Between the 'Metaphysics of the Stone Age' and the 'Brave New World': H.L.A. Hart on the Law's Assumptions about Human Nature
This paper analyses H.L.A. Hart’s views on the epistemic character of the law’s assumptions about human behaviour, as articulated in Causation in the Law and Punishment and Responsibility. Hart suggests that the assumptions behind legal doctrines typically combine common sense factual beliefs, moral intuitions, and philosophical theories of earlier ages with sound moral principles, and empirical knowledge. An important task of legal theory is to provide a ‘rational and critical foundation’ for these doctrines. This does not only imply conceptual clarification in light of an epistemic ideal of objectivity but also involves legal theorists in ‘enlightenment’ about empirical facts, ‘demystification’ of metaphysical obscurities, and substantive normative reasoning in terms of practical reasonableness. The confrontation of the implicit assumptions behind legal rules and doctrines with findings of psychology and neuro-sciences raises conceptual and normative questions about law as a regulatory technique and a specific mechanism of social control.
Cserne, P. (2012). Between the 'Metaphysics of the Stone Age' and the 'Brave New World': H.L.A. Hart on the Law's Assumptions about Human Nature. In M. Jovanovi?, & B. Spai? (Eds.), Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy in the 21st Century: Reassessing Legacies (71 - 89). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Pub Inc
|Acceptance Date||Jul 1, 2012|
|Publication Date||Jul 1, 2012|
|Deposit Date||Feb 27, 2018|
|Pages||71 - 89|
|Series Number||Vol. 2|
|Book Title||Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy in the 21st Century: Reassessing Legacies|
|Keywords||H.L.A. Hart; Human nature; Legal epistemology|
You might also like
Introduction: Why care about ‘style’ in legal scholarship?
Paternalism and contract law
Les nudges sont-ils des outils extra-juridiques?