J. Plass
On the testability of coarsening assumptions: a hypothesis test for subgroup independence
Plass, J.; Cattaneo, M.; Schollmeyer, G.; Augustin, T.
Authors
M. Cattaneo
G. Schollmeyer
T. Augustin
Abstract
Since coarse(ned) data naturally induce set-valued estimators, analysts often assume coarsening at random (CAR) to force them to be single-valued. Focusing on a coarse categorical response variable and a precisely observed categorical covariate, we re-illustrate the impossibility to test CAR and contrast it to another type of coarsening called subgroup independence (SI), using the data of the German Panel Study ``Labour Market and Social Security'' as an example. It turns out that -- depending on the number of subgroups and categories of the response variable -- SI can be point-identifying as CAR, but testable unlike CAR. A main goal of this paper is the construction of the likelihood-ratio test for SI. All issues are similarly investigated for the here proposed generalized versions, gCAR and gSI, thus allowing a more flexible application of this hypothesis test.
Citation
Plass, J., Cattaneo, M., Schollmeyer, G., & Augustin, T. (2017). On the testability of coarsening assumptions: a hypothesis test for subgroup independence. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 90, 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.014
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 25, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 19, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2017-11 |
Deposit Date | Jul 26, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 19, 2018 |
Journal | International journal of approximate reasoning |
Print ISSN | 0888-613X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 90 |
Pages | 292-306 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.014 |
Keywords | Coarse data; Missing data; Coarsening at random (CAR); Likelihood-ratio test; Partial identification; Sensitivity analysis |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/453792 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X17304905 |
Additional Information | This is a description of an article accepted for future publication in: International journal of approximate reasoning, 2017, v.90. |
Contract Date | Jul 26, 2017 |
Files
Article
(942 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
The likelihood interpretation as the foundation of fuzzy set theory
(2017)
Journal Article
Empirical interpretation of imprecise probabilities
(2017)
Journal Article
Conditional probability estimation
(2016)
Journal Article
The likelihood interpretation of fuzzy data
(2016)
Journal Article