Sally Seed
A Systematic Review of Exercise Prescription in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Does Pain Matter?
Seed, Sally; Harwood, Amy; Sinclair, Jonathan; Pymer, Sean; Caldow, Edward; Ingle, Lee; Egun, Anselm; Birkett, Stefan
Authors
Amy Harwood
Jonathan Sinclair
Mr Sean Pymer Sean.Pymer@hull.ac.uk
Academic Clinical Exercise Physiologist
Edward Caldow
Lee Ingle
Anselm Egun
Stefan Birkett
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines for intermittent claudication advocate exercise at moderate to maximal claudication pain. However, adherence rates to supervised exercise programmes (SEP) remain poor and claudication pain is a contributing factor. Limited evidence suggests that moderate or pain-free exercise may be just as beneficial and may be better tolerated. However, it remains unclear what ‘level’ of claudication pain is optimal for improving functional outcomes. We therefore conducted a systematic review to synthesise the evidence for exercise prescribed at different levels of claudication pain. Methods: The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched up to October 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared at least 2 different intensities of claudication pain were included. Outcome measures included walking performance, adherence, quality of life and vascular function. Results: Of 1,543 search results, 2 studies were included. Maximal walking distance improved by 100–128% in the moderate-pain SEP groups, and by 77–90% in the pain-free SEP groups. Importantly, there were no significant differences between the moderate-pain and pain-free SEP groups in either study for improvements in walking performance, though comparison to a maximal-pain SEP group was not made. Conclusions: The efficacy of SEPs for patients with intermittent claudication is irrefutable, though there is no consensus on the optimal level of pain. Therefore, adequately powered RCTs are required to compare the effect of pain-free SEPs, moderate-pain SEPs and maximal-pain SEPs on functional outcomes. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020213684).
Citation
Seed, S., Harwood, A., Sinclair, J., Pymer, S., Caldow, E., Ingle, L., Egun, A., & Birkett, S. (in press). A Systematic Review of Exercise Prescription in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Does Pain Matter?. Annals of vascular surgery, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.025
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 17, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 28, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jun 18, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 29, 2022 |
Journal | Annals of Vascular Surgery |
Print ISSN | 0890-5096 |
Electronic ISSN | 1615-5947 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.025 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3791143 |
Files
Article
(482 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Elsevier licence: © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search