Benjamin Cashore
Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany
Cashore, Benjamin; van Kooten, G.Cornelis; Vertinsky, Ilan; Auld, Graeme; Affolderbach, Julia
Authors
G.Cornelis van Kooten
Ilan Vertinsky
Graeme Auld
Julia Affolderbach
Abstract
Forest certification is perhaps the best example of a voluntary governance structure for addressing environmental spillovers. Competing forest certification schemes have evolved. At the global level, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 certification and Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification focus on environmental processes and sustainable management of forestland, respectively. Regional/domestic schemes have been started by industry and/or landowners to compete with the FSC system. The main difference between FSC certification and the others is that the FSC relie s on regulation by a non-state private regulator, while the others employ a form of self-regulation. In this study, survey data from firms in Canada, the United States and Germany are used to investigate factors that cause firms to prefer and/or choose a particular certification scheme. The findings indicate that market access is an important reason why forest firms certify, but it is an insufficient reason for them to pick the FSC system despite opinion polls that reveal a preference for FSC-style certification. Rather, firms prefer (participate in) FSC certification because they perceive it to confer environmental benefits, while those choosing another certification scheme do so on economic grounds. Finally, as companies become increasingly aware of their certification options, they are less likely to pursue FSC certification. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Citation
Cashore, B., van Kooten, G., Vertinsky, I., Auld, G., & Affolderbach, J. (2005). Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest policy and economics, 7(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341%2803%2900011-x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 18, 2003 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 14, 2003 |
Publication Date | 2005-01 |
Deposit Date | Feb 7, 2018 |
Journal | Forest Policy and Economics |
Print ISSN | 1389-9341 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 53-69 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341%2803%2900011-x |
Keywords | Economics and Econometrics; Forestry; Sociology and Political Science; Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/557385 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993410300011X?via%3Dihub |
You might also like
Mobile transitions : exploring synergies for urban sustainability research
(2015)
Journal Article
Grünes Wachstum und alternative Wirtschaftsformen
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search