Skip to main content

Research Repository

See what's under the surface

Energetic constraints, not predation, influence the evolution of sleep patterning in mammals

Capellini, I.; Nunn, C. L.; McNamara, P.; Preston, B. T.; Barton, R. A.

Authors

I. Capellini

C. L. Nunn

P. McNamara

B. T. Preston

R. A. Barton



Abstract

1 Mammalian sleep is composed of two distinct states – rapid-eye-movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep – that alternate in cycles over a sleep bout. The duration of these cycles varies extensively across mammalian species. Because the end of a sleep cycle is often followed by brief arousals to waking, a shorter sleep cycle has been proposed to function as an anti-predator strategy. Similarly, higher predation risk could explain why many species exhibit a polyphasic sleep pattern (division of sleep into several bouts per day), as having multiple sleep bouts avoids long periods of unconsciousness, potentially reducing vulnerability. 2 Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we tested these predictions in mammals, and also investigated the relationships among sleep phasing, sleep-cycle length, sleep durations and body mass. 3 Neither sleep-cycle length nor phasing of sleep was significantly associated with three different measures of predation risk, undermining the idea that they represent anti-predator adaptations. 4 Polyphasic sleep was associated with small body size, shorter sleep cycles and longer sleep durations. The correlation with size may reflect energetic constraints: small animals need to feed more frequently, preventing them from consolidating sleep into a single bout. The reduced daily sleep quotas in monophasic species suggests that the consolidation of sleep into one bout per day may deliver the benefits of sleep more efficiently and, since early mammals were small-bodied and polyphasic, a more efficient monophasic sleep pattern could be a hitherto unrecognized advantage of larger size.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Oct 1, 2008
Journal Functional ecology
Electronic ISSN 1365-2435
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 5
Pages 847-853
Institution Citation Capellini, I., Nunn, C. L., McNamara, P., Preston, B. T., & Barton, R. A. (2008). Energetic constraints, not predation, influence the evolution of sleep patterning in mammals. Functional ecology, 22(5), 847-853. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01449.x
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01449.x
Keywords Mammalian sleep architecture, Monophasic sleep, Polyphasic sleep, Phylogeny, Sleep-cycle length
Publisher URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01449.x/abstract
Copyright Statement ©2015 University of Hull
Additional Information Authors' accepted version of article: Capellini, I., Nunn, C. L., McNamara, P., Preston, B. T.,Barton, R. A. Energetic constraints, not predation, influence the evolution of sleep patterning in mammals. Functional Ecology. Volume 22, Issue 5, pages 847–853, October 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01449.x DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01449.x

Files

CapelliniEtAl-FunctionalEcology_Accepted.pdf (313 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
©2015 University of Hull





Downloadable Citations