Stephen H. Montgomery
Reconstructing the ups and downs of primate brain evolution: Implications for adaptive hypotheses and Homo floresiensis
Montgomery, Stephen H.; Capellini, Isabella; Barton, Robert A; Montgomery, Stephen H; Barton, Robert A.; Mundy, Nicholas I; Mundy, Nicholas I.
Robert A Barton
Stephen H Montgomery
Robert A. Barton
Nicholas I Mundy
Nicholas I. Mundy
Background: Brain size is a key adaptive trait. It is often assumed that increasing brain size was a general evolutionary trend in primates, yet recent fossil discoveries have documented brain size decreases in some lineages, raising the question of how general a trend there was for brains to increase in mass over evolutionary time. We present the first systematic phylogenetic analysis designed to answer this question. Results: We performed ancestral state reconstructions of three traits (absolute brain mass, absolute body mass, relative brain mass) using 37 extant and 23 extinct primate species and three approaches to ancestral state reconstruction: parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo. Both absolute and relative brain mass generally increased over evolutionary time, but body mass did not. Nevertheless both absolute and relative brain mass decreased along several branches. Applying these results to the contentious case of Homo floresiensis, we find a number of scenarios under which the proposed evolution of Homo floresiensis’ small brain appears to be consistent with patterns observed along other lineages, dependent on body mass and phylogenetic position. Conclusions: Our results confirm that brain expansion began early in primate evolution and show that increases occurred in all major clades. Only in terms of an increase in absolute mass does the human lineage appear particularly striking, with both the rate of proportional change in mass and relative brain size having episodes of greater expansion elsewhere on the primate phylogeny. However, decreases in brain mass also occurred along branches in all major clades, and we conclude that, while selection has acted to enlarge primate brains, in some lineages this trend has been reversed. Further analyses of the phylogenetic position of Homo floresiensis and better body mass estimates are required to confirm the plausibility of the evolution of its small brain mass. We find that for our dataset the Bayesian analysis for ancestral state reconstruction is least affected by inclusion of fossil data suggesting that this approach might be preferable for future studies on other taxa with a poor fossil record.
Montgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2010). Reconstructing the ups and downs of primate brain evolution: Implications for adaptive hypotheses and Homo floresiensis. BMC biology, 8(1), 9. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-9
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jan 27, 2010|
|Publication Date||Jan 27, 2010|
|Deposit Date||Mar 24, 2015|
|Publicly Available Date||Mar 24, 2015|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Article Number||ARTN 9|
|Keywords||Brain evolution, Homo floresiensis, Primate brain evolution, Brain size|
|Additional Information||Copy of article first published in BMC biology, 2010, v.8, issue 9|
© 2010 Montgomery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
Mixed phylogenetic signal in fish toxicity data across chemical classes
Male care and life history traits in mammals
The role of life history traits in mammalian invasion success