Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The inter-rate reliability of a generic measure of severity of illness

Shiels, Christopher; Eccles, Martin; Hutchinson, Allen; Gardiner, Eric; Smoljanovic, Lada

Authors

Christopher Shiels

Martin Eccles

Allen Hutchinson

Eric Gardiner

Lada Smoljanovic



Abstract

Background. There has been increasing interest in the development of measures to quantify baseline severity of illness and thus provide a more meaningful interpretation of health outcomes. Objective. We aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of a generic measure of illness severity, the Duke University Severity of Illness (DUSOI) checklist. Methods. Selected general practices and hospital outpatient departments across Tyneside and Humberside in the UK were used as the setting. Thirty-three clinicians were posted copies of the same set of 14 patient records and asked to rate the severity of illness of each patient using the DUSOI. The subjects were 27 GPs, three consultant chest physicians and three diabetologists. The main outcome measures were: (i) intraclass correlation coefficients used to express clinician agreement upon severity scores; and (ii) a 'gold standard', constructed in order to assess clinician agreement upon the health problems identified in the patient record to be considered as constituents of overall severity. Results. It was found that the degree of inter-rater reliability of severity scoring was satisfactory, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.43. In terms of identification of problems to be rated, there was considerable agreement between raters and a specially compiled 'gold standard' of health problems. Conclusion. The DUSOI has potential use in routine clinical practice, but strategies should be developed in order to maximize the reliability of rating illness severity on such a generic measure.

Citation

Shiels, C., Eccles, M., Hutchinson, A., Gardiner, E., & Smoljanovic, L. (1997). The inter-rate reliability of a generic measure of severity of illness. Family practice, 14(6), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.6.466

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 8, 1997
Publication Date Dec 1, 1997
Journal FAMILY PRACTICE
Print ISSN 0263-2136
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Issue 6
Pages 466-471
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.6.466
Keywords Generic; Reliability; Severity measurement
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/417755
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article/14/6/466/516357