Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being scale?

Deary, Ian J.; Watson, Roger; Booth, Tom; Gale, Catharine R.

Authors

Ian J. Deary

Tom Booth

Catharine R. Gale



Abstract

It has been suggested that how individuals respond to self-report items relies on cognitive processing. We hypothesized that an individual's level of cognitive ability may influence these processes such that, if there is a hierarchy of items within a particular questionnaire, as demonstrated by Mokken scaling, the strength of that hierarchy will vary according to cognitive ability. Using data on 8,643 men and women from the National Child Development Survey (1958 birth cohort; Power, & Elliott, 2006), we investigated, using Mokken scaling, whether the 14 items that make up the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (Tennant et al., 2007)-completed when the participants were 50 years of age-form a hierarchy and whether that hierarchy varied according to cognitive ability at age 11 years. Among the sample as a whole, we found a moderately strong unidimensional hierarchy of items (Loevinger's coefficient [H] = 0.48). We split participants into 3 groups according to cognitive ability and analyzed the Mokken scaling properties of each group. Only the medium and high cognitive ability groups had acceptable (0.3) invariant item ordering (assessed using the HT statistic). This pattern was also found when the 3 cognitive ability groups were assessed within men and women separately. Greater attention should be paid to the content validity of questionnaires to ensure they are applicable across the spectrum of mental ability. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

Citation

Deary, I. J., Watson, R., Booth, T., & Gale, C. R. (2013). Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being scale?. Psychological assessment, 25(2), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030834

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 1, 2013
Publication Date Jun 1, 2013
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2014
Publicly Available Date Nov 13, 2014
Journal Psychological assessment
Print ISSN 1040-3590
Electronic ISSN 1939-134X
Publisher American Psychological Association
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 25
Issue 2
Pages 313-318
DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030834
Keywords REF 2014 submission, Mokken scaling, Hierarchical scales, Item response theory, Cognitive ability, Mental well-being
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/469160
Publisher URL http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayrecord&uid=2012-32632-001
Additional Information Authors' accepted manuscript of article published in: Psychological assessment, 2013, v.245 issue 2. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
Contract Date Nov 13, 2014

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations