Amanda Rundle
Women’s views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women’s clinics
Rundle, Amanda; Iles, S.; Matheson, K.; Cahill, L. E.; Forbes, C. C.; Saint-Jacques, N.; Urquhart, R.; Younis, T.
Authors
S. Iles
K. Matheson
L. E. Cahill
Dr Cindy Forbes C.Forbes@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
N. Saint-Jacques
R. Urquhart
T. Younis
Abstract
Background Women attending mammography screening units (msus) and well women’s clinics (wwcs) represent a motivated cohort likely to engage in interventions aimed at primary breast cancer (bca) prevention. Methods We used a feasibility questionnaire distributed to women (40–49 or 50–74 years of age) attending msus and wwcs in Halifax, Nova Scotia, to examine ■ women’s views about bca primary prevention and sources of health care information, ■ prevalence of lifestyle-related bca risk factors, and ■ predictors of prior mammography encounters within provincial screening guidelines. Variables examined included personal profiling, comorbidities, prior mammography uptake, lifestyle behaviours, socioeconomic status, health information sources, and willingness to discuss or implement lifestyle modifications, or endocrine therapy, or both. A logistic regression analysis examined associations with prior mammography encounters. Results Of the 244 responses obtained during 1.5 months from women aged 40–49 years (n = 75) and 50–74 years (n = 169), 56% and 75% respectively sought or would prefer to receive health information from within, as opposed to outside, health care. Lifestyle-related bca risk factors were prevalent, and most women were willing to discuss or implement lifestyle modifications (93%) or endocrine therapy (67%). Of the two age groups, 49% and 93% respectively had previously undergone mammography within guidelines. Increasing age and marital status (single, separated, or divorced vs. married or partnered) were independent predictors of prior mammography encounters within guidelines for women 40–49 years of age; no independent predictors were observed in the older age group. Conclusions Women attending msus and wwcs seem to largely adhere to mammography guidelines and appear motivated to engage in bca primary prevention strategies, including lifestyle modifications and endocrine therapy. Women’s views as observed in this study provide a rationale for the potential incorporation of bca risk assessment within the “mammogram point of care” to engage motivated women in bca primary prevention strategies.
Citation
Rundle, A., Iles, S., Matheson, K., Cahill, L. E., Forbes, C. C., Saint-Jacques, N., Urquhart, R., & Younis, T. (2020). Women’s views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women’s clinics. Current oncology, 27(3), e336-e342. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5755
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 28, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 3, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jun 30, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Sep 26, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 28, 2020 |
Journal | Current Oncology |
Print ISSN | 1198-0052 |
Electronic ISSN | 1718-7729 |
Publisher | Multimed |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | e336-e342 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5755 |
Keywords | Cancer; Oncology; Prevention |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3600105 |
Publisher URL | https://current-oncology.com/index.php/oncology/article/view/5755 |
Files
Supplementary material
(513 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright © Multimed Inc.
Published article
(210 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© 2020 Multimed Inc.
You might also like
The association between mental health and shift work: Findings from the Atlantic PATH study
(2021)
Journal Article
The association between physical activity and self-rated health in Atlantic Canadians
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search