John M. Pearce
Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
Pearce, John M.; Redhead, Edward S.; George, David N.
Edward S. Redhead
Dr David George D.George@hull.ac.uk
Pigeons received autoshaping with 2 stimuli, A and B, presented in adjacent regions on a television screen. Conditioning with each stimulus was therefore accompanied by stimulation that was displaced from the screen whenever the other stimulus was presented. Test trials with AB revealed stronger responding if this displaced stimulation was similar to, rather than different from, A and B. For a further experiment the training just described included trials with A and B accompanied by an additional, similar, stimulus. Responding during test trials with AB was stronger if the additional trials signaled the presence rather than the absence of food. The results are explained with a configural theory of conditioning.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Journal||JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES|
|Publisher||American Psychological Association|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Pearce, J. M., Redhead, E. S., & George, D. N. (2002). Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.2.175|
|Keywords||Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics|
You might also like
More evidence that less is better: Sub-optimal choice in dogs
Stimulus similarity affects patterning discrimination learning.