Catherine Arundel
Study reporting guidelines : how valid are they?
Arundel, Catherine; James, Sophie; Northgraves, Matthew; Booth, Alison
Authors
Abstract
Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.
Citation
Arundel, C., James, S., Northgraves, M., & Booth, A. (2019). Study reporting guidelines : how valid are they?. Contemporary clinical trials communications, 14, Article 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 5, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 11, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2019-06 |
Deposit Date | May 20, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | May 20, 2019 |
Journal | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
Electronic ISSN | 2451-8654 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Article Number | 100343 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343 |
Keywords | Reporting guidelines; Validity; Validation |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1791440 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865418302035#! |
Files
Published article
(197 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/)
You might also like
The test-retest reliability of four functional mobility tests in apparently healthy adults
(2016)
Journal Article
Tissue inflammation signatures point towards resolution in adhesive capsulitis
(2019)
Journal Article