CU Menakaya
Fracture healing following high energy tibial trauma: Ilizarov versus Taylor Spatial Frame
Menakaya, CU; Rigby, AS; Hadland, Y; Barron, E; Sharma, H
Abstract
Introduction: The optimal treatment of high energy tibial fractures remains controversial and a challenging orthopaedic problem. The role of external fi xators for all these tibial fractures has been shown to be crucial. Methods: A fi ve-year consecutive series was reviewed retrospectively, identifying two treatment groups: Ilizarov and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, US). Fracture healing time was the primary outcome measure. Results: A total of 112 patients (85 Ilizarov, 37 TSF) were identifi ed for the review with a mean age of 45 years. This was higher in women (57 years) than in men (41 years). There was no signifi cant difference between frame types (p=0.83). The median healing time was 163 days in both groups. There was no signifi cant difference in healing time between smokers and non-smokers (180 vs 165 days respectively, p=0.07), open or closed fractures (p=0.13) or age and healing time (Spearman's r=0.12, p=0.18). There was no incidence of non-union or re-fracture following frame removal in either group. Conclusions: Despite the assumption of the rigid construct of the TSF, the median time to union was similar to that of the Ilizarov frame and the TSF therefore can play a signifi cant role in complex tibial fractures.
Citation
Menakaya, C., Rigby, A., Hadland, Y., Barron, E., & Sharma, H. (2014). Fracture healing following high energy tibial trauma: Ilizarov versus Taylor Spatial Frame. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 96(2), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13824511650335
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 17, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 11, 2015 |
Publication Date | 2014-03 |
Deposit Date | Mar 3, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 27, 2018 |
Journal | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
Print ISSN | 0035-8843 |
Publisher | Royal College of Surgeons of England |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 96 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 106-110 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13824511650335 |
Keywords | Surgery; General Medicine |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/707011 |
Contract Date | Mar 27, 2018 |
Files
Article
(307 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search