Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A grounded theory approach to the phenomenon of pro-anorexia

Williams, Sarah; Reid, Marie

Authors

Sarah Williams

Marie Reid



Abstract

This research looked at the thoughts and feelings expressed by visitors to pro-anorexic websites to find out how they felt about anorexia and why they used pro-anorexic sites. Using grounded theory (Strauss A, Corbin J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage), the information expressed by 176 participants on two pro-anorexic message boards and one online journal over eight frequently occurring topics was analysed. People believe in pro-anorexia because they want anorexic behaviours and feel positive towards them, however, anorexia could also be considered a problem at times when for some it was constituted a disorder with negative implications. Depictions of anorexia were very diverse. It is suggested that health professionals need to take into account the anorexic individual's perspectives of their anorexia in order that more successful treatment can be given. Additional research into anorexic's perspectives needs to be conducted to further develop understandings of anorexia and the ways it is viewed by those who have it.

Citation

Williams, S., & Reid, M. (2007). A grounded theory approach to the phenomenon of pro-anorexia. Addiction research & theory, 15(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350601143239

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 20, 2006
Online Publication Date Jul 11, 2009
Publication Date Jul 4, 2007
Deposit Date Dec 5, 2020
Journal Addiction Research and Theory
Print ISSN 1606-6359
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 141-152
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350601143239
Keywords Pro-anorexia; Perspectives of anorexia; Wanting anorexia; The diversity of anorexia
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3621299
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16066350601143239