Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Combining mirtazapine with SSRIs or SNRIs for treatment-resistant depression: The MIR RCT

Kessler, David; Burns, Alison; Tallon, Debbie; Lewis, Glyn; Macneill, Stephanie; Round, Jeff; Hollingworth, William; Chew-Graham, Carolyn; Anderson, Ian; Campbell, John; Dickens, Chris; Macleod, Una; Gilbody, Simon; Davies, Simon; Peters, Tim J.; Wiles, Nicola

Authors

David Kessler

Alison Burns

Debbie Tallon

Glyn Lewis

Stephanie Macneill

Jeff Round

William Hollingworth

Carolyn Chew-Graham

Ian Anderson

John Campbell

Chris Dickens

Simon Gilbody

Simon Davies

Tim J. Peters

Nicola Wiles



Abstract

Background: Depression is usually managed in primary care and antidepressants are often the first-line treatment, but only half of those treated respond to a single antidepressant.
Objectives: To investigate whether or not combining mirtazapine with serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants results in better patient outcomes and more efficient NHS care than SNRI or SSRI therapy alone in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Design: The MIR trial was a two-parallel-group, multicentre, pragmatic, placebo-controlled randomized trial with allocation at the level of the individual.
Setting: Participants were recruited from primary care in Bristol, Exeter, Hull/York and Manchester/Keele.
Participants: Eligible participants were aged ≥ 18 years; were taking a SSRI or a SNRI antidepressant for at least 6 weeks at an adequate dose; scored ≥ 14 points on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II); were adherent to medication; and met the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, criteria for depression.
Interventions: Participants were randomised using a computer-generated code to either oral mirtazapine or a matched placebo, starting at a dose of 15 mg daily for 2 weeks and increasing to 30 mg daily for up to 12 months, in addition to their usual antidepressant. Participants, their general practitioners (GPs) and the research team were blind to the allocation.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was depression symptoms at 12 weeks post randomization compared with baseline, measured as a continuous variable using the BDI-II. Secondary outcomes (at 12, 24 and 52 weeks) included response, remission of depression, change in anxiety symptoms, adverse events (AEs), quality of life, adherence to medication, health and social care use and cost-effectiveness. Outcomes were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. A qualitative study explored patients’ views and experiences of managing depression and GPs’ views on prescribing a second antidepressant.
Results: There were 480 patients randomised to the trial (mirtazapine and usual care, n = 241; placebo and usual care, n = 239), of whom 431 patients (89.8%) were followed up at 12 weeks. BDI-II scores at 12 weeks were lower in the mirtazapine group than the placebo group after adjustment for baseline BDI-II score and minimisation and stratification variables [difference –1.83 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) –3.92 to 0.27 points; p = 0.087]. This was smaller than the minimum clinically important difference and the CI included the null. The difference became smaller at subsequent time points (24 weeks: –0.85 points, 95% CI –3.12 to 1.43 points; 12 months: 0.17 points, 95% CI –2.13 to 2.46 points). More participants in the mirtazapine group withdrew from the trial medication, citing mild AEs (46 vs. 9 participants).
Conclusions: This study did not find convincing evidence of a clinically important benefit for mirtazapine in addition to a SSRI or a SNRI antidepressant over placebo in primary care patients with TRD. There was no evidence that the addition of mirtazapine was a cost-effective use of NHS resources. GPs and patients were concerned about adding an additional antidepressant.
Limitations: Voluntary unblinding for participants after the primary outcome at 12 weeks made interpretation of longer-term outcomes more difficult.
Future work: Treatment-resistant depression remains an area of important, unmet need, with limited evidence of effective treatments. Promising interventions include augmentation with atypical antipsychotics and treatment using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Citation

Kessler, D., Burns, A., Tallon, D., Lewis, G., Macneill, S., Round, J., Hollingworth, W., Chew-Graham, C., Anderson, I., Campbell, J., Dickens, C., Macleod, U., Gilbody, S., Davies, S., Peters, T. J., & Wiles, N. (2018). Combining mirtazapine with SSRIs or SNRIs for treatment-resistant depression: The MIR RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 22(63), 1-136. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22630

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 1, 2017
Publication Date Nov 23, 2018
Deposit Date Apr 19, 2022
Publicly Available Date Apr 22, 2022
Journal Health Technology Assessment
Print ISSN 1366-5278
Publisher NIHR Journals Library
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 63
Pages 1-136
DOI https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22630
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3607526

Files

Published report (2.6 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Kessler et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations