Owen Thomas
The surgical management of cutaneous abscesses: A UK cross-sectional survey
Thomas, Owen; Ramsay, Alistair; Yiasemidou, Marina; Hardie, Claire; Ashmore, Daniel; Macklin, Christopher; Bandyopadhyay, Dibyendu; Patel, Bijendra; Burke, Joshua R.; Jayne, David
Authors
Alistair Ramsay
Marina Yiasemidou
Claire Hardie
Daniel Ashmore
Christopher Macklin
Dibyendu Bandyopadhyay
Bijendra Patel
Joshua R. Burke
David Jayne
Contributors
Marina Yiasemidou
Other
Abstract
Aim
Cutaneous abscesses are one of the most common acute general surgery presentations. This study aimed to understand the current practice in the management of cutaneous abscesses in the United Kingdom (UK), once the decision has been made that acute surgical incision and drainage (I&D) is required.
Method
General surgeons from across the UK were surveyed on their opinions on the optimum management of cutaneous abscesses. Outcomes measured included anaesthesia, incision technique, antibiotic administration, departmental abscess pathways, and post-drainage management. A combination of Likert scales, multiple-choice questions, and short answer questions were used. Comparisons were made of Likert scales between regions using a two-sample independent t-test. The survey was peer reviewed and distributed through the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) network between April and June 2018.
Results
Sixty-one responses were collected from surgeons throughout the UK. Of these respondents, 69% indicated that cutaneous abscesses would always or usually require a General Anaesthetic (GA) for treatment, and 82% indicated that abscesses were at least sometimes not treated until the next day due to a lack of resources. While 79% of surgeons stated that pus swabs are always or are usually taken, 44% of respondents never or rarely chased the results. The main indications for giving antibiotics were sepsis/systemically unwell patients, and cellulitis. 31% of responding centres had an abscess management protocol, and 82% of respondents confirmed that they would always pack the abscess wound post-operatively.
Conclusion
‘Incision and drainage’ is currently the most widely used technique for the surgical management of cutaneous abscess. However, this study demonstrates the significant variability in the use of anaesthesia, antibiotics, packing and the use of protocols to guide and streamline patient management.
Citation
Thomas, O., Ramsay, A., Yiasemidou, M., Hardie, C., Ashmore, D., Macklin, C., Bandyopadhyay, D., Patel, B., Burke, J. R., & Jayne, D. (2020). The surgical management of cutaneous abscesses: A UK cross-sectional survey. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 60, 654-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.068
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 24, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 27, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-12 |
Deposit Date | Jan 27, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 1, 2021 |
Journal | Annals of Medicine and Surgery |
Print ISSN | 2049-0801 |
Electronic ISSN | 2049-0801 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 60 |
Pages | 654-659 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.068 |
Keywords | Cutaneous abscess; Antibiotics; Packing; ‘Incision and drainage’; Local anaesthetic |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3700425 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080120304957?via%3Dihub |
Files
Published article
(419 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
You might also like
The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Training: the Past, the Present and the Future
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search