Comparative cranial biomechanics in two lizard species: impact of variation in cranial design
Groning, Flora; Dutel, Hugo; Gröning, Flora; Sharp, Alana C.; Watson, Peter J.; Herrel, Anthony; Ross, Callum F.; Jones, Marc E. H.; Evans, Susan E.; Fagan, Michael J.
Alana C. Sharp
Dr Peter Watson P.J.Watson@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering
Callum F. Ross
Marc E. H. Jones
Susan E. Evans
Professor Michael Fagan M.J.Fagan@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Medical and Biological Engineering
Cranial morphology in lepidosaurs is highly disparate and characterised by the frequent loss or reduction of bony elements. In varanids and geckos, the loss of the postorbital bar is associated with changes in skull shape, but the mechanical principles underlying this variation remain poorly understood. Here, we sought to determine how the overall cranial architecture and the presence of the postorbital bar relate to the loading and deformation of the cranial bones during biting in lepidosaurs. Using computer-based simulation techniques, we compared cranial biomechanics in the varanid Varanus niloticus and the teiid Salvator merianae, two large, active foragers. The overall strain magnitude and distribution across the cranium were similar in the two species, despite lower strain gradients in V. niloticus. In S. merianae, the postorbital bar is important for resistance of the cranium to feeding loads. The postorbital ligament, which in varanids partially replaces the postorbital bar, does not affect bone strain. Our results suggest that the reduction of the postorbital bar impaired neither biting performance nor the structural resistance of the cranium to feeding loads in V. niloticus. Differences in bone strain between the two species might reflect demands imposed by feeding and non-feeding functions on cranial shape. Beyond variation in cranial bone strain related to species-specific morphological differences, our results reveal that similar mechanical behaviour is shared by lizards with distinct cranial shapes. Contrary to the situation in mammals, the morphology of the circumorbital region, calvaria and palate appears to be important for withstanding high feeding loads in these lizards.
Jones, M. E., Groning, F., Dutel, H., Gröning, F., Sharp, A. C., Watson, P. J., …Fagan, M. J. (2021). Comparative cranial biomechanics in two lizard species: impact of variation in cranial design. The journal of experimental biology, 224(5), https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.234831
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jan 18, 2021|
|Online Publication Date||Mar 11, 2021|
|Publication Date||Mar 1, 2021|
|Deposit Date||May 18, 2021|
|Publicly Available Date||May 18, 2021|
|Journal||Journal of Experimental Biology|
|Publisher||The Company of Biologists|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Lepidosauria; Squamata; Skull; Feeding; Finite element analysis; Multibody dynamic analysis|
Publisher Licence URL
© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
You might also like
Form-function relationships in dragonfly mandibles under an evolutionary perspective
The biomechanical role of the chondrocranium and sutures in a lizard cranium
Computational biomechanical modelling of the rabbit cranium during mastication