Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish diversity assessment in a macrotidal estuary: A comparison with established fish survey methods

Gibson, Thomas I.; Carvalho, Gary; Ellison, Amy; Gargiulo, Enrica; Hatton-Ellis, Tristan; Lawson-Handley, Lori; Mariani, Stefano; Collins, Rupert A.; Sellers, Graham; Antonio Distaso, Marco; Zampieri, Carlo; Creer, Simon

Authors

Thomas I. Gibson

Gary Carvalho

Amy Ellison

Enrica Gargiulo

Tristan Hatton-Ellis

Lori Lawson-Handley

Stefano Mariani

Rupert A. Collins

Graham Sellers

Marco Antonio Distaso

Carlo Zampieri

Simon Creer



Abstract

Fishes are a dominant component of the macrofauna in estuaries and are important for assessing the health of these threatened ecosystems. Several studies have applied environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to assess the biodiversity of fishes in estuaries. However, none have combined measurement of physicochemical variables with a spatially extensive sampling design across the full salinity gradient. This study aimed to compare spatial fish assemblage composition detected via eDNA metabarcoding of surface water samples with conventional fishing gear surveys in a macrotidal estuary (river Dee, North Wales, UK). In addition, eDNA assemblage composition across seasons was investigated. In autumn 2018, triplicate eDNA samples were taken at 13 stations in a spatially systematic design alongside seine, fyke and beam trawl sampling. In summer 2019, eDNA samples from eight of the 13 original stations were collected again in the upper and lower estuary. DNA was extracted from samples and subjected to metabarcoding analysis using an established assay targeting teleost fishes. The key findings were that in autumn, eDNA detected 17 of the 26 (71%) species caught by fishing gears, which included the most abundant species. Overall, eDNA detected a greater species richness, per 30 samples, than seine or fyke nets (but not beam trawling). Additionally, there was a clear correlation between salinity and assemblage composition, which was consistent across seasons. Overall, the study indicates that eDNA metabarcoding could enhance existing fish sampling methods, by generating a more comprehensive picture of estuarine fish biodiversity and providing additional information for ecological inference and management actions.

Citation

Gibson, T. I., Carvalho, G., Ellison, A., Gargiulo, E., Hatton-Ellis, T., Lawson-Handley, L., Mariani, S., Collins, R. A., Sellers, G., Antonio Distaso, M., Zampieri, C., & Creer, S. (2023). Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish diversity assessment in a macrotidal estuary: A comparison with established fish survey methods. Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 294, Article 108522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108522

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 1, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 10, 2023
Publication Date Nov 5, 2023
Deposit Date Apr 17, 2024
Publicly Available Date Apr 23, 2024
Journal Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Print ISSN 0272-7714
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 294
Article Number 108522
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108522
Keywords Estuaries; Fishes; Environmental DNA; Water framework directive; Metabarcoding; Biomonitoring
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4427112

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations