Evolutionary biomechanics: hard tissues and soft evidence?
Broyde, Sarah; Dempsey, Matthew; Wang, Linjie; Cox, Philip G.; Fagan, Michael; Bates, Karl T.
Philip G. Cox
Professor Michael Fagan M.J.Fagan@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Medical and Biological Engineering
Karl T. Bates
Biomechanical modelling is a powerful tool for quantifying the evolution of functional performance in extinct animals to understand key anatomical innovations and selective pressures driving major evolutionary radiations. However, the fossil record is composed predominantly of hard parts, forcing palaeontologists to reconstruct soft tissue properties in such models. Rarely are these reconstruction approaches validated on extant animals, despite soft tissue properties being highly determinant of functional performance. The extent to which soft tissue reconstructions and biomechanical models accurately predict quantitative or even qualitative patterns in macroevolutionary studies is therefore unknown. Here,we modelled the masticatory system in extant rodents to objectively test the ability of current muscle reconstruction methods to correctly identify quantitative and qualitative differences between macroevolutionary morphotypes. Baseline models generated using measured soft tissue properties yielded differences in muscle proportions, bite force, and bone stress expected between extant sciuromorph, myomorph, and hystricomorph rodents. However, predictions from models generated using reconstruction methods typically used in fossil studies varied widely from high levels of quantitative accuracy to a failure to correctly capture even relative differences between macroevolutionary morphotypes. Our novel experiment emphasizes that correctly reconstructing even qualitative differences between taxa in a macroevolutionary radiation is challenging using current methods. Future studies of fossil taxa should incorporate systematic assessments of reconstruction error into their hypothesis testing and, moreover, seek to expand primary datasets on muscle properties in extant taxa to better inform soft tissue reconstructions in macroevolutionary studies.
Broyde, S., Dempsey, M., Wang, L., Cox, P. G., Fagan, M., & Bates, K. T. (2021). Evolutionary biomechanics: hard tissues and soft evidence?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1945), https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2809
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jan 20, 2021|
|Online Publication Date||Feb 17, 2021|
|Publication Date||Feb 24, 2021|
|Deposit Date||Feb 19, 2021|
|Publicly Available Date||Feb 19, 2021|
|Journal||Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|
|Publisher||The Royal Society|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Macroevolution; Rodent mastication; Biomechanics; Multi-body dynamics; Finite element analysis|
|Additional Information||Received: 2020-11-10; Accepted: 2021-01-20; Published: 2021-02-17|
Publisher Licence URL
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
Mathematical modeling of canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways in TNF stimulation