Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Fracture healing following high energy tibial trauma: Ilizarov versus Taylor Spatial Frame

Menakaya, CU; Rigby, AS; Hadland, Y; Barron, E; Sharma, H

Authors

CU Menakaya

Y Hadland

E Barron

H Sharma



Abstract

Introduction: The optimal treatment of high energy tibial fractures remains controversial and a challenging orthopaedic problem. The role of external fi xators for all these tibial fractures has been shown to be crucial. Methods: A fi ve-year consecutive series was reviewed retrospectively, identifying two treatment groups: Ilizarov and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, US). Fracture healing time was the primary outcome measure. Results: A total of 112 patients (85 Ilizarov, 37 TSF) were identifi ed for the review with a mean age of 45 years. This was higher in women (57 years) than in men (41 years). There was no signifi cant difference between frame types (p=0.83). The median healing time was 163 days in both groups. There was no signifi cant difference in healing time between smokers and non-smokers (180 vs 165 days respectively, p=0.07), open or closed fractures (p=0.13) or age and healing time (Spearman's r=0.12, p=0.18). There was no incidence of non-union or re-fracture following frame removal in either group. Conclusions: Despite the assumption of the rigid construct of the TSF, the median time to union was similar to that of the Ilizarov frame and the TSF therefore can play a signifi cant role in complex tibial fractures.

Citation

Menakaya, C., Rigby, A., Hadland, Y., Barron, E., & Sharma, H. (2014). Fracture healing following high energy tibial trauma: Ilizarov versus Taylor Spatial Frame. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 96(2), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13824511650335

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 17, 2013
Online Publication Date Mar 11, 2015
Publication Date 2014-03
Deposit Date Mar 3, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 27, 2018
Journal Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Print ISSN 0035-8843
Publisher Royal College of Surgeons of England
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 96
Issue 2
Pages 106-110
DOI https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13824511650335
Keywords Surgery; General Medicine
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/707011
Contract Date Mar 27, 2018

Files

Article (307 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations