Rúben Mendes
What is spatial planning saying? A conceptual and methodological framework to assess the institutionalization of nature using critical discourse analysis
Mendes, Rúben; Fidélis, Teresa; Roebling, Peter; Teles, Filipe; Farrelly, Michael
Authors
Teresa Fidélis
Peter Roebling
Filipe Teles
Michael Farrelly
Abstract
Spatial planning policies are fundamental blocks for the implementation of sustainable development goals. Still, despite the growing adoption of environmental proxies, as it is nature-based solutions, the study of their institutionalization in policy and spatial planning is in the early stages. Simultaneously, the use of discursive and interpretative methods to unfold the social structures related to environmental issues is growing, nonetheless, their application is more common to supranational narratives. This article proposes a conceptual and methodological approach to using critical discourse analysis for studying the institutionalization and conceptualization of nature-related issues in policy and spatial planning at national and local levels. This is done by discussing the ontological relations between the discursive institutionalist theory and critical discourse analysis as a methodology. It contains four main stages: clarifying the analytical focus; mapping policy and planning documents; analyzing macro discourse, which includes critical textual analysis, text-type analysis, and intertextuality analysis, and, at last, the fourth phase, interpretation within the institutional context. It provides a tool for researchers less familiar with linguistics but interested in performing discourse analysis to understand the integration of environmental narratives within policy and spatial planning.
Citation
Mendes, R., Fidélis, T., Roebling, P., Teles, F., & Farrelly, M. (in press). What is spatial planning saying? A conceptual and methodological framework to assess the institutionalization of nature using critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2150668
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 1, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 27, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Dec 12, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 28, 2023 |
Journal | Critical Discourse Studies |
Print ISSN | 1740-5904 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2150668 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4142466 |
Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Files
Accepted manuscript
(414 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2022 The authors. All rights reserved.
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Discourse Studies on 27 Nov 2022, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17405904.2022.2150668
You might also like
Rethinking intertextuality in CDA
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search