Alastair I. Ward
Using and communicating uncertainty for the effective control of invasive non-native species
Ward, Alastair I.; Richardson, Suzanne; Macarthur, Roy; Mill, Aileen C.
Authors
Suzanne Richardson
Roy Macarthur
Aileen C. Mill
Contributors
Alastair Ward
Other
Abstract
Estimates of quantities needed to plan invasive species control, such as population size, are always uncertain; this is an issue that can become a problem when mishandled in ecological science and its communication. The complexities of incorporating uncertainty into sophisticated decision‐support tools may be a barrier to their use by decision makers, leading to decisions being made without due regard to uncertainty and risking misplaced certainty of predicted outcomes. We summarise ways in which uncertainty has been incorporated into and used to advise decisions on the management of invasive non‐native species and other problem species, and offer a simple conceptual model for accommodating and using uncertainty at the planning stage. We also demonstrate how frequently uncertainty has been misused and miscommunicated in the wildlife management literature. We contend that uncertainty in estimates of natural quantities must be acknowledged, can inform decisions and can be made to derive decisions, and should not be ignored if invasive species policy is to be delivered effectively. Uncertainty must be communicated thoroughly and correctly by scientists if decision makers are to understand its consequences for planning and resourcing control programmes.
Citation
Ward, A. I., Richardson, S., Macarthur, R., & Mill, A. C. (2020). Using and communicating uncertainty for the effective control of invasive non-native species. Mammal Review, 50(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12188
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 19, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 26, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-04 |
Deposit Date | Apr 8, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 18, 2021 |
Journal | Mammal Review |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2907 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 50 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 211-220 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12188 |
Keywords | Confidence interval; Decision‐making error; Invasive non‐native mammals; Probability; Wildlife management |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3494793 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mam.12188 |
Files
Article
(297 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2020 The authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder
You might also like
Exclusions for resolving urban badger damage problems: Outcomes and consequences
(2016)
Journal Article
Dietary niche partitioning between sympatric brown hares and rabbits
(2017)
Journal Article
Use of tri-axial accelerometers to assess terrestrial mammal behaviour in the wild
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search