Ian J. Deary
Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being scale?
Deary, Ian J.; Watson, Roger; Booth, Tom; Gale, Catharine R.
Authors
Professor Roger Watson R.Watson@hull.ac.uk
Honourary Professor of Nursing
Tom Booth
Catharine R. Gale
Abstract
It has been suggested that how individuals respond to self-report items relies on cognitive processing. We hypothesized that an individual's level of cognitive ability may influence these processes such that, if there is a hierarchy of items within a particular questionnaire, as demonstrated by Mokken scaling, the strength of that hierarchy will vary according to cognitive ability. Using data on 8,643 men and women from the National Child Development Survey (1958 birth cohort; Power, & Elliott, 2006), we investigated, using Mokken scaling, whether the 14 items that make up the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (Tennant et al., 2007)-completed when the participants were 50 years of age-form a hierarchy and whether that hierarchy varied according to cognitive ability at age 11 years. Among the sample as a whole, we found a moderately strong unidimensional hierarchy of items (Loevinger's coefficient [H] = 0.48). We split participants into 3 groups according to cognitive ability and analyzed the Mokken scaling properties of each group. Only the medium and high cognitive ability groups had acceptable (0.3) invariant item ordering (assessed using the HT statistic). This pattern was also found when the 3 cognitive ability groups were assessed within men and women separately. Greater attention should be paid to the content validity of questionnaires to ensure they are applicable across the spectrum of mental ability. © 2012 American Psychological Association.
Citation
Deary, I. J., Watson, R., Booth, T., & Gale, C. R. (2013). Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being scale?. Psychological assessment, 25(2), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030834
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 1, 2013 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2013 |
Deposit Date | Nov 13, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 13, 2014 |
Journal | Psychological assessment |
Print ISSN | 1040-3590 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-134X |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 25 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 313-318 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030834 |
Keywords | REF 2014 submission, Mokken scaling, Hierarchical scales, Item response theory, Cognitive ability, Mental well-being |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/469160 |
Publisher URL | http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayrecord&uid=2012-32632-001 |
Additional Information | Authors' accepted manuscript of article published in: Psychological assessment, 2013, v.245 issue 2. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. |
Contract Date | Nov 13, 2014 |
Files
Article.pdf
(628 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Is the PhD well for nursing faculty running dry?
(2021)
Journal Article
Vaccination timeliness in preterm infants
(2021)
Thesis
An international e-Delphi study to identify core competencies for Italian cardiac nurses
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search