How reproducible should research software be?

Harrison, Sam; Dasgupta, Abhishek; Waldman, Simon; Henderson, Alex; Lovell, Christopher

How reproducible should research software be?

Harrison, Sam; Dasgupta, Abhishek; Waldman, Simon; Henderson, Alex; Lovell, Christopher

Authors

Sam Harrison

Abhishek Dasgupta

Simon Waldman

Alex Henderson

Christopher Lovell

Abstract

How reproducible should research software be? In this article, we attempt to answer this question by defining four levels of reproducibility, suggesting criteria to help you decide which level your research software should be at, and recommended practices to reach these levels of reproducibility.

Citation

Harrison, S., Dasgupta, A., Waldman, S., Henderson, A., & Lovell, C. (2021). How reproducible should research software be?

Working Paper Type	Working Paper
Publication Date	May 14, 2021
Deposit Date	May 14, 2021
Keywords	reproducibility, software
Public URL	https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3769082
Publisher URL	http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4761867
Additional Information	Blog post resulting from conversations at the Software Sustainability Institute's fellowship selection day 2021.