Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

UK clinicians’ views on the use of formulations for the management of BPSD: a multidisciplinary survey

James, Ian A.; James, Ian; Mahesh, Mithila; Duffy, Frances; Reichelt, Katharina; Moniz-Cook, Esme

Authors

Ian A. James

Ian James

Mithila Mahesh

Frances Duffy

Katharina Reichelt

Profile Image

Professor Esme Moniz-Cook E.D.Moniz-Cook@hull.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor of Clinical Psychology of Ageing and Dementia Care Research / Dementia Research Work Group Lead



Abstract

© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background and objectives: The process of formulating in the area of dementia care is at an early stage of development. A review published in 2016, identified 14 different types of formulation-based approaches for the management of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD). The present study examines professionals’ views about the use of systematic formulations for choosing first-line non-pharmacological interventions for BPSD. Methods: A 34-item online survey, with six items about formulation-based interventions for the management of BPSD, was circulated to multi-disciplinary UK dementia networks. Quantitative data were examined for the use of formulation-based frameworks in practice. Thematic analyses provided insight into the practicalities of using formulations. Results: The majority of the 355 participants responding to the questions stated they used formulation-led models to inform interventions, but 24% stated they did not. Thirty-two types of formulation frameworks were named, and there was a diverse spread across the UK. The Newcastle model was the most frequently used framework, with fifty percent of the participants who formulated reporting using this framework. Four themes regarding the use of formulation emerged, relating to function, process, reported outcomes and obstacles. Conclusion: Formulation-based approaches to targeting intervention are becoming popular in dementia care in the UK. More types of formulation frameworks are used in practice compared with the 2016 review. The use of formulations are seen as key to offering an alternative to pharmacological treatments. Understanding both the value of formulation-led approaches and the obstacles to their use are important to implementing NICE 2018 recommendations.

Citation

James, I. A., James, I., Mahesh, M., Duffy, F., Reichelt, K., & Moniz-Cook, E. (2020). UK clinicians’ views on the use of formulations for the management of BPSD: a multidisciplinary survey. Aging and Mental Health, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1830944

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 25, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 13, 2020
Publication Date 2020
Deposit Date Sep 29, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 14, 2021
Journal Aging & Mental Health
Print ISSN 1360-7863
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Pages 1-8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1830944
Keywords Formulation; Nonpharmacological; NICE; BPSD; Agitation
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3619917
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13607863.2020.1830944

Files

Accepted article (453 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
©2020 The authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder







You might also like



Downloadable Citations