Dr Charlotte Kelly C.E.Kelly@hull.ac.uk
Career Development Fellow
Inter-rater reliability of care home staff's proxy judgements with residents' assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data
Kelly, Charlotte; Hulme, Claire; Graham, Liz; Ellwood, Alison; Patel, Ismail; Cundill, Bonnie; Farrin, Amanda; Goodwin, Madeline; Hull, Karen; Fisher, Jill; Forster, Anne
Authors
Claire Hulme
Liz Graham
Alison Ellwood
Ismail Patel
Bonnie Cundill
Amanda Farrin
Madeline Goodwin
Karen Hull
Jill Fisher
Anne Forster
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to compare care staff proxies with care home residents' self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3months and 6months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as 0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. RESULTS: over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident 'non-completers' were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents' mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.
Citation
Kelly, C., Hulme, C., Graham, L., Ellwood, A., Patel, I., Cundill, B., …Forster, A. (2021). Inter-rater reliability of care home staff's proxy judgements with residents' assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data. Age and ageing, 50(4), 1314-1320. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab053
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 4, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 5, 2021 |
Publication Date | Jun 28, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Apr 5, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 6, 2021 |
Journal | Age and ageing |
Print ISSN | 0002-0729 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2834 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 50 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 1314-1320 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab053 |
Keywords | Care homes; Care staff; Cost effectiveness; Health-related quality of life; Older people; Proxy measures |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3748835 |
Files
Published article
(153 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNon-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/),which permitsnon-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work isproperly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
You might also like
Geriatric assessment prior to cancer treatment: a health economic evaluation
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search