Skip to main content

Research Repository

See what's under the surface

Phylogeny and metabolic scaling in mammals

Capellini, Isabella; Venditti, Chris; Barton, Robert A.

Authors

Isabella Capellini

Chris Venditti

Robert A. Barton



Abstract

The scaling of metabolic rates to body size is widely considered to be of great biological and ecological importance, and much attention has been devoted to determining its theoretical and empirical value. Most debate centers on whether the underlying power law describing metabolic rates is 2/3 (as predicted by scaling of surface area/volume relationships) or 3/4 ("Kleiber's law''). Although recent evidence suggests that empirically derived exponents vary among clades with radically different metabolic strategies, such as ectotherms and endotherms, models, such as the metabolic theory of ecology, depend on the assumption that there is at least a predominant, if not universal, metabolic scaling exponent. Most analyses claimed to support the predictions of general models, however, failed to control for phylogeny. We used phylogenetic generalized least-squares models to estimate allometric slopes for both basal metabolic rate (BMR) and field metabolic rate (FMR) in mammals. Metabolic rate scaling conformed to no single theoretical prediction, but varied significantly among phylogenetic lineages. In some lineages we found a 3/4 exponent, in others a 2/3 exponent, and in yet others exponents differed significantly from both theoretical values. Analysis of the phylogenetic signal in the data indicated that the assumptions of neither species-level analysis nor independent contrasts were met. Analyses that assumed no phylogenetic signal in the data (species-level analysis) or a strong phylogenetic signal (independent contrasts), therefore, returned estimates of allometric slopes that were erroneous in 30% and 50% of cases, respectively. Hence, quantitative estimation of the phylogenetic signal is essential for determining scaling exponents. The lack of evidence for a predominant scaling exponent in these analyses suggests that general models of metabolic scaling, and macro-ecological theories that depend on them, have little explanatory power.

Publication Date Sep 1, 2010
Journal Ecology
Electronic ISSN 0012-9658
Publisher Ecological Society of America
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 91
Issue 9
Pages 2783-2793
Institution Citation Capellini, I., Venditti, C., & Barton, R. A. (2010). Phylogeny and metabolic scaling in mammals. Ecology, 91(9), 2783-2793. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0817.1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0817.1
Keywords Allometry; Basal metabolic rate (BMR); Field metabolic rate (FMR); Kleiber’s law; Metabolic theory of ecology (MTE); Phylogenetic comparative analysis; Hylogenetic generalized least squares; Hylogenetically independent contrasts; Hylogeny; Power law; Scal
Publisher URL http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/09-0817.1
Copyright Statement ©2010 by the Ecological Society of America
Additional Information Copy of article: Isabella Capellini, Chris Venditti, and Robert A. Barton 2010. Phylogeny and metabolic scaling in mammals. Ecology 91:2783–2793. Copyright by the Ecological Society of America.

Files

Article.pdf (358 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
©2010 by the Ecological Society of America





Downloadable Citations