Joshua Brown
The handheld fan for chronic breathlessness: Clinicians' experiences and views of implementation in clinical practice
Brown, Joshua; Miller, Isobel; Barnes-Harris, Matilda; Johnson, Miriam J.; Pearson, Mark; Luckett, Tim; Swan, Flavia
Authors
Isobel Miller
Matilda Barnes-Harris
Professor Miriam Johnson Miriam.Johnson@hull.ac.uk
Professor
Professor Mark Pearson Mark.Pearson@hull.ac.uk
Professor in Implementation Science
Tim Luckett
Dr Flavia Swan F.Swan@hull.ac.uk
Research fellow in cancer rehabilitation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The handheld fan ('fan') is useful for chronic breathlessness management, however little is known about clinicians' implementation of the fan in clinical practice. AIM: To explore clinicians' experiences and views of fan implementation. METHODS: A qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews. Participants were purposively sampled from clinicians who had completed an on-line fan implementation survey and were willing to participate. A topic guide was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Data were analysed using an inductive approach informed by the TDF. FINDINGS: Twelve clinicians participated (doctors n = 4; nurses n = 4; allied health professionals n = 4) from respiratory and palliative care. Analysis generated three major themes: i) Clinician knowledge and skills in fan implementation, ii) environmental constraints on fan use and iii) clinician beliefs about the consequences of fan use. Implementation by clinicians was positively influenced by having a scientific rationale for fan use presented (mechanism of action). Clinicians believed that the fan relieved breathlessness and did not carry a significant infection risk. Opportunity for fan use varied across healthcare settings; key environmental influences were COVID-19 restrictions, lack of access to resources and funding to provide fans, particularly in acute and respiratory services. Clinicians commonly encountered scepticism among patients and colleagues who felt the fan was an implausible intervention for breathlessness. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the fan is motivated by clinician beliefs about patient-benefit, a scientific rationale to counter clinician and patient scepticism, and access to fans in clinic. Funding to allow patients to be supplied with and taught how to use a fan would support uptake. Research is needed to address concerns about infection risk.
Citation
Brown, J., Miller, I., Barnes-Harris, M., Johnson, M. J., Pearson, M., Luckett, T., & Swan, F. (2023). The handheld fan for chronic breathlessness: Clinicians' experiences and views of implementation in clinical practice. PLoS ONE, 18(11), Article e0294748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294748
| Journal Article Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Acceptance Date | Nov 13, 2023 |
| Online Publication Date | Nov 28, 2023 |
| Publication Date | Nov 28, 2023 |
| Deposit Date | Nov 30, 2023 |
| Publicly Available Date | Dec 6, 2023 |
| Journal | PloS one |
| Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science |
| Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Article Number | e0294748 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294748 |
| Keywords | Multidisciplinary |
| Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4460281 |
Files
Published article
(406 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
Copyright: © 2023 Brown et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.