Alexander S. Antonarakis
Uncertainty in Parameterizing Floodplain Forest Friction for Natural Flood Management, Using Remote Sensing
Antonarakis, Alexander S.; Milan, David J.
Dr David Milan D.Milan@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Physical Geography
One potential Natural Flood Management (NFM) option is floodplain reforestation or manage existing riparian forests, with a view to increasing flow resistance and attenuate flood hydrographs. However, the effectiveness of floodplain forests as resistance agents, during different magnitude overbank floods, has yet to be appropriately parameterized for hydraulic models. Remote sensing offers high-resolution datasets capable of characterizing vegetation structure from a variety of platforms, but they contain uncertainty. For the first time, we demonstrate uncertainty propagation in remote sensing derivations of complex vegetation structure through roughness prediction and floodplain flow for extreme flows and different forest types (young and old Poplar plantations, young and old Pine plantations, and an unmanaged riparian forest). The lowest uncertainties resulted from terrestrial and airborne lidar, where airborne lidar is currently best at defining canopy leaf area, but more research is needed to determine wood area. Mean literature uncertainties in stem density, trunk diameter, wood, and leaf area indices (20, 10, 30, 20%, respectively) resulted in a combined Manning’s n uncertainty from 11–13% to 11–17% at 2 m to 8 m flow depths. This equates to 7–8% roughness uncertainty per 10% combined forest structure uncertainty. Individually, stem density and trunk diameter uncertainties resulted in the largest Manning’s n uncertainty at all flow depths, especially for flow though Pine plantations. For deeper flows, leaf and woody areas become much more important, especially for unmanaged riparian forests with low canopy morphology. Forest structure errors propagated to flow depth demonstrate that even small flows can change by a decimeter, while deeper flows can change by 40 cm or more. For flow depth, errors in canopy structure are deemed more severe in flows depths beyond 4–6 m. This study highlights the need for lower uncertainty in all forest structure components using remote sensing, to improve roughness parameterization and flood modeling for NFM.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jun 1, 2020|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Antonarakis, A. S., & Milan, D. J. (2020). Uncertainty in Parameterizing Floodplain Forest Friction for Natural Flood Management, Using Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing, 12(11), 1799. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111799|
|Keywords||Flow resistance; Floodplain forests; Uncertainty propagation; Hydraulic model parameterization; Terrestrial lidar; Airborne lidar; Radar|
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Terrestrial structure-from-motion: spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology
Ecohydraulic modelling of anabranching rivers