Lin Sun
Sustainable decisions on product upgrade confrontations with remanufacturing operations
Sun, Lin; Zhang, Lingjiang; Li, Youwei
Abstract
In recent decades, remanufacturing is perceived to be an environmentally friendly option due to the reduced consumption of materials, energy etc. It should be noted that whether the remanufacturing operations are undertaken by the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) or outsourced to the remanufacturers, given the size and the growth of remanufactured products, many OEMs intend to fend off the potential cannibalization of new products sales through differentiating their quality levels from those of remanufactured ones by launching upgraded versions. To understand whether and how the product upgrading strategy impacts on optimal outcomes in the context of the remanufacturing operations undertaken by OEMs or third-party remanufacturers (TPRs), in this paper, we develop two models that highlight the OEM’s product upgrading strategy under the scenarios where (1) the OEM owns its remanufacturing operations in-house (Model O) or (2) remanufacturing operations are undertaken by a TPR (Model T). Among other results, we find that, from an economic performance perspective, it is more beneficial for the OEM to perform remanufacturing operations in-house; however, from an environmental sustainability perspective, such behavior is not always good for our environment. In particular, when the level of product upgrading is pronounced, the remanufacturing operations undertaken by the OEM are always detrimental to our environment, due to indulging in remanufacturing, as seen in Model O.
Citation
Sun, L., Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2018). Sustainable decisions on product upgrade confrontations with remanufacturing operations. Sustainability, 10(11), Article 4090. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114090
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 5, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 7, 2018 |
Publication Date | 2018-11 |
Deposit Date | Mar 19, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 20, 2019 |
Journal | Sustainability (Switzerland) |
Electronic ISSN | 2071-1050 |
Publisher | MDPI |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 11 |
Article Number | 4090 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114090 |
Keywords | Sustainability; Environmental impacts; Product upgrading; Remanufacturing; Game theory |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1389470 |
Publisher URL | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4090 |
Contract Date | Mar 19, 2019 |
Files
Published article
(563 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
You might also like
Analysts’ forecast anchoring and discontinuous market reaction: evidence from China
(2024)
Journal Article
Financial literacy and household financial resilience
(2024)
Journal Article
Recycling and/or reusing: when product innovation meets the recast of WEEE direct
(2024)
Journal Article
Climate Change Exposure and Bankruptcy Risk
(2024)
Journal Article
Human capital in the financial sector and corporate innovation: Evidence from China
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search