Ethel Burns
Brief screening questionnaires to identify problem drinking during pregnancy: A systematic review
Burns, Ethel; Gray, Ron; Smith, Lesley A.
Abstract
Aims Although prenatal screening for problem drinking during pregnancy has been recommended, guidance on screening instruments is lacking. We investigated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of brief alcohol screening questionnaires to identify problem drinking in pregnant women. Methods Electronic databases from their inception to June 2008 were searched, as well as reference lists of eligible papers and related review papers. We sought cohort or cross-sectional studies that compared one or more brief alcohol screening questionnaire(s) with reference criteria obtained using structured interviews to detect 'at-risk' drinking, alcohol abuse or dependency in pregnant women receiving prenatal care. Results Five studies (6724 participants) were included. In total, seven instruments were evaluated: TWEAK (Tolerance, Worried, Eye-opener, Amnesia, Kut down), T-ACE Take (number of drinks), Annoyed, Cut down, Eye-opener, CAGE (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilt, Eye-opener, NET (Normal drinker, Eye-opener, Tolerance), AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test), AUDIT-C (AUDIT-consumption) and SMAST (Short Michigan Alcohol Screening Test). Study quality was generally good, but lack of blinding was a common weakness. For risk drinking sensitivity was highest for T-ACE (69-88%), TWEAK (71-91%) and AUDIT-C (95%), with high specificity (71-89%, 73-83% and 85%, respectively). CAGE and SMAST performed poorly. Sensitivity of AUDIT-C at score ≥3 was high for past year alcohol dependence (100%) or alcohol use disorder (96%) with moderate specificity (71% each). For life-time alcohol dependency the AUDIT at score ≥8 performed poorly. Conclusion T-ACE, TWEAK and AUDIT-C show promise for screening for risk drinking, and AUDIT-C may also be useful for identifying alcohol dependency or abuse. However, their performance as stand-alone tools is uncertain, and further evaluation of questionnaires for prenatal alcohol use is warranted. © 2010 Society for the Study of Addiction.
Citation
Burns, E., Gray, R., & Smith, L. A. (2010). Brief screening questionnaires to identify problem drinking during pregnancy: A systematic review. Addiction, 105(4), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02842.x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 16, 2009 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 10, 2010 |
Publication Date | Apr 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | Apr 5, 2022 |
Journal | Addiction |
Print ISSN | 0965-2140 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 105 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 601-614 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02842.x |
Keywords | Alcohol; Prenatal; Questionnaires; Screening; Sensitivity; Specificity; Systematic review |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3629320 |
You might also like
HVs’ role in providing alcohol advice to women who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy
(2024)
Digital Artefact
Planning for a baby? Why both men and women should consider quitting alcohol before and during pregnancy
(2023)
Newspaper / Magazine
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search