Terry Cooke-Davies
A cross-national comparison of public project benefits management practices–the effectiveness of benefits management frameworks in application
Cooke-Davies, Terry; Williams, Terry; Vo, Hang; Bourne, Mike; Bourne, Pippa; Cooke- Davies, Terry; Kirkham, Richard; Masterton, Gordon; Quattrone, Paolo; Valette, Jason
Authors
Professor Terry Williams Terry.Williams@hull.ac.uk
Director of the Risk Institute
Hang Vo
Mike Bourne
Pippa Bourne
Terry Cooke- Davies
Richard Kirkham
Gordon Masterton
Paolo Quattrone
Jason Valette
Abstract
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Benefits are the principal reason why an organization may seek to enact change through programmes and projects. The discipline of identification, definition, planning, tracking and realization of benefits is recognized to be instrumental in achieving organizational strategy. In this study, we describe the results of a cross-national comparison of public sector benefits management (BM) practices in Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA. It explores ‘BM practices in action’, considering to what extent ‘espoused’ or ‘mandated’ frameworks are actually practised and perceived by their users. Employing qualitative analysis, semi-structured interview data were analysed from 46 participants with experience in sponsoring, managing and/or reviewing government projects. The results expose considerable variation in the adoption and standardization of BM frameworks from inter and intragovernmental perspectives. We evidence a strong focus on benefits identification across the data set, specifically at the outset (the business case stage seeking project approval) and observe deterioration in focus as the project or programme progresses through the authorization (or assurance) approval gates towards close-out and operations. The results further emphasize the prominence of political interest, leadership buy-in, a benefits-driven culture and a transparent benefits reporting mechanism in the implementation of ‘effective’ BM frameworks.
Citation
Cooke-Davies, T., Williams, T., Vo, H., Bourne, M., Bourne, P., Cooke- Davies, T., Kirkham, R., Masterton, G., Quattrone, P., & Valette, J. (2020). A cross-national comparison of public project benefits management practices–the effectiveness of benefits management frameworks in application. Production planning & control, 31(8), 644-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1668980
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 28, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jun 10, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Aug 30, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 11, 2021 |
Journal | Production Planning and Control |
Print ISSN | 0953-7287 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 31 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 644-659 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1668980 |
Keywords | Project benefits; Project outcomes; Benefits management; Benefits realisation; Public projects |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/2537272 |
Contract Date | Aug 30, 2019 |
Files
PDF Proof 17jul19
(534 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Journal of the Operational Research Society (JORS): The last 40 years
(2023)
Journal Article
Assessing the Welfare of Technicians during Transits to Offshore Wind Farms
(2023)
Journal Article
Conclusions
(2022)
Book Chapter
Project success
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search