Amanda Lee
Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: a systematic review
Lee, Amanda; Khulusi, Sam; Watson, Roger
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval. Background: Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst survival rates. Identifying the most crucial period for intervention to inform earlier diagnosis is an important step towards improving survival. Design: Mixed methods literature review. Data Sources: CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search primer online databases were searched using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Empirical evidence published between 2000–2016 with a focus on gastroesophageal cancer presentation and survival was reviewed to inform this study. Review methods: Twelve studies were extracted for further review. Selected studies were appraised and presented through Olensen's “delay interval” framework to inform the most crucial interval to survival in gastroesophageal cancer. Results: The findings identify the patient interval as the most critical period for encouraging earlier presentation and reducing advanced stage presentation in gastroesophageal cancer. The article also highlighted some methodological limitations to cancer research, such as a lack of consensus in definitions which prevent statistical meta-analysis of cancer data, survivor bias in gastroesophageal cancer studies and a significant lack of qualitative evidence to reveal patient experience in presenting with this cancer. Conclusion: Further research into the patient interval is required to elicit information on how and why patients present with their cancer symptoms.
Citation
Lee, A., Khulusi, S., & Watson, R. (2017). Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: a systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 73(10), 2270-2282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13308
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 15, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 25, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2017-10 |
Deposit Date | Mar 15, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 3, 2018 |
Journal | Journal of advanced nursing |
Print ISSN | 0309-2402 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 73 |
Issue | 10 |
Pages | 2270-2282 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13308 |
Keywords | Cancer; Interval delay; Oesophagogastric cancer; Cancer data; Advanced presentation; Late presentation; Literature review methodology; Cancer methodology; GOC; Early presentation |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/449581 |
Publisher URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.13308/full |
Additional Information | This is the accepted manuscript of an article published in Journal of advanced nursing, 2017. The version of record is available at the DOI link in this record. |
Contract Date | Apr 3, 2018 |
Files
Article
(240 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2018 University of Hull
You might also like
Is the PhD well for nursing faculty running dry?
(2021)
Journal Article
An international e-Delphi study to identify core competencies for Italian cardiac nurses
(2021)
Journal Article
A change of Editor in Chief: Reflections and looking ahead
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search