Stefanie H. Meeuwis
Can contagious itch be affected by positive and negative suggestions?
Meeuwis, Stefanie H.; Skvortsova, Aleksandrina; van Laarhoven, Antoinette I. M.; Holle, Henning; Evers, Andrea W.M.
Authors
Aleksandrina Skvortsova
Antoinette I. M. van Laarhoven
Dr Henning Holle H.Holle@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Psychology / Leader of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience group (https://www.hull.ac.uk/neuroscience)
Andrea W.M. Evers
Abstract
Contagious itch can be evoked by observing people scratching. Verbal suggestions about to-be-received itch can influence itch intensity, as shown by placebo research, but it is unknown whether this extends to contagious itch. The current study aimed to replicate prior findings that listening to scratching and rubbing sounds elicits contagious itch, and to investigate whether suggestions can modulate this process. Healthy participants (n= 140) received positive or negative suggestions about itch in response to the sounds (aimed to decrease or increase expected itch, respectively), or no specific suggestions as a control. Participants listened to a number of audio fragments with scratching and rubbing sounds. The amount of expected itch as well as itch sensation after each audio fragment were measured by self-report. Suggestions had no effect on the expected itch. Both rubbing and scratching sounds significantly elicited itch in all groups. Scratching sounds induced more itch than rubbing sounds exclusively in the control group. These findings indicate that short suggestions might be not effective enough to modify the expectations of people regarding contagious itch. Furthermore, suggestions modulate contagious itch to some degree, but not in the hypothesized direction. Potential similarities and differences in the neurobiological mechanisms of contagious itch and nocebo effects are discussed.
Citation
Meeuwis, S. H., Skvortsova, A., van Laarhoven, A. I. M., Holle, H., & Evers, A. W. (in press). Can contagious itch be affected by positive and negative suggestions?. Experimental Dermatology, https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.14663
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 10, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 22, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Aug 26, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 2, 2022 |
Journal | Experimental Dermatology |
Print ISSN | 0906-6705 |
Electronic ISSN | 1600-0625 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.14663 |
Keywords | Contagious itch; Expectancy; Itch; Nocebo effects; Placebo effects |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4060668 |
Files
Published article
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
The Many Challenges of Human Experimental Itch Research
(2023)
Book Chapter
No preconscious attentional bias towards itch in healthy individuals
(2022)
Journal Article
Human but not robotic gaze facilitates action prediction
(2022)
Journal Article
Acute itch induces attentional avoidance of itch-related information
(2022)
Journal Article
Optimizing audiovisual itch induction: the role of attention and expectancy
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search