Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Impact of anthropogenic infrastructure on aquatic and avian predator–prey interactions in a modified lowland river

Norman, Josh; Reeds, Jake; Wright, Rosalind M.; Bolland, Jonathan D.

Authors

Jake Reeds

Rosalind M. Wright



Abstract

The relationship between aquatic and avian predators and prey is a fundamental process that influences the ecological dynamics of freshwater communities; a landscape of fear underpins spatial and temporal habitat use of prey, i.e., non-consumptive predation effects. For example, complex marginal vegetation and other natural in-river refuges are known to be important for prey to manage predation risk and predators must alter their behaviour in response to habitat patches prey occupy. However, it is unclear how prey respond to predators, and vice versa, in heavily modified degraded lowland rivers with a high degree of river maintenance measures; a component critical for flood risk management globally. Such modifications could lead to prey seeking refuge at hazardous anthropogenic infrastructure, but a robust quantification of predator–prey interactions in this context is required to develop this understanding. Using multi-beam sonar (Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar), we non-invasively and simultaneously quantified the temporal rate of predator–prey interactions, the attack behaviour of predators, and the refuge seeking behaviour of prey at a pumping station intake during winter in a heavily modified lowland river. Prey fish experienced temporally dynamic, density-dependant, and species-specific predation risks from two dissimilar predators (i.e., aquatic vs. avian); pike (Esox lucius) and cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Generalised linear modelling revealed that prey refuge use was positively associated with predator attack rate. Non-consumptive effects were evidenced by quantified changes to shoal structure (density, area), shoaling (group aggregation), and schooling (coordinated directional movement), including diurnal migrations to and from the pumping station intake for refuge. Our results show that in the absence of natural refuge habitats the natural landscape of fear shifted and speculate that prey fish were paradoxically dependant on hazardous anthropogenic infrastructure, i.e., a pumping station intake, for refuge from predators in a degraded lowland river. These findings strongly enhance our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic infrastructure on predator–prey interactions by demonstrating how flood risk management, including river maintenance measures, and associated anthropogenic infrastructure can impact the behavioural game played between aquatic and avian predators and their prey.

Citation

Norman, J., Reeds, J., Wright, R. M., & Bolland, J. D. (in press). Impact of anthropogenic infrastructure on aquatic and avian predator–prey interactions in a modified lowland river. Freshwater biology, https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14201

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 5, 2023
Online Publication Date Nov 17, 2023
Deposit Date Dec 12, 2023
Publicly Available Date Nov 18, 2024
Journal Freshwater Biology
Print ISSN 0046-5070
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14201
Keywords Behavioural game; Habitat; Landscape of fear; Non-consumptive effects; Pumping station
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4461903

Files

Accepted manuscript (1.9 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Norman, J., Reeds, J., Wright, R. M., & Bolland, J. D. (2023). Impact of anthropogenic infrastructure on aquatic and avian predator–prey interactions in a modified lowland river. Freshwater Biology, 00, 1–15, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14201. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations