Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways

Ahmad, Salman; Ouenniche, Jamal; Kolosz, Ben W.; Greening, Philip; Andresen, John M.; Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes; Xu, Bing

Authors

Salman Ahmad

Jamal Ouenniche

Profile image of Ben Kolosz

Dr Ben Kolosz B.W.Kolosz@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Renewable Energy and Carbon Removal and Director of the MSc Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Solutions Programme

Philip Greening

John M. Andresen

M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer

Bing Xu



Abstract

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) provide a viable option to decarbonise global aviation. Unlike conventional jet-fuel, SAFs can be produced in several production pathways making their selection a complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with conflicting objectives. In this paper, we propose a multicriteria based framework for evaluating SAF production pathways, which is a sequential decision-making process with feedback adjustment mechanisms. Given the early stage of SAF technologies' development and the scarcity of data on such technologies, in this research, we involved a variety of aviation industry stakeholders to assist with data and preference gathering. Our MCDM framework is designed to be generic to provide flexibilities to potential users in choosing the appropriate implementation decisions for the relevant stakeholders. The strength of the proposed framework lays in its flexibility to accommodate various stakeholders' subjective judgements, choice of ranking method, and robustness of results. We used our MCDM framework within a stakeholders’ participatory approach to rank order 11 SAF production pathways against 24 criteria grouped under social, environmental, economic, and technical impact categories. Our analysis revealed that the environmental and the economic impact categories are the most important ones followed by the technical and the social criteria; the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) based production processes are preferred over fermentation and oil-based ones; and waste gases are the preferred feedstock along with wood-residue. These findings provide decision-makers with guidelines on the selection of SAF production pathways.

Citation

Ahmad, S., Ouenniche, J., Kolosz, B. W., Greening, P., Andresen, J. M., Maroto-Valer, M. M., & Xu, B. (2021). A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways. International journal of production economics, 238, Article 108156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108156

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 7, 2021
Online Publication Date May 12, 2021
Publication Date Aug 1, 2021
Deposit Date Aug 3, 2024
Publicly Available Date Aug 9, 2024
Journal International Journal of Production Economics
Electronic ISSN 0925-5273
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 238
Article Number 108156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108156
Keywords Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF); Sustainability; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; VIKOR
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4057262

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations