Skip to main content

Reasoning through Crisis: Crisis, Incommensurability and Belief

Connelly, James



This paper draws on Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, but it is neither an exposition nor a critique of that book and uses certain concepts from it as a springboard for reflections on the nature of crisis. Kuhn’s key term was paradigm; however, the primary focus of this paper will be on the intertwined concepts of normal and revolutionary science, and one of the concepts central to the latter: crisis. I ask whether crisis necessarily constitutes a break in continuity or practice, together with our understanding of that practice, thereby generating an inability to ‘think through’ crisis (the radical rupture thesis), or whether crisis can be conceived in an evolutionary fashion as a dialectical progression in which tensions and oppositions do not necessarily signify (or result in) a breakdown of the system or our understanding of it (the dialectical thesis). One of the underlying questions to be considered is precisely how far the analogy between natural science and politics is valid. Here my purpose is primarily to explore the issue and to raise questions rather than to provide concrete answers.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Sep 10, 2019
Journal Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique
Print ISSN 0248-9015
Electronic ISSN 2429-4373
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 21
Issue 2
APA6 Citation Connelly, J. (2019). Reasoning through Crisis: Crisis, Incommensurability and Belief. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, 21(2),
Keywords Kuhn; Collingwood; Crisis; Tradition; Reason; Normal politics
Publisher URL


Article (308 Kb)

Copyright Statement
Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

You might also like

Downloadable Citations