Risto Talas
Using portfolio optimisation to calculate the efficient relationship between maritime port security residual risk and security investment
Talas, Risto; Menachof, David
Authors
David Menachof
Abstract
The research employs an adaptive cross-disciplinary research strategy in an industrial example to address container port facilities’ inability to assess whether their security systems are efficient. The research combines subjective assessments of the performances of the port facilities’ security systems with estimates of terrorism risk from a specialist terrorism underwriter. The research constructs the optimum theoretical portfolio of the three different security systems (access control, biometrics and detection systems) drawn from six different container port facilities owned by a major international ports company to calculate the efficient relationship between maritime port security residual risk and security investment. The research builds on the existing literature and proposes new definitions of security, port security, port security risk and port security risk management. The research also highlights the managerial impact of a chief financial officer’s ability to assess the efficiency of security budget allocation through the residual risk – security investment ratio. The contribution which the research makes is in terms of modelling and measurement of the impact of the introduction of new port security technology and changes to background port security threat levels. The research also juxtaposes for the first time the performance of port security systems with estimates of terrorism risk from a specialist Lloyd’s terrorism underwriter.
Citation
Talas, R., & Menachof, D. (2014). Using portfolio optimisation to calculate the efficient relationship between maritime port security residual risk and security investment. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 6(3), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2014.060788
Acceptance Date | Jan 1, 2014 |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2014 |
Deposit Date | Feb 25, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 25, 2016 |
Journal | International journal of shipping and transport logistics |
Print ISSN | 1756-6517 |
Publisher | Inderscience |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 314-338 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2014.060788 |
Keywords | Security, Port security, Port security risk, Port security risk management, Terrorism, Efficient frontier, Portfolio analysis, ISPS code, Port facility security officer, Company security officer, Benefit-cost analysis, Residual security risk, Expected los |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/411490 |
Publisher URL | http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJSTL.2014.060788 |
Additional Information | This is the authors accepted manuscript of an article published in International journal of shipping and transport logistics, 2014, v.6 issue 3. |
Contract Date | Feb 25, 2016 |
Files
Article.pdf
(2.4 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
You might also like
Scenario analysis and disaster preparedness for port and maritime logistics risk management
(2016)
Journal Article
Doing the right thing – ethical issues in logistics and supply chain
(2018)
Journal Article
Does the concept of 'nearporting' provide a pathway to better logistics sustainability?
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search