Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: A qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making

Selman, Lucy Ellen; Bristowe, Katherine; Higginson, Irene J.; Murtagh, Fliss E. M.

Authors

Lucy Ellen Selman

Katherine Bristowe

Irene J. Higginson



Abstract

Background: Older people with advanced kidney disease require information and support from clinicians when deciding whether to have dialysis or conservative (non-dialysis) care. There is evidence that communication practices, information provision and treatment rates vary widely across renal units. However, experiences of communicating with clinicians among patients receiving conservative care are poorly understood. This evidence is essential to ensure support is patient-centred and equitable. Our aim was to explore views and experiences of communication, information provision and treatment decision-making among older patients receiving conservative care.
Methods: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease from three UK renal units. Purposive sampling captured variation in age, co-morbidity and functional status. Interviews were analysed thematically.
Results: 20 patients were interviewed (11 were men; median age 82 (range 69-95)). Participants described positive experiences of communicating with clinicians and receiving information, but also negative experiences involving insensitivity, rushing or ambiguity. Participants reported clinicians omitting/avoiding conversations regarding diagnosis and prognosis, and described what helped and hindered good communication and support. They wanted information about their treatment options and illness, but expressed ambivalence about knowing details of disease progression. Clinicians’ views and recommendations regarding treatment influenced patients’ decision-making.
Conclusions: Older patients report variable quality in communication with clinicians and gaps in the information received. Uncertainty about the disease trajectory and patients’ ambivalence regarding information makes communication particularly challenging for
clinicians. Tailoring information to patient preferences and conveying it clearly and sensitively is critical. Renal clinicians require support and training to ensure decision-making support for older patients is patient-centred. Future research should examine how clinicians’ communication practices influence treatment decision-making.

Citation

Selman, L. E., Bristowe, K., Higginson, I. J., & Murtagh, F. E. M. (2019). The views and experiences of older people with conservatively managed renal failure: A qualitative study of communication, information and decision-making. BMC Nephrology, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 24, 2019
Online Publication Date Feb 4, 2019
Publication Date Feb 4, 2019
Deposit Date Feb 5, 2019
Publicly Available Date Feb 5, 2019
Print ISSN 1471-2369
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 20
Issue 1
Article Number 38
Pages 1-12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4
Keywords Qualitative research; Kidney disease; Chronic; Professional-patient relations; Communication; Education; Conservative treatment; Palliative care
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1242635
Publisher URL https://bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12882-019-1230-4
Additional Information Journal is BMC Nephrology but this is not listed
Contract Date Feb 5, 2019

Files

Article (666 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations