Zufishan Alam
Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Alam, Zufishan; Cairns, Joanne Marie; Scott, Marissa; Dean, Judith Ann; Janda, Monika
Authors
Dr Joanne Cairns J.Cairns@hull.ac.uk
Career Development Fellowship
Marissa Scott
Judith Ann Dean
Monika Janda
Abstract
Numerous intervention studies have attempted to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women, nonetheless their screening participation remains low. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence on interventions to improve cervical screening among immigrant women globally and identify their effectiveness. Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to October 12, 2021, for intervention studies, including randomised and clinical controlled trials (RCT, CCT) and one and two group pre-post studies. Peer-reviewed studies involving immigrant and refugee women, in community and clinical settings, were eligible. Comparator interventions were usual or minimal care or attention control. Data extraction, quality appraisal and risk of bias were assessed by two authors independently using COVIDENCE software. Narrative synthesis of findings was carried out, with the main outcome measure defined as the cervical screening uptake rate difference pre- and post-intervention followed by random effects meta-analysis of trials and two group pre-post studies, using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, to calculate pooled rate ratios and adjustment for publication bias, where found. The protocol followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42020192341). 1,900 studies were identified, of which 42 (21 RCTS, 4 CCTs, and 16 pre-post studies) with 44,224 participants, were included in the systematic review, and 28 with 35,495 participants in the meta-analysis. Overall, the uptake difference rate for interventions ranged from -6.7 to 96%. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled rate ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 1.03–1.29), with high heterogeneity. Culturally sensitive, multicomponent interventions, using different modes of information delivery and self-sampling modality were most promising. Interventions led to at least 15% increase in cervical screening participation among immigrant women. Interventions designed to overcome logistical barriers and use multiple channels to communicate culturally appropriate health promotion messages are most effective at achieving cervical screening uptake among immigrant women.
Citation
Alam, Z., Cairns, J. M., Scott, M., Dean, J. A., & Janda, M. (2023). Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 18(6 JUNE), Article e0281976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281976
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 5, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 2, 2023 |
Publication Date | Jun 2, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Jun 30, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 3, 2023 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Electronic ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 18 |
Issue | 6 JUNE |
Article Number | e0281976 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281976 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4320535 |
Files
Published article
(1.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
Copyright: © 2023 Alam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions
(2022)
Journal Article
Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and suicidal behaviour in Europe: A systematic review
(2017)
Journal Article