Rebecca Weil
Detecting falsehood relies on mismatch detection between sentence components
Weil, Rebecca; Mudrik, Liad
Authors
Liad Mudrik
Abstract
How do people process and evaluate falsehood of sentences? Do people need to compare presented information with the correct answer to determine that a sentence is false, or do they rely on a mismatch between presented sentence components? To illustrate, when confronted with the false sentence ‘trains run on highways’, does one need to know that trains do not run on highways or does one need to know that trains run on tracks to reject the sentence as false? To investigate these questions, participants were asked to validate sentences that were preceded by images (Experiments 1-3) conveying a truth-congruent or a falsehood-congruent component of the sentence (e.g., an image of tracks/highway preceding the sentence ‘trains run on tracks/highways’) or by words (Experiment 4) that were either sentence-congruent, truth-congruent, or both (e.g., the word ‘train/tracks’ preceding the sentence ‘trains run on tracks/highways’). Results from four experiments showed that activating sentence-congruent concepts facilitates validation for both false and true sentences but that activating truth-congruent concepts did not aid the validation of false sentences. The present findings suggest that a detection of falsehood relies on a mismatch detection between sentence’s components, rather than on the activation of true content in the context of a particular sentence.
Citation
Weil, R., & Mudrik, L. (2020). Detecting falsehood relies on mismatch detection between sentence components. Cognition, 195, Article 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104121
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 30, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 13, 2019 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Nov 17, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 14, 2020 |
Journal | Cognition |
Print ISSN | 0010-0277 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 195 |
Article Number | 104121 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104121 |
Keywords | Validation; Falsehood; False information; Congruency; Priming |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3033467 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027719302951 |
Contract Date | Nov 17, 2019 |
Files
Article
(2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
©2019, Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
The role of recollection in evaluative conditioning
(2014)
Journal Article
At the crossroads: Attention, contingency awareness, and evaluative conditioning
(2012)
Journal Article
The role of evaluative conditioning in attitude formation
(2011)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search