349 (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,93	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,94	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,95	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,96	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,97	½ CARUCATE. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined this and the 2 carucates and 6 bovates of 'Sempringham' above the place-names, though he had already given a total of 3 carucates and 2 bovates after these places (CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,98	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,99	IN INGOLDSBY. In the manuscript the initial I is 'square' (PM).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,100	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,101	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,102	MEADOW ... MEADOW. The second of these is perhaps a scribal error for siluę (minutę or pastilis). Compare 18,20 (CT).
	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,103	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,104	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
24,105	ULF [* FENMAN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
25	LAND OF HUGH SON OF BALDRIC. The main scribe of Great Domesday numbered the chapter incorrectly as XXXV ('35'), continuing the error in the following chapter also. The error is repeated, though without subsequent correction, from the same point in the Yorkshire folios (CT).
25,1	FREEMEN [HAVE] 3 BOVATES. The Latin soch' is the usual abbreviation for sochemannus ('Freeman') in its various cases, but it is not clear, as the verb is missing, whether it is singular or plural here. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 115, translate as '3 bovates ... [are] soke[land]', reading soch' as equivalent to soca, but there is no reason why Freemen should not have held land here, as elsewhere (see 1,5 Freemen note). Compare 18,7 Freemen's note and 22,28 Freemen's note (CT).
25,10	IN THE MANUSCRIPT is a marginal k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'); the claim is entered in CN24. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
25,11	9 FREEMEN. In the manuscript 7 ix. soch'; Farley omitted the 7 in error (CT).
25,13	[KETTLEBY] THORPE. Lost, the site represented by Kettleby Thorpe Farm at TA042079 (PM).
25,18	`[WEST] WYKEHAM'. Lost in Ludford Magna at TF215890 (PM).
25,19	GUY, HUGH'S SON-IN-LAW. Presumably Guy of Craon, as also at 25,25. The 120 acres of underwood appear again at 24,61 where the jurisdiction is associated with Guy of Craon (PM-CT).
25,21	WOODTHORPE. Domesday Endretorp. The first element is identical to that occurring in the place-name Enderby, and perhaps represents the Scandinavian personal name. Eindrithr: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 75. The place was known as Woodthorpe from the twelfth century: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 121 (PM).
26	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
26,6	IT PAID [AND PAYS]. Domesday redd' is used here for both the past tense (reddebat) and present tense (reddit) (CT).
26,7	COLA [* NEPHEW OF KOLSVEINN *]. See Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, pp. 176-77 (PM).
		There are six occurrences of this name in the Midlands and the north, probably representing three individuals. Cola here is named as Kolsveinn's nephew in C22. The Lincolnshire holdings had no discernible links with those in Derbyshire and Yorkshire (JP).
26,8	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on folio 357a between the entries for Cockerington (26,21) and Kexby (26,22). He used transposition signs to indicate its position next to another manor in Barlings on folio 356d (26,7). For another misplaced entry on folio 357a, also belonging on folio 356d, see 26,12 entry note, and for one entered on folio 356d but belonging with one on folio 357a, see 26,24 entry note. The scribe used three different designs of transposition sign for these misplaced entries, so their correct position would not be in doubt.
26,10	CNUT <OF SPRIDLINGTON>. See 12,42 Cnut note.
26,12	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on folio 357a after the entry for Kexby (26,22) and before another misplaced entry, for Fillingham (26,23). He used transposition signs to indicate its correct position on folio 356d next to the manor of Ingham, of which it was a jurisdiction; Farley did not reproduce these signs. See 26,8 entry note.
26,16	CNUT <OF SPRIDLINGTON>. See 12,42 Cnut note.
26,17	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
26,18	4 PARTS OF 1 BOVATE. It is possible that iiii. part' is a scribal error for iiii. pars ('the fourth part'), easily done if in the source iiii. part' abbreviated iiii. partem (accusative) after 'Kolsveinn has ...'. There is a fourth part of 1 bovate recorded for Redbourne at 41,2. Compare 27,22 part note.
	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
26,19	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
26,24	THIS ENTRY was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday on folio 356d between the entries for Friesthorpe (26,13) and Cold Hanworth (26,14). He used transposition signs to link it to the manor of Fillingham on folio 357a (26,23). See 26,8 entry note.
	INGHAM. The manuscript has Lageham, probably in error for Ingeham (PM).
26,27	ALGAR. Described as 'Algar the deacon' at CK31. His manor was apparently of 6 bovates (PM).
26,29	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in a smaller script in the top margin of folio 357b above the first ruled line (on which is written the first line of 26,30); it is not rubricated. He wrote aslant and in a similar colour of ink to that used by him for the upside down hvvelle at the top of column 356a (see 24,90 scribe note), though he used a different pen (CT).
26,37	`OSEBY'. Lost in Birthorpe at TF104343: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxii (PM).
26,40	MEADOW, 18 ACRES. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original xiii ac[ras] to xvi, by joining together the first two minims to form a v and interlining ii to give a total of xviii (CT).
26,45	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *] THEIR BROTHER. See 57,18 (PM).
		On Aelfric's identification, see 57,15 Aelfric note.
26,51	THIS ENTRY and the following three (26,52-54) are written smaller than the others on this folio, though in the same colour ink. They might have been added at an early stage in the space the scribe originally left after the end of LIN 26 (see 1,106 entry note) and the size of the script may be due to the scribe's uncertainty as to whether they would fit the column, though in fact two ruled lines remain after them (CT).
26,53	IN THE COUNT OF ANY HUNDRED. See {Introduction: Hundreds} (PM).
27,1	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,3	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
27,4	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
27,5	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
27,6	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
27,7	WILLIAM [* MALET *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,12	GLEU. From Old English glēaw or Old Breton Gleu: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 262 note 1, the latter being more probable in view of Gleu's tenure from Alfred of Lincoln, an important Breton tenant-in-chief: Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, pp. 141-42. The name occurs six times in Domesday Book, five times as a tenant of Alfred of Lincoln, and once as a 'man' of Godfrey of Cambrai. Despite this description, there is little doubt that this is the same individual as Alfred's tenant since Gleu holds in the same vill from both tenants-in-chief. All six references can be taken to refer to one individual. See also Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 216 (JP).
27,13	CABOURNE. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
27,14	WILLIAM [* MALET *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
27,15	THIS ENTRY and that following (27,16) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 357d, extending some three letters into the 'tramlines' and central margin. He used a slightly paler ink than for the preceding entries (CT).
27,16	THIS ENTRY and the previous one (27,15) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 357d, extending some three letters into the 'tramlines' and central margin. He used a slightly paler ink than for the preceding entries (CT).
27,19	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,20	2 ½ FREEMEN. These are complemented by 2 ½ Freemen in 27,21. It looks as though the services of 5 Freemen were originally divided between two lords, Rothulfr and Klakkr, in Torrington and that the same division persisted in 1086 though Jocelyn had both their holdings. Compare the term dimidius uillanus ('half a villager') which means either a villager whose services were divided between two lords (as between two brothers, Ralph of Pomeroy and William the goat in Devon (DEV 19,43. 34,45; see DEV 19,43 villager note) or a villager with only half the normal holding of the average villager in the area (see SHR 2,2 half note). In Lincolnshire ½ priest occurs in 26,30, 3 ½ villagers are recorded in 29,3;15, 3 ½ Freemen in 38,2 and ½ Freeman in 59,16 (CT).
27,21	2 ½ FREEMEN. See 27,20 Freemen note (CT).
27,22	THE SIXTH PART. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote vi. pars, a scribal error for vi. partem, as it is the object of 'had'; he made a similar mistake in 40,17. Compare 26,18 parts note (CT).
27,25	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), though apparently without a corresponding entry in the Clamores. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. The name Maccus occurs nine times in Domesday Book, on holdings in three widely separated counties which devolved upon four tenants-in-chief, probably representing four individuals. Although his holding in Cornwall was substantial in Cornish terms, it is improbable that he is the same individual as either the Maccus with three manors in Lincolnshire or two in Yorkshire given the distances involved and the absence of any links other than the name. See also Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 292 (JP).
27,27	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. See 27,25 Maccus note.
27,28	WILLIAM. Perhaps William Blunt, who held land here. See 49,5-6 (PM).
	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. See 27,25 Maccus note.
27,29	WILLIAM. See 27,28 William note (PM).
	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. See 27,25 Maccus note.
27,30	IN CALCETHORPE - '[SOUTH] CADEBY'. The main scribe of Great Domesday interlined the place-name CATEBI above TORP. Both names are manorial in form, and TORP is not underlined for deletion, suggesting the existence of two manors. The two succeeding entries are given as separate jurisdictions of Calcethorpe and 'South Cadeby', the latter in a post-scriptal addition at the foot of the column (27,32 entry note). Presumably the scribe made his alteration to this entry at the same time (PM-CT).
27,32	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 358a, extending some four letters into the 'tramlines' and the left margin of the manuscript (CT).
	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. See 27,25 Maccus note.
27,33	MACCUS <OF COCKERINGTON>. See 27,25 Maccus note.
27,34	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a large star in the central margin, with dots between four of the six spokes (not four as Farley printed), written in the same colour ink as the text, level with the last two lines of this entry. The meaning is unclear, though it may be a checking mark connected with the claim concerning this holding at CK1 (PM-CT).
27,39	DEEPING [ST JAMES]. CK1 identifies the T.R.E. holder as Wulfgeat (PM).
27,40	3 PARTS OF 2 BOVATES. Although part' can abbreviate both partes or partem (the latter making the meaning 'the third part of 2 bovates'), it is more likely that partes is meant here because the remaining 2 parts of the 2 bovates are recorded in 59,9 (CT).
27,42	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,43	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,44	ROXHOLM. A deserted village, the name commemorated in Roxholm Hall and Roxholm Grange. The village lay close to Roxholm Old Hall at TF062498 (PM).
27,47	IN [SOUTH] WITHAM. As it stands this entry is idiosyncratic; the marginal M[anerium] indicating a manor, whilst the text describes Witham as a jurisdiction of Thistleton. In the manuscript, however, the rubric M appears to have been changed to S and although the place-name is rubricated the initial I is rustic (PM). See RUT 2a,9 there note.
	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
27,48	IN THISTLETON. In "Roteland", where it is also entered, though with slightly different detail; see RUT 2a,9 and RUT 2a,9 there note (PM).
	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
27,49	ANOTHER THISTLETON. That is, another holding in Thistleton, not another manor called Thistleton. See Thorn, 'Manorial Affixes' (CT).
	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
27,51	IN BOURNE. See 14,87 Bourne note (PM)
27,57	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
27,59	`SOMERTON'. A deserted village at SK954586, close to Somerton castle (PM).
	OSFRITH. The Domesday form Offerd represents Old English Osfrith: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 339, the -ff- being a scribal error for -sf-; see also Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 19 (PM-CT).
27,60	IN HUTTOFT. See CS16 (PM).
27,61	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,62	SIWARD <OF THISTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
27,64	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), though apparently without a corresponding entry in the Clamores. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
	AFTER THE ENTRY the scribe left blank the remaining half a column, 22 ruled lines; see 1,106 entry note (CT).
28,1	BLYBOROUGH. See 3,4 Jocelyn note (PM).
28,3	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,4	BISHOP REMIGIUS HAS THE JURISDICTION. He held land at Owmby-by-Spital in 7,6 (PM). See 14,21 there note.
	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,12	BRICTEVA <OF HACKTHORN>. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,13	OWMBY[-BY-SPITAL]. Domesday dunebi, probably in error for ounebi. Farley printed a capital d: Dunebi (CT).
28,20	EDRIC [* ERIK *] <OF TEALBY>. The Domesday form Edric usually represents Old English Eadric: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 233-36. However, the holder of this land is referred to as Eiric in the Clamores at CN18. The personal name would seem properly to be Eirik(r): Fellows Jensen, ‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, p. 38 (PM-CT). On his identification, see 4,69 Erik note.
28,21	JURISDICTION. See 14,7 jurisdiction note (PM).
	EDRIC [* ERIK *] <OF TEALBY>. See 28,20 Erik note and 4,69 Erik note.
28,22	IN "SUMMERLEDE" [* OSGODBY *]. See 4,19 "Summerlede" note. This entry is perhaps a duplicate of the one for Osgodby (28,24) (PM).
	EDRIC [* ERIK *] <OF TEALBY>. See 28,20 Erik note and 4,69 Erik note.
28,23	EDRIC [* ERIK *] <OF TEALBY>. See 28,20 Erik note and 4,69 Erik note.
28,24	EDRIC [* ERIK *] <OF TEALBY>. See 28,20 Erik note and 4,69 Erik note.
28,26	WILLIAM OF PERCY. His holding appears at 22,15 (PM).
28,36	IN SOMERSBY. The place-name is manorial in form. It is evident from the manuscript. that the initial I has been changed from a 'square' to a rustic form, that is from a manor to a jurisdiction. The rubric S[oca] has clearly been altered from M[anerium]; Farley misprinted M' (PM-CT).
28,39	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,40	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,41	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
28,43	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left 10 ruled lines blank, perhaps for further manors of Jocelyn to be detailed if discovered (see 1,106 entry note) (CT).
29,1	2 PLOUGHS. The manuscript has .ii. car'; Farley misprinted .i. car' (CT).
29,2	"SUDTONE". Here and at 29,3 "Sudtone" is associated with Eudo son of Spirewic's holding at 'Little Sturton'; see 3,10 Sturton note and 29,15. Canon Foster drew attention to the fact that Hugh son of Eudo, the son of the Domesday holder, granted his lordship at 'Little Sturton' to Kirkstead Abbey in 1139: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. lxvii-lxviii. A charter containing a boundary clause makes it clear that the estate lay to the south of 'Little Sturton': Stenton, Social and Economic History of the Danelaw, pp. 140-41. If "Sudtone", 'the south vill', was included in the grant its location is to be sought between 'Little Sturton' and Minting (PM).
29,3	THERE ALSO. See 29,2 "Sudtone" note (PM).
29,6	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), referring to the jurisdiction divided between Eudo here and the Bishop of Durham at 3,12. See 3,15 marginal note. Eudo's claim for parts of this and the next holding (29,7) is mentioned at the end of 29,7 (CT).
	WADDINGWORTH. The bishop's holding appears at 3,12 (PM).
29,7	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), referring to the jurisdiction divided between Eudo here and the Bishop of Durham at 3,11. See 3,15 marginal note. Eudo's claim for parts of this and the previous holding (29,6) is mentioned at the end of the present entry (CT).
	WISPINGTON. The bishop's holding appears at 3,11 (PM).
	BISHOP [* OF DURHAM *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
29,8	BISHOP OF DURHAM ... THIRD PART ... EUDO TWO [PARTS]. The bishop's part appears at 3,42, Eudo's two parts here and at 29,28 (CT).
29,13	4 PARTS. Or possibly 'the fourth part', as part' can abbreviate partem (if it is the object of 'the villager has', which is unlikely) as well as partes. No other church, or part of one, is mentioned elsewhere under Scremby (CT).
29,14	THIS ENTRY and the next (29,15) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 359d, extending some 4 letters into the 'tramlines' and central margin. Although added together, the present entry really belongs with the other jurisdictions of Burgh[-le-Marsh] (29,18) (CT).
29,15	THIS ENTRY like the previous one (29,14) was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 29,14 entry note (CT).
	THERE ALSO ^["SUDTONE"]^. Latin Ibid[em] normally refers to the place-name in the previous entry, which is here Sutton-on Sea. However, here it refers to the "Sudtone" which was an outlier of 'Little Sturton' because this entry duplicates almost all of the information in 29,2-3. The confusion arose as a result of the common place-name form Sudtone. The main scribe of Great Domesday rubricated the I of Ibid' in the second line (as well as the one in the first line, as expected) and that indicates the start of the information duplicated in 29,3 (CT).
29,26	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
29,28	'WRAGGOE' WAPENTAKE. Added by the main scribe of Great Domesday in the left margin. Tattershall Thorpe was later in Horncastle Wapentake (PM-CT).
29,30	NORTH RIDING. Bolingbroke Wapentake was in the South Riding; see {Introduction: Wapentakes}(PM).
29,32	THIS ENTRY and the next (29,33) were added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 360a, the B' and S' being written in the left margin; the ink is slightly paler than in the preceding entries. The following entry (29,34) was also added, but at a different time, after the county had been rubricated; see 29,34 entry note (CT).
29,33	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 29,32 entry note. Farley printed beside this entry the transposition sign that is in the central margin in the manuscript, though in fact it belongs with the added entry at the foot of the opposite column (30,10; see 30,10 entry note) (CT).
	SKIRBECK. Later Skirbeck quarter in Boston (PM).
29,34	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 360a, some three letters into the 'tramlines' and left margin of the manuscript; it is not rubricated. The pen used is thinner than that used for the preceding entries and this may be the reason why the ink looks even paler. There are no transposition signs, but it probably belongs after the other entry for [Tattershall] Thorpe in this column (29,28) (CT).
30	DROGO OF LA BEUVRIERE. A Fleming from La Beuvrière near Béthune in the French département of Pas-de-Calais. He had forfeited his Yorkshire lands in or about August 1086, but is entered here in possession of his Lincolnshire lands; see English, Lords of Holderness 1086-1260, pp. 6-8 (PM).
30,1	WEST RIDING. Barrow-upon-Humber was later in Yarborough Wapentake in the North Riding, see {Introduction: Wapentakes} (PM).
30,3	BEFORE 1066 [VALUE ***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining half-line for the later inclusion of the T.R.E. and present values, when available; the T.R.E. is not superfluous, nor is this manor 'evidently valued in' 30,1, as stated in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 139 note 4 (CT).
30,4	THERE IS A REPAIRED HOLE in the manuscript extending from the last line of 30,4 to the first line of 30,5; it is not a space as stated by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 139 note 5 (CT).
30,5	ON THE REPAIRED HOLE in the first line of this entry, see 30,4 hole note (CT).
	IN THE ABOVE MANOR. Presumably Barrow-upon-Humber at 30,1 (PM).
30,6	KETTLEBY. Lost in the vicinity of Kettleby House at TA034079 (PM).
	ULF. The will of Ulf and Madselin of 1066 x 1068 survives in a twelfth-century copy in the Black Book (Liber Niger) of Peterborough Abbey; see Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, pp. 95-97. It records a series of mostly uncompleted grants prior to the donors' pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Most of Ulf's lands were held in Domesday by Drogo of La Beuvrière. A number of lands in the will are said in Domesday to have been held by Earl Morcar, but the relationship between Ulf and Morcar is unclear. This estate and that at 34,8 were the subject of an exchange in the will between Ulf and his mother Edeva (PM).
30,9	`COTON'. The phrase vel COTES was interlined above the name Keelby by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the same time as he added the entry for its outlier in the foot margin (30,10 entry note). The 1 carucate appears in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 11/1 p. 249) as Cotun ('at the Cotes'), from which its later form, 'Nun Coton', derives. Lost in Keelby: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liv (PM-CT). 'Coton' is given as the name of the manor in its jurisdiction in 'Lopingheham' (30,11), as well as in the addition on its outlier in Killingholme (30,10: 30,10 entry note).
	ROTHULFR. Said to have held the land T.R.E., though it seems clear that the land had belonged to Ulf son of Topi (Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, p. 96). The relationship between Rothulfr and Ulf is unknown (PM).
30,10	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line on folio 360b at the same time as he interlined vel COTES in 30,9. He used transposition signs to direct it to its correct position after Keelby (30,9) in the column above. Farley misplaced the transposition sign beside this entry; see 29,33 entry note.
30,14	ENQUIRE. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote r[e]q[uire] de t[er]ra arab[ili] R. de mort[emer] 7 ep[iscopu]s baioc[ensis] in the right margin of the manuscript; ep's is an error for ep'i as the genitive is required after terra. Farley misprinted De and Mort. The bishop's holding here appears at 4,70-71; Ralph of Mortimer's at 36,1. (CT).
30,17	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
30,18	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	FREEMEN ... 6 BOVATES. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected iii. bou' to vi. bou' (CT).
30,19	THE REVERSE OF THE REPAIRED HOLE mentioned in 30,4 hole note appears in this and the following entry (30,20) (CT).
	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
30,20	THE REVERSE OF THE REPAIRED HOLE mentioned in 30,4 hole note appears in this entry and the previous one (30,19) (CT).
	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
30,21	GEOFFREY [* OF AALST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
30,22	[***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left almost half a line's space for the later inclusion of the plough estimate of this holding. See 31,12 land note (CT).
	ARCHBISHOP THOMAS. Of York (PM-CT).
	HUGH OF GRANDMESNIL. He had no other recorded holdings in Lincolnshire, though he was a substantial landholder in Leicestershire where he held Waltham-on-the-Wolds (LEC 13,69) a few miles from Stroxton (PM).
30,25	STOKE [ROCHFORD]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote STOCES with a malformed or incomplete letter H interlined above and between the CE in the manner of the CH ligature; compare 67,2 Howell note. Farley printed a capital H as the interlineation (CT).
	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
30,27	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
	12 BOVATES. In the manuscript .xii. bou' clearly; Farley misprinted .xii. bob' ('12 oxen') which is meaningless in this context (CT).
30,28	IN "BREDESTORP". It appears as Breidestorp in the Black Book (Liber Niger) of Peterborough Abbey (Society of Antiquaries, MS 60 folio 23), 'Breithr's torp': Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 64. It was represented in later sources by Holywell and Aunby. See 8,7 "Bergestorp" note (PM).
	ERNWULF <OF "BREDESTORP">. The name Ernwulf occurs on nine holdings in Domesday Book, each probably belonging to a different individual. None of the holdings are substantial, all are distant from each other, and none shared English predecessors or Norman tenants-in-chief. Five of the holdings were pre-Conquest tenures, four post-Conquest. These latter may well have been of continental origin (as was certainly the case at Leake in Nottinghamshire), making even more remote the faint possibility that any of the Ernwulfs were related to each other. The nearest post-Conquest Ernwulf to "Bredestorp" was Ernwulf of Bully, tenant of a tiny property in Nottinghamshire (JP).
	VALUE BEFORE 1066 £4. The manuscript has .iiii. lib', written over an erasure; Farley misprinted .iii. lib' (CT).
30,29	`WEST BYTHAM' [* [CASTLE] BYTHAM *]. In the manuscript the place-name appears as Wesbithā. Farley misprinted Westbithā (CT).
		Domesday's differentiated 'West Bytham' was later Castle Bytham, named from the castle, which may have been in existence by 1086. The association of military subtenancies, represented here by the holding of 7 Frenchmen, is common at early castle sites and is repeated at Drogo's estate at Aldborough in Holderness in Yorkshire (PM).
	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
30,30	COUNTHORPE. Now represented by Counthorpe House at TF004202 (PM).
	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
30,31	[* YOUNG *] EDWARD. See 4,42 Edward note.
30,32	WITHAM[-ON-THE-HILL]. Professor Whitelock speculates that this may refer to an estate at Manthorpe, mentioned in the will of Ulf and Madselin: Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, p. 210; see 30,6 Ulf note. The possibility increases in the light of the Abbot of Peterborough's claim and the fact that the reference is to Witham hundred, in which Manthorpe lay (PM).
30,36	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
31,3	NORTHMANN. He only held it in pledge according to CK55 (CT).
	IN THE SAME [PERIOD OF] TIME. That is, T.R.E., but the date is given more specifically in CK55 as 'in the year in which the same king [Edward] died', that is 'in 1066' (CT).
31,6	`HOUGHTON'. See 8,12 'Houghton' note.
31,7	"SUDUUELLE". Lost in Swayfield at approximately TF990230: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxviii (PM).
31,8	UNDERWOOD, 15 ACRES. In the manuscript ac's (= acras); Farley misprinted ac' (= acrae); see 24,6 acres note (CT).
31,9	MEADOW ... PASTURABLE WOODLAND ... MILL. It is not clear whether these are part of Walter's holding or of that of his two men. Compare 8,4 meadow note (CT).
31,12	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remainder of the line after T'ra for the later completion of the plough estimate, when available. For other incomplete plough estimates, see 32,32;34. 40,20;24. 53,2. 57,54 and compare 30,22. For the addition of whole plough estimates, see 24,86 land note, 68,47 land note and 12,72 land note (CT).
31,18	'LANGOE'. In the manuscript IAGEHOV; the scribe's source may have had lagehov, which he misread as a capital I. See 24,38 Ewerby note and 68,20 Lobthorpe note. Farley printed the correct LAGEHOV; compare 32,25 'Langoe' note.
32,19	HAKET. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the name Vghete to Aghete by interlining A above the V which he then underlined for deletion. Aghete represents Haket, an Anglo-Norman -et diminutive of Old Norse Haki: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, pp. 123-24; Reaney, Dictionary of British Surnames, under Hackett. The form Aghete is described as 'obscure' by von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 141. The Alecto edition has Aghete. This is the only occurrence of this name in Domesday. Farley failed to print the deletion line under V of Vghete (CT).
32,21	32 FREEMEN. This corrects the Phillimore printed translation which has 'Frenchmen' for the Latin soch[emanni]. The same translation error was made in the Nottinghamshire printed edition; see NTT 9,29. Both mistakes were perpetuated in the first version of Domesday Explorer.
32,22	A JURISDICTION. The main scribe of Great Domesday may have written this second Soca in the wrong place: it may be intended for two lines below at the end of 32,23. Or it is possible that it is intended to be an advance heading for 32,23, as for example in 61,10 (CT).
32,24	GARTHULFR. See Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 96 (PM).
32,25	'LANGOE'. In the manuscript IANGEHOV; Farley printed the correct LANGEHOV. Compare 31,18 'Langoe' note.
32,30	CROSBY. In the manuscript the place-name Cropesbi is rubricated (PM).
	CONESBY. Domesday Cunesbi is later represented by 'Great Conesby' [or 'South Conesby'] in Flixborough and 'Little Conesby' [or 'North Conesby'] at SE876144 in Crosby, both now deserted villages. Canon Foster identifies Earl Hugh's holding at 13,16 with South Conesby [that is, 'Great Conesby'/'South Conesby'] and that of Norman of Arcy with North Conesby [that is 'North Conesby'/'Little Conesby']: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. 75, 149. However, the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, no. 1/14 p. 238) distinguishes two holdings in Conesby belonging to Norman, one [identified by them as North Conesby] associated with Flixborough and perhaps listed anonymously at 32,17, and the other [identified as ?North Conesby] associated with Crosby and listed here at 32,30. This reference may therefore refer to 'Great Conesby' also (PM).
		In fact, Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liii, in discussing 'Extinct Villages' identify Lindsey Survey 1/14 as Conesby, North or Little Conesby. They identify the holding of Earl Hugh (13,16) with Conesby, South or Great Conesby and do not mention the present holding. In the index to the volume (p. 271) they list the present holding and Lindsey Survey 1/14 under 'Conesby, North, Little Conesby [in Flixborough parish']' and Domesday 13,16 under 'South, Great Conesby [in Crosby parish]'. There are inconsistencies here that require further investigation.
		The un-affixed name Conesby (Farm) is found on modern 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey maps (SE8913).
32,32	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote T'ra at the end of the first line of this entry and then left a third of the next line blank for the plough estimate to be completed when available. For other incomplete plough estimates, see 31,12 land note and compare 30,22 (CT).
32,34	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remainder of the line after T'ra for the later completion of the plough estimate; see 31,12 land note.
	9 PLOUGHS AND 6 MILLS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected .viii car' to .viiii car'; the original dot after viii. can be clearly seen under the added final minim which is in darker ink. He made an identical correction to the number of ploughs in the plough estimate in 35,6. He also corrected ii. molin' to vi. molin' in the present entry (CT).
33,1	AGHMUND. Perhaps identical with Aghmund son of Walraven, the Lincoln lawman. Norman the fat succeeded Aghmund here and Walraven at Canwick in 33,2 (PM).
33,2	AFTER THIS ENTRY the scribe left eight ruled lines blank; see 1,106 entry note (CT).
34,3	EDEVA. The mother of Ulf son of Topi, to whom these lands were granted 1066 x 1068, as also at 34,8; see Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, p. 97. She may be identical with the Edeva who occurs frequently in Erneis of Buron's chapter as his predecessor (PM).
34,14	`CALCOTE'. Later Collow (PM). This statement is derived from Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. lxxxv, 152, 256 nos. 34/14. L16/8. It is not there supported by evidence. The Domesday name (Caldecote: l interlined) is found again in 'Wraggoe' Wapentake in 1284-85 as Caldecot juxta Mixell and in 1401-2 as Calcot: Feudal Aids, iii. pp. 367, 246; Mixell might be a corruption of Sixhills, a neighbouring Ancient Parish. 'Calcote' seems unlikely to have evolved to Collow, and it is not certain whether a settlement or estate once called 'Calcote' was simply renamed Collow, or whether the names 'Calcote' and Collow were those of adjacent but separate settlements within the same estate, one of which displaced the other as the name by which the estate was later known. The matter requires further investigation.
34,24	JOHN <OF ORTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
34,25	JOHN <OF ORTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
34,26	JOHN <OF ORTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
34,27	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left seven ruled lines blank; see 1,106 entry note (CT).
35,1	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,2	VALUE ... NOW [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remainder of this line for the later insertion of the present value and perhaps exactions (CT).
35,3	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,4	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,5	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,6	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
	LAND FOR 9 PLOUGHS. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original .viii. car' to .viiii. car' , as in 32,34 (CT).
35,7	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,8	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,9	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
	10? FREEMEN. It is not clear quite how many Freemen were intended by the main scribe of Great Domesday. He seems originally to have written .x., but then to have written a large | over it (as Farley printed it); if he had meant to correct .x. to .i. one would have thought he would have erased the .x. or interlined .i. and put a deletion dot under the .x., as the result could never be clear (CT).
35,10	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line on folio 362d after the entry for Burton[-le-Coggles] and beginning in the central margin. He used transposition signs to indicate its correct position in the column above after the manor of Tealby (CT).
	½ PLOUGH IN TEALBY. It is possible that the phrase j' Tauelesbi was intended to refer to the marginal S[oca], thus more correctly 'A jurisdiction of Tealby'. In the manuscript it is written slightly further to the left than Farley printed it (CT).
	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,11	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,12	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,13	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
35,14	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,15	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
35,17	MERLESWEIN [* THE SHERIFF *]. See C5 Merleswein note.
36,2	"BODEBI". Lost in the vicinity of Thornton Curtis and Wootton, with which it is here associated: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxxxvi (PM).
36,5	STOW. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
37,1	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,2	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,3	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,4	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,5	SWATON. It was an outlier of Steyning in the thirteenth-century Book of Fees (DR).
	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,6	STEYNING. Lost in Swineshead, the site represented by Estovening Hall at TF231401, and commemorated in The Steyning and Steyning Lane: Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 381 (PM).
	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
37,7	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *]. See LEC 16,9 Aelric note.
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left 15 ruled lines blank; see 1,106 note (CT).
38,1	9 FREEMEN. The number was corrected from ii. by the main scribe of Great Domesday;
	the word soch' also seems to have been written by him over an erasure (CT).
	WOODLAND IN [VARIOUS] PLACES, 350 ACRES. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably omitted past' after siluę which would make the meaning 'pasturable woodland in [various] places...' as in the next two entries. It is possible, though less likely, that the meaning is that here the woodland was in several places, totalling 350 acres (CT). However, see 1,4 woodland note and DBY 1,12 woodland note.
38,6	MAREHAM[-ON-THE-HILL]. See 1,102 Mareham note (PM).
38,10	`BUTCHETT'. Lost in Bardney. Canon Foster draws attention to Butchett Farm near Bardney Grange at TF136718: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lii (PM). The form adopted by the Phillimore printed translation was 'Butyate'. Butchett Farm existed in the nineteenth century but has since disappeared.
38,12	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday wrote chetelber in the bottom left corner of folio 363c, possibly as a reminder to himself to add a holding of Ketilbiorn. It is in a similar ink to other reminders; see 3,56 scribe note and 24,90 scribe note. Farley did not print it (CT).
39,2	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday wrote S (for Soca, 'jurisdiction') over an erasure, perhaps of an original M'. He did not put an abbreviation line over the S, though Farley printed one (CT).
39,3	6? MILLS. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote .iiii. originally and then drew a large v over the two middle minims and enlarged the last minim so it was the same size as the v, but then presumably forgot to erase the first one to make vi. The result is .ivi. which is not a Roman numeral (CT).
39,4	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left 12 ruled lines blank, perhaps for further holdings of Guy to be added if necessary; see 1,106 entry note (CT).
40,1	LIMBER. At the time of Domesday Limberge was divided between Great Limber and Little Limber, though not differentiated. The Lindsey Survey makes it clear that Rainer of Brimeux' holding (40,1) was at Great Limber (Foster and Longley, 11/3 p. 250) and that Norman of Arcy's holding (32,28) was at Little Limber (Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 11/8 p. 250). In addition the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 11/2 p. 249) records that Ranulf Mischin [that is, Ranulf Le Meschin, Earl of Chester], who succeeded to the Lincolnshire estate of Ivo Tallboys, held land at Little Limber, represented in Domesday by the latter's holding at 14,32. As Ivo's holding was at Little Limber this was perhaps also the location of his claim against the king at CN3. As Rainer of Brimeux' holding was at Great Limber this was perhaps also the location of his claim against the Archbishop of York at CN10. The remaining entries cannot safely be identified from these early sources, though Canon Foster identified them as Great Limber (PM).
40,2	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
40,3	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
40,6	BALDWIN [* OF FLANDERS *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
40,7	4 BOVATES OF LAND TAXABLE. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original .ii. bou' t're to .iiii. bou' t're and erased something after it (perhaps 7 dim', making an original 2 ½ bovates) and drew in a link-line to indicate nothing more was to be inserted there. Farley did not print the link-line, though he sometimes did; compare 16,23 'Thonock' note (CT).
40,8	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'); the claim is entered at CS29. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
40,11	STRUBBY. On a possible duplicate of this entry in a late addition made in the fief of Ivo Tallboys, who also had a manor in Kingthorpe, see 14,61 entry note.
40,14	WHO. The manuscript has qi (= qui); Farley misprinted qa (= qua) (CT).
40,16	LUDFORD. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
40,17	AND THE FOURTH PART OF 1 BOVATE. The main scribe of Great Domesday added 7 iiii. pars .i. bouatę with ta interlined above the iiii., extending into the right margin of the manuscript. As the ink colour is the same as for the rest of the entry, it was probably an early addition. He should have written iiii. partem with tā interlined because it is the object of 'Jaulfr had'; he made a similar mistake in 27,22 (CT).
	BALDWIN [* OF FLANDERS *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	1 MILL, 8s. Half held by Alfred of Lincoln; see CS9 (PM).
40,18	BALDWIN [* OF FLANDERS *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
40,19	BALDWIN [* OF FLANDERS *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
40,20	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left space after T'ra at the end of the line here, as also in 40,24, for the later completion of the plough estimate when available. See 31,12 land note (CT).
40,23	IN COCKERINGTON HE HAD. The T.R.E. holder is not named, but was presumably Jaulfr, Rainer's predecessor elsewhere in the chapter (CT).
40,24	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. See 40,20 land note (CT).
	ILBERT OF LACY HAS THE LAND. His holding here is not otherwise recorded in Domesday, nor is that of the Bishop of Bayeux (PM).
40,25	SIXTH PART. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected vi. pars from his original vi. partes ('6 parts'); compare 16,34 parts note (CT).
40,26	IN WITHCALL. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square' (PM).
	CLAIMS. See CS11 (PM-CT).
41	LAND OF OSBERN OF ARQUES. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote TERA instead of TERRA. After he had written this chapter heading using vermilion he added DE ARCIS in a darker brown ink than that used by him in the rest of this chapter (CT).
41,1	[***] AND GRIMBALD. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space for the later insertion of the missing T.R.E. holder, who was Esbiorn, see 48,2. The land entered here and in 41,2 is duplicated at 48,2-3 with minor differences (PM-CT).
	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
41,2	REDBOURNE. This holding and the previous one (41,1) are duplicated in 48,2-3 with minor differences.
	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
42,4	CAWTHORPE. The note to the Phillimore printed edition reads: 'Lost in Covenham: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liii' (PM). It is true that Cawthorpe (in Covenham St Bartholemew parish) appeared in Foster and Longley's list of 'extinct villages'. However, that Cawthorpe was in Ludborough Wapentake and does not appear in Domesday but in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 10/7 p. 249). The Domesday Cawthorpe was in Bourne parish in Aveland Wapentake and is represented on modern maps by Cawthorpe itself, found at TF090221, Cawthorpe Hall at TF089222, Cawthorpe Farm at TF091221 and Cawthorpe House at TF091220.
42,6	THERE ALSO. This entry is apparently duplicated at 61,2. See CK41 Dyke note (PM).
42,8	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
42,9	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
42,10	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
42,11	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
42,12	HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *]. See 8,34 Hereward note.
42,13	THE MONKS. That is, of Crowland Abbey (PM).
	[***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about eight letters after the details of the Freemen, perhaps for the later inclusion of villagers and ploughs, as in the next entry (42,14).
42,14	IN HACONBY. In the manuscript the form of the initial I of In is 'square' and the place-name Haconby is manorial (PM).
42,15	MORTON. In the manuscript the place-name Morton is manorial (PM).
	OGER HAS HALF. See 24,77 (PM).
42,18	THERE ALSO. CK42 locates the 1 ½ bovates at Hanthorpe, an adjacent vill (PM).
44,2	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
44,3	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
44,4	`MANBY'. Lost at SE936088 (PM).
44,6	`AUTBY'. Domesday Aduluesbi, probably out of confusion with Audleby; see Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands, p. 34 (PM). The form adopted in the Phillimore printed edition was 'Audby'.
44,14	1 SALT-HOUSE. Duplicated at 44,6 (PM).
44,15	`WYKEHAM'. Lost in Nettleton, now represented by Wykeham Well at TF121974 (PM).
44,19	RASEN. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
45,3	4 PARTS OF 1 BOVATE. Or perhaps 'the fourth part' as a fourth part of 1 bovate in Hackthorn is recorded at 26,15; see 29,13 parts note (CT).
45,4	AUSTHORPE. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM). On the name, see 1,3 Austhorpe note.
	6 BOVATES. See CK30 (CT).
46	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal r for require ('enquire') in the right margin level with this chapter head. Farley did not reproduce it (CT).
46,3	[SILK] WILLOUGHBY. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated and is not in capitals (PM).
47,3	ERIK <OF TEALBY>. See 4,69 Erik note.
47,5	4 PARTS. It should perhaps be 'the fourth part' as there are 3 parts (that is, three-quarters) of a mill recorded for Thorganby in 14,12. On the extension of part', see 29,13 parts note (CT).
47,8	WRAGBY. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
48,1	OTHENKAR <OF ASHBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
48,2	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
48,3	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
48,4	THE FOURTH PART. The extension of part' to partem is more likely than to partes (= '4 parts') because another fourth part of a bovate is recorded for Swinhope in 12,33 (CT).
48,6	`OSEBY'. In the manuscript the place-name is rubricated (PM).
48,9	BLEASBY. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote blesbi, then corrected it to belesbi by interlining an e above and between the b and l. In the next entry (48,10) he corrected his original BLESBI to BILESBI by interlining an I and providing an omission sign below and between the B and I. These changes differentiate the names as Bleasby and Beelsby (CT).
48,10	BEELSBY. See 48,9 Bleasby note.
49	FOR THE MARGINAL f written in the central margin beside this chapter head, but not reproduced by Farley, see 8,14 marginal note.
	WILLIAM BLUNT. The manuscript has Blundi; bynames are usually in capitals in chapter headings (CT).
49,3	THORGOT [* LAG *]. See 18,1 Thorgot note.
51,2	`EAST DEEPING' [* DEEPING [ST JAMES] *]. Formerly 'East Deeping' (PM). The current name comes from the dedication of the church; for the change of name, see Youngs, Local Administrative Units, ii. p. 257.
51,3	THERE ALSO. In the manuscript IBIDĒ is manorial (PM).
		This land is described in the Black Book (Liber Niger) of Peterborough Abbey (Society of Antiquaries manuscript 60, f olio 23): 'In [East] Deeping 1 carucate and land for 3 oxen in jurisdiction from the land of Bole. In the land of Leofwin of Deeping there is as much in jurisdiction. Godfrey of Cambrai holds it.' Leofwin of Deeping and Bole were perhaps Godfrey's two men referred to here. The land returned to Peterborough ownership shortly thereafter, for later sources record the establishment of Market Deeping on Peterborough land here; see Beresford and Joseph, Medieval England, pp. 100-102 (PM).
	JURISDICTION OVER 5 MANORS. Domesday .v. soc' sup' .v. M' poses problems: soc' is the normal abbreviation for the oblique cases of soca (socam here) and the first .v. could have been mistakenly written in anticipation of the .v. M'. The word super is also the correct preposition in this phrase. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 173, translate as '5 sokemen upon 5 manors', but this is a rare extension of soc' (soch', the normal abbreviation for sochemannus in its various cases, is used in the next three entries) and super meaning 'on' is unusual. Moreover, this would be the only mention in Domesday Lincolnshire of Freemen with land before 1066. The description of the land referred to here as a jurisdiction in the Liber Niger (see 51,3 there note) lends weight to the reading proposed in this translation. Compare 18,7 Freemen's note (CT).
51,6	ITS VALUATION [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remainder of this line for the later completion of the valuation of this holding.
51,10	THISTLETON. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
		This estate lay in "Roteland", though this entry is not duplicated there (PM).
	GLEU. See 27,12 Gleu note.
51,11	AZUR. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original Ascer to Azor by interlining zor above the scer, though he failed then to underline that for deletion (CT).
	DEEPING. It is not clear whether the reference is to Deeping St James [formerly East Deeping] or to West Deeping (PM).
51,12	6 BOVATES. Corrected by the main scribe of Great Domesday from his original .iii. bou' (CT).
	BISHOP R[EMIGIUS] ... LINCOLN. This last line was written by the main scribe of Great Domesday below the last ruled line of folio 366b, extending into the left-hand 'tramlines' (CT).
52,1	AZUR [* FATHER OF SWEIN *]. Azur was the predecessor of Gunfrid of Chocques here and in NTH 48. His son Swein preceded Gunfrid in NTH 48,3;5-10;17 and in BUK 50,1. Swein held a single estate in chief, Stoke Bruerne (NTH 50,1), to which belonged 21 houses in Northampton held by Swein son of Azur (NTH B29).
53,2	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remainder of the line after T'ra for the later completion of the plough estimate, when available. For other uncompleted plough estimates, see 31,12 land note and compare 30,22.
	OSBERN THE PRIEST. He granted these lands as a prebend to Lincoln in 1099, according to the Lincoln Cathedral Registrum Antiquissimum (Foster, i. 14) (PM)
54,2	BARKSTON. The manuscript has Barchestune with a long -s-. Farley misprinted Barcheftune (CT).
55	ANSGOT [* OF BURWELL *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
55,4	THIS ENTRY was clearly written below the last ruled line of folio 366c by the main scribe of Great Domesday, but is unlikely to have been a much later addition because the ink is the same colour as the preceding entries. He probably wanted to begin the next fief (LIN 56) on a new column (CT).
56,1	[SOUTH] WITHAM. Young Edward is recorded as holding a third part of the church of [North] Witham at 2,34. However, this holding appears as [South] Witham in later sources (DR, citing the Book of Fees, pp. 183, 190).
	2 SALT-HOUSES, 10s. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected the render from .ii. solid' to .x. solid' (CT)
56,4	CULTIVATES IT. The land had been alienated from the church and without livestock, hence the unusual arrangements for cultivation.
	[***]. It is unclear what the main scribe of Great Domesday intended to add in the space (suitable for about 12 letters, not as large as the gap in Farley's edition) that he left here (CT).
	BELMESTHORPE. Held by Countess Judith in Northamptonshire (NTH 56,1) in 1086; it was later in Rutland (PM-CT).
56,5	IN HOUGHAM. William Rufus' confirmation of his father's gifts associates 5 carucates in Hougham with the gift of Leighton (Huntingdonshire) which Earl Waltheof, at Remigius' request, made to Lincoln , according to the Lincoln Cathedral Registrum Antiquissimum (Foster, i. pp. 3, 5). See also 7,54-55 (PM).
	STORI <OF BOLINGBROKE>. See C10 Stori note.
56,7	LITTLE PONTON. In the manuscript the place-name is not in capitals and is not rubricated (PM).
56,8	`GANTHROPS'. Often referred to as 'Ganthorpe'. The settlement is lost in Great Ponton, the site commemorated as Ganthrops plantation in Stoke Rochford Park: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lvi (PM).
56,9	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
	OSBERN [* OF BROUAY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
56,10	[* EARL *] MORCAR. See T3 Morcar note.
56,11	IN [MARKET] OVERTON. In "Roteland", as also 56,12-13;17-18, and entered there, though with slightly differing information: RUT 2,7-8;11-13 (PM). See RUT {Introduction: Duplicate Entries}.
	VALUE ... £12; NOW £40. Both figures were corrected. The main scribe of Great Domesday probably originally wrote .xx. lib' or .xv. lib' for the T.R.E. value, which was then corrected to .xii. by the erasure of the second x (or v) and the interlineation of .ii.. In the present value the main scribe seems to have begun to write a sum of shillings (perhaps 40): xl. sol'; this was then corrected to lib'. In the corresponding entry in "Roteland" the 1086 value is xx lib' (CT).
56,12	THISTLETON. See 56,11 Overton note.
	ERIK <OF TEALBY>. See 4,69 Erik note.
	HUGH [* OF BUCY *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
56,13	WHISSENDINE. See 56,11 Overton note.
	HUGH ^[OF HOTOT]^. He is called Hugh of Hotot in the duplicate entry in RUT 2,11.
	[VALUE ***]. As this is a manor with full manorial detail, a value would be expected. The space at the end of this entry, while not being deliberately left for this information, would have proved useful for it, if available.
56,14	MEADOW 15 FURLONGS. In the manuscript p'tū .xv. q'; Farley misprinted p'tū 7 .xv. q' (CT).
56,17	EXTON. See 56,11 Overton note.
56,18	WHITWELL. See 56,11 Overton note.
	"BESI". Domesday Besy here and in RUT 2,13, Besi in OXF 35,19, Beso in SUF 6,216. 35,7. Old Danish Bǿsi is one of a series of suggestions in von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 201, and is accepted by Fellows Jensen, Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, p. 70. However, in view of von Feilitzen's other suggestions, it has been decided for the present edition to keep to "Besi", his lead word. The Alecto edition has Besi here, in Rutland and in Oxfordshire, but Bosi in Suffolk.
		The Oxfordshire "Besi" was a predecessor of Miles Crispin who was also preceded on two of his holdings by a Bisi (BUK 23,32) and a Bosi (BRK 33,8) which makes it probable that all three forms, which occur only seven times between them in Great Domesday, represent one name and a single individual. Miles' predecessor in Buckinghamshire is described as a royal thane, as is the Bisi who preceded Hugh of Bolbec (BUK 26,8). The Bisi who preceded William son of Ansculf (BUK 17,21) was also an overlord and a close neighbour of the Bisi on the Crispin fief. The Besi, man of Alsi, with two small holdings in neighbouring vills in Hartismere Hundred in Suffolk, is likely to be a second individual (JP).
		The Domesday form Bisi occurs three times in Domesday Buckinghamshire (BUK 17,21. 23,32. 26,8) and represents Old Norse/Old Danish/Old Swedish Bisi: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 202, who rejected it as representing the forms Besi, Besy, Beso (p. 201). The Alecto edition has Bisi. This makes it unlikely that any of these people is the same individual as the "Besi" in the present entry or elsewhere. Likewise the form Bosi in BRK 33,8, as well as the forms Bose and Boso, represents Old Norse/Old Danish Bosi: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 207.
56,21	HUGH [* OF BUCY *]. See RUT 2,8 Thistleton note and RUT 2,8 Hugh note..
56,22	BICKER. The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original Wichere to Bichere; this is not clear in the Ordnance Survey facsimile (CT).
	[NORTH] WITHAM. See Stenton, Social and Economic History of the Danelaw, p. 433 (PM).
56,23	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the end of Countess Judith's fief after he had left a line blank. He wrote it after he had rubricated this county, probably in the same campaign as 1,37; see 1,37 entry note.
57,1	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,2	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,3	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,4	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,5	NORMANBY AND SANTON. In the manuscript the place-names are not rubricated (PM).
	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,6	ORFORD. Lost in Stainton-le-Vale at TF204947 where Orford House stands. The site of the twelfth-century house of Premonstratensian Canonesses founded at Orford lies to the west at TF195945 (PM).
	[* YOUNG *] EDWARD. See 4,42 Edward note.
	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,7	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,8	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,9	ALFRED [* OF CHANCE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,10	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. Aethelstan son of Godram, a substantial Lincolnshire landowner with full jurisdiction and market rights in Lincolnshire (T5), was the predecessor of Guy of Craon, who received the bulk of his honour from this one individual. This is disguised to a degree by scribal confusion of the names Aethelstan (Adestan) and Alstan (Alestan); but the Clamores for Lincolnshire (CK66) reveal that the Alestan of Drayton (57,56) is the same man as the Adestan of Bicker (57,44) and it is likely that the error is repeated elsewhere in the fief, all such cases (perhaps significantly) occurring on folio 368a (57,48;50;54-56). In addition to the properties which had devolved upon Guy, Aethelstan had also held Swaton (26,45) since that entry reveals that Aethelstan had two brothers, one of whom, Aelfric, had jurisdiction over him in Haceby. The only Aelfric holding in Haceby was on Guy's fief (57,18), incidentally indicating that part of Guy's honour came from another member of Aethelstan's family: see 57,15 Aelfric note. Links between Drayton and Ralph the constable referred to in the Clamores also suggest that the Aethelstan of 12,76 is the son of Godram. See also Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 240-41, who omits Haceby and its implications and inexplicably includes Swarby (probably an error for Swaton) (JP). See also 57,48 Alstan note.
57,11	WARNER <OF POINTON>. Warner is not a common name in Domesday Book, occurring less than two dozen times in all, and only three times in Lincolnshire, all on the fief of the same tenant-in-chief and all within a short distance of each other. It is probable they belonged to one individual (JP).
	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,12	IN DOWSBY. This entry is apparently duplicated at 67,23 where Osfram is recorded as holding it (PM). See also CK49.
57,13	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	WARNER <OF POINTON>. See 57,11 Warner note.
57,14	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,15	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. Aelfric was a predecessor of Guy of Craon, the bulk of whose holdings came from Aelfric's brother, Aethelstan: see 57,10 Aethelstan note. The family relationship is recorded in the entry for Swaton (26,45), which also connects the two brothers to Guy's fief via the link to his manor of Haceby. Aelfric's holdings which devolved upon Guy are intermixed with those of his brother, Aethelstan, and form a tight group of their own, only Kirton lying outside that group and that holding is adjacent to Athelstan's properties at Wyberton and Frampton. Despite the frequency of the occurrence of the name Aelfric, these links provide persuasive grounds for identifying all of Guy's predecessors of that name as the same individual (JP).
57,16	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,17	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,18	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
	JURISDICTION OVER 11 BOVATES. Duplicated at 46,1 where Waldin is identified as Waldin the Breton (PM).
57,19	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	WARNER <OF POINTON>. See 57,11 Warner note.
57,21	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,22	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,23	1 CARUCATE. The manuscript has .i. car' clearly; Farley misprinted .v. car' (CT).
57,24	`TOWTHORPE'. Lost in Londonthorpe, the site commemorated by Towthorpe Hollow: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxx (PM).
57,27	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,28	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,29	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,30	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,31	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,32	`MAREHAM'. This place, sometimes known as 'Cold Mareham' is lost in Burton Pedwardine, the name commemorated in Mareham Lane at approximately TF085431: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxi (PM).
57,33	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,34	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,35	MEADOW, 12 ACRES. In the manuscript ac's (= acras, accusative); Farley misprinted the nominative ac[rae]; see 24,6 acres note (CT).
	AELFRIC [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,15 Aelfric note.
57,36	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,37	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,38	WULFWARD [* WHITE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,39	WULFWARD [* WHITE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
57,44	AETHELSTAN [* SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,45	`SOUTHORPE'. Lost in Edenham at TF060220: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxvi (PM).
57,48	`HOUGHTON'. See 8,12 'Houghton' note.
	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. The Domesday form is Alestan here and in 57,50;54-56, which usually represents the name-form Alstan: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 152-53. In CK66 Aethelstan (Adestan) son of Godram appears to be the same individual as Alstan here; see Fellows Jensen, ‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, p. 32. See also CK66 Aethelstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note (PM-CT).
57,49	`HOUGHTON'. See 8,12 'Houghton' note.
	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Aethelstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,50	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	LAND FOR 12 [OXEN?]. Farley printed den' ('pence'). Although that is meaningless here, this is just what the word looks like now in the manuscript. There has obviously been an attempt at correction, not completed, probably from den' to bou'. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 184 note 2, categorically state that the correction was from car' to bou' or vice versa, but there is no sign of an initial c or b in the manuscript, though the final letter n looks as if it might have been ū: the abbreviation line is still visible (CT).
57,51	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,52	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,53	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,54	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	LAND [FOR *** PLOUGHS]. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote T'ra at the end of the first line of this entry and then left about a third of the second line blank for the later completion of the plough estimate, when available. See 31,12 land note for other examples of this. (CT).
	A DRYING-PLACE WITH SALT-HOUSES. Latin area means 'open space', 'building spot', 'courtyard', 'threshing floor'; area is a technical term in salt-houses and refers to the drying-space or salt-pan or the heap in which the salt was dried (PM-CT).
57,55	BOOTHBY [PAGNELL]. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM)
	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
	SIGHVATR HAS THE JURISDICTION. See 24,81 (PM).
57,56	DRAYTON. In the manuscript the place-name is manorial (PM).
	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
57,57	ALSTAN [* AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM *]. See 57,48 Alstan note and 57,10 Aethelstan note.
58,1	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,2	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,3	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,4	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,5	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,6	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,7	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
58,8	GODWIN <OF TEIGH>. Note to be supplied (JP).
59,1	UHTBRAND <OF DENTON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	GEOFFREY <OF DENTON>. On his identification, see Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 232 (JP).
59,4	GEOFFREY <OF DENTON>. See 59,1 Geoffrey note.
59,5	GEOFFREY <OF DENTON>. See 59,1 Geoffrey note.
59,7	GEOFFREY <OF DENTON>. See 59,1 Geoffrey note.
	FISHERIES. The estate of Bourne will have stretched to the River Glen, but will have included a great deal of marsh and fen. Any drainage ditch that preceded the Bourne Eau will probably have reached the threshold of the settlement. It is unclear whether these were fishponds, in the sense of closed areas where fish were bred and caught or fisheries (traps or weirs) on watercourses. The two Latin words used by Domesday (piscina and piscaria) do not appear to make this distinction; rather they are interchangeable (see HUN 4,3 fisheries note).
59,8	GEOFFREY <OF DENTON>. See 59,1 Geoffrey note.
59,13	RAUCEBY. In the manuscript there is a very faint pale brown smudge over the sb of Rosbi; it is not an interlined ce to correct this place-name to Roscebi, as the name is printed in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 187. With the exception of Roscebi in 59,14, Rosbi is the form used for Rauceby elsewhere in Domesday Lincolnshire (CT).
59,14	BRIAN <OF RAUCEBY>. The name Brian occurs without a byname on a dozen holdings in Domesday Book. Given the uncommon name and the geographical and tenurial patterns, there were probably three individuals bearing the name, the tenant of Robert of Stafford, ancestor of the de Stanton family, being one of them: Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 171 (JP).
59,15	BRIAN <OF RAUCEBY>. See 59,14 Brian note.
59,17	WOODLAND [AND?] MEADOW, 35 ACRES. The main scribe of Great Domesday either omitted 7 ('and') after siluę, or wrote p[ra]ti for minutę ('underwood, 35 acres'), or for pastilis ('pasturable woodland, 35 acres') (CT).
60,1	BURTON. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated and is not in capitals (PM).
61,1	HACONBY AND IN STAINFIELD. In the manuscript the place-names are not rubricated (PM).
61,5	IN THE MANUSCRIPT there is a marginal K (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim'), though apparently without a corresponding entry in the Clamores. See 3,15 marginal note (CT).
61,7	MARGINAL S'. The main scribe of Great Domesday seems originally to have written B[erewica], but then to have corrected it to S[oca] using darker ink. Farley misprinted B' (CT).
62,2	[NORTH?] WITHAM. This is to be identified either with North Witham or South Witham, though in view of its association here with Gunby the former is perhaps more likely (PM).
63,1	ROBERT <OF BITTESWELL>. See Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 394, to which should perhaps be added the Robert who held in the same vill from the escheated fief of Earl Aubrey; he also held in Swinford (LEC 10,9-10) (JP).
63,2	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *]. The Domesday form here and in 63,5 is Leduin[us], which normally represents Old English Leodwine: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 310. The Alecto edition has Leodwine. However, Geoffrey's predecessor here seems to be identical with his predecessor in Leicestershire (LEC 29,14) and in all his lands in Warwickshire, whose name was undoubtedly Leofwin; see Fellows Jensen, ‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, pp. 33-34 (PM-CT). See LEC 29 Geoffrey note.
		See Williams, English and the Norman Conquest, pp. 117-18; Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 290 (JP).
63,3	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *]. See 63,2 Leodwin note.
63,4	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *]. See 63,2 Leodwin note.
63,5	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *] *]. See 63,2 Leodwin note.
63,6	GYTHA <OF OWSTON>. If the manors of the two countesses are excluded, Gytha is a rare name, occurring fewer than half-a-dozen times. Neither countess or their families had known associations with either Owston or Lincolnshire so these two holdings were probably held by another individual (JP).
63,7	WAZELIN <OF HAXEY>. The name Wazelin occurs on seven holdings in Domesday Book, possibly representing four individuals. This was probably the sole holding of Wazelin <of Haxey>, who had no discernible links with the remaining holdings, none of which were within easy reach (JP).
63,9	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *]. See 63,2 Leodwin note.
63,11	LEODWIN [* LEOFWIN OF NEWNHAM *]. See 63,2 Leodwin note.
63,12	ULF ^[FENMAN]^. That is, Ulf Fenman; see CW17 (PM).
63,15	ABBOT OF ST GERMAN'S OF SELBY. The manuscript has Germano. Farley misprinted Gemano (CT).
63,16	2 CARUCATES. Corrected from .i. car' by the main scribe of Great Domesday (CT).
63,18	6? BOVATES. Farley printed .vi. Canon Foster argued (in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 193 note 1) that the punctus after the number .v had been smudged, although on close examination of the manuscript it is apparent that .v was corrected to .vi by the main scribe of Great Domesday. In the context of the carucation of Amcotts hundred (63,16-22) a figure of 5 bovates would produce the correct assessment of 12 carucates (PM-CT).
63,22	GYTHA <OF OWSTON>. See 63,6 Gytha note.
63,23	LUDDINGTON. In the manuscript this place-name is manorial (PM).
	`THE MARSHES'. Lost in Luddington, the site commemorated by Mere Dyke at approximately SE850166: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxi (PM).
	WATERTON. Lost at SE853180, the name commemorated by Waterton Hall (PM). Waterton Hall is at SE 853179; the 'Medieval Village of Waterton (site of)' is marked on the Ordnance Survey 1:25,000 map at SE857183.
63,26	THIS ISLAND. That is, the Isle of Axholme, co-extensive in Domesday with Epworth Wapentake, renamed Axholme Wapentake by the time of the Lindsey Survey. The Isle of Axholme lay at the junction of Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire. Although the name survives, the 'island', like the Isle of Thanet and the Isle of Oxney (both in Kent) is now surrounded by drained dry land. This summative entry refers to 63,5-25, places in Epworth Wapentake.
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left the remaining 18 ruled lines of the column blank, probably in case more of Geoffrey's lands should be revealed (see 1,106 entry note). However, he later filled the last 6 ½ lines with details of more jurisdictions of Ruskington and Westborough (64,11-14) belonging to the opposite column; see 64,11 entry note (CT).
64,1	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. Toki was Geoffrey Alselin's only predecessor in Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire, and his chief predecessor in Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire. Toki is only identified as the son of Auti in C4 and T5, though the Toki son of Otti (Otta) in YKS C36 is almost certainly the same man as he had the same identical rights in York as Toki son of Auti did in Lincoln. See von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 385 note 5, with reference to VCH Leicestershire, i. p. 295; see also Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xxx. On the forms of the names Toki and Auti in Domesday Book, see DBY 6,27 Toki note.
		See Clarke, English Nobility, pp. 347-48, who does not include DBY 6,48 and YKS 13W14 (JP).
	A CERTAIN DROGO [* OF LA BEUVRIERE *]. Drogo of La Beuvrière here and at 64,2. His lands appear at 30,34-35 (PM).
64,2	DROGO [* OF LA BEUVRIERE *]. See 64,1 Drogo note.
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,3	MEADOW, 160? ACRES. It is not clear in the manuscript whether the interlined cxl is intended as an addition to the .xx. below (= 160) or as a correction (= 140), though if the latter the scribe omitted to underline the .xx. for deletion. Compare 13,2 smallholders note and 24,51 meadow note (CT)
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,4	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,5	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,6	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,7	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,8	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,9	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,10	1 MILL [***]. The main scribe of Great Domesday left a space suitable for about four letters here, probably for the later insertion of the mill's render (CT).
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,11	THIS ENTRY and the three following (64,12-14) were added together by the main scribe of Great Domesday at the bottom of folio 369c in part of the space left by him at the end of LIN 63 (see 63,26 entry note). There are no transposition signs, but the first three entries (64,11-13) were jurisdictions of Ruskington (64,1) at the top of the next column (folio 369d) and the last entry (64,14) was a jurisdiction of Westborough (64,15) which is the last entry on folio 369d (CT).
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,12	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 64,11 entry note (CT).
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,13	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 64,11 entry note (CT).
	"COTELAND". Lost in Anwick: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. liv (PM).
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,14	THIS ENTRY was added by the main scribe of Great Domesday; see 64,11 entry note (CT).
	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,15	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,16	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,17	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
64,18	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
	5 PARTS. Or perhaps 'the fifth part'; on the extension of part', see 29,13 parts note (CT).
64,19	TOKI [* SON OF AUTI *]. See 64,1 Toki note.
65,1	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. Aelric son of Mergeat; see CK27 (PM).
65,2	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. Aelric son of Mergeat; see CK27.
65,3	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. Aelric son of Mergeat; see CK27.
65,4	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. Aelric son of Mergeat; see CK27.
65,5	ALL THIS ... BY THE WITNESS OF THE MEN OF THE WHOLE COUNTY. See CK27; however, details of North Hykeham are omitted there, possibly in error (CT).
	AELRIC ^[SON OF MERGEAT]^. Aelric son of Mergeat; see CK27.
67,2	HOWELL. The manuscript has Vuelle, with a malformed or incomplete letter H in the manner of the HV ligature interlined above and to the left of the V, for Huuelle. Compare 30,25 Stoke note. Farley printed a t above the I of In in error (CT).
67,3	"BURG". Lost in Evedon. Canon Foster draws attention to Bargate Hill and Bargate Lane at approximately TF106465; Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lii (PM).
67,11	IN THREEKINGHAM. Duplicated at 3,55 (PM).
	TWELFTH PART ... SIXTH PART ... SIXTH PART. All these are in the accusative, so must be objects of h[abe]t Vluiet despite the ibi .i. soch[emannus] (CT).
67,20	`HOUGHTON'. In the manuscript the place-name not rubricated (PM). See 8,12 'Houghton' note.
67,21	`HOUGHTON'. See 8,12 'Houghton' note.
68	LAND OF SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *] AND OTHER THANES. The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote TERRA SORTEBRAND, and then added 7 aliorum tainorum mostly in large lower-case letters, the tainorum being interlined and in a smaller script, but he omitted to correct TERRA to the plural TERRAE. The remainder of the Lincolnshire folios were originally intended to form three chapters (see L68 Swartbrand note). The division was preserved in the text for the scribe left one line between 68,4 and 68,5, which would have started LIN 69; and began 68,16 with an enlarged initial I to signify the start of LIN 70 (CT).
		The Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 3/20 p. 242) identifies Swartbrand as Swartbrand son of Ulf, that is, the Lincoln lawman of that name; see C2-3;13 and CK18;29 (PM).
68,1	EDNOTH. The Domesday form Ednod represents Old English Eadnoth: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 233. However, in the corresponding entry in the Clamores (CW1) the form of his name appears as Elnod which represents the name-form Alnoth: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, pp. 149-50. According to Fellows Jensen, ‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, p. 32, his name was probably Old English Æthelstan, though she could not rule out the possibility of scribal error or confusion. The Phillimore printed edition has Alnoth both here and for CW1, but it has been decided for the present edition to keep to the names normally represented by the Domesday forms. The Alecto edition has Eadnoth here and Alnoth in CW1.
	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,2	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,3	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,4	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,5	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,6	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,7	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,8	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,9	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	MEADOW, 60 ACRES. In the manuscript ac' (= acrae); Farley misprinted the accusative ac[ra]s. Compare 24,6 acres note (CT).
	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,10	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,11	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,12	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,13	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,14	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,15	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,18	BRICTEVA <OF CORBY>. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,20	LOBTHORPE. The manuscript has IOPINTORP; Farley misprinted LOPINTORP; see 1,48 Heapham note. The main scribe of Great Domesday may have misread an original L or l as an I ; see 24,38 Ewerby note and 31,18 'Langoe' note (CT).
68,21	THIS WHOLE ENTRY is underlined and boxed in on the right of the second and third lines. The ink of the lining is paler than that of the main body of the entry and is the same colour as that used in 68,22 and subsequent entries, which suggests that the scribe had a break after 68,21 and did the underlining when he resumed work, though whether the underlining was intended to convey deletion or for emphasis is uncertain. Compare 16,21 entry note (CT). The scribe of the Breviate read this as underlining to indicate deletion and omitted this passage (PM).
	`LITTLE LAVINGTON'. Lost in Lenton (formerly 'Lavington') between Lenton and Hanby: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lx (PM).
68,25	IN [SOUTH] WITHAM. In the manuscript the initial I of In is 'square', and the place-name is rubricated. A marginal M', however, appears to have been erased (PM-CT).
68,29	LEODWIN [* SON OF RAVEN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,30	ERNWIN [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,31	RECEIVED IT WITHOUT A DELIVERER. That is, without any lawful transfer of tenure by a representative of the king. The Latin liberator is from libero ('to hand over', 'to deliver', 'to transfer'), from which the Modern French verb livrer comes. Compare CW14 and also CS13 where land was 'delivered' to Bishop Odo by charter (CT).
68,35	"ELFAIN". The name "Elfain" occurs twice in Domesday Book, holding a manor and jurisdiction in the same vill and therefore belonging to the same individual. A possibly related form of the name, "Elfin", occurs four times in Derbyshire but is unlikely to be connected with these distant and modest holdings with which they have no links (JP).	However, the Alecto edition has the name Elfin for both the holdings here and in 68,36 and those in Derbyshire (DBY 6,40;52;58;60). See DBY 6,40 "Elfin" note.
68,36	"ELFAIN". See 68,35 "Elfain" note.
68,37	YADDLETHORPE. In the manuscript IADVLFTORP; Farley misprinted LADVLFTORP, as he did for the same name in 1,61. Compare 1,48 Heapham note.
68,38	WINTERTON. In the manuscript the place-name is not rubricated and is not in capitals (PM).
68,43	SIWARD [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
68,44	STENKIL <OF RIBY>. See 16,1 Stenkil note.
	SIWARD [* THE PRIEST *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	3? FREEMEN. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote an 7 after Seuard' in error, but then superimposed the first of the three minims of iii. soch' on it; the result is unsatisfactory. Farley misread it as Seuard' 7 ii. soch'. (CT).
68,47	LAND FOR 4 OXEN. Interlined later by the main scribe of Great Domesday. For the addition of other plough estimates by him, see 24,86 land note and 12,72 land note.
	CHURCH OF ST MICHAEL. Perhaps in Lincoln; see Hill, Medieval Lincoln, p. 130 (PM).
68,48	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left blank the remaining 38 ruled lines of folio 371c, all 44 ruled lines of folio 371d and the whole of folio 372 (also ruled for 44 lines). He began a new quire for the Yorkshire Clamores, which occupy folios 373a-374b. He left blank folio 374cd are blank before beginning the account of the Lincolnshire Clamores on folio 375a (CT).
CS1	THE CLAMORES are discussed briefly in {Introduction: The Clamores}.
CS5	LANDS ... IN LINDSEY. Hill argued in Medieval Lincoln, p. 67, that these were the 12 carucates in Louth listed at 7,56 (PM).
CS6	LANDS OF THE TWO BROTHERS. Earl Hugh's holdings appear at 13,33;44 where his predecessors were Aleifr, Godric, Edric and Aelfeva (PM).
CS7	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CS9	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CS10	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	3 BOVATES OF LAND IN STEWTON. Apparently the 3 bovates held by Ilbert from the Bishop of Bayeux at 4,73 (PM).
CS11	IN THE LEFT MARGIN of the manuscript, close to the left edge of the folio and just below the first line of this entry the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote rq', for require ('enquire') in paler ink; Farley did not print it. The interlined words dicunt and de added by him, which help to explain the truncated Latin, are probably in response to this request (CT).
	WHOLE MINSTER [CHURCH]. Domesday totum monasterium, rightly a monastery or minster (church), but see 40,26 which states that Rainer has the third part of 1 church (ęcclesię) and claims the other two parts (CT). There is no evidence that there was ever a monastery here.
CS13	1 CARUCATE OF LAND IN WELL. See 24,68 where Tonni is recorded as Gilbert's predecessor. Losoard was the Bishop of Bayeux' tenant at Rigsby where Thorulf was one of the 1066 holders, and to which 1 bovate of land in Well belonged in jurisdiction (4,61-62) (PM).
	THE DAY HE WAS TAKEN. This appears to be a reference to the arrest of Bishop Odo in 1082. Though he remained a captive until William's death there is little other evidence that he was dispossessed and indeed he appears in Domesday as mostly in possession of his lands; see Douglas, William the Conqueror, p. 243, but see also GLS 1,22-23;65 (PM-CT).
CS14	2 BOVATES OF LAND IN ULCEBY. See 40,22 where they are listed as a jurisdiction of Cumberworth in Rainer's chapter (PM).
CS15	IN MABLETHORPE. The manuscript has im for in (CT).
CS16	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	OUGHT TO HAVE ONE. The manuscript has unā debet habet hab'e: habet is an error for habere but was not deleted by the scribe (CT).
CS17	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
CS19	IN WILLOUGHBY. Possibly the land at 24,59. Alnoth, perhaps Alnoth the priest, was the bishop's predecessor at 3,21;25 (PM).
CS20	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
CS21	HAROLD. The bishop's predecessor in Horncastle Wapentake (see 3,13). On the claims of Eudo and the bishop, see 3,15;22 (PM).
	JOINTLY. Domesday pariliter here and in CS22;38 is apparently the same as pariter; see DEV 1,15 freely note on the form of land tenure implied by par(il)iter and in paragio (CT).
CS22	EUDO [* SON OF SPIREWIC *]. See 3,15 Eudo note.
	"TORP". See note 2,23 "Torp" note (PM).
	JOINTLY. See CS21 jointly note (CT).
	GUTHFRITHR'S SONS. Eudo son of Spirewic derived title to his lands in Horncastle Wapentake from Godwin and Gunnhvati, who are perhaps therefore to be identified as the sons of Guthfrithr. See 3,10 (PM).
	UNCLE. That is, the Harold mentioned in CS21 (CT).
CS23	THE WOODLAND. Entered at 24,16 (PM).
CS25	KLAKKR. Roger of Poitou's predecessor at Hainton (16,14). Rainer held 3 ½ bovates there at 40,9. Alfred of Lincoln held 3 ½ bovates there [Torrington] which had been Klakkr's (27,21) (PM).
CS26	IN LEGSBY. This would seem to be the 4 bovates of land at 22,37. Domesday notes that jurisdiction lay in Wragby which was held by Erneis; see 34,12-23 (PM).
CS28	ESKIL'S LAND. At 4,53 where Wadard held it from the Bishop of Bayeux (PM).
	THE ARCHBISHOP'S PREDECESSOR. Almer, who had held [South] Willingham at 2,1. See also CS29 (PM-CT).
CS29	10 BOVATES IN [SOUTH] WILLINGHAM. Entered in Rainer of Brimeux' chapter at 40,8 (PM).
CS30	12 BOVATES IN STAINFIELD. See 22,17 (PM).
	WHICH BELONGS. The Latin quę refers to soca ('jurisdiction') (CT).
CS31	IT LIES. The jurisdiction lies, because of eā in the next clause (CT).
CS32	IN APLEY. The bishop's holding appears at 3,8, William of Percy's at 22,20; the predecessor in both instances, Aelfric (PM).
CS34	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON> HOLDS. See 68,6 (PM-CT).
CS36	TO [THE LOSS OF] HIS LORD, GILBERT. Domesday contra dominum suum G. is possibly a corrupt phrase. Vigleikr was Robert's predecessor at 'Butchett' in Bardney (38,10). Here and at Claythorpe (CS12) Robert claimed lands which had been held by Vigleikr, the jurisdiction of which lay elsewhere. Gilbert was Vigleikr's lord only in the sense that he held Bardney (24,17;45-53), of which the 2 carucates at Scremby (24,47) were a jurisdiction. In this case, however, the use of the preposition contra ('forfeited that land to his lord') would be bad grammar. Alternatively, the manuscript G. may be a scribal error for R., the sense being that Vigleikr forfeited the land to the loss of his lord Robert: because it was forfeited, Robert could not succeed to it as he had done to another of Vigleikr's lands (38,8) (CT).
CS37	KETILBIORN <OF NETTLETON>. Note to be supplied (JP).
	THROUGH GODRIC ... FORFEITED IT. Ketilbiorn had received other lands held T.R.E. by Godric, but the 1 carucate (or the ½ carucate) holding in Scremby had been forfeited by Godric, and presumably was reallocated to Gilbert of Ghent (CT).
CS38	THEIR FATHER. Perhaps Godwin, but see CN30 brothers note (PM).
	IF A ROYAL EXPEDITION WAS NECESSARY. That is, they were needed for military service. Sighvatr was the king's man and so under obligation to serve him, but the obligation seems to have been shared between the brothers in the order: Sighvatr, Alnoth, Fenkell and then Eskil, which was probably that of their seniority. The 'help' presumably involved minding the brother's property and working his lands in his absence (CT).
CS39	SALTFLEET. Canon Foster argued that Domesday Salfluet here and in CS40 is not to be identified with modern Saltfleet, but lay to the south, close to Saltfleetby St Clements: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxiv (PM).
	`MARE'. A haven at the mouth of Mar Dyke at TF465924: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. lxiv (PM).
	`SWINE'. A haven at the mouth of Swine Dyke at approximately TF395985: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. lxiii-lxiv (PM).
CS40	SALTFLEET. See CS39 Saltfleet note (PM).
	WILLINGLY AND UNWILLINGLY. The normal sense of ingratis is 'unwillingly'. Gratis on the other hand in Classical Latin means 'for no reward but thanks', 'for nothing', but in Medieval Latin it seems to have been affected by the meaning of ingratis and developed into a true antonym: 'freely', 'willingly'. Tolls are raised, it seems, both on boats putting in at Saltfleet in the normal course of trade and on those driven there by storm or seeking a haven (CT).
CN1	BARTON[-UPON-HUMBER]. See 24,13-14 (PM).
CN2	IN CAISTOR. See 1,65 (PM).
CN4	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	STRIP OF PLOUGHLAND. The Latin is cultura terrę: cultura comes from colo ('to cultivate', 'to till'), so a cultura terrę would be a piece of land that was to be tilled, or was actually under the plough, rather than one intended for pasture (CT).
CN5	IN GOXHILL. Hugh's holding appears at 68,40; Drogo of La Beuvrière's interest at 30,2; and Alfred of Lincoln's at 27,1 (PM).
	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CN6	CHURCH OF CAISTOR. The claim is noted in 1,65 (PM).
CN7	JOCELYN. See 12,10 (PM).
	3 BOVATES. The manuscript has .iii. bou' clearly; Farley misprinted .ii. bou' (CT).
CN8	NORMAN. That is, of Norman of Arcy who held 1 ½ bovates in Brocklesby at 32,2 (PM)
CN9	EILAFR'S TWO MANORS. See 2,6. The Latin has poor sentence construction (PM).
CN10	½ BOVATE. See 2,25. Rainer held Limber (40,1) (PM).
	STALLINGBOROUGH. The manuscript has Stalingeburg clearly; Farley misprinted Stanlingeburg (CT).
CN11	IN KEELBY. See 2,8 (PM).
CN12	ALFRED [* OF LINCOLN *]. That is, Alfred of Lincoln who held land here at 27,3. Durand Malet's holding appears at 44,8 (PM).
CN13	IN SWALLOW. See 2,10 (PM).
	ERIK'S LAND. See 4,71 (PM).
CN14	LOSOARD. The Bishop of Bayeux is recorded as holding the customs and the ferry at Grimsby (4,70), but as Losoard was the bishop's tenant elsewhere (4,8;41;61) it is likely that he held Grimsby also (PM).
CN15	2 ½ BOVATES OF LAND. Perhaps part of Roger of Poitou's holding at Owersby at 16,8, which belonged to the church of Winghale. See 16,8 manuscript note (PM).
CN16	ERNWIN THE PRIEST. The Bishop of Bayeux' holding appears at 4,74; Ernwin's at 68,42 (PM).
CN18	RAINER CLAIMS IT. Rainer of Brimeux held land at Tealby at 40,14. The claim refers to Jocelyn's holding in the same place at 28,20 (PM).
CN19	1 MILL. See 14,11 (PM).
CN22	DROGO. Presumably Drogo of La Beuvrière, though his interest in the place is not otherwise recorded (PM).
CN23	FULCRIC'S LAND. In the manuscript t'ra Fulcheri; Farley misprinted terra Fulcheri (CT).
CN24	CUXWOLD. See 25,10 manuscript note. William of Percy's holding appears at 22,9 (PM).
CN25	GRIMKEL'S HALL. See 3,7 (PM).
CN26	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	THE LAND OF INGIMUNDR AND HIS BROTHERS. In [Wold] Newton (12,31) (PM).
CN27	4 ½ CARUCATES OF LAND. The note to the Phillimore printed edition read: 'Canon Foster argued that this was part of the bishop's 13 bovates in North Ormsby (7,25). Ulf of Ormsby is identical with Ulf son of Topi, whose grant to St Mary is recorded in his will of 1066 x 1068: Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 219; Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, p. 97. The claim may therefore refer to the holding at 7,25 or more probably to that at 30,20, of which the T.R.E. holders were Ulf and Skemundr' (PM).
		Both Foster and Longley and the editors of the Phillimore printed edition read the Latin terra Vlf de Ormesbi as meaning 'the land of Ulf of Ormsby', thus giving Ulf a byname. However, parallel examples in the Huntingdonshire Declarations (HUN D7;10;27; see HUN D7 Aelfric note) suggest the the land is actually at Ormsby and that Ulf (who is already Ulf son of Topi) has no other byname. The translation in the Phillimore printed edition, 'the land of Ulfr of Ormsby', has therefore been altered here to 'the land of Ulf in [North] Ormsby'.
CN28	IN "SCHEMIN" [* [NORTH] ORMSBY *]. Domesday Schemin is undoubtedly the personal name. Skemundr (Domesday Scemund), the T.R.E. holder of land in [North] Ormsby, to which this claim refers (30,20). For other scribal confusions of this kind, see 4,10 "Summerlede" note and 24,26 "Offran" note (PM).
	DROGO [* OF LA BEUVRIERE *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CN29	LAND OF BERENGAR OF TOSNY. See 18,9 and 3,20 (PM).
CN30	LAND OF 3 BROTHERS. The bishop acquired the holdings of Alnoth, Eskil and Fenkell (3,21-22;43; and perhaps 3,47 if the '3 brothers' there were the same as these three), whilst Eudo acquired those of the fourth brother, Sighvatr (29,10), on whom see CN30 Sighvatr note (PM-CT).
	SIGHVATR - OR GODWIN -. In the manuscript (and Farley) the interlined letter before Goduin is clearly l with an abbreviation line through it, standing for vel ('or'); Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 218, read it as f[ilius] ('son of Godwin'). Perhaps the main scribe of Great Domesday misread an f in his source as l with a line through it; he often had such problems of deciphering, often leading to his insertions of vel with an alternative reading, which may be the case here. A Sighvatr, Alnoth, Fenkell and Eskil, presumably the same four brothers, occur at CS38, but there is no mention there of Godwin as an alternative for Sighvatr, though a Godwin was Eudo's predecessor at 29,11;30 (CT).
CW1	ALNOTH. See 68,1 Ednoth note (PM).
	SWARTBRAND [* SON OF ULF *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CW2	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]'S LAND. See 8,13 (PM).
	ALL SAINTS IN LINCOLN. See C16 church note (PM).
CW3	JOCELYN SON OF LAMBERT. His claim is not otherwise noted, nor his interest here, although Aghmund was his predecessor elsewhere. Norman the fat is the successor of the Lincoln lawman Guthroth at C3 from whom he presumably derived his title to '[Middle] Carlton' (33,1) (PM).
CW5	NORMAN. That is, Norman of Arcy who held 9 bovates of land at Scothern, with Godric as his predecessor, at 32,29. The claim, presumably made by Norman, probably refers to 4 ½ bovates here which Kolsveinn held through Godric at 26,5 (PM).
CW7	BISHOP REMIGIUS. The bishop's interest here is not otherwise recorded in Domesday, though in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 3/2 p. 241) he held the king's lands here listed at 1,35-36 (PM).
CW8	RANULF. Ranulf of Saint-Valery; see 43,5 (PM).
	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CW9	LANDS ... IN STURTON[-BY-STOW] HUNDRED. In the Bishop of Bayeux' holding at 4,3 (PM).
CW10	BELONGS TO. The main scribe of Great Domesday wrote pertinet ab in error for pertinet ad (CT).
	[GATE] BURTON OR "BROCTONE". The main scribe of Great Domesday originally wrote bortona and then interlined o above and between the r and t with a faint hair-line indicating its correct position in the text to produce borotona. He then interlined l' (= vel, 'or') broctone, but failed to see his interlined o when he began, so it became mixed up with the c of broctone. This presumably led Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 220, to print Bortona uel Brogtone, though the interlineations are quite clear in the manuscript. Farley printed the two sets of interlineations on different levels for clarity. The reading in the scribe's source was probably unclear (CT).
	STEINGRIMR'S LAND. In Willingham-by-Stow (12,3) (PM).
CW11	GILBERT OF GHENT. See 24,9 Ulf note (PM).
	AND THE THIRD PART. Farley omitted 7 before t'cia pars (CT).
	BECAUSE OF THEIR PREDECESSORS. That is, their predecessors were exempt from this custom. This extended use of per develops from phrases such as that in CS36 'Robert the bursar claims against Gilbert of Ghent in Scremby through Vigleikr, his predecessor' (that is, by succession from, through inheritance from Vigleikr) (CT).
CW12	GRIMKEL. No indication of the place is given, although this section of the Clamores appears to be concerned with 'Aslacoe' Wapentake. Grimkel held land at Willoughton (47,1) in 'Aslacoe' Wapentake and the claim would appear to refer to this estate. Merleswein's successor in Lincolnshire was Ralph Paynel, who held land at Broughton in 'Manley' Wapentake as successor to Merleswein and Grimkel (35,1-2) to which, alternatively, this claim may refer (PM).
	MERLESWEIN THE SHERIFF. See C5 Merleswein note.
	BECAUSE HE STOOD ACCUSED BEFORE THE KING. Domesday pro reatu regis: reatus is the state of being a reus, that is, 'a defendant', 'a man accused'. A whole clause is needed to translate the brief Latin (CT).
CW13	JOCELYN ... AND IVO. The holdings of Jocelyn son of Lambert and Ivo Tallboys appear at 28,4 and 14,21 respectively, where the jurisdiction of Bishop Remigius is acknowledged (PM).
CW14	IN NORTHORPE HUNDRED. See 8,16. R(alph) of Néville held the land in the Lindsey Survey (Foster and Longley, 4/9 p. 243). See 8,20 Ralph note (PM).
	HE DID NOT HAVE A DELIVERER FOR IT. That is, he was not given formal seizin of it; see 68,31 deliverer note.
CW15	SWEIN'S LAND. A k (for kalum(p)nia, 'claim') was written beside Roger of Poitou's holding in Laughton (16,28), which had been held by Swein in 1066, but no mention of a disputed jurisdiction is mentioned there.
	THROUGH HIS PREDECESSOR. In the manuscript suū seems to have been corrected to suā, although antecessor is masculine; the main scribe of Great Domesday may have thought it should agree with socā or t'rā (CT).
	WILGRIM [* ULFGRIM *]. Domesday Wilgrim represents Old German Wilgrim: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 415. However, Guy of Craon's predecessor in Laughton (57,7) was Ulfgrim (Domesday Vlgrim). The form Wilgrim only occurs here in Domesday and it would seem likely that it is a misreading of the Old Norse Ulfgrimr, whose Domesday forms are Vlgrim, Vlgrin, Olgrim: von Feilitzen, Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book, p. 399. It would be very easy to misread Vl- as Wi-. The fact that Wilgrim had full jurisdiction over Swein probably supports this suggestion: it would be less likely for someone with an Old German name to have had such powers over someone with an Old Norse/Old Danish name. Compare 12,7 Wilgrim note.
CW16	THREE MANORS. Listed at 8,15;17;23. Eskil's bequests to Peterborough are described in the early twelfth-century brevis cartula of the abbey (Society of Antiquaries manuscript 60, folio 72v-73). He is there described as Eskil son of Toki and brother of Abbot Brand, Siric and Sighvatr. Apart from the lands where he is named (8,15;17;23;28) he is also listed as the donor of those lands, which in Domesday had been held by Rothulfr (8,14;20;22); see Stenton in Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. xl (PM).
	UNDER HIS FREE AUTHORITY. Domesday in propria libertate; this use looks forward to the later medieval sense of a territorial 'Liberty', though it is probably here the equivalent of habuit sacam 7 socam ('he had full jurisdiction') as in the preceding entry (CT).
	BRAND, THE MONK. The interlined m with an o above it abbreviates monachus ('monk') here, not modo ('now') as it frequently does. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. 222-23, however, extend it to modo and translate it as 'only' (CT).
CW17	EPWORTH WAPENTAKE. Later Axholme Wapentake; see {Introduction: Wapentakes} (PM).
	3 BOVATES ... IN AMCOTTS. Perhaps those given at 63,17 (CT).
	IN BELTON. The claim is noted at 63,25 (PM).
CW18	IN WINTERINGHAM HUNDRED. At Walcot, see 34,25 (PM).
CW19	1 PLOT. See 1,64 (PM-CT).
CW20	DROGO [* OF LA BEUVRIERE *]. That is, Drogo of La Beuvrière; see 30,3 (PM).
	AFTER THIS ENTRY the main scribe of Great Domesday left 17 ruled lines blank, probably for the later addition, if necessary, of more claims in the West Riding (CT).
CK1	LAND OF WULFGEAT. At 27,34;37-39. Wulfgeat appears as the T.R.E. holder in two of the places named (PM).
	HIS SISTER'S RELATIVE. According to the Revised Medieval Latin Word List, sororius (from soror, 'sister') can mean 'sister's husband' or 'wife's brother'. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 225, have 'sister's son'. There seems no way of telling which is the correct translation here, so the term 'relative' was chosen (CT).
CK2	60 ACRES OF LAND. Recorded at 56,4 where it is said to be at Uffington; see also 27,34-35. Peterborough Abbey appears to have acquired the land at Uffington shortly after Domesday; see Stapleton, Chronicon Petroburgense, p. 178 (PM-CT). However, the situation may be as Domesday describes it, that Peterborough Abbey held the land before 1066 and that it was alienated, perhaps by Earl Waltheof, Countess Judith's husband. This may be connected with the unusual arrangements for cultivation.
	PLOUGHS FROM BELMESTHORPE. The Latin reads: colit cum carucis de belmestorp. That is, Countess Judith uses the ploughs from the estate of Belmesthorpe that she held in Northamptonshire (NTH 56,1). Belmesthorpe was later in Rutland. 'From Belmesthorpe' was the translation of the Phillimore printed edition, but the Latin preposition de can equally well mean 'of', its use being necessary when the noun (belmestorp) is indeclinable. A possible translation is therefore: 'the ploughs of Belmesthorpe' or 'the Belmesthorpe ploughs'.
	UFFINGTON [THE LAND] OF ALFRED OF LINCOLN. In the Latin (in Offintone Aluredi de Lincolia) Aluredi is in the genitive case and simply means ' Uffington of/ belonging to Alfred of Lincoln' or 'Alfred of Lincoln's Uffington', referring to his two manors there (27,34-35).
CK3	AZUR'S ½ CARUCATE OF LAND. Held by Gilbert of Ghent at 24,35, although its jurisdiction lay in Gunfrid's manor at Casewick at 52,1 (PM).
CK4	ASFRITH'S LAND. See 8,34 Hereward note (PM-CT).
	HEREWARD. See 8,34 Hereward note(PM).
	THE DAY HE FLED. This is a reference to Hereward's flight after the Fenland rebellion of 1070/1071, 'who with a few men escaped through the marshes': Florence of Worcester, Chronicle, (Thorpe, i. p. 9) (PM). This edition has now been superseded by John of Worcester, Chronicle (McGurk, iii. pp. 20-21) who translates 'who fled with a few men through the fens'. The Latin is qui per paludes cum paucis evasit. Latin evasit tends to mean 'escape' rather than 'flee' (effugo); the presumption is that he was not caught.
CK5	MORCAR. See 35,13 (PM).
CK6	DROGO [* OF LA BEUVRIERE *]. That is, Drogo of La Beuvrière. The land appears at 30,32 where the abbot's claim is noted. Gilbert of Ghent's holding is at 24,32 (PM).
CK8	SKILLINGTON. See 2,37 (PM-CT).
CK9	ASLACKBY. See 18,19 (PM).
CK10	THE OUTLIER HARDWICK. The name is a common one, so it is not certain that this is the place in Witchley Wapentake, Northamptonshire (later in Rutland). identified by Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, pp. xl, 227.
	ULF SON OF TOPI. The 'sale' is recorded in the will of Ulf and Madselin, 'to Bishop (sic) Aldred the estates at Lavington and Hardwick as a complete purchase': Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills, pp. 95, 209 (PM).
CK11	ESKIL. See 26,49 (PM)
CK13	RAUCEBY. See 3,37 and 7,53 (PM).
CK14	BRANSTON, THE LAND OF ALSI. Domesday has in Branztun t'rā Elsi. Terram is probably in apposition to socā, although it could be a mistake for the ablative terra. Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 227, aware that the T.R.E. holder of Branston was Hemming (31,11) translated the phrase as in apposition to the nouem bouatas, but the Latin word order is against this. Moreover, the reason why the Walter's claim was just was because he already held the main manor of which the 9 bovates were being claimed: if the 9 bovates were already held by Walter there would have been no need for a claim (CT).
CK16	ARCHBISHOP THOMAS. Thomas was Archbishop of York (PM).
	LEOFSI. Robert's predecessor at Metheringham at 59,19, who was identical to Leofsi the deacon, who gave lands here to Ramsey Abbey c.1040 x 1041. Auti held land at Hackthorn in 2,17, where Ramsey Abbey also had an estate and to which this claim may perhaps refer; see Hart, Early Charters of Eastern England, p. 101 (PM).
CK19	ALMER AND HIS BROTHERS. Grimbert and Thorfridh; see 56,6-7 (PM).
CK21	IN THE LEFT MARGIN of folio 377a, level with the second line of this entry, the main scribe of Great Domesday wrote rq' (for require, 'enquire'). It is closer to the inner edge of the parchment and is very slightly fainter than the one next to CK28. It is not reproduced in the Ordnance Survey facsimile, however, and this was presumably why Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 226, made no reference to it. Farley printed it correctly. There is no sign in the manuscript of any addition to this entry (CT).
	7 GARDENS IN GRANTHAM. Perhaps those claimed by the Bishop of Durham; see 1,9 (PM).
CK22	THEY THEMSELVES SHOULD GO OVER THIS LAND. 'They' are presumably not Ivo and Robert, but the 'men of the wapentake' who will judge the claim to ownership by the amount of tax each pays.
CK23	3 CARUCATES. See 12,91 (PM).
CK25	THURLBY. See 56,15 (PM).
CK27	BALDWIN [* OF FLANDERS *]. That is, Baldwin of Flanders. His lands are entered at 65,1-5, where this claim is also noted. Aelric son of Mergeat's grant to St Peter of Westminster is rehearsed in a writ of William I to Bishop Remigius: Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, i. p. 212 (PM).
	HEAD MANOR. That is, Doddington.
CK28	THE MAIN SCRIBE of Great Domesday wrote rq' (for require, 'enquire') in the margin next to this entry. Nothing was added or corrected as a result of it (CT).
	KOFSI. His holding is not otherwise noted (PM).
CK29	4 CARUCATES OF LAND IN NORTH HYKEHAM. The claim is Swartbrand's and is noted at 12,92 (PM).
CK30	6 BOVATES. Described as an outlier of Ewerby at 45,4 (PM).
	NOW ARE MARTIN'S. Domesday ē (=est, 'is') is a scribal error for sunt ('are') (CT).
CK31	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	HECKINGTON. See 26,27. (PM-CT)'
CK32	QUARRINGTON. See 10,1 (PM)
CK34	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK35	AZUR HIS PREDECESSOR. Azur does not appear in Robert's chapter where the T.R.E. holder is Godwin, though he was his predecessor in Nottinghamshire (NTT 25,1). Godwin was perhaps a subtenant (DR).
CK36	AELRIC [* SON OF MERGEAT *] ... HIS PREDECESSOR. He was Robert of Vessey's predecessor at Caythorpe (37,2); see LEC 16,9 Aelric note (CT).
CK37	CARLTON [SCROOP]. See 15,1 (PM).
CK38	[LONG] BENNINGTON. See 15,2 (PM).
CK40	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. That is, Oger the Breton, who held Bourne (42,1) (PM).
CK41	3 ½ BOVATES ... IN DYKE. Entered first under Oger at 42,6 and later under Heppo at 61,2, although the latter assigns only 3 bovates to the place (PM).
	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK42	1 CARUCATE OF LAND IN MORTON. See 42,17-18. 61,3, and 42,18 there note (PM).
CK43	IN MORTON ...½ CARUCATE. See 42,19 (PM).
	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK44	IN HACONBY ... 9 BOVATES OF LAND. See 42,14 (PM).
		The main scribe of Great Domesday corrected his original .x to .ix by adding a minim; he clarified it by interlining uē (the last two letters of nouem, '9') (CT).
	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK45	HEALFDENE. Hugh Candidus records that Abbot Brand of Peterborough let Dunsby at rent 'to a certain kinsman of his own named Healfdene, because King William had taken all Healfdene's land from him and had given it to Remigius, Bishop of Lincoln, and thus Remigius unjustly took away Dunsby'. In his Chronicle Hugh Candidus further identifies Healfdene as a brother of Ulf son of Topi: Mellows, p. 69; Society of Antiquaries manuscript 60, folio 72. Presumably the Healfdene who appears throughout the holding of the bishop is the one referred to here, as at 7,18 where he is named as Healfdene [son of] Topi (PM).
	DUNSBY. See 7,30 (PM-CT).
CK46	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Oger the Breton; see 42,11-12 where 'Ringstone' is associated with Rippingale. Robert of Tosny's predecessors in 'Ringstone' were Aslak and Dene (18,15) (PM).
CK47	KIRKBY [UNDERWOOD]. See 27,55 (PM).
CK48	ST GUTHLAC'S [* OF CROWLAND *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	OGER [* THE BRETON *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	LORDSHIP REVENUE OF THE MONKS. In 42,13 the land is stated to have been for the monks' supplies (ad uictum monachorum) (CT).
	ASSIGNED IT TO HEREWARD [* 'THE WAKE' *] AT A REVENUE. That is, he allowed Hereward to 'farm' the land: to pay the abbot a fixed rent (to be negotiated each year) which he hoped would be more than offset by the rents and dues he received from the land and the profits he could make from it (CT). On Hereward, see 8,34 Hereward note.
CK49	LAND IN DOWSBY. See 57,12 and 57,12 Dowsby note where the detail of the redemption is recorded (PM).
	ST GUTHLAC'S [* OF CROWLAND *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK51	KARLI'S LAND. Presumably the 1 carucate at 12,55 (PM).
CK52	LAND IN WALCOT HUNDRED. At 3,32 and 67,10 (PM).
CK53	FULL JURISDICTION. In the manuscript socā 7 socā in error for sacā 7 socā (CT).
	OSBOURNBY. See 57,15 (PM).
CK54	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
	IN THE COUNT OF ANY HUNDRED. The observation is also noted at 26,53. See {Introduction: Hundreds}(CT).
CK55	MEN OF THE WAPENTAKE ... SERVICE FOR IT. See 31,3 (CT).
CK56	THORI'S LAND. At Ropsley (18,24) (PM).
CK57	SYSTON. See 39,3 (PM).
CK58	WELBY. See 57,22 (PM).
CK60	BELTON. See 57,25 and 67,13 (PM).
CK64	KOLSVEINN [* OF LINCOLN *]. Note to be supplied (JP).
CK65	IN DRAYTON HUNDRED. The following claims relate to Holland, here regarded as part of Kesteven. See {Introduction: Districts and Ridings} (PM).
		For Drayton, see 12,59 (PM).
	WULFWY, HIS PREDECESSOR. Wulfwy was Remigius' predecessor as Bishop of Dorchester-on-Thames (Oxfordshire) before Remigius moved the see to Lincoln. Remigius was claiming this carucate because it had been held by the person to whose other lands he had succeeded. Although here it states that his claim was successful, in 12,59 it is recorded that the wapentake did not know through whom Bishop Wulfwy held the carucate that had belonged to St Benedict's (CT).
CK66	AETHELSTAN SON OF GODRAM. He would appear to be identical to Alestan of Frampton, Guy of Craon's man. Gillian Fellows Jensen (‘Domesday Tenants in Lincolnshire’, p. 32) draws attention to the confusion of the personal name-forms Alestan and Adestan, and suggests that throughout Guy of Craon's chapter these may refer to the same man (PM). Guy's holding in Bicker (57,44) had been held T.R.E. by Adestan, while his holding in Drayton had been held by Alestan. See 57,48 Alstan note.
CK67	STEYNING. See 12,89 (PM).
CK68	QUADRING. See 12,90 (PM).
	AGREE ... BOTH THAT. The Phillimore printed translation has: 'The men of Holland agree with the same Alfred because not only was it his predecessor's but also he ...'. This suggests that the two reasons are given by the scribe, but it misunderstands the use of Latin quia. As in CK34 (where the more usual dicunt ('say') stands in place of concordant ('agree') and commonly elsewhere, quia introduces a reported statement: 'they agree that...'; quod is used similarly in CK67 where quia is found in the sense of 'because'. This usage develops from that in Classical Latin where quod or quia with a verb in the subjunctive gives the 'alleged reason': 'the men agree, saying that ...' or 'the men agree to the effect that ... ' or 'on the grounds that ...'. In time this usage comes to be seen as identical to the classical accusative and infinitive, and, as it is easier to use, replaces it.
CK69	COUNT ALAN'S PREDECESSOR. Aethelstan; see 12,76. However, that entry states that Earl Ralph had the jurisdiction (CT).
	IN GOSBERTON. The main scribe of Great Domesday added this: it extends into the right margin of folio 377d and he was forced to interline part of the place-name (CT).
CK70	KETIL'S MINSTER [CHURCH] OF [LONG] SUTTON. In the Phillimore printed edition this phrase is rendered as ' Ketill of Sutton's church' and the note reads: 'Canon Foster rendered as 'Ketill's church of (Long) Sutton' (Foster and Longley, Lincolnshire Domesday, p. 235), though it seems more probably to be a byname: Tengvik, Old English Bynames, p. 51. The present church of Long Sutton replaced an earlier wooden church on a different site: Owen, Church and Society in Medieval Lincolnshire, p. 5 (PM). On reconsideration and bearing in mind the apparently parallel instance of ''the land of Ulf in [North] Ormsby' (CN27) and the Huntingdonshire examples cited in CN27 land note, it seems more probable that Ketil has no byname (he might have had one, but it is not mentioned in Domesday) and that the minster church is located by Domesday at [Long] Sutton. There is no evidence that there was ever a monastery at Long Sutton.
	TYDD [ST MARY]. The king's manor is at 1,28, but there is no reference to this jurisdiction. However, Long Sutton is sufficiently close to Tydd St Mary to have been a member of it and it can be assumed that it would have been mentioned in a more comprehensive survey of Tydd St Mary in a precursor document.
CK71	HOLBEACH. The claim is noted at 12,83. The 6 carucates mentioned here would seem to include 12,83 and the further 5 carucates mentioned at 12,84. Farley did not print the punctus after M' at the end of this entry (PM).