Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found, and how can it be strengthened?
Bammer, Gabriele; O’Rourke, Michael; O’Connell, Deborah; Neuhauser, Linda; Midgley, Gerald; Thompson Klein, Julie; Grigg, Nicola J; Gadlin, Howard; Elsum, Ian R; Bursztyn, Marcel; Fulton, Elizabeth A; Pohl, Christian; Smithson, Michael; Vilsmaier, Ulli; Bergmann, Matthias; Jaeger, Jill; Merkx, Femke; Vienni Baptista, Bianca; Burgman, Mark A; Walker, Daniel H; Young, John; Bradbury, Hilary; Crawford, Lynn; Haryanto, Budi; Pachanee, Cha-aim; Polk, Merritt; Richardson, George P
Professor Gerald Midgley G.R.Midgley@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Systems Thinking
Julie Thompson Klein
Nicola J Grigg
Ian R Elsum
Elizabeth A Fulton
Bianca Vienni Baptista
Mark A Burgman
Daniel H Walker
George P Richardson
Expertise in research integration and implementation is an essential but often overlooked component of tackling complex societal and environmental problems. We focus on expertise relevant to any complex problem, especially contributory expertise, divided into ‘knowing-that’ and ‘knowing-how.’ We also deal with interactional expertise and the fact that much expertise is tacit. We explore three questions. First, in examining “when is expertise in research integration and implementation required?,” we review tasks essential to developing more comprehensive understandings of complex problems, plus possible ways to address them. Also, there are tasks necessary for supporting implementation of those understandings into government policy, community practice, business and social innovation, or other initiatives. Second, in considering “where can expertise in research integration and implementation currently be found?,” we describe three realms: 1) specific approaches, including interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, systems thinking and sustainability science; 2) case-based experience that is independent of these specific approaches; and 3) research examining elements of integration and implementation, specifically considering unknowns and fostering innovation. We highlight examples of expertise in each realm and demonstrate how fragmentation currently precludes clear identification of research integration and implementation expertise. Third, in exploring “what is required to strengthen expertise in research integration and implementation?,” we propose building a knowledge bank. We delve into three key challenges: compiling existing expertise, indexing and organizing the expertise to make it widely accessible, and understanding and overcoming the core reasons for the existing fragmentation. A growing knowledge bank of expertise in research integration and implementation on the one hand, and accumulating success in addressing complex societal and environmental problems on the other, will form a virtuous cycle so that each strengthens the other. Building a coalition of researchers and institutions will ensure this expertise and its application are valued and sustained.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jan 13, 2020|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Bammer, G., O’Rourke, M., O’Connell, D., Neuhauser, L., Midgley, G., Thompson Klein, J., …Richardson, G. P. (2020). Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found, and how can it be strengthened?. Palgrave communications, 6, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0|
© The Author(s) 2020
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
You might also like
Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions
Towards a heart and soul for co-creative research practice: A systemic approach
Critical Systems Thinking, Systemic Intervention and Beyond
Developing a systemic program evaluation methodology: A critical systems perspective