Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Quality of life as quality of being: an alternative to the subject-object dichotomy

Draper, Peter

Authors

Peter Draper



Abstract

The opening section of this paper is concerned with certain questions concerning the concept ‘quality of life’ Is it possible for one person to make judgements about the quality of life of another? If it is possible, then is it morally acceptable? Given that quality of life is a concept and therefore not amenable to direct observation, which visible phenomena will be chosen as its indicators, and how can their choice be justified? Do the components of a life of quality vary from person to person, or can features be identified which are common to all? Next, it is argued that instruments which have been developed to measure quality of life give clues to the ontological beliefs of their authors, those which address fragments of the human experience, or accept the artificial limits of the subjective/objective dichotomy, are expressive of a fractured and reductionist view of what it means to be a human being Finally, it is suggested that the adoption of insights drawn from Heidegger's work would enable us to develop a rather more unified view of quality of life as quality of being, and that this theoretical principle might constitute a common link between nurses of varying professional backgrounds.

Citation

Draper, P. (1992). Quality of life as quality of being: an alternative to the subject-object dichotomy. Journal of advanced nursing, 17(8), 965-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02025.x

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 15, 1991
Online Publication Date Dec 22, 2006
Publication Date 1992-08
Journal Journal of advanced nursing
Print ISSN 0309-2402
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 17
Issue 8
Pages 965-970
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02025.x
Keywords General Nursing
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/400219
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02025.x