Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer

Valle, Juan; Wasan, Harpreet; Palmer, Daniel H.; Cunningham, David; Anthoney, Alan; Maraveyas, Anthony; Madhusudan, Srinivasan; Iveson, Tim; Hughes, Sharon; Pereira, Stephen P.; Roughton, Michael; Bridgewater, John

Authors

Juan Valle

Harpreet Wasan

Daniel H. Palmer

David Cunningham

Alan Anthoney

Anthony Maraveyas

Srinivasan Madhusudan

Tim Iveson

Sharon Hughes

Stephen P. Pereira

Michael Roughton

John Bridgewater



Abstract

BACKGROUND:There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here. METHODS:We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer.

Citation

Valle, J., Wasan, H., Palmer, D. H., Cunningham, D., Anthoney, A., Maraveyas, A., …Bridgewater, J. (2010). Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(14), 1273-1281. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908721

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Apr 8, 2010
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2014
Publicly Available Date Nov 13, 2014
Journal New England journal of medicine
Electronic ISSN 1533-4406
Publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 362
Issue 14
Pages 1273-1281
DOI https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
Keywords General Medicine
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/467879
Publisher URL http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa0908721
Additional Information From New England journal of medicine, Juan Valle, M.D., Harpreet Wasan, M.D., Daniel H. Palmer, M.D., Ph.D., David Cunningham, M.D., Alan Anthoney, M.D., Anthony Maraveyas, M.D., Ph.D., Srinivasan Madhusudan, M.D., Ph.D., Tim Iveson, M.D., Sharon Hughes, B.Sc., Stephen P. Pereira, M.D., Ph.D., Michael Roughton, M.Sc., and John Bridgewater, M.D., Ph.D. for the ABC-02 Trial Investigators, Cisplatin plus gemcitabin versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer, 2010; 362:1273-1281.
Contract Date Nov 13, 2014

Files

Article.pdf (403 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations