Alison Booth
Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review
Booth, Alison; Ingoe, Helen Margaret Ann; Northgraves, Matthew; Coleman, Elizabeth; Harden, Melissa; Kassam, Jamila; Kwok, Iris; Hilton, Catherine; Bates, Peter; McDaid, Catriona
Authors
Helen Margaret Ann Ingoe
Dr Matthew Northgraves M.Northgraves@hull.ac.uk
Clinical Trial Manager
Elizabeth Coleman
Melissa Harden
Jamila Kassam
Iris Kwok
Catherine Hilton
Peter Bates
Catriona McDaid
Abstract
© 2019 Author(s). Objectives: To undertake a systematic review of the evidence base for the effectiveness of surgical fixation of lateral compression (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis compared with non-surgical approaches. Searches: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and two international trials registers were searched up to January 2017 (MEDLINE to February 2019) for studies of internal or external fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Participants: Patients with lateral compression pelvic fractures, sustained as the result of a low-energy mechanism, defined as a fall from standing height or less. Interventions: Surgery using either external or internal fixation devices. Conservative non-surgical treatment was the defined comparator. Outcome measures: Outcomes of interest were patient mobility and function, pain, quality of life, fracture union, mortality, hospital length of stay and complications (additional operative procedures, number and type of adverse events and serious adverse events). Quality assessment and synthesis: The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Case Series was used to assess the included studies. Results: were presented in a narrative synthesis. Results Of 3421 records identified, four retrospective case series met the inclusion criteria. Fixation types were not consistent between studies or within studies and most patients had more than one type of pelvic fixation. Where reported, mobility and function improved post-surgery, and a reduction in pain was recorded. Length of hospital stay ranged from 4 days to 54 days for surgical fixation of any type. Reported complications and adverse outcomes included: infections, implant loosening, pneumonia and thrombosis. Use of analgesia was not reported. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support guidance on the most effective treatment for patients who fail to mobilise after sustaining an LC-1 fragility fracture.
Citation
Booth, A., Ingoe, H. M. A., Northgraves, M., Coleman, E., Harden, M., Kassam, J., Kwok, I., Hilton, C., Bates, P., & McDaid, C. (2019). Effectiveness of surgical fixation for lateral compression type one (LC-1) fragility fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review. BMJ open, 9(5), Article e024737. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 5, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | May 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | May 19, 2019 |
Deposit Date | May 22, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | May 22, 2019 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Print ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 9 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | e024737 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024737 |
Keywords | General Medicine |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1826631 |
Publisher URL | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/5/e024737 |
Additional Information | This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
Contract Date | May 22, 2019 |
Files
Published article
(424 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search