Towards better integration of environmental science in society: lessons from BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea environmental research and development programme

Snoeijs-Leijonmalm, Pauline; Barnard, Steve; Elliott, Michael; Andrusaitis, Andris; Kononen, Kaisa; Sirola, Maija

Abstract

Integration of environmental science in society is impeded by the large gap between science and policy that is characterised by weaknesses in societal relevance and dissemination of science and its practical implementation in policy. We analyse experiences from BONUS, the policy-driven joint Baltic Sea research and development programme (2007–2020), which is part of the European Research Area (ERA) and involves combined research funding by eight EU member states. The ERA process decreased fragmentation of Baltic Sea science and BONUS funding increased the scientific quality and societal relevance of Baltic Sea science and strengthened the science-policy interface. Acknowledging the different drivers for science producers (academic career, need for funding, peer review) and science users (fast results fitting policy windows), and realising that most scientists aim at building conceptual understanding rather than instrumental use, bridges can be built through strategic planning, coordination and integration. This requires strong programme governance stretching far beyond selecting projects for funding, such as coaching, facilitating the sharing of infrastructure and data and iterative networking within and between science producer and user groups in all programme phases. Instruments of critical importance for successful science-society integration were identified as: (1) coordinating a strategic research agenda with strong inputs from science, policy and management, (2) providing platforms where science and policy can meet, (3) requiring cooperation between scientists to decrease fragmentation, increase quality, clarify uncertainties and increase consensus about environmental problems, (4) encouraging and supporting scientists in disseminating their results through audience-tailored channels, and (5) funding not only primary research but also synthesis projects that evaluate the scientific findings and their practical use in society – in close cooperation with science users − to enhance relevance, credibility and legitimacy of environmental science and expand its practical implementation.

Citation

Snoeijs-Leijonmalm, P., Barnard, S., Elliott, M., Andrusaitis, A., Kononen, K., & Sirola, M. (2017). Towards better integration of environmental science in society: lessons from BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea environmental research and development programme. Environmental science & policy, 78, 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.004

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 4, 2017
• Online Publication Date: Oct 16, 2017
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Deposit Date: Oct 20, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 20, 2017
• Journal: Environmental science and policy
• Print ISSN: 1462-9011
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 78
• Pages: 193-209
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.004
• Keywords: Science funding, European Research Area (ERA), Relevance of science, Dissemination of science, Practical implementation of science, Baltic Sea
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/455874
• Publisher URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117305622
• Additional Information: This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Towards better integration of environmental science in society: Lessons from BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea environmental research and development programme; Journal Title: Environmental Science & Policy; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.004; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
• Contract Date: Oct 20, 2017