Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach
Igudia, Eghosa; Ackrill, Rob; Coleman, Simeon; Dobson, Carlyn
Dr Carlyn Dobson Carlyn.Dobson@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Economics
Positing the implementation of evidenced-based policies to manage the informal economy, our paper employs, in a novel way, the multiple-indicator, multiple-cause model and primary data, to identify the determinants of the Nigerian informal economy. Building on previous literature, relevant determinants of the informal economy were constructed from participants' responses to questions designed to solicit such information. We found the factors responsible for the origin and expansion of the Nigerian informal economy to include: unemployment, a need to be autonomous/self-employed, corruption of government officials/agencies, participants' desire to pay less tax, and participants' need to survive. The greatest influence, in terms of magnitude and impacts, comes from the 'participants' need to survive' factor, followed by corruption. Our policy recommendations follow these identified factors, and recognise the positive and important role played by the informal economy. Although country-specific, our findings/recommendations may be used to inform policy in other countries with similar economic structures as Nigeria.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Journal||International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Igudia, E., Ackrill, R., Coleman, S., & Dobson, C. (2016). Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(2/3), 154. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesb.2016.076643|
|Related Public URLs||http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27108/|
You might also like
A gravity model of remittance determinants: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean
Is there club convergence in Latin America?
International income convergence: Is Latin America actually different?
Is Africa actually developing?
Are income differences within the OECD diminishing? Evidence from Fourier unit root tests