Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Study reporting guidelines : how valid are they?

Arundel, Catherine; James, Sophie; Northgraves, Matthew; Booth, Alison

Authors

Catherine Arundel

Sophie James

Alison Booth



Abstract

Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.

Citation

Arundel, C., James, S., Northgraves, M., & Booth, A. (2019). Study reporting guidelines : how valid are they?. Contemporary clinical trials communications, 14, Article 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 5, 2019
Online Publication Date Mar 11, 2019
Publication Date 2019-06
Deposit Date May 20, 2019
Publicly Available Date May 20, 2019
Journal Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Electronic ISSN 2451-8654
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Article Number 100343
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343
Keywords Reporting guidelines; Validity; Validation
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1791440
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865418302035#!
Contract Date May 20, 2019

Files

Published article (197 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/)






You might also like



Downloadable Citations