Effect of aclidinium bromide on cough and sputum symptoms in moderate-to-severe COPD in three phase III trials

McGarvey, Lorcan; Morice, Alyn H.; Smith, Jaclyn A.; Birring, Surinder S.; Chuecos, Ferran; Seoane, Beatriz; Jarreta, Diana

Abstract

© 2016, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved. Background: Cough and sputum are troublesome symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and are associated with adverse outcomes. The efficacy of aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice daily in patients with stable COPD has been established in two phase III studies (ACCORD COPD I and ATTAIN) and a phase IIIb active-comparator study. This analysis evaluated cough-related symptoms across these studies. Method: Patients were randomised to placebo, aclidinium 200 μg or 400 μg twice daily in ACCORD (12 weeks) and ATTAIN (24 weeks), or to placebo, aclidinium 400 μg twice daily or tiotropium 18 μg once daily (6-week active-comparator study). Analysed end points included changes from baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS; formerly known as EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool), total and cough/sputum scores and frequency/severity of morning and night-time cough and sputum symptoms. Results: Data for 1792 patients were evaluated. E-RS cough/sputum domain scores were significantly reduced with aclidinium 400 μg versus placebo in ATTAIN (−0.7 vs −0.3, respectively; p

Citation

McGarvey, L., Morice, A. H., Smith, J. A., Birring, S. S., Chuecos, F., Seoane, B., & Jarreta, D. (2016). Effect of aclidinium bromide on cough and sputum symptoms in moderate-to-severe COPD in three phase III trials. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 3(1), Article e000148. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000148

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 24, 2016
• Online Publication Date: Dec 8, 2016
• Publication Date: 2016
• Deposit Date: May 12, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: May 16, 2022
• Journal: BMJ Open Respiratory Research
• Electronic ISSN: 2052-4439
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: e000148
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000148
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3609892