Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial)

Goulao, Beatriz; Carnell, Sonya; Shen, Jing; MacLennan, Graeme; Norrie, John; Cook, Jonathan; McColl, Elaine; Breckons, Matt; Vale, Luke; Whybrow, Paul; Rapley, Tim; Forbes, Rebecca; Currer, Stephanie; Forrest, Mark; Wilkinson, Jennifer; Andrich, Daniela; Barclay, Stewart; Mundy, Anthony; N’Dow, James; Payne, Stephen; Watkin, Nick; Pickard, Robert

Abstract

Background
Urethral stricture affects 0.9% of men. Initial treatment is urethrotomy. Approximately, half of the strictures recur within 4 yr. Options for further treatment are repeat urethrotomy or open urethroplasty.
Objective
To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of urethrotomy with open urethroplasty in adult men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture.
Design, setting, and participants
This was an open label, two-arm, patient-randomised controlled trial. UK National Health Service hospitals were recruited and 222 men were randomised to receive urethroplasty or urethrotomy.
Intervention
Urethrotomy is a minimally invasive technique whereby the narrowed area is progressively widened by cutting the scar tissue with a steel blade mounted on a urethroscope. Urethroplasty is a more invasive surgery to reconstruct the narrowed area.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
The primary outcome was the profile over 24 mo of a patient-reported outcome measure, the voiding symptom score. The main clinical outcome was time until reintervention.
Results and limitations
The primary analysis included 69 (63%) and 90 (81%) of those allocated to urethroplasty and urethrotomy, respectively. The mean difference between the urethroplasty and urethrotomy groups was –0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] –1.74 to 1.02). Fifteen men allocated to urethroplasty needed a reintervention compared with 29 allocated to urethrotomy (hazard ratio [95% CI] 0.52 [0.31–0.89]).
Conclusions
In men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture, both urethroplasty and urethrotomy improved voiding symptoms. The benefit lasted longer for urethroplasty.
Patient summary
There was uncertainty about the best treatment for men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. We randomised men to receive one of the following two treatment options: urethrotomy and urethroplasty. At the end of the study, both treatments resulted in similar and better symptom scores. However, the urethroplasty group had fewer reinterventions.

Citation

Goulao, B., Carnell, S., Shen, J., MacLennan, G., Norrie, J., Cook, J., McColl, E., Breckons, M., Vale, L., Whybrow, P., Rapley, T., Forbes, R., Currer, S., Forrest, M., Wilkinson, J., Andrich, D., Barclay, S., Mundy, A., N’Dow, J., Payne, S., …Pickard, R. (2020). Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial). European Urology, 78(4), 572-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.003

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 2, 2020
• Online Publication Date: Jul 4, 2020
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Deposit Date: May 3, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: May 6, 2022
• Journal: European Urology
• Print ISSN: 0302-2838
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 78
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 572-580
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.003
• Keywords: Surgery; Randomised controlled trial; Urethral stricture; Urethroplasty; Urethrotomy; Voiding symptoms
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3778351
• Related Public URLs: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:178e2d9c-e337-4fdc-9968-626765ca10e2