New Insights Into Refractory Chronic Cough and Unexplained Chronic Cough: A 6-Year Ambispective Cohort Study

Zhang, Mengru; Morice, Alyn H.; Si, Fengli; Zhang, Li; Chen, Qiang; Wang, Shengyuan; Zhu, Yiqing; Xu, Xianghuai; Yu, Li; Qiu, Zhongmin

Abstract

Purpose: Only limited studies have depicted the unique features and management of refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC). These led to the initiation of this study, which reported the demographic characteristics, manifestations, and long-term outcomes on a large series of consecutive RCC/UCC patients, providing a guideline-led real-world clinical experience. Methods: Retrospective baseline information was obtained from Clinical Research Database (January 2016 to May 2021). At least 6 months after the last clinic visit, included subjects were prospectively followed up. Results: Three hundred and sixty-nine RCC and UCC patients (199 females, 53.9%) were analyzed. The median cough duration was 24.0 (12.0–72.0) months. Laryngeal symptoms were reported in 95.9% of the patients. The common triggers for coughing were talking (74.9%), pungent odors (47.3%), eating (45.5%), and cold air (42.8%). RCC was considered in 38.2%, and the remainder of 228 patients had UCC, with an equal sex distribution (P = 0.66). Among the 141 RCCs, 90.8% (128) had refractory reflux cough, which was more responsive to current treatments (P < 0.01). Although most features and test results between RCC and UCC were similar, UCC was more commonly inappropriately treated (P < 0.01). Nineteen (7.7–41.1) months after the final clinic visit, 31.2% still coughed persistently, while 68.8% reported cough improvement or remission. RCC reported more favorable treatment outcomes (including cough improvement, control, and spontaneous remission) than UCC (P < 0.01). Coughs with long duration before the initial cough clinic visit (P < 0.01), frequent urinary incontinence (P < 0.01), and being sensitive to “talking” (P < 0.01) or “cold air” (P < 0.01) were less likely to be solved. Conclusions: The current treatments only improve cough symptoms in two-thirds of patients. Clinical indicators for treatment failure were those coughing for long duration and being sensitive to “talking” or “cold air.”

Citation

Zhang, M., Morice, A. H., Si, F., Zhang, L., Chen, Q., Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Yu, L., & Qiu, Z. (2023). New Insights Into Refractory Chronic Cough and Unexplained Chronic Cough: A 6-Year Ambispective Cohort Study. Allergy Asthma and Immunology Research, 15(6), 795-811. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2023.15.6.795

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 13, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Aug 21, 2023
• Publication Date: Nov 1, 2023
• Deposit Date: Sep 17, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 24, 2024
• Journal: Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Research
• Print ISSN: 2092-7355
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 795-811
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2023.15.6.795
• Keywords: Cough; Cough hypersensitivity syndrome; Population characteristics; Treatment outcome
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4450409