Taking Profound Offence Seriously - Freedom Of Speech V. Human Dignity

Cohen-Almagor, Raphael

Abstract

This study discusses the issue of offence to sensibilities as possible grounds for limiting freedom of expression. This issue is constantly brought to the public agenda, as for example, in the limitation imposed in Israel on the playing of Richard Wagner’s music by Israeli orchestras. The proposed thesis is as follows: The Offence to Sensibilities Argument will take precedence over free expression only in cases where profound and direct damage is inflicted upon the sensibilities of individuals or a target group, undermining their dignity, especially when the speaker’s intentions are to offend the target individual/group under circumstances in which the individual or target group cannot avoid. In every case, it is incumbent upon those who wish to limit expression to examine the content of the expression and its manner, the duration and intensity of the expression, the frequency of the offence, the speaker’s intentions, the circumstances and the likely consequences of the offensive speech. Psychologists should be consulted concerning the severity of each offence.

Citation

Cohen-Almagor, R. (2020). Taking Profound Offence Seriously - Freedom Of Speech V. Human Dignity. Journal of hate studies, 16(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.152

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 30, 2020
• Online Publication Date: Dec 29, 2020
• Publication Date: Dec 29, 2020
• Deposit Date: Dec 30, 2020
• Publicly Available Date: Jan 5, 2021
• Journal: Journal of Hate Studies
• Publisher: Gonzaga Library Publishing
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: 1
• Pages: 1-11
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.152
• Keywords: Freedom of expression; Feinberg; Harm; Offence; Skokie; Wagner
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3684872
• Publisher URL: https://jhs.press.gonzaga.edu/articles/10.33972/jhs.152/